GCVE-1-2026-20039 (CVE-2026-72761)
Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-08-10 14:32 – Updated: 2026-08-10 14:33
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Webhook SSRF guard bypassed by IPv6 transition addresses (NAT64/6to4/Teredo pass is_global check) in vulnerability-lookup
Summary
The webhook URL validator in `website/notifications/webhooks.py` uses
`ip.is_global` to reject non-public addresses after DNS resolution. IPv6
transition addresses (NAT64 `64:ff9b::/96`, 6to4 `2002::/16`, Teredo
`2001:0000::/32`) are classified as globally routable by IANA, so `is_global`
returns `True` even when the embedded IPv4 targets a private, loopback, or
cloud metadata destination. An attacker can register a webhook pointing at a
hostname that resolves to a transition address to bypass the SSRF guard and
exfiltrate vulnerability data to an internal endpoint.
The vulnerability was introduced on a non-release version. The fix was already done on HEAD. It only affects
organisation running the HEAD.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/vulnerability-lookup/vulnerabi… | patch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| vulnerability-lookup | vulnerability-lookup |
Unaffected:
0 , ≤ 5.5.0
(semver)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "vulnerability-lookup",
"repo": "https://github.com/vulnerability-lookup/vulnerability-lookup",
"vendor": "vulnerability-lookup",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.5.0",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "tonghuaroot"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Cedric Bonhomme"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The webhook URL validator in `website/notifications/webhooks.py` uses\u003cbr\u003e`ip.is_global` to reject non-public addresses after DNS resolution. IPv6\u003cbr\u003etransition addresses (NAT64 `64:ff9b::/96`, 6to4 `2002::/16`, Teredo\u003cbr\u003e`2001:0000::/32`) are classified as globally routable by IANA, so `is_global`\u003cbr\u003ereturns `True` even when the embedded IPv4 targets a private, loopback, or\u003cbr\u003ecloud metadata destination. An attacker can register a webhook pointing at a\u003cbr\u003ehostname that resolves to a transition address to bypass the SSRF guard and\u003cbr\u003eexfiltrate vulnerability data to an internal endpoint.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThe vulnerability was introduced on a non-release version. The fix was already done on HEAD. It only affects\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eorganisation running the HEAD.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The webhook URL validator in `website/notifications/webhooks.py` uses\n`ip.is_global` to reject non-public addresses after DNS resolution. IPv6\ntransition addresses (NAT64 `64:ff9b::/96`, 6to4 `2002::/16`, Teredo\n`2001:0000::/32`) are classified as globally routable by IANA, so `is_global`\nreturns `True` even when the embedded IPv4 targets a private, loopback, or\ncloud metadata destination. An attacker can register a webhook pointing at a\nhostname that resolves to a transition address to bypass the SSRF guard and\nexfiltrate vulnerability data to an internal endpoint.\n\nThe vulnerability was introduced on a non-release version. The fix was already done on HEAD. It only affects\n\norganisation running the HEAD."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-664",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vulnerability-lookup/vulnerability-lookup/commit/f3e0c6899c5b3823dcfd860fc6cb3edbedc9bf65"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Webhook SSRF guard bypassed by IPv6 transition addresses (NAT64/6to4/Teredo pass is_global check) in vulnerability-lookup",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-72761",
"datePublished": "2026-08-10T14:32:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-10T14:32:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-10T14:33:01.108239Z",
"requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20039"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…