FKIE_CVE-2026-35563
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-01 08:16 - Updated: 2026-07-22 07:10
Severity
Summary
It was identified that the LDAP client implementation in version 2.1.7 does not verify if the server certificate matches the intended LDAP
hostname. While the underlying code validates the certificate chain
against a trusted authority, the absence of endpoint identification
allows a valid certificate issued for an entirely unrelated host to be
improperly accepted. This oversight leaves the connection highly
vulnerable to server impersonation and complete connection compromise.
The
root cause of this vulnerability lies in the incomplete TLS server
identity verification within the LDAP client implementation.
The attacker requires MITM capability on the network to exploit this vulnerability. This attacker must be able to present a certificate trusted by the client's configured trust store.
The hostname verification has been enforced in the new version of the LDAP API
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/5rc2nzqxp1m9wknyf93r8dnp46fhc1nn | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/01/2 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | directory_ldap_api | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.directory.api:api-ldap-client-api",
"product": "Apache Directory LDAP API",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:directory_ldap_api:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "224EA2FF-B575-4C21-AC64-8B5D54E12C18",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.1.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "It was identified that the LDAP client implementation in version 2.1.7 does not verify if the server certificate matches the intended LDAP \nhostname. While the underlying code validates the certificate chain \nagainst a trusted authority, the absence of endpoint identification \nallows a valid certificate issued for an entirely unrelated host to be \nimproperly accepted. This oversight leaves the connection highly \nvulnerable to server impersonation and complete connection compromise.\n\n\nThe\n root cause of this vulnerability lies in the incomplete TLS server \nidentity verification within the LDAP client implementation.\n\n\n\n\nThe attacker requires MITM capability on the network to exploit this vulnerability. This attacker must be able to present a certificate trusted by the client\u0027s configured trust store.\n\n\n\n\nThe hostname verification has been enforced in the new version of the LDAP API"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se identific\u00f3 que la implementaci\u00f3n del cliente LDAP en la versi\u00f3n 2.1.7 no verifica si el certificado del servidor coincide con el nombre de host LDAP previsto. Si bien el c\u00f3digo subyacente valida la cadena de certificados contra una autoridad de confianza, la ausencia de identificaci\u00f3n de punto final permite que un certificado v\u00e1lido emitido para un host completamente no relacionado sea aceptado incorrectamente. Esta omisi\u00f3n deja la conexi\u00f3n altamente vulnerable a la suplantaci\u00f3n del servidor y al compromiso completo de la conexi\u00f3n.\n\nLa causa ra\u00edz de esta vulnerabilidad reside en la verificaci\u00f3n incompleta de la identidad del servidor TLS dentro de la implementaci\u00f3n del cliente LDAP.\n\nEl atacante requiere capacidad de MitM en la red para explotar esta vulnerabilidad. Este atacante debe poder presentar un certificado de confianza para el almac\u00e9n de confianza configurado del cliente.\n\nLa verificaci\u00f3n del nombre de host se ha aplicado en la nueva versi\u00f3n de la API LDAP."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-35563",
"lastModified": "2026-07-22T07:10:00.107",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-35563",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-01T13:09:38.839628Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-01T08:16:20.307",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/5rc2nzqxp1m9wknyf93r8dnp46fhc1nn"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/01/2"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-297"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…