GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2026-32794

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-30 22:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:36
Summary
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Apache Airflow Provider for Databricks. Provider code did not validate certificates for connections to Databricks back-end which could result in a man-of-a-middle attack that traffic is intercepted and manipulated or credentials exfiltrated w/o notice. This issue affects Apache Airflow Provider for Databricks: from 1.10.0 before 1.12.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.12.0, which fixes the issue.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
apache airflow_providers_databricks *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://pypi.python.org",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "apache-airflow-providers-databricks",
          "product": "Apache Airflow Provider for Databricks",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.12.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.10.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow_providers_databricks:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "89CF59C2-CDC8-4C1A-8FD8-BCAA850355ED",
              "versionEndExcluding": "1.12.0",
              "versionStartIncluding": "1.10.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Apache Airflow Provider for Databricks. Provider code did not validate certificates for connections to Databricks back-end which could result in a man-of-a-middle attack that traffic is intercepted and manipulated or credentials exfiltrated w/o notice.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Airflow Provider for Databricks: from 1.10.0 before 1.12.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.12.0, which fixes the issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de Validaci\u00f3n de Certificado Incorrecta en el Proveedor de Apache Airflow para Databricks. El c\u00f3digo del proveedor no validaba los certificados para las conexiones al *back-end* de Databricks, lo que podr\u00eda dar lugar a un ataque de intermediario en el que el tr\u00e1fico es interceptado y manipulado o las credenciales son exfiltradas sin previo aviso.\n\nEste problema afecta al Proveedor de Apache Airflow para Databricks: desde la versi\u00f3n 1.10.0 hasta antes de la 1.12.0.\n\nSe recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 1.12.0, que corrige el problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-32794",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:36:22.440",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.8,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-32794",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-03-31T13:31:16.526806Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-30T22:16:18.760",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/63704"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/hn17yqsgsdtl81llvhf80rkp53hnz5nb"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/03/30/9"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…