FKIE_CVE-2025-14844
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-16 10:16 - Updated: 2026-01-23 17:09
Severity ?
8.2 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
The Membership Plugin – Restrict Content plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authentication in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.16 via the 'rcp_stripe_create_setup_intent_for_saved_card' function due to missing capability check. Additionally, the plugin does not check a user-controlled key, which makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to leak Stripe SetupIntent client_secret values for any membership.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| liquidweb | restrict_content | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:liquidweb:restrict_content:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4029F83A-38F5-4132-92F3-E0639BEF0DE4",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.2.17",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Membership Plugin \u2013 Restrict Content plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authentication in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.16 via the \u0027rcp_stripe_create_setup_intent_for_saved_card\u0027 function due to missing capability check. Additionally, the plugin does not check a user-controlled key, which makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to leak Stripe SetupIntent client_secret values for any membership."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-14844",
"lastModified": "2026-01-23T17:09:18.520",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 4.2,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-01-16T10:16:04.330",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"tags": [
"Technical Description"
],
"url": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/639.html"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://docs.stripe.com/api/setup_intents/object"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/restrict-content/tags/3.2.16/core/includes/gateways/stripe/functions.php#L848"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/restrict-content/tags/3.2.16/core/includes/gateways/stripe/functions.php#L987"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3438168/restrict-content/tags/3.2.17/core/includes/gateways/stripe/functions.php"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0c28545d-c7cd-469f-bccf-90e8b52fd4e7?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-639"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…