fkie_cve-2021-3610
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2022-02-24 19:15
Modified
2024-11-21 06:21
Severity ?
Summary
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in ImageMagick in versions prior to 7.0.11-14 in ReadTIFFImage() in coders/tiff.c. This issue is due to an incorrect setting of the pixel array size, which can lead to a crash and segmentation fault.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
secalert@redhat.com | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/29/4 | Mailing List, Patch | |
secalert@redhat.com | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/06/05/1 | Mailing List, Patch | |
secalert@redhat.com | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973689 | Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
secalert@redhat.com | https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/930ff0d1a9bc42925a7856e9ea53f5fc9f318bf3 | Patch | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/29/4 | Mailing List, Patch | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/06/05/1 | Mailing List, Patch | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973689 | Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/930ff0d1a9bc42925a7856e9ea53f5fc9f318bf3 | Patch |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
imagemagick | imagemagick | * | |
imagemagick | imagemagick | * | |
fedoraproject | fedora | 34 | |
redhat | enterprise_linux | 8.0 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:imagemagick:imagemagick:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "4B402469-D9D7-42B8-B2E5-365A0C17B333", "versionEndExcluding": "6.9.12-14", "versionStartIncluding": "6.9.10.88", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:imagemagick:imagemagick:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "8C4ED8DF-FA1F-4CB5-8724-9E8B1C3B10AA", "versionEndExcluding": "7.0.11-14", "versionStartIncluding": "7.0.0-0", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:34:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "A930E247-0B43-43CB-98FF-6CE7B8189835", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "F4CFF558-3C47-480D-A2F0-BABF26042943", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in ImageMagick in versions prior to 7.0.11-14 in ReadTIFFImage() in coders/tiff.c. This issue is due to an incorrect setting of the pixel array size, which can lead to a crash and segmentation fault." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se ha encontrado una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en la regi\u00f3n heap de la memoria en ImageMagick en las versiones anteriores a 7.0.11-14 en la funci\u00f3n ReadTIFFImage() en el archivo coders/tiff.c. Este problema es debido a un ajuste incorrecto del tama\u00f1o de la matriz de p\u00edxeles, que puede conllevar un fallo de bloqueo y segmentaci\u00f3n" } ], "id": "CVE-2021-3610", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:21:58.403", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 5.0, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ], "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2022-02-24T19:15:09.213", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/29/4" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/06/05/1" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973689" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/930ff0d1a9bc42925a7856e9ea53f5fc9f318bf3" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/29/4" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/06/05/1" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973689" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/930ff0d1a9bc42925a7856e9ea53f5fc9f318bf3" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-125" } ], "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Secondary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-787" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…