fkie_cve-2017-1000383
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2017-10-31 20:29
Modified
2025-04-20 01:37
Severity ?
Summary
GNU Emacs version 25.3.1 (and other versions most likely) ignores umask when creating a backup save file ("[ORIGINAL_FILENAME]~") resulting in files that may be world readable or otherwise accessible in ways not intended by the user running the emacs binary.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/10/31/1 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101671 | Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/10/31/1 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101671 | Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:gnu:emacs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "BD011634-56BE-4D2A-B6CC-320C6DB7FC9B", versionEndIncluding: "25.3.0", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "GNU Emacs version 25.3.1 (and other versions most likely) ignores umask when creating a backup save file (\"[ORIGINAL_FILENAME]~\") resulting in files that may be world readable or otherwise accessible in ways not intended by the user running the emacs binary.", }, { lang: "es", value: "GNU Emacs en la versión 25.3.1 (y, muy probablemente, en otras versiones) ignora la máscara de usuario cuando se crea un archivo de guardado de copia de seguridad (\"[ORIGINAL_FILENAME]~\"), lo que da como resultado archivos que podrían ser legibles por cualquier usuario o accesibles de formas no planeadas por el usuario que ejecuta el binario de emacs.", }, ], id: "CVE-2017-1000383", lastModified: "2025-04-20T01:37:25.860", metrics: { cvssMetricV2: [ { acInsufInfo: false, baseSeverity: "LOW", cvssData: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "LOCAL", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 2.1, confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL", integrityImpact: "NONE", vectorString: "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 2.9, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", userInteractionRequired: false, }, ], cvssMetricV30: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 5.5, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", version: "3.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 3.6, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2017-10-31T20:29:00.310", references: [ { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/10/31/1", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry", ], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101671", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/10/31/1", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry", ], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101671", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org", vulnStatus: "Deferred", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-200", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.