fkie_cve-2012-4575
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2012-11-18 19:55
Modified
2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
The add_database function in objects.c in the pgbouncer pooler 1.5.2 for PostgreSQL allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a long database name in a request.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pgbouncer_project | pgbouncer | 1.5.2 | |
| postgresql | postgresql | - |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:pgbouncer_project:pgbouncer:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F46A0B5B-9259-4C34-913B-ACBC876A35DB",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ECC070DF-4131-43BA-B975-907023E0D39F",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The add_database function in objects.c in the pgbouncer pooler 1.5.2 for PostgreSQL allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a long database name in a request."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "La funci\u00f3n add_database en objects.c en pgbouncer pooler v1.5.2 para PostgreSQL permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (parada del demonio) a trav\u00e9s de un nombre de base de datos demasiado largo en una solicitud."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2012-4575",
"lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2012-11-18T19:55:01.290",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692103"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgbouncer.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b92112b820830b30cd7bc91bef3dd8f35305525"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/8"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56371"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872527"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692103"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgbouncer.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b92112b820830b30cd7bc91bef3dd8f35305525"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/8"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56371"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872527"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…