CVE-2012-4575 (GCVE-0-2012-4575)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2012-11-18 19:00
Modified
2024-08-06 20:42
Severity ?
CWE
  • n/a
Summary
The add_database function in objects.c in the pgbouncer pooler 1.5.2 for PostgreSQL allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a long database name in a request.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a n/a Version: n/a
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:42:54.602Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "56371",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56371"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgbouncer.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b92112b820830b30cd7bc91bef3dd8f35305525"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872527"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692103"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20121102 Re: CVE Request -- pgbouncer: DoS (pooler server shutdown) by adding database with large name",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/8"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2012-09-10T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The add_database function in objects.c in the pgbouncer pooler 1.5.2 for PostgreSQL allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a long database name in a request."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2013-03-02T10:00:00",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "56371",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56371"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgbouncer.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b92112b820830b30cd7bc91bef3dd8f35305525"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872527"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692103"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20121102 Re: CVE Request -- pgbouncer: DoS (pooler server shutdown) by adding database with large name",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/8"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-4575",
    "datePublished": "2012-11-18T19:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2012-08-21T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:42:54.602Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-4575\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2012-11-18T19:55:01.290\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-11T00:51:21.963\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The add_database function in objects.c in the pgbouncer pooler 1.5.2 for PostgreSQL allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a long database name in a request.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La funci\u00f3n add_database en objects.c en pgbouncer pooler v1.5.2 para PostgreSQL permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (parada del demonio) a trav\u00e9s de un nombre de base de datos demasiado largo en una solicitud.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:pgbouncer_project:pgbouncer:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F46A0B5B-9259-4C34-913B-ACBC876A35DB\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"ECC070DF-4131-43BA-B975-907023E0D39F\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692103\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgbouncer.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b92112b820830b30cd7bc91bef3dd8f35305525\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/8\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56371\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872527\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692103\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgbouncer.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b92112b820830b30cd7bc91bef3dd8f35305525\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56371\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872527\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.