CVE-2026-47233 (GCVE-0-2026-47233)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-12 13:57 – Updated: 2026-08-12 13:57
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Admidio: Any logged-in user can delete inventory fields via `mode=field_delete` — incomplete fix of #2024
Summary
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Version 5.0.9 added a missing `isAdministratorInventory()` gate to `case 'item_delete':` in `modules/inventory.php`. The same fix was not applied to the sibling `case 'field_delete':` handler, which destroys an entire inventory field definition, cascading to every `adm_inventory_item_data` row that referenced that field and every `adm_inventory_field_options` entry. The handler validates only a session-bound CSRF token; there is no `isAdministratorInventory()` check at the controller level, and `Admidio\Inventory\Entity\ItemField::delete()` does not enforce one at the entity level either (unlike its sibling `ItemField::save()`, which does check `$gCurrentUser->isAdministrator()`). Any user who can log in to the site can permanently destroy a non-system inventory field by sending one POST. Version 5.0.10 provides an updated fix.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/commit/d37ca6b… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "admidio",
"vendor": "Admidio",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 5.0.10"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Version 5.0.9 added a missing `isAdministratorInventory()` gate to `case \u0027item_delete\u0027:` in `modules/inventory.php`. The same fix was not applied to the sibling `case \u0027field_delete\u0027:` handler, which destroys an entire inventory field definition, cascading to every `adm_inventory_item_data` row that referenced that field and every `adm_inventory_field_options` entry. The handler validates only a session-bound CSRF token; there is no `isAdministratorInventory()` check at the controller level, and `Admidio\\Inventory\\Entity\\ItemField::delete()` does not enforce one at the entity level either (unlike its sibling `ItemField::save()`, which does check `$gCurrentUser-\u003eisAdministrator()`). Any user who can log in to the site can permanently destroy a non-system inventory field by sending one POST. Version 5.0.10 provides an updated fix."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1281",
"description": "CWE-1281: Sequence of Processor Instructions Leads to Unexpected Behavior",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T13:57:14.510Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/security/advisories/GHSA-xw54-c3mx-9pm3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/security/advisories/GHSA-xw54-c3mx-9pm3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/commit/d37ca6b27b9674238e58491cf7ba292e66898f15",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/commit/d37ca6b27b9674238e58491cf7ba292e66898f15"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-xw54-c3mx-9pm3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Admidio: Any logged-in user can delete inventory fields via `mode=field_delete` \u2014 incomplete fix of #2024"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47233",
"datePublished": "2026-08-12T13:57:14.510Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-18T22:54:18.271Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T13:57:14.510Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-47233",
"date": "2026-06-14",
"epss": "0.00029",
"percentile": "0.08977"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-47233\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-08-12T15:17:33.813\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-12T15:17:33.813\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Version 5.0.9 added a missing `isAdministratorInventory()` gate to `case \u0027item_delete\u0027:` in `modules/inventory.php`. The same fix was not applied to the sibling `case \u0027field_delete\u0027:` handler, which destroys an entire inventory field definition, cascading to every `adm_inventory_item_data` row that referenced that field and every `adm_inventory_field_options` entry. The handler validates only a session-bound CSRF token; there is no `isAdministratorInventory()` check at the controller level, and `Admidio\\\\Inventory\\\\Entity\\\\ItemField::delete()` does not enforce one at the entity level either (unlike its sibling `ItemField::save()`, which does check `$gCurrentUser-\u003eisAdministrator()`). Any user who can log in to the site can permanently destroy a non-system inventory field by sending one POST. Version 5.0.10 provides an updated fix.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Admidio\",\"product\":\"admidio\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 5.0.10\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-862\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-1281\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/commit/d37ca6b27b9674238e58491cf7ba292e66898f15\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/security/advisories/GHSA-xw54-c3mx-9pm3\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…