CVE-2026-45677 (GCVE-0-2026-45677)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-24 20:54 – Updated: 2026-06-25 13:41
VLAI
Title
Rocket.Chat: Lack of SAML Signature Check During Logout Could Lead To DoS
Summary
Rocket.Chat is an open-source, secure, fully customizable communications platform. Prior to 8.5.0, 8.4.1, 8.3.3, 8.2.3, 8.1.4, 8.0.5, 7.13.7, and 7.10.11, Rocket.Chat's SAML integration does not verify the signature on inbound LogoutRequest messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker who knows a target user's SAML NameID - which major identity providers (Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft Entra ID, JumpCloud) expose as the user's email address - can craft a valid-looking unsigned LogoutRequest and submit it to the SP logout endpoint. The server processes it as legitimate, immediately destroying the victim's session. Because the attack requires no authentication and no interaction from the victim, it can be repeated in a loop against individual users or scripted across many accounts, effectively rendering the Rocket.Chat instance unusable for SAML-authenticated users. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.5.0, 8.4.1, 8.3.3, 8.2.3, 8.1.4, 8.0.5, 7.13.7, and 7.10.11.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-862 - Missing Authorization
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/securit… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RocketChat | Rocket.Chat |
Affected:
>= 8.5.0-rc.0, < 8.5.0
Affected: >= 8.4.0-rc.0, < 8.4.1 Affected: >= 8.3.0-rc.0, < 8.3.3 Affected: >= 8.2.0-rc.0, < 8.2.3 Affected: >= 8.1.0-rc.0, < 8.1.4 Affected: >= 8.0.0-rc.0, < 8.0.5 Affected: >= 7.11.0-rc.0, < 7.13.7 Affected: < 7.10.11 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-45677",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-25T13:40:53.521845Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T13:41:12.096Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Rocket.Chat",
"vendor": "RocketChat",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.5.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.5.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.4.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.4.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.3.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.3.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.2.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.2.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.1.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.1.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.0.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.0.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 7.11.0-rc.0, \u003c 7.13.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 7.10.11"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rocket.Chat is an open-source, secure, fully customizable communications platform. Prior to 8.5.0, 8.4.1, 8.3.3, 8.2.3, 8.1.4, 8.0.5, 7.13.7, and 7.10.11, Rocket.Chat\u0027s SAML integration does not verify the signature on inbound LogoutRequest messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker who knows a target user\u0027s SAML NameID - which major identity providers (Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft Entra ID, JumpCloud) expose as the user\u0027s email address - can craft a valid-looking unsigned LogoutRequest and submit it to the SP logout endpoint. The server processes it as legitimate, immediately destroying the victim\u0027s session. Because the attack requires no authentication and no interaction from the victim, it can be repeated in a loop against individual users or scripted across many accounts, effectively rendering the Rocket.Chat instance unusable for SAML-authenticated users. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.5.0, 8.4.1, 8.3.3, 8.2.3, 8.1.4, 8.0.5, 7.13.7, and 7.10.11."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T20:54:13.059Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/security/advisories/GHSA-pw6f-q8ww-vqfq",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/security/advisories/GHSA-pw6f-q8ww-vqfq"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-pw6f-q8ww-vqfq",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Rocket.Chat: Lack of SAML Signature Check During Logout Could Lead To DoS"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-45677",
"datePublished": "2026-06-24T20:54:13.059Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-12T21:59:25.666Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T13:41:12.096Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-45677",
"date": "2026-06-26",
"epss": "0.00451",
"percentile": "0.35951"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-45677\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-25T13:40:53.521845Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-25T13:40:56.428Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Rocket.Chat: Lack of SAML Signature Check During Logout Could Lead To DoS\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-pw6f-q8ww-vqfq\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 8.7, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"RocketChat\", \"product\": \"Rocket.Chat\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 8.5.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.5.0\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 8.4.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.4.1\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 8.3.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.3.3\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 8.2.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.2.3\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 8.1.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.1.4\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 8.0.0-rc.0, \u003c 8.0.5\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 7.11.0-rc.0, \u003c 7.13.7\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 7.10.11\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/security/advisories/GHSA-pw6f-q8ww-vqfq\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/security/advisories/GHSA-pw6f-q8ww-vqfq\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rocket.Chat is an open-source, secure, fully customizable communications platform. Prior to 8.5.0, 8.4.1, 8.3.3, 8.2.3, 8.1.4, 8.0.5, 7.13.7, and 7.10.11, Rocket.Chat\u0027s SAML integration does not verify the signature on inbound LogoutRequest messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker who knows a target user\u0027s SAML NameID - which major identity providers (Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft Entra ID, JumpCloud) expose as the user\u0027s email address - can craft a valid-looking unsigned LogoutRequest and submit it to the SP logout endpoint. The server processes it as legitimate, immediately destroying the victim\u0027s session. Because the attack requires no authentication and no interaction from the victim, it can be repeated in a loop against individual users or scripted across many accounts, effectively rendering the Rocket.Chat instance unusable for SAML-authenticated users. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.5.0, 8.4.1, 8.3.3, 8.2.3, 8.1.4, 8.0.5, 7.13.7, and 7.10.11.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-862\", \"description\": \"CWE-862: Missing Authorization\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-24T20:54:13.059Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-45677\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-25T13:41:12.096Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-12T21:59:25.666Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-24T20:54:13.059Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…