CVE-2026-44894 (GCVE-0-2026-44894)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-12 14:06 – Updated: 2026-06-13 03:04
VLAI
Title
Netty's Default QUIC token handler accepts any client-supplied token
Summary
Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. NoQuicTokenHandler is the tokenHandler used when the application does not set one. Prior to version 4.2.15.Final, its writeToken() returns false (server will not send Retry — acceptable), but validateToken() unconditionally `return 0`. In QuicheQuicServerCodec.handlePacket(), a non-negative return from validateToken() is interpreted as 'token is valid, ODCID starts at offset 0', causing the server to call quiche_accept as if the client's address had been validated by a Retry round-trip. Per RFC 9000 §8.1, a validated address lifts the 3× anti-amplification send limit. Thus any attacker who includes ANY non-empty token bytes in an Initial packet — with a spoofed victim source IP — causes the Netty server to treat the victim as validated and reflect full-size handshake flights (certificates, etc.) toward it without the 3× cap. The correct 'no token handler' semantics would be to return -1 (invalid) so the normal un-validated path and amplification limit apply. Version 4.2.15.Final patches the issue.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-940 - Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44894",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-13T03:03:54.989814Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-13T03:04:10.351Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "netty",
"vendor": "netty",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.2.0.Final, \u003c 4.2.15.Final"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. NoQuicTokenHandler is the tokenHandler used when the application does not set one. Prior to version 4.2.15.Final, its writeToken() returns false (server will not send Retry \u2014 acceptable), but validateToken() unconditionally `return 0`. In QuicheQuicServerCodec.handlePacket(), a non-negative return from validateToken() is interpreted as \u0027token is valid, ODCID starts at offset 0\u0027, causing the server to call quiche_accept as if the client\u0027s address had been validated by a Retry round-trip. Per RFC 9000 \u00a78.1, a validated address lifts the 3\u00d7 anti-amplification send limit. Thus any attacker who includes ANY non-empty token bytes in an Initial packet \u2014 with a spoofed victim source IP \u2014 causes the Netty server to treat the victim as validated and reflect full-size handshake flights (certificates, etc.) toward it without the 3\u00d7 cap. The correct \u0027no token handler\u0027 semantics would be to return -1 (invalid) so the normal un-validated path and amplification limit apply. Version 4.2.15.Final patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-940",
"description": "CWE-940: Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T14:06:54.213Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-cmm3-54f8-px4j",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-cmm3-54f8-px4j"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-cmm3-54f8-px4j",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Netty\u0027s Default QUIC token handler accepts any client-supplied token"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44894",
"datePublished": "2026-06-12T14:06:54.213Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-07T21:50:33.545Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-13T03:04:10.351Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-44894",
"date": "2026-06-15",
"epss": "0.00232",
"percentile": "0.13775"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-44894\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-06-12T15:16:26.240\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-15T02:23:16.623\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. NoQuicTokenHandler is the tokenHandler used when the application does not set one. Prior to version 4.2.15.Final, its writeToken() returns false (server will not send Retry \u2014 acceptable), but validateToken() unconditionally `return 0`. In QuicheQuicServerCodec.handlePacket(), a non-negative return from validateToken() is interpreted as \u0027token is valid, ODCID starts at offset 0\u0027, causing the server to call quiche_accept as if the client\u0027s address had been validated by a Retry round-trip. Per RFC 9000 \u00a78.1, a validated address lifts the 3\u00d7 anti-amplification send limit. Thus any attacker who includes ANY non-empty token bytes in an Initial packet \u2014 with a spoofed victim source IP \u2014 causes the Netty server to treat the victim as validated and reflect full-size handshake flights (certificates, etc.) toward it without the 3\u00d7 cap. The correct \u0027no token handler\u0027 semantics would be to return -1 (invalid) so the normal un-validated path and amplification limit apply. Version 4.2.15.Final patches the issue.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-940\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netty:netty:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.2.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.2.15\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"413D4611-A46C-4BE4-AB2F-D86282F65984\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-cmm3-54f8-px4j\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-44894\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-13T03:03:54.989814Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-13T03:04:04.265Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Netty\u0027s Default QUIC token handler accepts any client-supplied token\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-cmm3-54f8-px4j\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"netty\", \"product\": \"netty\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 4.2.0.Final, \u003c 4.2.15.Final\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-cmm3-54f8-px4j\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-cmm3-54f8-px4j\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. NoQuicTokenHandler is the tokenHandler used when the application does not set one. Prior to version 4.2.15.Final, its writeToken() returns false (server will not send Retry \\u2014 acceptable), but validateToken() unconditionally `return 0`. In QuicheQuicServerCodec.handlePacket(), a non-negative return from validateToken() is interpreted as \u0027token is valid, ODCID starts at offset 0\u0027, causing the server to call quiche_accept as if the client\u0027s address had been validated by a Retry round-trip. Per RFC 9000 \\u00a78.1, a validated address lifts the 3\\u00d7 anti-amplification send limit. Thus any attacker who includes ANY non-empty token bytes in an Initial packet \\u2014 with a spoofed victim source IP \\u2014 causes the Netty server to treat the victim as validated and reflect full-size handshake flights (certificates, etc.) toward it without the 3\\u00d7 cap. The correct \u0027no token handler\u0027 semantics would be to return -1 (invalid) so the normal un-validated path and amplification limit apply. Version 4.2.15.Final patches the issue.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-940\", \"description\": \"CWE-940: Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-12T14:06:54.213Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-44894\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-13T03:04:10.351Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-07T21:50:33.545Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-12T14:06:54.213Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…