CVE-2026-105570 (GCVE-0-2026-105570)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-08 18:46 – Updated: 2026-10-08 19:28
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Docker Sandboxes OAuth response masking could be bypassed with a case-variant token host
Summary
Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider's access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-08 19:28 UTC
CWE
- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/ | product |
| https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/configuratio… | technical-description |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Docker | Docker Sandboxes |
Affected:
0.21.0 , < 0.47.0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:docker:docker_sandboxes:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105570",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-08T19:28:07.889305Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T19:28:28.605Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:docker:docker_sandboxes:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"MacOS",
"Windows"
],
"product": "Docker Sandboxes",
"vendor": "Docker",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.47.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.21.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider\u0027s access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials."
}
],
"value": "Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider\u0027s access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T18:46:05.122Z",
"orgId": "686469e6-3ff6-451b-ab8b-cf5b9e89401e",
"shortName": "Docker"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/configuration/credentials/#how-credential-injection-works"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to Docker Sandboxes 0.47.0 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Docker Sandboxes OAuth response masking could be bypassed with a case-variant token host"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "686469e6-3ff6-451b-ab8b-cf5b9e89401e",
"assignerShortName": "Docker",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105570",
"datePublished": "2026-10-08T18:46:05.122Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T16:05:53.033Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T19:28:28.605Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-105570",
"date": "2026-10-09",
"epss": "0.00127",
"percentile": "0.02079"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:docker:docker_sandboxes:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"MacOS",
"Windows"
],
"product": "Docker Sandboxes",
"vendor": "Docker",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.47.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.21.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@docker.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider\u0027s access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-105570",
"lastModified": "2026-10-08T20:46:35.260",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "security@docker.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105570",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-08T19:28:07.889305Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-08T19:16:57.133",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@docker.com",
"url": "https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/"
},
{
"source": "security@docker.com",
"url": "https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/configuration/credentials/#how-credential-injection-works"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@docker.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-178"
}
],
"source": "security@docker.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105570",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-08T19:28:07.889305Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T19:28:13.076Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:docker:docker_sandboxes:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"MacOS",
"Windows"
],
"product": "Docker Sandboxes",
"vendor": "Docker",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.47.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.21.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider\u0027s access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials."
}
],
"value": "Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider\u0027s access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T18:46:05.122Z",
"orgId": "686469e6-3ff6-451b-ab8b-cf5b9e89401e",
"shortName": "Docker"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/configuration/credentials/#how-credential-injection-works"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to Docker Sandboxes 0.47.0 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Docker Sandboxes OAuth response masking could be bypassed with a case-variant token host"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "686469e6-3ff6-451b-ab8b-cf5b9e89401e",
"assignerShortName": "Docker",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105570",
"datePublished": "2026-10-08T18:46:05.122Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T16:05:53.033Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T19:28:28.605Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…