CVE-2025-2723 (GCVE-0-2025-2723)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The code maintainer explains that "[the] call is invalid [as] the buffer pointed to by "data" must have "len" valid bytes." The documentation was fixed to make that clear.

Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-04-22T12:25:37.918Z",
        "orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
        "shortName": "VulDB"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The code maintainer explains that \"[the] call is invalid [as] the buffer pointed to by \"data\" must have \"len\" valid bytes.\" The documentation was fixed to make that clear."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
    "assignerShortName": "VulDB",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-2723",
    "datePublished": "2025-03-25T01:00:06.666Z",
    "dateRejected": "2025-04-22T12:25:37.918Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-03-24T12:46:32.307Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-04-22T12:25:37.918Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-2723\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"published\":\"2025-03-25T01:15:11.800\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-22T13:15:43.140\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The code maintainer explains that \\\"[the] call is invalid [as] the buffer pointed to by \\\"data\\\" must have \\\"len\\\" valid bytes.\\\" The documentation was fixed to make that clear.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"shortName\": \"VulDB\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-22T12:25:37.918Z\"}, \"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The code maintainer explains that \\\"[the] call is invalid [as] the buffer pointed to by \\\"data\\\" must have \\\"len\\\" valid bytes.\\\" The documentation was fixed to make that clear.\"}]}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-2723\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"VulDB\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-03-24T12:46:32.307Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-03-25T01:00:06.666Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-22T12:25:37.918Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2025-04-22T12:25:37.918Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…