cve-2024-40761
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-09-25 07:31
Modified
2024-09-27 19:02
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Apache Answer: Avatar URL leaked user email addresses
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ | Apache Software Foundation | Apache Answer |
Version: 0 ≤ 1.3.5 |
|
|
|||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:apache:answer:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "answer",
"vendor": "apache",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.3.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-40761",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-25T15:20:39.711931Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-25T15:22:37.253Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-27T19:02:34.376Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/2"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/5"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/6"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/7"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/8"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/26/1"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/26/3"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/26/4"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/27/4"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/27/5"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/27/8"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Apache Answer",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.3.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "\u5f20\u5cb3\u7199"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eInadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in Apache Answer.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 1.3.5.\u003c/p\u003eUsing the MD5 value of a user\u0027s email to access Gravatar is insecure and can lead to the leakage of user email. The official recommendation is to use SHA256 instead.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.4.0, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in Apache Answer.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 1.3.5.\n\nUsing the MD5 value of a user\u0027s email to access Gravatar is insecure and can lead to the leakage of user email. The official recommendation is to use SHA256 instead.\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.4.0, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "low"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-326",
"description": "CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-25T07:31:08.416Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmrhsfy16qwrw0pkv0p9kj40vy3sg08x"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Apache Answer: Avatar URL leaked user email addresses",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-40761",
"datePublished": "2024-09-25T07:31:08.416Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-07-10T07:49:21.665Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-27T19:02:34.376Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-40761\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2024-09-25T08:15:04.437\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T09:31:34.510\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in Apache Answer.\\n\\nThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 1.3.5.\\n\\nUsing the MD5 value of a user\u0027s email to access Gravatar is insecure and can lead to the leakage of user email. The official recommendation is to use SHA256 instead.\\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.4.0, which fixes the issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Vulnerabilidad de fuerza de cifrado inadecuada en Apache Answer. Este problema afecta a Apache Answer: hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.3.5. El uso del valor MD5 del correo electr\u00f3nico de un usuario para acceder a Gravatar es inseguro y puede provocar la filtraci\u00f3n del correo electr\u00f3nico del usuario. La recomendaci\u00f3n oficial es utilizar SHA256 en su lugar. Se recomienda a los usuarios que actualicen a la versi\u00f3n 1.4.0, que soluciona el problema.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-326\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmrhsfy16qwrw0pkv0p9kj40vy3sg08x\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/5\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/6\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/25/8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/26/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/26/3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/26/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/27/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/27/5\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/27/8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.