cve-2011-5094
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2012-06-16 21:00
Modified
2024-09-16 21:56
Severity ?
Summary
Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2
cve@mitre.orghttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T00:23:40.220Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2012-06-16T21:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2011-5094",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "** DISPUTED ** Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2011-5094",
    "datePublished": "2012-06-16T21:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2012-06-16T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T21:56:51.299Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2011-5094\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2012-06-16T21:55:02.500\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:33:37.247\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"** EN DISPUTA ** Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) v3.x, con ciertos ajustes de la opci\u00f3n SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION, no restringen adecuadamente la renegociaci\u00f3n iniciada por el cliente dentro de los protocolos SSL y TLS, lo que podr\u00eda hacer m\u00e1s f\u00e1cil para los atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (consumo de CPU) mediante la realizaci\u00f3n de las renegociaciones de muchos dentro de una sola conexi\u00f3n, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2011-1473. NOTA: tambi\u00e9n se puede argumentar que es la responsabilidad de las implementaciones de servidores, no una biblioteca de seguridad, para prevenir o limitar la renegociaci\u00f3n cuando es inapropiado dentro de un entorno espec\u00edfico.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"44E0E1D0-F71C-4A3F-B3EE-97B299EF2AE7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"47CD4C15-02C8-42F2-9AF3-E44F74DE62B2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D3DDE473-7A61-46AD-9D3B-CA299928FD44\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"046596DB-57EB-4354-A79E-B3B1D5B4DD26\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0755B957-CB78-4B8E-9CFE-D53389789ADA\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"17D292FA-E062-4C52-AE0A-CA7D183D9E2A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"83E1A0EA-9E2F-407F-A72F-D5061B6CD318\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B565D82B-CAB8-4512-B7B7-0402146DD2B6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"68341EA6-4FF0-4F87-AC71-4EC5D648406C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A91596AC-3F28-4BBD-A697-81909A5407B2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A57A5053-018B-468C-BC18-5140E6B5B048\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C2962B1B-4B7F-4527-AE4C-C76787FEDB67\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"AE921188-7A50-479F-853F-95127C9BE4E2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F710939C-8598-40FE-9D5F-A3665723A5C9\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"75572113-BD36-49BB-B7A1-177EB7DD3AA0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1F18265E-EE99-4D0F-B975-22A86077A611\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.7.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C5E3EA58-3FD3-4AD8-AA63-057F8D31301B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A51D3086-99CB-4C01-B286-3F7F6B6FB3AB\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"ACA7EB49-52A7-4AFC-9D7D-0225A430B636\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.11.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EAD5F88F-038C-4973-8391-C40C08573F8D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.11.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F474C4B3-B85D-4059-B5D9-84238A642EC0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.11.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F5BB4C26-42DC-48F7-B73B-4C88FD3D1E01\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:network_security_services:3.11.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0FCC4537-605F-4A3B-AAD1-FC7D0F44F6B8\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.