cve-2006-1902
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2006-04-20 10:00
Modified
2024-08-07 17:27
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is "not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value."
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T17:27:29.536Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"
},
{
"name": "20060418 RE: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"
},
{
"name": "20060417 gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug c/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h"
},
{
"name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug middle-end/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2006-03-19T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\""
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-10-18T14:57:01",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"
},
{
"name": "20060418 RE: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"
},
{
"name": "20060417 gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug c/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h"
},
{
"name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug middle-end/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2006-1902",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\""
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"
},
{
"name": "20060418 RE: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"
},
{
"name": "20060417 gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug c/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"
},
{
"name": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h"
},
{
"name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug middle-end/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2006-1902",
"datePublished": "2006-04-20T10:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2006-04-20T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T17:27:29.536Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2006-1902\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2006-04-20T10:02:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T00:10:03.050\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \\\"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\\\"\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":2.1,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:gnu:gcc:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CD2441A8-8FEE-4F96-BB88-3965C747A78B\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.