BREW-SIGSTORE-CVE-2026-24408 (CVE-2026-24408)

Vulnerability from osv_homebrew – Published: 2026-08-13 17:34 – Updated: 2026-09-10 01:12 – Source website
VLAI
Summary
sigstore has CSRF possibility in OIDC authentication during signing
Details

sigstore-python is a Python tool for generating and verifying Sigstore signatures. Prior to version 4.2.0, the sigstore-python OAuth authentication flow is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery. _OAuthSession creates a unique "state" and sends it as a parameter in the authentication request but the "state" in the server response seems not not be cross-checked with this value. Version 4.2.0 contains a patch for the issue.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "fix": "bump",
        "range_state": "fixed",
        "upstream_fixed_in": "4.2.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Homebrew",
        "name": "sigstore",
        "purl": "pkg:brew/sigstore"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "confidence": "high",
    "source": "matched",
    "strategy": "git",
    "upstream_evidence": [
      {
        "ecosystem": "GIT",
        "key": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-python",
        "name": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-python",
        "strategy": "git",
        "subject_version": "4.5.0"
      },
      {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "key": "pkg:pypi/sigstore@4.5.0",
        "name": "sigstore",
        "strategy": "registry",
        "subject_version": "4.5.0"
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "sigstore-python is a Python tool for generating and verifying Sigstore signatures. Prior to version 4.2.0, the sigstore-python OAuth authentication flow is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery. `_OAuthSession` creates a unique \"state\" and sends it as a parameter in the authentication request but the \"state\" in the server response seems not not be cross-checked with this value. Version 4.2.0 contains a patch for the issue.",
  "id": "BREW-sigstore-CVE-2026-24408",
  "modified": "2026-09-10T01:12:53Z",
  "published": "2026-08-13T17:34:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-python/releases/tag/v4.2.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/24xxx/CVE-2026-24408.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-python/security/advisories/GHSA-hm8f-75xx-w2vr"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24408"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-python/commit/5e77497fe8f0b202bdd118949074ec2f20da69aa"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.3",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "sigstore has CSRF possibility in OIDC authentication during signing",
  "upstream": [
    "CVE-2026-24408",
    "GHSA-hm8f-75xx-w2vr",
    "PYSEC-2026-1924"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…