MOKSHA-2026-0086 (MOKSHA-2026-0086)

Vulnerability from moksha – Published: 2026-04-24 06:00 – Updated:
VLAI
Title
License Expiry Manipulation via Host.license_params expiry
Summary
An attacker with root access on an XAPI-based hypervisor host (XenServer, XCP-ng) can set the expiry key in Host.license_params to never or a far-future date, preventing license expiry enforcement and suppressing alerts. The license_check.ml code reads this value and treats never as no expiration. The field has the strongest XAPI access control (_R_LOCAL_ROOT_ONLY, pool_internal, DynamicRO). This is a license compliance issue - root access already grants full system control.
CWE
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
References
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "XenServer",
          "vendor": "Cloud Software Group",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "product": "XCP-ng",
          "vendor": "Vates",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jakob Wolffhechel, Moksha"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An attacker with root access on an XAPI-based hypervisor host (XenServer, XCP-ng) can set the expiry key in Host.license_params to never or a far-future date, preventing license expiry enforcement and suppressing alerts. The license_check.ml code reads this value and treats never as no expiration. The field has the strongest XAPI access control (_R_LOCAL_ROOT_ONLY, pool_internal, DynamicRO). This is a license compliance issue - root access already grants full system control."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 2.3,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 4.6,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T06:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "moksha.dk",
        "shortName": "Moksha"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://cna.moksha.dk/MOKSHA-2026-0086"
        }
      ],
      "title": "License Expiry Manipulation via Host.license_params expiry"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "alternateIds": [
      "GCVE-117-2026-0086"
    ],
    "assignerOrgId": "moksha.dk",
    "cveId": "MOKSHA-2026-0086",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-24T06:00:00Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "x_moksha_note": "Self-issued advisory. MOKSHA-2026-NNNN is not a MITRE CVE ID. Schema follows CVE JSON 5.1 for tooling compatibility. alternateIds contains GCVE cross-references (GNA #117) and will also carry MITRE CVE IDs if assigned."
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…