GHSA-G7P5-89MH-248H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 20:51 – Updated: 2026-08-18 20:51
VLAI
Summary
Lemur: Sub-CA creation never checks `AuthorityPermission` on the parent authority
Details

Summary

Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur

When ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False (an explicitly supported and documented configuration), POST /api/1/authorities with type=subca never verifies that the caller holds AuthorityPermission on the supplied parent authority. The parent field is resolved by AssociatedAuthoritySchema via a raw fetch_objects(Authority, data) lookup, then passed straight through service.create → mint → cryptography-issuer.create_authority, which loads options["parent"].authority_certificate.private_key and signs a brand-new intermediate CA on the caller's behalf.

Any authenticated non-read-only user can therefore mint a sub-CA chained to any internal root whose private key Lemur holds — including roots they hold no role on — attach a role they already belong to, and immediately issue or offline-sign trusted leaf certificates for arbitrary names.

Affected route

POST /api/1/authorities (with type=subca)

Affected code

Impact

In deployments that set ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False to enable self-service CA creation, any authenticated non-read-only user — with zero permission on a given internal root CA — can obtain a working intermediate CA chained to that root. They can then:

  • Issue TLS certificates for arbitrary names trusted by every relying party that trusts the internal root, bypassing LEMUR_ALLOWED_DOMAINS, sensitive-domain flags, and the per-user domain-authorization plugin.
  • Export the sub-CA private key and sign end-entity certificates entirely outside Lemur, defeating all in-product issuance controls.

This converts "can create a self-contained test CA" into "can mint trusted certs under any internal PKI root in the organisation". The ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION documentation does not warn operators of this consequence.

Root cause

AuthoritiesList.post evaluates AuthorityCreatorPermission (a global "may create authorities" flag) and StrictRolePermission, but never evaluates AuthorityPermission(parent.id, parent.roles) against the caller-supplied parent. AssociatedAuthoritySchema is a pure lookup schema with no authz hook, and neither authorities.service.create nor mint re-check before invoking issuer_plugin.create_authority(options). The bundled cryptography-issuer then uses the parent's stored private key directly.

Validated evidence

Static trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: CONFIRMED):

  • parent is loaded via AssociatedAuthoritySchema (raw fetch_objects), passed unchecked through views.post → service.create → mint → plugin.create_authority → issue_certificate, where the parent authority's stored private key is read and used to sign the new intermediate.
  • No call to AuthorityPermission(parent.id, ...) exists anywhere on this path.
  • Precondition ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False is an explicitly supported config (docs/administration.rst:517).

Proof of concept / reproducer

Status: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA).

Preconditions: ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False; attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than read-only; <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID> is any internal cryptography-issuer root CA the attacker holds no role on; <ATTACKER_ROLE> is any role the attacker already belongs to.

curl -sS -X POST "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/authorities" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
        "name": "attacker-subca",
        "owner": "attacker@example.com",
        "description": "poc",
        "type": "subca",
        "parent": {"id": <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID>},
        "plugin": {"slug": "cryptography-issuer"},
        "roles": [{"name": "<ATTACKER_ROLE>"}],
        "commonName": "attacker-intermediate",
        "validityYears": 1
      }'

The response contains a new authority whose authority_certificate is signed by <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID>'s private key. The caller is recorded as creator and holds <ATTACKER_ROLE> on it, so POST /api/1/certificates against the new authority succeeds (and skips allowed_issuance_for_domain because is_private_authority is true).

Static-trace validation command from the source report:

grep -n 'parent' lemur/authorities/schemas.py lemur/authorities/views.py lemur/authorities/service.py \
  && sed -n '37,55p' lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py

Source artifact: audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl (run_022, finding cluster lemur-subca-parent-authz, 5/100 runs).

Suggested fix

In AuthoritiesList.post (or authorities.service.create), when data.get('parent') is present, enforce AuthorityPermission(parent.id, [r.name for r in parent.roles]).can() before invoking the issuer plugin, regardless of ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION. Additionally, update the ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION documentation to state that disabling it currently grants every authenticated user the ability to chain sub-CAs off any internal root whose private key Lemur holds. Consider also requiring admin (or an explicit per-parent capability) for any type=subca creation independent of the global flag.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.9.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "lemur"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-71317"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-18T20:51:37Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nRepo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur\n\nWhen `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False` (an explicitly supported and documented configuration), `POST /api/1/authorities` with `type=subca` never verifies that the caller holds `AuthorityPermission` on the supplied `parent` authority. The `parent` field is resolved by `AssociatedAuthoritySchema` via a raw `fetch_objects(Authority, data)` lookup, then passed straight through `service.create \u2192 mint \u2192 cryptography-issuer.create_authority`, which loads `options[\"parent\"].authority_certificate.private_key` and signs a brand-new intermediate CA on the caller\u0027s behalf.\n\nAny authenticated non-read-only user can therefore mint a sub-CA chained to any internal root whose private key Lemur holds \u2014 including roots they hold no role on \u2014 attach a role they already belong to, and immediately issue or offline-sign trusted leaf certificates for arbitrary names.\n\n## Affected route\n\n`POST /api/1/authorities` (with `type=subca`)\n\n## Affected code\n\n- [`lemur/authorities/views.py:231`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/authorities/views.py#L231) \u2014 gates only on `AuthorityCreatorPermission()` + `StrictRolePermission()`; no `AuthorityPermission` on `data[\u0027parent\u0027]`\n- [`lemur/authorities/schemas.py:58`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/authorities/schemas.py#L58) \u2014 `parent = fields.Nested(AssociatedAuthoritySchema)`; `validate_subca` only checks presence\n- [`lemur/schemas.py:107`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/schemas.py#L107) \u2014 `AssociatedAuthoritySchema.get_object` \u2192 `fetch_objects(Authority, data)` resolves any authority by id/name with no permission check\n- [`lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py:40`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py#L40) \u2014 `private_key = options[\"authority\"].authority_certificate.private_key` (set from `options[\"parent\"]`) signs the new intermediate\n- [`lemur/auth/permissions.py:62`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/auth/permissions.py#L62) \u2014 `AuthorityCreatorPermission` becomes always-allow when `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False`\n- [`lemur/certificates/views.py:538`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/certificates/views.py#L538) \u2014 `is_private_authority` (true for `cryptography-issuer`) skips `USER_DOMAIN_AUTHORIZATION_PROVIDER` for subsequent leaf issuance\n\n## Impact\n\nIn deployments that set `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False` to enable self-service CA creation, any authenticated non-read-only user \u2014 with zero permission on a given internal root CA \u2014 can obtain a working intermediate CA chained to that root. They can then:\n\n- Issue TLS certificates for arbitrary names trusted by every relying party that trusts the internal root, bypassing `LEMUR_ALLOWED_DOMAINS`, sensitive-domain flags, and the per-user domain-authorization plugin.\n- Export the sub-CA private key and sign end-entity certificates entirely outside Lemur, defeating all in-product issuance controls.\n\nThis converts \"can create a self-contained test CA\" into \"can mint trusted certs under any internal PKI root in the organisation\". The `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION` documentation does not warn operators of this consequence.\n\n## Root cause\n\n`AuthoritiesList.post` evaluates `AuthorityCreatorPermission` (a global \"may create authorities\" flag) and `StrictRolePermission`, but never evaluates `AuthorityPermission(parent.id, parent.roles)` against the caller-supplied `parent`. `AssociatedAuthoritySchema` is a pure lookup schema with no authz hook, and neither `authorities.service.create` nor `mint` re-check before invoking `issuer_plugin.create_authority(options)`. The bundled `cryptography-issuer` then uses the parent\u0027s stored private key directly.\n\n## Validated evidence\n\nStatic trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: `CONFIRMED`):\n\n- `parent` is loaded via `AssociatedAuthoritySchema` (raw `fetch_objects`), passed unchecked through `views.post \u2192 service.create \u2192 mint \u2192 plugin.create_authority \u2192 issue_certificate`, where the parent authority\u0027s stored private key is read and used to sign the new intermediate.\n- No call to `AuthorityPermission(parent.id, ...)` exists anywhere on this path.\n- Precondition `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False` is an explicitly supported config ([`docs/administration.rst:517`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/docs/administration.rst#L517)).\n\n## Proof of concept / reproducer\n\nStatus: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA).\n\nPreconditions: `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False`; attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than `read-only`; `\u003cPARENT_AUTHORITY_ID\u003e` is any internal `cryptography-issuer` root CA the attacker holds no role on; `\u003cATTACKER_ROLE\u003e` is any role the attacker already belongs to.\n\n```bash\ncurl -sS -X POST \"\u003cTARGET_BASE_URL\u003e/api/1/authorities\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Bearer \u003cAUTH_TOKEN\u003e\" \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\n        \"name\": \"attacker-subca\",\n        \"owner\": \"attacker@example.com\",\n        \"description\": \"poc\",\n        \"type\": \"subca\",\n        \"parent\": {\"id\": \u003cPARENT_AUTHORITY_ID\u003e},\n        \"plugin\": {\"slug\": \"cryptography-issuer\"},\n        \"roles\": [{\"name\": \"\u003cATTACKER_ROLE\u003e\"}],\n        \"commonName\": \"attacker-intermediate\",\n        \"validityYears\": 1\n      }\u0027\n```\n\nThe response contains a new authority whose `authority_certificate` is signed by `\u003cPARENT_AUTHORITY_ID\u003e`\u0027s private key. The caller is recorded as creator and holds `\u003cATTACKER_ROLE\u003e` on it, so `POST /api/1/certificates` against the new authority succeeds (and skips `allowed_issuance_for_domain` because `is_private_authority` is true).\n\nStatic-trace validation command from the source report:\n\n```bash\ngrep -n \u0027parent\u0027 lemur/authorities/schemas.py lemur/authorities/views.py lemur/authorities/service.py \\\n  \u0026\u0026 sed -n \u002737,55p\u0027 lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py\n```\n\nSource artifact: `audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl` (run_022, finding cluster `lemur-subca-parent-authz`, 5/100 runs).\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nIn `AuthoritiesList.post` (or `authorities.service.create`), when `data.get(\u0027parent\u0027)` is present, enforce `AuthorityPermission(parent.id, [r.name for r in parent.roles]).can()` before invoking the issuer plugin, regardless of `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION`. Additionally, update the `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION` documentation to state that disabling it currently grants every authenticated user the ability to chain sub-CAs off any internal root whose private key Lemur holds. Consider also requiring admin (or an explicit per-parent capability) for any `type=subca` creation independent of the global flag.",
  "id": "GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h",
  "modified": "2026-08-18T20:51:38Z",
  "published": "2026-08-18T20:51:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/security/advisories/GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/commit/8669011203ca3dd89d9e39bab9ef6850eca723f9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Netflix/lemur"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/releases/tag/v1.9.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Lemur: Sub-CA creation never checks `AuthorityPermission` on the parent authority"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…