GHSA-384w-5v3f-q499
Vulnerability from github
8.3 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
Impact
What goes wrong?
The deprecated (in jupyterhub 1.2) configuration Authenticator.whitelist, which should be transparently mapped to Authenticator.allowed_users with a warning, is instead ignored by OAuthenticator classes, resulting in the same behavior as if this configuration has not been set. If this is the only mechanism of authorization restriction (i.e. no group or team restrictions in configuration) then all authenticated users will be allowed. Provider-based restrictions, including deprecated values such as GitHubOAuthenticator.org_whitelist are not affected.
Who is impacted?
All users of OAuthenticator 0.12.0 and 0.12.1 with JupyterHub 1.2 (JupyterHub Helm chart 0.10.0-0.10.5) who use the admin.whitelist.users configuration in the jupyterhub helm chart or the c.Authenticator.whitelist configuration directly. Users of other deprecated configuration, e.g. c.GitHubOAuthenticator.team_whitelist are not affected.
If you see a log line like this and expect a specific list of allowed usernames:
[I 2020-11-27 16:51:54.528 JupyterHub app:1717] Not using allowed_users. Any authenticated user will be allowed.
you are likely affected.
Patches
- Replacing deprecated
c.Authenticator.whitelist = ...withc.Authenticator.allowed_users = ...avoids the issue. - Update oauthenticator to 0.12.2
- Update jupyterhub helm chart to 0.10.6
If any users have been authorized during this time who should not have been, they must be deleted via the API or admin interface, per the documentation.
Workarounds
Replacing c.Authenticator.whitelist = ... with c.Authenticator.allowed_users = ... avoids the issue.
In the jupyterhub helm chart prior to 0.10.6, this can be done via hub.extraConfig:
```yaml auth: allowedUsers: - user1 - user2
hub: extraConfig: allowedUsers: | # set new field not exposed in helm chart < 0.10.6 set_config_if_not_none(c.Authenticator, "allowed_users", "auth.allowedUsers") ```
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open a thread on the Jupyter forum
- Email us at security@ipython.org
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "oauthenticator"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.12.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.12.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-26250"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-12-01T20:24:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n__What goes wrong?__\n\nThe deprecated (in jupyterhub 1.2) configuration `Authenticator.whitelist`, which should be transparently mapped to `Authenticator.allowed_users` with a warning, is instead ignored by OAuthenticator classes, resulting in the same behavior as if this configuration has not been set. If this is the only mechanism of authorization restriction (i.e. no group or team restrictions in configuration) then all authenticated users will be allowed. Provider-based restrictions, including deprecated values such as `GitHubOAuthenticator.org_whitelist` are **not** affected.\n\n__Who is impacted?__\n\nAll users of OAuthenticator 0.12.0 and 0.12.1 with JupyterHub 1.2 (JupyterHub Helm chart 0.10.0-0.10.5) who use the `admin.whitelist.users` configuration in the jupyterhub helm chart or the `c.Authenticator.whitelist` configuration directly. Users of other deprecated configuration, e.g. `c.GitHubOAuthenticator.team_whitelist` are **not** affected.\n\nIf you see a log line like this and expect a specific list of allowed usernames:\n\n```\n[I 2020-11-27 16:51:54.528 JupyterHub app:1717] Not using allowed_users. Any authenticated user will be allowed.\n```\n\nyou are likely affected.\n\n### Patches\n\n- Replacing deprecated `c.Authenticator.whitelist = ...` with `c.Authenticator.allowed_users = ...` avoids the issue.\n- Update oauthenticator to 0.12.2\n- Update jupyterhub helm chart to 0.10.6\n\nIf any users have been authorized during this time who should not have been, they must be deleted via the API or admin interface, [per the documentation](https://jupyterhub.readthedocs.io/en/1.2.2/getting-started/authenticators-users-basics.html#add-or-remove-users-from-the-hub).\n\n### Workarounds\n\nReplacing `c.Authenticator.whitelist = ...` with `c.Authenticator.allowed_users = ...` avoids the issue.\n\nIn the jupyterhub helm chart prior to 0.10.6, this can be done via `hub.extraConfig`:\n\n```yaml\nauth:\n allowedUsers:\n - user1\n - user2\n\nhub:\n extraConfig:\n allowedUsers: |\n # set new field not exposed in helm chart \u003c 0.10.6\n set_config_if_not_none(c.Authenticator, \"allowed_users\", \"auth.allowedUsers\")\n```\n\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Open a thread [on the Jupyter forum](http://discourse.jupyter.org)\n* Email us at [security@ipython.org](mailto:security@ipython.org)",
"id": "GHSA-384w-5v3f-q499",
"modified": "2024-10-01T21:19:38Z",
"published": "2020-12-01T20:25:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jupyterhub/oauthenticator/security/advisories/GHSA-384w-5v3f-q499"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26250"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jupyterhub/oauthenticator/commit/a4aac191c16cf6281f3d346615aefa75702b02d7"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jupyterhub/oauthenticator"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jupyterhub/oauthenticator/blob/master/docs/source/changelog.md#0122---2020-11-30"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/oauthenticator/PYSEC-2020-68.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jupyterhub.readthedocs.io/en/1.2.2/getting-started/authenticators-users-basics.html#add-or-remove-users-from-the-hub"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Base class whitelist configuration ignored in OAuthenticator"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.