{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "moquette",
          "vendor": "moquette-io",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.18.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Moquette is a lightweight Java MQTT broker. Prior to 0.18.1, PostOffice.publishWill publishes a client-controlled Last Will message through publish2Subscribers without invoking the authorizator.canWrite check used by normal PUBLISH paths. When anonymous access is enabled and topic ACLs restrict writes, a remote client can set an ACL-protected topic as the Last Will Topic during CONNECT and perform an abnormal client disconnect, causing the broker to inject attacker-controlled messages into a topic for which the client lacks write permission. This issue is fixed in version 0.18.1."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-85058",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-18T18:17:17.447",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-09-18T18:17:17.447",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/commit/e23df019f6a11e22c7d2047d4f86d07095466c97"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/commit/f5a323fe782d1505c0097498cb22eb6ec6c96973"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/releases/tag/v0.18.1"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/security/advisories/GHSA-9jjc-fw8x-fmwx"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.moquette:moquette-broker"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.18.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-85058"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-18T17:58:39Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nMoquette MQTT Broker fails to enforce ACL write permission checks when publishing Will (Last Will and Testament) messages on behalf of disconnected clients. All normal PUBLISH paths (`receivedPublishQos0`, `receivedPublishQos1`, `receivedPublishQos2`) correctly invoke `authorizator.canWrite()` before publishing, but the Will message publishing path (`fireWill()` \u2192 `publishWill()` \u2192 `publish2Subscribers()`) completely bypasses this authorization check.\n\nThis allows an unauthenticated attacker (when `allow_anonymous=true`, which is the default) to inject arbitrary messages into any ACL-protected topic by setting a restricted topic as the Will Topic in the CONNECT packet and then disconnecting abruptly via TCP RST.\n\nOther major MQTT Broker implementations (Mosquitto, EMQX, HiveMQ) correctly enforce ACL checks on Will messages, confirming this is a bug, not a design choice.\n\n## Details\n\nIn the MQTT protocol, a client can declare a \"Will\" topic and message in the CONNECT packet. When the client disconnects abnormally (without sending a DISCONNECT packet), the Broker publishes the Will message on behalf of the client. Although the Will message content (topic and payload) is entirely controlled by the connecting client \u2014 making it functionally equivalent to a PUBLISH \u2014 Moquette skips the ACL check for this path.\n\n### Root Cause\n\n**File**: `broker/src/main/java/io/moquette/broker/PostOffice.java` (v0.18.0)\n\nWill publishing path (lines 286-328) \u2014 **no canWrite() check**:\n```java\npublic void fireWill(Session bindedSession) {\n    final ISessionsRepository.Will will = bindedSession.getWill();\n    if (will.delayInterval == 0) {\n        publishWill(will);  // No canWrite() check!\n    } else {\n        trackWillSpecificationForFutureFire(...);\n    }\n}\n\nprivate void publishWill(ISessionsRepository.Will will) {\n    // ... build message ...\n    publish2Subscribers(WILL_PUBLISKER, messageExpiryInstant, willPublishMessage);\n    // No canWrite() check!\n}\n```\n\nNormal PUBLISH path (line 641) \u2014 **has canWrite() check**:\n```java\nif (!authorizator.canWrite(topic, username, clientID)) {\n    LOG.error(\"client is not authorized to publish on topic: {}\", topic);\n    return;\n}\n```\n\nAdditionally, `SessionRegistry.createNewWill()` (line 408-428) stores the Will topic from the CONNECT packet without any `canWrite()` pre-check. The `fireWill()`/`publishWill()` method is the only publishing path that does not invoke `authorizator.canWrite()`, creating a complete authorization bypass.\n\n### Prerequisites\n\n| Condition | Who controls | Default? | Notes |\n|-----------|-------------|----------|-------|\n| Attacker can establish MQTT connection to Broker | Environment | Yes | `allow_anonymous` defaults to true |\n| Broker has ACL restricting topic write access | Application | No | Only deployments with ACL configured have \"bypass\" significance, but this is a normal security deployment |\n| Client disconnects abnormally (TCP RST, not DISCONNECT) | Attacker | Yes | Attacker simply closes the TCP connection |\n\n## PoC\n\nVerified against Moquette Broker **v0.18.0** (latest release as of 2024-12-27). All scripts are included in the attached `GitHub_Advisory_POC.zip`.\n[GitHub_Advisory_POC.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29499548/GitHub_Advisory_POC.zip)\n### Environment Setup\n\n**Step 1: Download Moquette Broker v0.18.0**\n\nDownload the official release bundle from GitHub and extract:\n\n```bash\ncurl -L -o /tmp/moquette-0.18-bundle.tar.gz \"https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/releases/download/v0.18.0/distribution-0.18-bundle.tar.gz\"\nmkdir -p /tmp/moquette-0.18\ntar xzf /tmp/moquette-0.18-bundle.tar.gz -C /tmp/moquette-0.18\n```\n\n**Step 2: Configure ACL rules**\n\nReplace `/tmp/moquette-0.18/config/acl.conf` with the provided `acl.conf` (from POC zip), which contains:\n\n```conf\n# acl.conf - restrict write access to restricted/topic\ntopic write allowed/topic\ntopic read restricted/topic\n```\n\n\u003e Note: Must use `topic` rules (not `pattern` rules). Moquette\u0027s `AuthorizationsCollector.canDoOperation()` skips `pattern` rules when username is null (anonymous users), because `isNotEmpty(null)` returns false.\n\nEdit `/tmp/moquette-0.18/config/moquette.conf` to ensure ACL is enabled. Use the provided `moquette.conf` (from POC zip) as reference:\n\n```conf\n# moquette.conf\nport 1883\nhost 0.0.0.0\nallow_anonymous true\nacl_file config/acl.conf\n```\n\n**Step 3: Download dependency and compile POC scripts**\n\nDownload `commons-collections-3.2.1.jar` (required by CC6 deserialization chain) and compile the POC Java sources (all from POC zip):\n\n```bash\n# Download commons-collections (required for CC6 RCE POC only)\n# Place commons-collections-3.2.1.jar in /tmp/\n\n# Compile POC scripts\ncd /tmp\njavac -cp /tmp/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar CC6PayloadGen.java          # CC6 deserialization payload generator\njavac -cp /tmp/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar AttackerCC6_v018.java       # Attacker-side full POC (Will bypass + CC6 RCE)\njavac MqttDeviceService_v018.java                                         # Victim-side IoT subscriber service\n```\n\nScripts overview:\n\n| Script | Language | Purpose |\n|--------|----------|---------|\n| `poc_will_bypass.py` | Python | Lightweight Will ACL bypass verification (no Java/deserialization dependency) |\n| `AttackerCC6_v018.java` | Java | Full attacker POC: generates CC6 payload, verifies ACL blocks direct PUBLISH, bypasses ACL via Will, verifies victim-side RCE |\n| `CC6PayloadGen.java` | Java | CC6 deserialization payload generator (dependency of AttackerCC6_v018) |\n| `MqttDeviceService_v018.java` | Java | Victim-side IoT device subscriber \u2014 subscribes to `restricted/topic`, deserializes received messages via `ObjectInputStream.readObject()` |\n| `MoquetteWillAclBypassPoc.java` | Java | Standalone pure-Java POC for v0.15 (no external dependencies, verifies Will ACL bypass only) |\n| `acl.conf` | Config | ACL rules \u2014 `restricted/topic` read-only, no write |\n| `moquette.conf` | Config | Broker configuration \u2014 enables ACL, allows anonymous |\n\n### Reproduction \u2014 Will ACL Bypass Only (Python, no dependencies)\n\nThis verifies the core vulnerability: Will message bypasses ACL. Uses `poc_will_bypass.py`.\n\n**Terminal 1 \u2014 Start the Broker** (using Moquette\u0027s built-in main class `io.moquette.broker.Server`):\n\n```bash\ncd /tmp/moquette-0.18 \u0026\u0026 java -cp \u0027lib/*:lib\u0027 io.moquette.broker.Server\n```\n\nWait for \"Server started\" log.\n\n**Terminal 2 \u2014 Run POC**:\n\n```bash\npython3 poc_will_bypass.py\n```\n\nThis script automatically performs:\n1. Subscriber connects and subscribes to `restricted/topic`\n2. Verifies direct PUBLISH to `restricted/topic` is blocked by ACL\n3. Attacker connects with Will Topic=`restricted/topic`, then RST-disconnects\n4. Checks if subscriber received the Will message on the restricted topic\n\n**Expected output**:\n```\n[Step 1] Direct PUBLISH to restricted/topic (should be blocked)\n  [+] No message - ACL blocking direct PUBLISH (expected)\n\n[Step 2] Will ACL Bypass on v0.18.0\n  SUBACK: 9003000100\n  Attacker connected, Will set to \u0027restricted/topic\u0027\n  RST disconnecting attacker...\n  [!!!] WILL MESSAGE RECEIVED on restricted/topic!\n  [!!!] VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED on Moquette v0.18.0!\n```\n\n### Reproduction \u2014 Full RCE Chain (Will Bypass + CC6 Deserialization)\n\nThis demonstrates the real-world impact: Will bypass + Java deserialization = Remote Code Execution. Uses `AttackerCC6_v018.java`, `CC6PayloadGen.java`, and `MqttDeviceService_v018.java`.\n\n**Terminal 1 \u2014 Start the Broker** (using Moquette\u0027s built-in main class `io.moquette.broker.Server`):\n\n```bash\ncd /tmp/moquette-0.18 \u0026\u0026 java -cp \u0027lib/*:lib\u0027 io.moquette.broker.Server\n```\n\nWait for \"Server started\" log.\n\n**Terminal 2 \u2014 Start victim subscriber** (`MqttDeviceService_v018.java`):\n\n```bash\ncd /tmp \u0026\u0026 java -cp .:/tmp/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar MqttDeviceService_v018 localhost 1883\n```\n\nThis simulates an IoT device that subscribes to `restricted/topic` and deserializes received messages via `ObjectInputStream.readObject()`. Wait for:\n\n```\n[\u7b49\u5f85\u4e2d]   \u7b49\u5f85\u7ba1\u7406\u5e73\u53f0\u4e0b\u53d1\u6307\u4ee4...\n```\n\n**Terminal 3 \u2014 Run attacker POC** (`AttackerCC6_v018.java`):\n\n```bash\ncd /tmp \u0026\u0026 java -cp .:/tmp/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar AttackerCC6_v018 localhost 1883\n```\n\nThis script automatically performs:\n1. **Generate CC6 payload** \u2014 uses `CC6PayloadGen.java` to create a Commons Collections CC6 deserialization chain that executes `touch /tmp/pwned_by_will_bypass_\u003ctimestamp\u003e`\n2. **Verify direct PUBLISH is blocked** \u2014 attempts PUBLISH to `restricted/topic`, confirms ACL blocks it\n3. **Bypass ACL via Will** \u2014 CONNECT with Will Topic=`restricted/topic`, Will Message=CC6 serialized payload, then RST disconnect\n4. **Verify victim-side RCE** \u2014 checks if `/tmp/pwned_by_will_bypass_\u003ctimestamp\u003e` file was created on the victim\n\n\u003e Key verification point: Java CC6 chain triggers `exec` once during `HashMap.put()` when constructing the payload (a known CC6 artifact). The POC deletes this file before the Will bypass step, then verifies the file is re-created by the victim\u0027s `readObject()`, confirming the RCE is on the victim side, not a POC construction side-effect.\n\n**Expected attacker output** (Terminal 3):\n```\n=== \u653b\u51fb\u8005 (CC6\u539f\u751f\u53cd\u5e8f\u5217\u5316\u94fe) - Moquette v0.18.0 ===\n[1] \u751f\u6210CC6\u53cd\u5e8f\u5217\u5316payload...\n    payload\u957f\u5ea6: 1189 \u5b57\u8282\n[2] \u76f4\u63a5PUBLISH\u5230restricted topic (\u5e94\u88abACL\u62e6\u622a)...\n    \u5df2\u53d1\u9001\n[3] \u901a\u8fc7Will\u6d88\u606f\u7ed5\u8fc7ACL...\n    \u5df2\u8fde\u63a5\uff0cWill Topic=restricted/topic\n    Will Payload=CC6\u5e8f\u5217\u5316\u6570\u636e(1189\u5b57\u8282)\n    RST\u65ad\u5f00\u8fde\u63a5...\n    \u5df2\u65ad\u5f00\uff0cWill\u6d88\u606f\u7ed5\u8fc7ACL\u6295\u9012\u6210\u529f\n[4] \u9a8c\u8bc1\u53d7\u5bb3\u8005\u7aefRCE:\n    -rw-r--r-- 1 fire fire 0 ... /tmp/pwned_by_will_bypass_XXXXXXXXXXXXX\n    *** RCE\u6210\u529f! Will\u6d88\u606f\u7ed5\u8fc7ACL\u6295\u9012CC6 payload\uff0c\u53d7\u5bb3\u8005readObject()\u89e6\u53d1\u547d\u4ee4\u6267\u884c! ***\n```\n\n**Expected victim output** (Terminal 2):\n```\n[\u6536\u5230\u6d88\u606f] MQTT\u6d88\u606f\u5230\u8fbe\uff0c\u957f\u5ea6=1189\u5b57\u8282\n[\u53cd\u5e8f\u5217\u5316] \u6b63\u5728\u6267\u884c ObjectInputStream.readObject() ...\n[\u53cd\u5e8f\u5217\u5316] \u5b8c\u6210\uff0c\u5bf9\u8c61\u7c7b\u578b: java.util.HashMap\n```\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Authorization Bypass**: Attacker can inject arbitrary messages into any ACL-restricted topic, completely undermining the Broker\u0027s access control\n- **Remote Code Execution**: When subscribers deserialize MQTT message payloads (e.g., using Java `ObjectInputStream.readObject()`), attacker can inject deserialization gadgets (e.g., Commons Collections CC6 chain) to achieve RCE\n- **Affected scope**: All IoT/messaging middleware scenarios using Moquette as MQTT Broker with ACL enabled\n\n| Metric | Value | Rationale |\n|--------|-------|-----------|\n| Attack Vector | Network | MQTT Broker listens on TCP port, network-reachable |\n| Attack Complexity | Low | Standard MQTT CONNECT + TCP RST, no special conditions needed |\n| Privileges Required | None | `allow_anonymous` defaults to true |\n| User Interaction | None | Fully automated attack |\n| Scope | Unchanged | Impact limited to Broker\u0027s security domain |\n| Confidentiality | None | No data disclosure |\n| Integrity | High | ACL write protection completely bypassed |\n| Availability | None | No service disruption |\n[GitHub_Advisory_POC.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29499548/GitHub_Advisory_POC.zip)",
  "id": "GHSA-9jjc-fw8x-fmwx",
  "modified": "2026-09-18T17:58:39Z",
  "published": "2026-09-18T17:58:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/security/advisories/GHSA-9jjc-fw8x-fmwx"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/commit/e23df019f6a11e22c7d2047d4f86d07095466c97"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/commit/f5a323fe782d1505c0097498cb22eb6ec6c96973"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/moquette-io/moquette/releases/tag/v0.18.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "io.moquette:moquette-broker has a Missing Authorization issue"
}