CVE-2026-47191 (GCVE-0-2026-47191)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-14 16:35 – Updated: 2026-08-18 02:10
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
kas checks out SHA-like git branches as valid commits
Summary
kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Prior to version 5.3, when relying solely on a git commit ID (SHA-1 or SHA-256) to qualify if a checkout of a repository is equivalent to the state validated while adding its commit ID to a kas configuration, users may be tricked to check out a branch of the same name from this repository. This implies that the referenced repository has been taken over by an attacker and modified to carry such a branch. SHA-1 commits may also be replaced by creating hash collisions, so the primary impact of this issue is on SHA-256 commit IDs. Version 5.3 fixes the issue. As a workaround, avoid relying solely on the commit ID for integrity validation of a repository that might become under control of a malicious 3rd party. If available, additional validate cryptographically signed commits or tags. Alternatively, mirror the repository to a save place, validate its integrity, and use this instead of the original one.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-18 02:10 UTC
CWE
- CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/siemens/kas/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/siemens/kas/commit/4cb4a3d0112… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/ma… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47191",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-18T02:10:17.022365Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-18T02:10:29.632Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "kas",
"vendor": "siemens",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 5.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Prior to version 5.3, when relying solely on a git commit ID (SHA-1 or SHA-256) to qualify if a checkout of a repository is equivalent to the state validated while adding its commit ID to a kas configuration, users may be tricked to check out a branch of the same name from this repository. This implies that the referenced repository has been taken over by an attacker and modified to carry such a branch. SHA-1 commits may also be replaced by creating hash collisions, so the primary impact of this issue is on SHA-256 commit IDs. Version 5.3 fixes the issue. As a workaround, avoid relying solely on the commit ID for integrity validation of a repository that might become under control of a malicious 3rd party. If available, additional validate cryptographically signed commits or tags. Alternatively, mirror the repository to a save place, validate its integrity, and use this instead of the original one."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-14T16:35:48.128Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/siemens/kas/security/advisories/GHSA-qjwp-hrq6-r26r",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/siemens/kas/security/advisories/GHSA-qjwp-hrq6-r26r"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/siemens/kas/commit/4cb4a3d01122ffaec9feaae768a5814092f6f9b5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/siemens/kas/commit/4cb4a3d01122ffaec9feaae768a5814092f6f9b5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/kas/PYSEC-2026-2544.yaml",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/kas/PYSEC-2026-2544.yaml"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qjwp-hrq6-r26r",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "kas checks out SHA-like git branches as valid commits"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47191",
"datePublished": "2026-08-14T16:35:48.128Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-18T22:07:37.435Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-18T02:10:29.632Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-47191",
"date": "2026-08-22",
"epss": "0.00159",
"percentile": "0.05591"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-47191\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-08-14T17:18:15.410\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-18T02:17:26.957\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Prior to version 5.3, when relying solely on a git commit ID (SHA-1 or SHA-256) to qualify if a checkout of a repository is equivalent to the state validated while adding its commit ID to a kas configuration, users may be tricked to check out a branch of the same name from this repository. This implies that the referenced repository has been taken over by an attacker and modified to carry such a branch. SHA-1 commits may also be replaced by creating hash collisions, so the primary impact of this issue is on SHA-256 commit IDs. Version 5.3 fixes the issue. As a workaround, avoid relying solely on the commit ID for integrity validation of a repository that might become under control of a malicious 3rd party. If available, additional validate cryptographically signed commits or tags. Alternatively, mirror the repository to a save place, validate its integrity, and use this instead of the original one.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"siemens\",\"product\":\"kas\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 5.3\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":2.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"PASSIVE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-08-18T02:10:17.022365Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-47191\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/kas/PYSEC-2026-2544.yaml\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/siemens/kas/commit/4cb4a3d01122ffaec9feaae768a5814092f6f9b5\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/siemens/kas/security/advisories/GHSA-qjwp-hrq6-r26r\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"kas checks out SHA-like git branches as valid commits\", \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-347\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"PASSIVE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 2.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"version\": \"4.0\"}}], \"references\": [{\"name\": \"https://github.com/siemens/kas/security/advisories/GHSA-qjwp-hrq6-r26r\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/siemens/kas/security/advisories/GHSA-qjwp-hrq6-r26r\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/siemens/kas/commit/4cb4a3d01122ffaec9feaae768a5814092f6f9b5\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/siemens/kas/commit/4cb4a3d01122ffaec9feaae768a5814092f6f9b5\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/kas/PYSEC-2026-2544.yaml\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/kas/PYSEC-2026-2544.yaml\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"siemens\", \"product\": \"kas\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"\u003c 5.3\", \"status\": \"affected\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-14T16:35:48.128Z\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Prior to version 5.3, when relying solely on a git commit ID (SHA-1 or SHA-256) to qualify if a checkout of a repository is equivalent to the state validated while adding its commit ID to a kas configuration, users may be tricked to check out a branch of the same name from this repository. This implies that the referenced repository has been taken over by an attacker and modified to carry such a branch. SHA-1 commits may also be replaced by creating hash collisions, so the primary impact of this issue is on SHA-256 commit IDs. Version 5.3 fixes the issue. As a workaround, avoid relying solely on the commit ID for integrity validation of a repository that might become under control of a malicious 3rd party. If available, additional validate cryptographically signed commits or tags. Alternatively, mirror the repository to a save place, validate its integrity, and use this instead of the original one.\"}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-qjwp-hrq6-r26r\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-47191\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-08-18T02:10:17.022365Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-18T02:10:26.000Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-47191\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-18T22:07:37.435Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-14T16:35:48.128Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-18T02:10:29.632Z\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…