Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-58093 (GCVE-0-2024-58093)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-16 14:11 – Updated: 2026-07-16 11:13| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
666e7f9d60cee23077ea3e6331f6f8a19f7ea03f , < 0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b
(git)
Affected: 7badf4d6f49a358a01ab072bbff88d3ee886c33b , < 62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2 (git) Affected: 9856c0de49052174ab474113f4ba40c02aaee086 , < e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077 (git) Affected: 7aecdd47910c51707696e8b0e045b9f88bd4230f , < cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66 (git) Affected: 456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2 , < 8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3 (git) Affected: 456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2 , < f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7 (git) Affected: 456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2 , < ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183 (git) Affected: 456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2 , < 4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173 (git) Affected: 456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2 , < cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5 (git) Affected: d51d2eeae4ce54d542909c4d9d07bf371a78592c (git) Affected: 4203722d51afe3d239e03f15cc73efdf023a7103 (git) Affected: 5.4.251 , < 5.4.292 (semver) Affected: 5.10.188 , < 5.10.236 (semver) Affected: 5.15.121 , < 5.15.180 (semver) Affected: 6.1.39 , < 6.1.134 (semver) Affected: 6.3.13 , < 6.4 (semver) Affected: 6.4.4 , < 6.5 (semver) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
6.5
Unaffected: 0 , < 6.5 (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.292 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.236 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.180 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.134 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.87 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.23 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.13.11 , ≤ 6.13.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.14.2 , ≤ 6.14.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.15 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "666e7f9d60cee23077ea3e6331f6f8a19f7ea03f",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7badf4d6f49a358a01ab072bbff88d3ee886c33b",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9856c0de49052174ab474113f4ba40c02aaee086",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7aecdd47910c51707696e8b0e045b9f88bd4230f",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "d51d2eeae4ce54d542909c4d9d07bf371a78592c",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4203722d51afe3d239e03f15cc73efdf023a7103",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.4.292",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.4.251",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.10.236",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.10.188",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.15.180",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.15.121",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.1.134",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.1.39",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.5"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.5",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.292",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.236",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.180",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.134",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.87",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.23",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.13.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.13.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.292",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.4.251",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.236",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.10.188",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.180",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.15.121",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.134",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.1.39",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.87",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.23",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.13.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.14.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.15",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal\n\nBefore 456d8aa37d0f (\"PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to\navoid use-after-free\"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last\nfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.\n\nThat was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,\nlink-\u003edownstream would point to free\u0027d memory after.\n\nAfter above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function\nremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.\n\nThat is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream\nport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which\nstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.\n\nThe resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because\npciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.\n\nOn that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.\nFree exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is\nobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log]"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-16T11:13:50.898Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5"
}
],
"title": "PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-58093",
"datePublished": "2025-04-16T14:11:42.682Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-06T15:52:09.188Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-16T11:13:50.898Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-58093",
"date": "2026-09-19",
"epss": "0.00232",
"percentile": "0.14318"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-02-18T01:36:35.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-58093",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2024-58093",
"initial_release_date": "2025-04-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "1",
"product_status:known_affected": "1",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2025/msrc_cve-2024-58093.json",
"version": "2"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "666e7f9d60cee23077ea3e6331f6f8a19f7ea03f",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7badf4d6f49a358a01ab072bbff88d3ee886c33b",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9856c0de49052174ab474113f4ba40c02aaee086",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7aecdd47910c51707696e8b0e045b9f88bd4230f",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "d51d2eeae4ce54d542909c4d9d07bf371a78592c",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4203722d51afe3d239e03f15cc73efdf023a7103",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.4.292",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.4.251",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.10.236",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.10.188",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.15.180",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.15.121",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.1.134",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.1.39",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.5"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.5",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.292",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.236",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.180",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.134",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.87",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.23",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.13.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.13.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "44DA80F9-E53B-4731-AC41-BD9BAFB7661D",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.5",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.4.251",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6D42E8C7-CD33-432A-AC09-DC524C88ECE4",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.10.188",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F3AFFFEE-0707-48FE-B692-4AB92FDAA922",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.15.121",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "43B56BBD-C68E-4AF0-AEFF-3863C4B70AC2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.1.39",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9058C05B-5440-4D83-834D-2E94FC46621C",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2C10C69F-6357-4624-ADB7-90D4E8729AD5",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.15",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal\n\nBefore 456d8aa37d0f (\"PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to\navoid use-after-free\"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last\nfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.\n\nThat was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,\nlink-\u003edownstream would point to free\u0027d memory after.\n\nAfter above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function\nremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.\n\nThat is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream\nport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which\nstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.\n\nThe resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because\npciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.\n\nOn that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.\nFree exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is\nobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log]"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: PCI/ASPM: Correcci\u00f3n de la salida del estado del enlace durante la eliminaci\u00f3n de la funci\u00f3n ascendente del conmutador. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 456d8aa37d0f (\"PCI/ASPM: Deshabilitar ASPM al eliminar la funci\u00f3n MFD para evitar el use-after-free\"), liber\u00e1bamos el enlace ASPM solo despu\u00e9s de eliminar la \u00faltima funci\u00f3n del bus correspondiente al enlace en cuesti\u00f3n. Era demasiado tarde. Si la funci\u00f3n 0 se elimina antes que la funci\u00f3n hermana, enlace-\u0026gt;descendente apuntar\u00eda a la memoria liberada despu\u00e9s. Tras el cambio mencionado, liber\u00e1bamos el estado del enlace principal ASPM al eliminar cualquier funci\u00f3n del bus correspondiente a un enlace determinado. Era demasiado pronto. Si el enlace es a un conmutador PCIe con MFD en el puerto ascendente, eliminar primero las funciones distintas de la 0 liberar\u00eda un enlace que a\u00fan permanece como parent_link para los puertos descendentes restantes. Los GPF resultantes son especialmente frecuentes durante la desconexi\u00f3n en caliente, ya que pciehp elimina los dispositivos del bus de enlace en orden inverso. En ese conmutador, la funci\u00f3n 0 es el puente P2P virtual al bus interno. Se libera exactamente cuando se elimina la funci\u00f3n 0: antes de que el enlace principal quede obsoleto, pero despu\u00e9s de que todos los enlaces subordinados desaparezcan. [kwilczynski: registro de confirmaciones]"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-58093",
"lastModified": "2026-07-16T12:16:43.480",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-16T15:15:53.220",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-29T23:04:10+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-58093",
"id": "CVE-2024-58093",
"initial_release_date": "2024-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "226",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "48",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: Linux kernel: PCI/ASPM use-after-free during hot-unplug",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-58093.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-30T02:11:40Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-58093",
"id": "CVE-2024-58093",
"initial_release_date": "2025-04-18T01:30:11Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "522",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "224",
"product_status:recommended": "433",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2024-58093",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2024-58093.json",
"version": "41"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-09-05T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-09-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7726-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7726-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7725-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7725-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7726-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7726-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7703-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7703-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7726-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7726-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7724-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7724-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7727-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7727-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7725-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7725-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7704-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7704-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7727-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7727-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-09-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7727-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7727-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7726-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7726-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-09-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7712-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7712-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-09-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7725-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7725-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-09-03",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7737-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7737-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-11-06 - Updated: 2025-11-06
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | GenAI sur Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry versions antérieures à 10.2.5 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry versions antérieures à 6.0.20+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions antérieures à 1.90.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | NodeJS Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.8.58 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Python Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.8.63 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | VMware Tanzu pour MySQL sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.1.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | API Gateway pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 2.4.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | PHP Buildpack versions antérieures à 4.6.49 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Single Sign-On pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 1.16.14 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy FIPS) versions antérieures à 1.915.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Application Service | CredHub Service Broker versions antérieures à 1.6.6 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy FIPS) versions antérieures à 1.943.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.4+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry Windows versions antérieures à 6.0.20+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions antérieures à 1.915.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry Windows versions antérieures à 10.2.3+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Single Sign-On pour VMware Tanzu Application Service versions antérieures à 1.16.13 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions antérieures à 1.943.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry isolation segment versions antérieures à 6.0.20+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions antérieures à 1.77.x | ||
| VMware | Services Suite | Platform Automation Toolkit versions antérieures à 5.3.2 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy Azure Light) versions antérieures à 1.906.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Spring Cloud Data Flow pour VMware Tanzu versions antérieures à 1.14.9 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 250.5.9 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Spring Cloud Services pour VMware Tanzu versions antérieures à 3.3.10 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry versions antérieures à 10.2.3+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Concourse pour VMware Tanzu versions antérieures à 7.14.1+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry isolation segment versions antérieures à 10.2.3+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Platform Services pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.3.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Ruby Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.10.46 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Elastic Application Runtime pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 6.0.21+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Telemetry pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 2.3.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions antérieures à 1.103.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Hub versions antérieures à 10.3.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions antérieures à 1.906.x |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "GenAI sur Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.5",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.20+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.90.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "NodeJS Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.8.58",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Python Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.8.63",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "VMware Tanzu pour MySQL sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.1.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "API Gateway pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.4.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "PHP Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.6.49",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Single Sign-On pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.16.14",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy FIPS) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.915.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "CredHub Service Broker versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.6.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Application Service",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy FIPS) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.943.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.4+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry Windows versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.20+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.915.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry Windows versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.3+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Single Sign-On pour VMware Tanzu Application Service versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.16.13",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.943.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry isolation segment versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.20+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.77.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Platform Automation Toolkit versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.3.2",
"product": {
"name": "Services Suite",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy Azure Light) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.906.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Spring Cloud Data Flow pour VMware Tanzu versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.14.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 250.5.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Spring Cloud Services pour VMware Tanzu versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3.10",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.3+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Concourse pour VMware Tanzu versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 7.14.1+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform pour Cloud Foundry isolation segment versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.3+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Platform Services pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ruby Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.10.46",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.21+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Telemetry pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.3.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.103.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Hub versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.906.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2019-25013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-25013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-9937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-4235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-4235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-20919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-20919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2005-0602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2005-0602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-26465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-9157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2011-3374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-3374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-26260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-18250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-46908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-46908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2001-1268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-1268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-9748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-8141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-15120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-15120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-0682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-10928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-10928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-12429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-12429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-8322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1010238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1010238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-4715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-4715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-20926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-20926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-29562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-22218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-22218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-2163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-10805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-10805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-15095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-16328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-15798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-15798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-8323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-6293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-2161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-10140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-10140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-2341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-16329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-1752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2007-4559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-4559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-6461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-5262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-20921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-20921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-39046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-39046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-17547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-10919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-10919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-10804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-10804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-16776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-2064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-2064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-22844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-13232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2011-2207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-2207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-3189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-7531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2006-3082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-3082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-10062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-2708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-2708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-0692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-43859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-7514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-26603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-5118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-18781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-18781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-22576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-3418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-9133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-18032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-18032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-8324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-8139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-5783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-5783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-16777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-13153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-13153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-28544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-2369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-25032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-25032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-9904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-6153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-6153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-16412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-6462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-29509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-29921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-9636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-43857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-33068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-2388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-12900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-22942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-20012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-20012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-8325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-3792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-15607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-15607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-16775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-34558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-9913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-0694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-21606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-21606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2001-1269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-1269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-20873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-5841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-8321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-13440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-13440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-34903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-20696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-20696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-34169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-22916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-22916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-3779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-3779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-28196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-29923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-24031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-24031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-8908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-12643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-12643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-4074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-33099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-41175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-41175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-13147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-57803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-57803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-29511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-16231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-9409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-0689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-8140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-28861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-18276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-0499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-20918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-20918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-20883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-43965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-18253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-13410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-13410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-24032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-24032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-27645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-34526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-16645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-1606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-1606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-20945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-20945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-21599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-21599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-0340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-0340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-20107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-20107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-12674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-12674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-21605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-21605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-21967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-1000476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-8863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-25217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-19876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-19876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-40812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-9135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-12433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-12433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-20952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-20952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-21540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-6836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-1000027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-57807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-57807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-18384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-9844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-13136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11226"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-11-06T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-11-06T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-11-06T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36320",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36320"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36423",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36423"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2022-19",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36364"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-53",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36351"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36424",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36424"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36412",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36412"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36388",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36388"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36426",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36426"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36411",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36411"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36357",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36357"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36408",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36408"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36349",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36349"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36414",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36414"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36397",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36397"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36389",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36389"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36398",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36398"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36380",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36380"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-41",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36407"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36362",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36362"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36413",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36413"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36384",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36384"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36379",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36379"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36400",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36400"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36377",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36377"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36368",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36368"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36418",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36418"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36420",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36420"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36391",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36391"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36392",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36392"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36353",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36353"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-14",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36356"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36422",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36422"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36381",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36381"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36421",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36421"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36416",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36416"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-86",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36415"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36403",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36403"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36347",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36347"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36383",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36383"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36410",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36410"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36352",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36352"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36394",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36394"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36354",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36354"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36399",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36399"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-53",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36350"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36419",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36419"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-85",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36401"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2022-19",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36365"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36405",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36405"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2018-27",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36367"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36395",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36395"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36387",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36387"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36363",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36363"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36385",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36385"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36409",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36409"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-53",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36359"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36348",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36348"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36386",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36386"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36417",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36417"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36425",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36425"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2018-27",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36366"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2024-44",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36360"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36355",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36355"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-53",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36358"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36396",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36396"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36378",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36378"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36382",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36382"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36404",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36404"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2024-44",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36361"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36402",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36402"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36393",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36393"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36406",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36406"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36390",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36390"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-58093
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-16 15:15 - Updated: 2026-07-16 12:16| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b | ||
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173 | ||
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2 | ||
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3 | ||
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183 | ||
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66 | ||
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077 | ||
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7 |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "666e7f9d60cee23077ea3e6331f6f8a19f7ea03f",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7badf4d6f49a358a01ab072bbff88d3ee886c33b",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9856c0de49052174ab474113f4ba40c02aaee086",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7aecdd47910c51707696e8b0e045b9f88bd4230f",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "d51d2eeae4ce54d542909c4d9d07bf371a78592c",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4203722d51afe3d239e03f15cc73efdf023a7103",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.4.292",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.4.251",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.10.236",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.10.188",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.15.180",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.15.121",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.1.134",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.1.39",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.5"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.5",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.292",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.236",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.180",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.134",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.87",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.23",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.13.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.13.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "44DA80F9-E53B-4731-AC41-BD9BAFB7661D",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.5",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.4.251",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6D42E8C7-CD33-432A-AC09-DC524C88ECE4",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.10.188",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F3AFFFEE-0707-48FE-B692-4AB92FDAA922",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.15.121",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "43B56BBD-C68E-4AF0-AEFF-3863C4B70AC2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.1.39",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9058C05B-5440-4D83-834D-2E94FC46621C",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2C10C69F-6357-4624-ADB7-90D4E8729AD5",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.15",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal\n\nBefore 456d8aa37d0f (\"PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to\navoid use-after-free\"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last\nfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.\n\nThat was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,\nlink-\u003edownstream would point to free\u0027d memory after.\n\nAfter above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function\nremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.\n\nThat is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream\nport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which\nstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.\n\nThe resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because\npciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.\n\nOn that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.\nFree exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is\nobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log]"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: PCI/ASPM: Correcci\u00f3n de la salida del estado del enlace durante la eliminaci\u00f3n de la funci\u00f3n ascendente del conmutador. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 456d8aa37d0f (\"PCI/ASPM: Deshabilitar ASPM al eliminar la funci\u00f3n MFD para evitar el use-after-free\"), liber\u00e1bamos el enlace ASPM solo despu\u00e9s de eliminar la \u00faltima funci\u00f3n del bus correspondiente al enlace en cuesti\u00f3n. Era demasiado tarde. Si la funci\u00f3n 0 se elimina antes que la funci\u00f3n hermana, enlace-\u0026gt;descendente apuntar\u00eda a la memoria liberada despu\u00e9s. Tras el cambio mencionado, liber\u00e1bamos el estado del enlace principal ASPM al eliminar cualquier funci\u00f3n del bus correspondiente a un enlace determinado. Era demasiado pronto. Si el enlace es a un conmutador PCIe con MFD en el puerto ascendente, eliminar primero las funciones distintas de la 0 liberar\u00eda un enlace que a\u00fan permanece como parent_link para los puertos descendentes restantes. Los GPF resultantes son especialmente frecuentes durante la desconexi\u00f3n en caliente, ya que pciehp elimina los dispositivos del bus de enlace en orden inverso. En ese conmutador, la funci\u00f3n 0 es el puente P2P virtual al bus interno. Se libera exactamente cuando se elimina la funci\u00f3n 0: antes de que el enlace principal quede obsoleto, pero despu\u00e9s de que todos los enlaces subordinados desaparezcan. [kwilczynski: registro de confirmaciones]"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-58093",
"lastModified": "2026-07-16T12:16:43.480",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-16T15:15:53.220",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-XCJF-5V2R-GVC9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-16 15:34 – Updated: 2026-07-16 12:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal
Before 456d8aa37d0f ("PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to avoid use-after-free"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last function on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.
That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function, link->downstream would point to free'd memory after.
After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function removal on the bus pertaining to a given link.
That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream port, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which still remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.
The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because pciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.
On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus. Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is obsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.
[kwilczynski: commit log]
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-58093"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-416"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:15:53Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal\n\nBefore 456d8aa37d0f (\"PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to\navoid use-after-free\"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last\nfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.\n\nThat was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,\nlink-\u003edownstream would point to free\u0027d memory after.\n\nAfter above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function\nremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.\n\nThat is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream\nport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which\nstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.\n\nThe resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because\npciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.\n\nOn that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.\nFree exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is\nobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log]",
"id": "GHSA-xcjf-5v2r-gvc9",
"modified": "2026-07-16T12:31:42Z",
"published": "2025-04-16T15:34:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a0f9aecf66b98959aab7fb5764b4b3e522f4f5b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d96930239981f312821a4065db8cc0f8240a173"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62db339ecc3d58d8fd83a9e4d80061cd943bb6e2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b930ddc2044e36866c41423e89889e0258695a3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba4cdc14c0d4df00d3e99bff7fe545303db98183"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd4b07507794f7ad1a74e12eca75121d98187e66"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5cd58f61e9d8024ee11bd78c12c8916891d4077"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f556b6ba0ac5f8353287ce6ed761228f0b4fafb7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
MSRC_CVE-2024-58093
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2025-04-02 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-18 01:36OESA-2025-1463 (CVE-2024-58093)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-05-09 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal
Before 456d8aa37d0f ("PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to avoid use-after-free"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last function on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.
That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function, link->downstream would point to free'd memory after.
After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function removal on the bus pertaining to a given link.
That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream port, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which still remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.
The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because pciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.
On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus. Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is obsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()
Added a check for "read-only" mode in the jfs_truncate_nolock
function to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only
filesystem.
Call stack:
block_write_begin() { jfs_write_failed() { jfs_truncate() { jfs_truncate_nolock() { txEnd() { ... log = JFS_SBI(tblk->sb)->log; // (log == NULL)
If the isReadOnly(ip) condition is triggered in
jfs_truncate_nolock, the function execution will stop, and no
further data modification will occur. Instead, the xtTruncate
function will be called with the "COMMIT_WMAP" flag, preventing
modifications in "read-only" mode.(CVE-2024-58094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vmxnet3: Fix packet corruption in vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame
Andrew and Nikolay reported connectivity issues with Cilium's service load-balancing in case of vmxnet3.
If a BPF program for native XDP adds an encapsulation header such as IPIP and transmits the packet out the same interface, then in case of vmxnet3 a corrupted packet is being sent and subsequently dropped on the path.
vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame() which is called e.g. via vmxnet3_run_xdp() through vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back() calculates an incorrect DMA address:
page = virt_to_page(xdpf->data); tbi->dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) + VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM; dma_sync_single_for_device(&adapter->pdev->dev, tbi->dma_addr, buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
The above assumes a fixed offset (VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM), but the XDP BPF program could have moved xdp->data. While the passed buf_size is correct (xdpf->len), the dma_addr needs to have a dynamic offset which can be calculated as xdpf->data - (void *)xdpf, that is, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start.(CVE-2024-58099)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rds: sysctl: rds_tcp_{rcv,snd}buf: avoid using current->nsproxy
As mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the 'net' structure via 'current' is not recommended for different reasons:
-
Inconsistency: getting info from the reader's/writer's netns vs only from the opener's netns.
-
current->nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an 'Oops' (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by syzbot [1] using acct(2).
The per-netns structure can be obtained from the table->data using container_of(), then the 'net' one can be retrieved from the listen socket (if available).(CVE-2025-21635)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: make sure ptp clock is unregister and freed if hclge_ptp_get_cycle returns an error
During the initialization of ptp, hclge_ptp_get_cycle might return an error and returned directly without unregister clock and free it. To avoid that, call hclge_ptp_destroy_clock to unregist and free clock if hclge_ptp_get_cycle failed.(CVE-2025-21924)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle
Syzkaller reports a NULL pointer dereference issue in input_event().
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395 Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000028 by task syz-executor199/2949
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2949 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00076-gf097a36ef88d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602 check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline] kasan_check_range+0xef/0x1a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline] input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395 input_report_key include/linux/input.h:439 [inline] key_down drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:159 [inline] appleir_raw_event+0x3e5/0x5e0 drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:232 __hid_input_report.constprop.0+0x312/0x440 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:2111 hid_ctrl+0x49f/0x550 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:484 __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x389/0x6e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1650 usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x396/0x450 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1734 dummy_timer+0x17f7/0x3960 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c:1993 __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1739 [inline] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x20a/0xae0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1803 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17d/0x350 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1820 handle_softirqs+0x206/0x8d0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xfa/0x160 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702 __mod_timer+0x8f6/0xdc0 kernel/time/timer.c:1185 add_timer+0x62/0x90 kernel/time/timer.c:1295 schedule_timeout+0x11f/0x280 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:98 usbhid_wait_io+0x1c7/0x380 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:645 usbhid_init_reports+0x19f/0x390 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:784 hiddev_ioctl+0x1133/0x15b0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:794 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK>
This happens due to the malformed report items sent by the emulated device which results in a report, that has no fields, being added to the report list. Due to this appleir_input_configured() is never called, hidinput_connect() fails which results in the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag is not being set. However, it does not make appleir_probe() fail and lets the event callback to be called without the associated input device.
Thus, add a check for the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag and leave the event hook early if the driver didn't claim any input_dev for some reason. Moreover, some other hid drivers accessing input_dev in their event callbacks do have similar checks, too.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-21948)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level > 2
A null dereference or oops exception will eventually occur when qla1280.c driver is compiled with DEBUG_QLA1280 enabled and ql_debug_level > 2. I think its clear from the code that the intention here is sg_dma_len(s) not length of sg_next(s) when printing the debug info.(CVE-2025-21957)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: cancel wiphy_work before freeing wiphy
A wiphy_work can be queued from the moment the wiphy is allocated and initialized (i.e. wiphy_new_nm). When a wiphy_work is queued, the rdev::wiphy_work is getting queued.
If wiphy_free is called before the rdev::wiphy_work had a chance to run, the wiphy memory will be freed, and then when it eventally gets to run it'll use invalid memory.
Fix this by canceling the work before freeing the wiphy.(CVE-2025-21979)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop
Driver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with buffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated, it may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!
...
Call trace:
hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!
...
Call trace:
hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc
Add a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not to affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop count of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().(CVE-2025-22010)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock
When some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for the service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new server packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server() which eventually sets pdr->locator_init_complete to true which process A sees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due to deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi->wq and it is ordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server request work due to deadlock on list lock.
Fix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration is already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just call schedule_work() here.
Process A Process B
process_scheduled_works()
pdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work() process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server() pdr->locator_init_complete=true; pdr_locator_work() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock);
pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock);
pdr_get_domain_list()
pr_err("PDR: %s get domain list
txn wait failed: %d\n",
req->service_name,
ret);
Timeout error log due to deadlock:
" PDR: tms/servreg get domain list txn wait failed: -110 PDR: service lookup for msm/adsp/sensor_pd:tms/servreg failed: -110 "
Thanks to Bjorn and Johan for letting me know that this commit also fixes an audio regression when using the in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it easier to hit this race. 1
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration
A shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the same time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio->mapping should be NULL, and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.
In __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries to update, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in page cache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray multi-index entry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a normal entry during xas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction). Fix it by only using folio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray is storing swap cache entries or not to choose the right number of xarray entries to update.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/
Note: In __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() && folio_test_swapcache() is used to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in swap cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a in-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since !folio_test_anon() is true and folio->mapping is NULL. But fortunately, its caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY when folio->mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.(CVE-2025-22015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: streamzap: fix race between device disconnection and urb callback
Syzkaller has reported a general protection fault at function ir_raw_event_store_with_filter(). This crash is caused by a NULL pointer dereference of dev->raw pointer, even though it is checked for NULL in the same function, which means there is a race condition. It occurs due to the incorrect order of actions in the streamzap_disconnect() function: rc_unregister_device() is called before usb_kill_urb(). The dev->raw pointer is freed and set to NULL in rc_unregister_device(), and only after that usb_kill_urb() waits for in-progress requests to finish.
If rc_unregister_device() is called while streamzap_callback() handler is not finished, this can lead to accessing freed resources. Thus rc_unregister_device() should be called after usb_kill_urb().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-22027)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection
There is a race condition between session setup and ksmbd_sessions_deregister. The session can be freed before the connection is added to channel list of session. This patch check reference count of session before freeing it.(CVE-2025-22040)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister()
In multichannel mode, UAF issue can occur in session_deregister when the second channel sets up a session through the connection of the first channel. session that is freed through the global session table can be accessed again through ->sessions of connection.(CVE-2025-22041)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
acpi: nfit: fix narrowing conversion in acpi_nfit_ctl
Syzkaller has reported a warning in to_nfit_bus_uuid(): "only secondary bus families can be translated". This warning is emited if the argument is equal to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_NFIT == 0. Function acpi_nfit_ctl() first verifies that a user-provided value call_pkg->nd_family of type u64 is not equal to 0. Then the value is converted to int, and only after that is compared to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_MAX. This can lead to passing an invalid argument to acpi_nfit_ctl(), if call_pkg->nd_family is non-zero, while the lower 32 bits are zero.
Furthermore, it is best to return EINVAL immediately upon seeing the invalid user input. The WARNING is insufficient to prevent further undefined behavior based on other invalid user input.
All checks of the input value should be applied to the original variable call_pkg->nd_family.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mm: Fix flush_tlb_range() when used for zapping normal PMDs
On the following path, flush_tlb_range() can be used for zapping normal PMD entries (PMD entries that point to page tables) together with the PTE entries in the pointed-to page table:
collapse_pte_mapped_thp
pmdp_collapse_flush
flush_tlb_range
The arm64 version of flush_tlb_range() has a comment describing that it can be used for page table removal, and does not use any last-level invalidation optimizations. Fix the X86 version by making it behave the same way.
Currently, X86 only uses this information for the following two purposes, which I think means the issue doesn't have much impact:
- In native_flush_tlb_multi() for checking if lazy TLB CPUs need to be IPI'd to avoid issues with speculative page table walks.
- In Hyper-V TLB paravirtualization, again for lazy TLB stuff.
The patch "x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB" which is currently under review (see <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230175550.4046587-13-riel@surriel.com/>) would probably be making the impact of this a lot worse.(CVE-2025-22045)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Don't override subprog's return value
The verifier test calls: div by 0 in subprog triggers a panic at the
ld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory
address returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct
address at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).
But at commit 73c359d1d356 ("LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values")
we also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).
For function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5
register. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls
which expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0
to a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).(CVE-2025-22048)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes
prior to "[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks" we used to have a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed, but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we ended up with a leak.
Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way. Dentry of gang directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone. One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir() as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput(). Another bug was in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got destroyed.
Fix consists of * reverting the commit in question * adding a counter to gang, protected by ->i_rwsem of gang directory inode. * having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped in spufs_create_context(), provided that it's not 0. * using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang directory out when counter reaches zero.(CVE-2025-22072)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: brcmstb: Fix error path after a call to regulator_bulk_get()
If the regulator_bulk_get() returns an error and no regulators are created, we need to set their number to zero.
If we don't do this and the PCIe link up fails, a call to the regulator_bulk_free() will result in a kernel panic.
While at it, print the error value, as we cannot return an error upwards as the kernel will WARN() on an error from add_bus().
kwilczynski: commit log, use comma in the message to match style with other similar messages
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying
Presently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked with JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running stress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is possible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is destroyed eg:
(umount) ext4_kill_sb kill_block_super generic_shutdown_super sync_filesystem / commits all txns / evict_inodes / might start a new txn / ext4_put_super flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) / flush the workqueue / jbd2_journal_destroy journal_kill_thread journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT; jbd2_journal_commit_transaction jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer jbd2_journal_bmap ext4_journal_bmap ext4_map_blocks ... ext4_inode_error ext4_handle_error schedule_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work)
/* work queue kicks in */
update_super_work
jbd2_journal_start
start_this_handle
BUG_ON(journal->j_flags &
JBD2_UNMOUNT)
Hence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do a journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just fallback to an un-journaled commit.
Further, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:
- Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying
- force a commit and wait for it
- flush pending sb updates
This sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb update that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the journal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)
Also, we don't need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only called from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.(CVE-2025-22113)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()
There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172
CPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline] dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896 ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323 evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622 iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline] iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline] iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758 ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300 mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446 legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline] path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316 do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1
Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88807b002f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff88807b002f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff88807b003000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ ffff88807b003080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff88807b003100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
Above issue happens as ext4_xattr_delete_inode() isn't check xattr is valid if xattr is in inode. To solve above issue call xattr_check_inode() check if xattr if valid in inode. In fact, we can directly verify in ext4_iget_extra_inode(), so that there is no divergent verification.(CVE-2025-22121)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks, due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")(CVE-2025-22125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error in build_prologue()
Vincent reported that running BPF progs with tailcalls on LoongArch causes kernel hard lockup. Debugging the issues shows that the JITed image missing a jirl instruction at the end of the epilogue.
There are two passes in JIT compiling, the first pass set the flags and the second pass generates JIT code based on those flags. With BPF progs mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls, build_prologue() generates N insns in the first pass and then generates N+1 insns in the second pass. This makes epilogue_offset off by one and we will jump to some unexpected insn and cause lockup. Fix this by inserting a nop insn.(CVE-2025-37893)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal\n\nBefore 456d8aa37d0f (\u0026quot;PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to\navoid use-after-free\u0026quot;), we would free the ASPM link only after the last\nfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.\n\nThat was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,\nlink-\u0026gt;downstream would point to free\u0026apos;d memory after.\n\nAfter above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function\nremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.\n\nThat is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream\nport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which\nstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.\n\nThe resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because\npciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.\n\nOn that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.\nFree exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is\nobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()\n\nAdded a check for \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode in the `jfs_truncate_nolock`\nfunction to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only\nfilesystem.\n\nCall stack:\n\nblock_write_begin() {\n jfs_write_failed() {\n jfs_truncate() {\n jfs_truncate_nolock() {\n txEnd() {\n ...\n log = JFS_SBI(tblk-\u0026gt;sb)-\u0026gt;log;\n // (log == NULL)\n\nIf the `isReadOnly(ip)` condition is triggered in\n`jfs_truncate_nolock`, the function execution will stop, and no\nfurther data modification will occur. Instead, the `xtTruncate`\nfunction will be called with the \u0026quot;COMMIT_WMAP\u0026quot; flag, preventing\nmodifications in \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode.(CVE-2024-58094)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvmxnet3: Fix packet corruption in vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame\n\nAndrew and Nikolay reported connectivity issues with Cilium\u0026apos;s service\nload-balancing in case of vmxnet3.\n\nIf a BPF program for native XDP adds an encapsulation header such as\nIPIP and transmits the packet out the same interface, then in case\nof vmxnet3 a corrupted packet is being sent and subsequently dropped\non the path.\n\nvmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame() which is called e.g. via vmxnet3_run_xdp()\nthrough vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back() calculates an incorrect DMA address:\n\n page = virt_to_page(xdpf-\u0026gt;data);\n tbi-\u0026gt;dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) +\n VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM;\n dma_sync_single_for_device(\u0026amp;adapter-\u0026gt;pdev-\u0026gt;dev,\n tbi-\u0026gt;dma_addr, buf_size,\n DMA_TO_DEVICE);\n\nThe above assumes a fixed offset (VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM), but the XDP\nBPF program could have moved xdp-\u0026gt;data. While the passed buf_size is\ncorrect (xdpf-\u0026gt;len), the dma_addr needs to have a dynamic offset which\ncan be calculated as xdpf-\u0026gt;data - (void *)xdpf, that is, xdp-\u0026gt;data -\nxdp-\u0026gt;data_hard_start.(CVE-2024-58099)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrds: sysctl: rds_tcp_{rcv,snd}buf: avoid using current-\u0026gt;nsproxy\n\nAs mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the \u0026apos;net\u0026apos;\nstructure via \u0026apos;current\u0026apos; is not recommended for different reasons:\n\n- Inconsistency: getting info from the reader\u0026apos;s/writer\u0026apos;s netns vs only\n from the opener\u0026apos;s netns.\n\n- current-\u0026gt;nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an \u0026apos;Oops\u0026apos;\n (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by\n syzbot [1] using acct(2).\n\nThe per-netns structure can be obtained from the table-\u0026gt;data using\ncontainer_of(), then the \u0026apos;net\u0026apos; one can be retrieved from the listen\nsocket (if available).(CVE-2025-21635)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: hns3: make sure ptp clock is unregister and freed if hclge_ptp_get_cycle returns an error\n\nDuring the initialization of ptp, hclge_ptp_get_cycle might return an error\nand returned directly without unregister clock and free it. To avoid that,\ncall hclge_ptp_destroy_clock to unregist and free clock if\nhclge_ptp_get_cycle failed.(CVE-2025-21924)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle\n\nSyzkaller reports a NULL pointer dereference issue in input_event().\n\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395\nRead of size 8 at addr 0000000000000028 by task syz-executor199/2949\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2949 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00076-gf097a36ef88d #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline]\n kasan_check_range+0xef/0x1a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189\n instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline]\n _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\n is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline]\n input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395\n input_report_key include/linux/input.h:439 [inline]\n key_down drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:159 [inline]\n appleir_raw_event+0x3e5/0x5e0 drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:232\n __hid_input_report.constprop.0+0x312/0x440 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:2111\n hid_ctrl+0x49f/0x550 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:484\n __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x389/0x6e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1650\n usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x396/0x450 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1734\n dummy_timer+0x17f7/0x3960 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c:1993\n __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1739 [inline]\n __hrtimer_run_queues+0x20a/0xae0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1803\n hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17d/0x350 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1820\n handle_softirqs+0x206/0x8d0 kernel/softirq.c:561\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0xfa/0x160 kernel/softirq.c:662\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702\n __mod_timer+0x8f6/0xdc0 kernel/time/timer.c:1185\n add_timer+0x62/0x90 kernel/time/timer.c:1295\n schedule_timeout+0x11f/0x280 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:98\n usbhid_wait_io+0x1c7/0x380 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:645\n usbhid_init_reports+0x19f/0x390 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:784\n hiddev_ioctl+0x1133/0x15b0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:794\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThis happens due to the malformed report items sent by the emulated device\nwhich results in a report, that has no fields, being added to the report list.\nDue to this appleir_input_configured() is never called, hidinput_connect()\nfails which results in the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag is not being set. However,\nit does not make appleir_probe() fail and lets the event callback to be\ncalled without the associated input device.\n\nThus, add a check for the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag and leave the event hook\nearly if the driver didn\u0026apos;t claim any input_dev for some reason. Moreover,\nsome other hid drivers accessing input_dev in their event callbacks do have\nsimilar checks, too.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-21948)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level \u0026gt; 2\n\nA null dereference or oops exception will eventually occur when qla1280.c\ndriver is compiled with DEBUG_QLA1280 enabled and ql_debug_level \u0026gt; 2. I\nthink its clear from the code that the intention here is sg_dma_len(s) not\nlength of sg_next(s) when printing the debug info.(CVE-2025-21957)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: cfg80211: cancel wiphy_work before freeing wiphy\n\nA wiphy_work can be queued from the moment the wiphy is allocated and\ninitialized (i.e. wiphy_new_nm). When a wiphy_work is queued, the\nrdev::wiphy_work is getting queued.\n\nIf wiphy_free is called before the rdev::wiphy_work had a chance to run,\nthe wiphy memory will be freed, and then when it eventally gets to run\nit\u0026apos;ll use invalid memory.\n\nFix this by canceling the work before freeing the wiphy.(CVE-2025-21979)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop\n\nDriver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with\nbuffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated,\nit may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!\n ...\n Call trace:\n hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!\n ...\n Call trace:\n hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc\n\nAdd a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not\nto affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop\ncount of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().(CVE-2025-22010)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock\n\nWhen some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for\nthe service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new\nserver packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server()\nwhich eventually sets pdr-\u0026gt;locator_init_complete to true which process A\nsees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due\nto deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi-\u0026gt;wq and it is\nordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server\nrequest work due to deadlock on list lock.\n\nFix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration\nis already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just\ncall schedule_work() here.\n\n Process A Process B\n\n process_scheduled_works()\npdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work()\n process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server()\n pdr-\u0026gt;locator_init_complete=true;\n pdr_locator_work()\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;pdr-\u0026gt;list_lock);\n\n pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(\u0026amp;pdr-\u0026gt;list_lock);\n\n pdr_get_domain_list()\n pr_err(\u0026quot;PDR: %s get domain list\n txn wait failed: %d\\n\u0026quot;,\n req-\u0026gt;service_name,\n ret);\n\nTimeout error log due to deadlock:\n\n\u0026quot;\n PDR: tms/servreg get domain list txn wait failed: -110\n PDR: service lookup for msm/adsp/sensor_pd:tms/servreg failed: -110\n\u0026quot;\n\nThanks to Bjorn and Johan for letting me know that this commit also fixes\nan audio regression when using the in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it\neasier to hit this race. [1](CVE-2025-22014)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration\n\nA shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the\nsame time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio-\u0026gt;mapping should be\nNULL, and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.\n\nIn __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries to\nupdate, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in page\ncache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray multi-index\nentry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a normal entry during\nxas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction). Fix it by only using\nfolio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray is storing swap cache\nentries or not to choose the right number of xarray entries to update.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/\n\nNote:\nIn __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() \u0026amp;\u0026amp; folio_test_swapcache() is\nused to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in\nswap cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a\nin-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since\n!folio_test_anon() is true and folio-\u0026gt;mapping is NULL. But fortunately,\nits caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY\nwhen folio-\u0026gt;mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.(CVE-2025-22015)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: streamzap: fix race between device disconnection and urb callback\n\nSyzkaller has reported a general protection fault at function\nir_raw_event_store_with_filter(). This crash is caused by a NULL pointer\ndereference of dev-\u0026gt;raw pointer, even though it is checked for NULL in\nthe same function, which means there is a race condition. It occurs due\nto the incorrect order of actions in the streamzap_disconnect() function:\nrc_unregister_device() is called before usb_kill_urb(). The dev-\u0026gt;raw\npointer is freed and set to NULL in rc_unregister_device(), and only\nafter that usb_kill_urb() waits for in-progress requests to finish.\n\nIf rc_unregister_device() is called while streamzap_callback() handler is\nnot finished, this can lead to accessing freed resources. Thus\nrc_unregister_device() should be called after usb_kill_urb().\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-22027)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection\n\nThere is a race condition between session setup and\nksmbd_sessions_deregister. The session can be freed before the connection\nis added to channel list of session.\nThis patch check reference count of session before freeing it.(CVE-2025-22040)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister()\n\nIn multichannel mode, UAF issue can occur in session_deregister\nwhen the second channel sets up a session through the connection of\nthe first channel. session that is freed through the global session\ntable can be accessed again through -\u0026gt;sessions of connection.(CVE-2025-22041)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nacpi: nfit: fix narrowing conversion in acpi_nfit_ctl\n\nSyzkaller has reported a warning in to_nfit_bus_uuid(): \u0026quot;only secondary\nbus families can be translated\u0026quot;. This warning is emited if the argument\nis equal to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_NFIT == 0. Function acpi_nfit_ctl() first\nverifies that a user-provided value call_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family of type u64 is\nnot equal to 0. Then the value is converted to int, and only after that\nis compared to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_MAX. This can lead to passing an invalid\nargument to acpi_nfit_ctl(), if call_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family is non-zero, while\nthe lower 32 bits are zero.\n\nFurthermore, it is best to return EINVAL immediately upon seeing the\ninvalid user input. The WARNING is insufficient to prevent further\nundefined behavior based on other invalid user input.\n\nAll checks of the input value should be applied to the original variable\ncall_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family.\n\n[iweiny: update commit message](CVE-2025-22044)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mm: Fix flush_tlb_range() when used for zapping normal PMDs\n\nOn the following path, flush_tlb_range() can be used for zapping normal\nPMD entries (PMD entries that point to page tables) together with the PTE\nentries in the pointed-to page table:\n\n collapse_pte_mapped_thp\n pmdp_collapse_flush\n flush_tlb_range\n\nThe arm64 version of flush_tlb_range() has a comment describing that it can\nbe used for page table removal, and does not use any last-level\ninvalidation optimizations. Fix the X86 version by making it behave the\nsame way.\n\nCurrently, X86 only uses this information for the following two purposes,\nwhich I think means the issue doesn\u0026apos;t have much impact:\n\n - In native_flush_tlb_multi() for checking if lazy TLB CPUs need to be\n IPI\u0026apos;d to avoid issues with speculative page table walks.\n - In Hyper-V TLB paravirtualization, again for lazy TLB stuff.\n\nThe patch \u0026quot;x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB\u0026quot; which\nis currently under review (see\n\u0026lt;https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230175550.4046587-13-riel@surriel.com/\u0026gt;)\nwould probably be making the impact of this a lot worse.(CVE-2025-22045)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Don\u0026apos;t override subprog\u0026apos;s return value\n\nThe verifier test `calls: div by 0 in subprog` triggers a panic at the\nld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory\naddress returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct\naddress at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).\nBut at commit 73c359d1d356 (\u0026quot;LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values\u0026quot;)\nwe also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).\nFor function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5\nregister. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls\nwhich expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0\nto a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).(CVE-2025-22048)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nspufs: fix gang directory lifetimes\n\nprior to \u0026quot;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks\u0026quot; we used to have\na problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened\ngang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed,\nbut if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and\nkept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we\nended up with a leak.\n\nUnfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way. Dentry of gang\ndirectory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone.\nOne problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir()\nas cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput(). Another bug was\nin the success case - gang creation incremented link count on\nroot directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got\ndestroyed.\n\nFix consists of\n\t* reverting the commit in question\n\t* adding a counter to gang, protected by -\u0026gt;i_rwsem\nof gang directory inode.\n\t* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped\nin both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped\nin spufs_create_context(), provided that it\u0026apos;s not 0.\n\t* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang\ndirectory out when counter reaches zero.(CVE-2025-22072)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: brcmstb: Fix error path after a call to regulator_bulk_get()\n\nIf the regulator_bulk_get() returns an error and no regulators\nare created, we need to set their number to zero.\n\nIf we don\u0026apos;t do this and the PCIe link up fails, a call to the\nregulator_bulk_free() will result in a kernel panic.\n\nWhile at it, print the error value, as we cannot return an error\nupwards as the kernel will WARN() on an error from add_bus().\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log, use comma in the message to match style with\nother similar messages](CVE-2025-22095)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying\n\nPresently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked\nwith JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running\nstress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is\npossible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is\ndestroyed eg:\n\n(umount)\next4_kill_sb\n kill_block_super\n generic_shutdown_super\n sync_filesystem /* commits all txns */\n evict_inodes\n /* might start a new txn */\n ext4_put_super\n\tflush_work(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_sb_upd_work) /* flush the workqueue */\n jbd2_journal_destroy\n journal_kill_thread\n journal-\u0026gt;j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;\n jbd2_journal_commit_transaction\n jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer\n jbd2_journal_bmap\n ext4_journal_bmap\n ext4_map_blocks\n ...\n ext4_inode_error\n ext4_handle_error\n schedule_work(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_sb_upd_work)\n\n /* work queue kicks in */\n update_super_work\n jbd2_journal_start\n start_this_handle\n BUG_ON(journal-\u0026gt;j_flags \u0026amp;\n JBD2_UNMOUNT)\n\nHence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do\na journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just\nfallback to an un-journaled commit.\n\nFurther, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:\n\n 1. Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying\n 2. force a commit and wait for it\n 3. flush pending sb updates\n\nThis sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb\nupdate that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the\njournal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)\n\nAlso, we don\u0026apos;t need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only\ncalled from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.(CVE-2025-22113)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()\n\nThere\u0026apos;s issue as follows:\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172\n\nCPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0\nCall Trace:\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline]\n dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400\n __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560\n kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585\n ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137\n ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896\n ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323\n evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622\n iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline]\n iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline]\n iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758\n ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline]\n ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300\n mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446\n legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611\n vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576\n do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline]\n path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316\n do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514\n do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1\n\nMemory state around the buggy address:\n ffff88807b002f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n ffff88807b002f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n\u0026gt;ffff88807b003000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n ^\n ffff88807b003080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n ffff88807b003100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n\nAbove issue happens as ext4_xattr_delete_inode() isn\u0026apos;t check xattr\nis valid if xattr is in inode.\nTo solve above issue call xattr_check_inode() check if xattr if valid\nin inode. In fact, we can directly verify in ext4_iget_extra_inode(),\nso that there is no divergent verification.(CVE-2025-22121)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0026apos;t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0026apos;s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\u0026quot;md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\u0026quot;)(CVE-2025-22125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error in build_prologue()\n\nVincent reported that running BPF progs with tailcalls on LoongArch\ncauses kernel hard lockup. Debugging the issues shows that the JITed\nimage missing a jirl instruction at the end of the epilogue.\n\nThere are two passes in JIT compiling, the first pass set the flags and\nthe second pass generates JIT code based on those flags. With BPF progs\nmixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls, build_prologue() generates N insns in the\nfirst pass and then generates N+1 insns in the second pass. This makes\nepilogue_offset off by one and we will jump to some unexpected insn and\ncause lockup. Fix this by inserting a nop insn.(CVE-2025-37893)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1463",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:33Z",
"published": "2025-05-09T11:08:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1463"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58099"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21924"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21948"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21957"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22010"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22027"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22044"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22045"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22048"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22095"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37893"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-58093",
"CVE-2024-58094",
"CVE-2024-58099",
"CVE-2025-21635",
"CVE-2025-21924",
"CVE-2025-21948",
"CVE-2025-21957",
"CVE-2025-21979",
"CVE-2025-22010",
"CVE-2025-22014",
"CVE-2025-22015",
"CVE-2025-22027",
"CVE-2025-22040",
"CVE-2025-22041",
"CVE-2025-22044",
"CVE-2025-22045",
"CVE-2025-22048",
"CVE-2025-22072",
"CVE-2025-22095",
"CVE-2025-22113",
"CVE-2025-22121",
"CVE-2025-22125",
"CVE-2025-37893"
]
}
OESA-2025-1464 (CVE-2024-58093)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-05-09 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal
Before 456d8aa37d0f ("PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to avoid use-after-free"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last function on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.
That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function, link->downstream would point to free'd memory after.
After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function removal on the bus pertaining to a given link.
That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream port, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which still remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.
The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because pciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.
On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus. Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is obsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()
Added a check for "read-only" mode in the jfs_truncate_nolock
function to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only
filesystem.
Call stack:
block_write_begin() { jfs_write_failed() { jfs_truncate() { jfs_truncate_nolock() { txEnd() { ... log = JFS_SBI(tblk->sb)->log; // (log == NULL)
If the isReadOnly(ip) condition is triggered in
jfs_truncate_nolock, the function execution will stop, and no
further data modification will occur. Instead, the xtTruncate
function will be called with the "COMMIT_WMAP" flag, preventing
modifications in "read-only" mode.(CVE-2024-58094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rds: sysctl: rds_tcp_{rcv,snd}buf: avoid using current->nsproxy
As mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the 'net' structure via 'current' is not recommended for different reasons:
-
Inconsistency: getting info from the reader's/writer's netns vs only from the opener's netns.
-
current->nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an 'Oops' (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by syzbot [1] using acct(2).
The per-netns structure can be obtained from the table->data using container_of(), then the 'net' one can be retrieved from the listen socket (if available).(CVE-2025-21635)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle
Syzkaller reports a NULL pointer dereference issue in input_event().
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395 Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000028 by task syz-executor199/2949
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2949 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00076-gf097a36ef88d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602 check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline] kasan_check_range+0xef/0x1a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline] input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395 input_report_key include/linux/input.h:439 [inline] key_down drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:159 [inline] appleir_raw_event+0x3e5/0x5e0 drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:232 __hid_input_report.constprop.0+0x312/0x440 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:2111 hid_ctrl+0x49f/0x550 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:484 __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x389/0x6e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1650 usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x396/0x450 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1734 dummy_timer+0x17f7/0x3960 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c:1993 __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1739 [inline] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x20a/0xae0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1803 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17d/0x350 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1820 handle_softirqs+0x206/0x8d0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xfa/0x160 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702 __mod_timer+0x8f6/0xdc0 kernel/time/timer.c:1185 add_timer+0x62/0x90 kernel/time/timer.c:1295 schedule_timeout+0x11f/0x280 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:98 usbhid_wait_io+0x1c7/0x380 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:645 usbhid_init_reports+0x19f/0x390 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:784 hiddev_ioctl+0x1133/0x15b0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:794 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK>
This happens due to the malformed report items sent by the emulated device which results in a report, that has no fields, being added to the report list. Due to this appleir_input_configured() is never called, hidinput_connect() fails which results in the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag is not being set. However, it does not make appleir_probe() fail and lets the event callback to be called without the associated input device.
Thus, add a check for the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag and leave the event hook early if the driver didn't claim any input_dev for some reason. Moreover, some other hid drivers accessing input_dev in their event callbacks do have similar checks, too.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-21948)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level > 2
A null dereference or oops exception will eventually occur when qla1280.c driver is compiled with DEBUG_QLA1280 enabled and ql_debug_level > 2. I think its clear from the code that the intention here is sg_dma_len(s) not length of sg_next(s) when printing the debug info.(CVE-2025-21957)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: cancel wiphy_work before freeing wiphy
A wiphy_work can be queued from the moment the wiphy is allocated and initialized (i.e. wiphy_new_nm). When a wiphy_work is queued, the rdev::wiphy_work is getting queued.
If wiphy_free is called before the rdev::wiphy_work had a chance to run, the wiphy memory will be freed, and then when it eventally gets to run it'll use invalid memory.
Fix this by canceling the work before freeing the wiphy.(CVE-2025-21979)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop
Driver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with buffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated, it may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!
...
Call trace:
hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!
...
Call trace:
hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc
Add a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not to affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop count of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().(CVE-2025-22010)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock
When some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for the service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new server packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server() which eventually sets pdr->locator_init_complete to true which process A sees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due to deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi->wq and it is ordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server request work due to deadlock on list lock.
Fix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration is already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just call schedule_work() here.
Process A Process B
process_scheduled_works()
pdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work() process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server() pdr->locator_init_complete=true; pdr_locator_work() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock);
pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock);
pdr_get_domain_list()
pr_err("PDR: %s get domain list
txn wait failed: %d\n",
req->service_name,
ret);
Timeout error log due to deadlock:
" PDR: tms/servreg get domain list txn wait failed: -110 PDR: service lookup for msm/adsp/sensor_pd:tms/servreg failed: -110 "
Thanks to Bjorn and Johan for letting me know that this commit also fixes an audio regression when using the in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it easier to hit this race. 1
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration
A shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the same time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio->mapping should be NULL, and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.
In __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries to update, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in page cache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray multi-index entry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a normal entry during xas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction). Fix it by only using folio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray is storing swap cache entries or not to choose the right number of xarray entries to update.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/
Note: In __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() && folio_test_swapcache() is used to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in swap cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a in-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since !folio_test_anon() is true and folio->mapping is NULL. But fortunately, its caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY when folio->mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.(CVE-2025-22015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: streamzap: fix race between device disconnection and urb callback
Syzkaller has reported a general protection fault at function ir_raw_event_store_with_filter(). This crash is caused by a NULL pointer dereference of dev->raw pointer, even though it is checked for NULL in the same function, which means there is a race condition. It occurs due to the incorrect order of actions in the streamzap_disconnect() function: rc_unregister_device() is called before usb_kill_urb(). The dev->raw pointer is freed and set to NULL in rc_unregister_device(), and only after that usb_kill_urb() waits for in-progress requests to finish.
If rc_unregister_device() is called while streamzap_callback() handler is not finished, this can lead to accessing freed resources. Thus rc_unregister_device() should be called after usb_kill_urb().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-22027)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection
There is a race condition between session setup and ksmbd_sessions_deregister. The session can be freed before the connection is added to channel list of session. This patch check reference count of session before freeing it.(CVE-2025-22040)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister()
In multichannel mode, UAF issue can occur in session_deregister when the second channel sets up a session through the connection of the first channel. session that is freed through the global session table can be accessed again through ->sessions of connection.(CVE-2025-22041)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
acpi: nfit: fix narrowing conversion in acpi_nfit_ctl
Syzkaller has reported a warning in to_nfit_bus_uuid(): "only secondary bus families can be translated". This warning is emited if the argument is equal to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_NFIT == 0. Function acpi_nfit_ctl() first verifies that a user-provided value call_pkg->nd_family of type u64 is not equal to 0. Then the value is converted to int, and only after that is compared to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_MAX. This can lead to passing an invalid argument to acpi_nfit_ctl(), if call_pkg->nd_family is non-zero, while the lower 32 bits are zero.
Furthermore, it is best to return EINVAL immediately upon seeing the invalid user input. The WARNING is insufficient to prevent further undefined behavior based on other invalid user input.
All checks of the input value should be applied to the original variable call_pkg->nd_family.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mm: Fix flush_tlb_range() when used for zapping normal PMDs
On the following path, flush_tlb_range() can be used for zapping normal PMD entries (PMD entries that point to page tables) together with the PTE entries in the pointed-to page table:
collapse_pte_mapped_thp
pmdp_collapse_flush
flush_tlb_range
The arm64 version of flush_tlb_range() has a comment describing that it can be used for page table removal, and does not use any last-level invalidation optimizations. Fix the X86 version by making it behave the same way.
Currently, X86 only uses this information for the following two purposes, which I think means the issue doesn't have much impact:
- In native_flush_tlb_multi() for checking if lazy TLB CPUs need to be IPI'd to avoid issues with speculative page table walks.
- In Hyper-V TLB paravirtualization, again for lazy TLB stuff.
The patch "x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB" which is currently under review (see <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230175550.4046587-13-riel@surriel.com/>) would probably be making the impact of this a lot worse.(CVE-2025-22045)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Don't override subprog's return value
The verifier test calls: div by 0 in subprog triggers a panic at the
ld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory
address returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct
address at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).
But at commit 73c359d1d356 ("LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values")
we also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).
For function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5
register. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls
which expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0
to a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).(CVE-2025-22048)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes
prior to "[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks" we used to have a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed, but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we ended up with a leak.
Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way. Dentry of gang directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone. One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir() as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput(). Another bug was in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got destroyed.
Fix consists of * reverting the commit in question * adding a counter to gang, protected by ->i_rwsem of gang directory inode. * having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped in spufs_create_context(), provided that it's not 0. * using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang directory out when counter reaches zero.(CVE-2025-22072)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: brcmstb: Fix error path after a call to regulator_bulk_get()
If the regulator_bulk_get() returns an error and no regulators are created, we need to set their number to zero.
If we don't do this and the PCIe link up fails, a call to the regulator_bulk_free() will result in a kernel panic.
While at it, print the error value, as we cannot return an error upwards as the kernel will WARN() on an error from add_bus().
kwilczynski: commit log, use comma in the message to match style with other similar messages
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying
Presently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked with JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running stress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is possible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is destroyed eg:
(umount) ext4_kill_sb kill_block_super generic_shutdown_super sync_filesystem / commits all txns / evict_inodes / might start a new txn / ext4_put_super flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) / flush the workqueue / jbd2_journal_destroy journal_kill_thread journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT; jbd2_journal_commit_transaction jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer jbd2_journal_bmap ext4_journal_bmap ext4_map_blocks ... ext4_inode_error ext4_handle_error schedule_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work)
/* work queue kicks in */
update_super_work
jbd2_journal_start
start_this_handle
BUG_ON(journal->j_flags &
JBD2_UNMOUNT)
Hence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do a journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just fallback to an un-journaled commit.
Further, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:
- Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying
- force a commit and wait for it
- flush pending sb updates
This sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb update that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the journal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)
Also, we don't need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only called from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.(CVE-2025-22113)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()
There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172
CPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline] dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896 ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323 evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622 iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline] iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline] iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758 ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300 mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446 legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline] path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316 do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1
Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88807b002f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff88807b002f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff88807b003000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ ffff88807b003080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff88807b003100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
Above issue happens as ext4_xattr_delete_inode() isn't check xattr is valid if xattr is in inode. To solve above issue call xattr_check_inode() check if xattr if valid in inode. In fact, we can directly verify in ext4_iget_extra_inode(), so that there is no divergent verification.(CVE-2025-22121)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks, due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")(CVE-2025-22125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error in build_prologue()
Vincent reported that running BPF progs with tailcalls on LoongArch causes kernel hard lockup. Debugging the issues shows that the JITed image missing a jirl instruction at the end of the epilogue.
There are two passes in JIT compiling, the first pass set the flags and the second pass generates JIT code based on those flags. With BPF progs mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls, build_prologue() generates N insns in the first pass and then generates N+1 insns in the second pass. This makes epilogue_offset off by one and we will jump to some unexpected insn and cause lockup. Fix this by inserting a nop insn.(CVE-2025-37893)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal\n\nBefore 456d8aa37d0f (\u0026quot;PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to\navoid use-after-free\u0026quot;), we would free the ASPM link only after the last\nfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.\n\nThat was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,\nlink-\u0026gt;downstream would point to free\u0026apos;d memory after.\n\nAfter above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function\nremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.\n\nThat is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream\nport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which\nstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.\n\nThe resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because\npciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.\n\nOn that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.\nFree exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is\nobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()\n\nAdded a check for \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode in the `jfs_truncate_nolock`\nfunction to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only\nfilesystem.\n\nCall stack:\n\nblock_write_begin() {\n jfs_write_failed() {\n jfs_truncate() {\n jfs_truncate_nolock() {\n txEnd() {\n ...\n log = JFS_SBI(tblk-\u0026gt;sb)-\u0026gt;log;\n // (log == NULL)\n\nIf the `isReadOnly(ip)` condition is triggered in\n`jfs_truncate_nolock`, the function execution will stop, and no\nfurther data modification will occur. Instead, the `xtTruncate`\nfunction will be called with the \u0026quot;COMMIT_WMAP\u0026quot; flag, preventing\nmodifications in \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode.(CVE-2024-58094)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrds: sysctl: rds_tcp_{rcv,snd}buf: avoid using current-\u0026gt;nsproxy\n\nAs mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the \u0026apos;net\u0026apos;\nstructure via \u0026apos;current\u0026apos; is not recommended for different reasons:\n\n- Inconsistency: getting info from the reader\u0026apos;s/writer\u0026apos;s netns vs only\n from the opener\u0026apos;s netns.\n\n- current-\u0026gt;nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an \u0026apos;Oops\u0026apos;\n (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by\n syzbot [1] using acct(2).\n\nThe per-netns structure can be obtained from the table-\u0026gt;data using\ncontainer_of(), then the \u0026apos;net\u0026apos; one can be retrieved from the listen\nsocket (if available).(CVE-2025-21635)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle\n\nSyzkaller reports a NULL pointer dereference issue in input_event().\n\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395\nRead of size 8 at addr 0000000000000028 by task syz-executor199/2949\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2949 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00076-gf097a36ef88d #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline]\n kasan_check_range+0xef/0x1a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189\n instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline]\n _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\n is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline]\n input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395\n input_report_key include/linux/input.h:439 [inline]\n key_down drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:159 [inline]\n appleir_raw_event+0x3e5/0x5e0 drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:232\n __hid_input_report.constprop.0+0x312/0x440 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:2111\n hid_ctrl+0x49f/0x550 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:484\n __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x389/0x6e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1650\n usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x396/0x450 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1734\n dummy_timer+0x17f7/0x3960 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c:1993\n __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1739 [inline]\n __hrtimer_run_queues+0x20a/0xae0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1803\n hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17d/0x350 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1820\n handle_softirqs+0x206/0x8d0 kernel/softirq.c:561\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0xfa/0x160 kernel/softirq.c:662\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702\n __mod_timer+0x8f6/0xdc0 kernel/time/timer.c:1185\n add_timer+0x62/0x90 kernel/time/timer.c:1295\n schedule_timeout+0x11f/0x280 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:98\n usbhid_wait_io+0x1c7/0x380 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:645\n usbhid_init_reports+0x19f/0x390 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:784\n hiddev_ioctl+0x1133/0x15b0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:794\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThis happens due to the malformed report items sent by the emulated device\nwhich results in a report, that has no fields, being added to the report list.\nDue to this appleir_input_configured() is never called, hidinput_connect()\nfails which results in the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag is not being set. However,\nit does not make appleir_probe() fail and lets the event callback to be\ncalled without the associated input device.\n\nThus, add a check for the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag and leave the event hook\nearly if the driver didn\u0026apos;t claim any input_dev for some reason. Moreover,\nsome other hid drivers accessing input_dev in their event callbacks do have\nsimilar checks, too.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-21948)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level \u0026gt; 2\n\nA null dereference or oops exception will eventually occur when qla1280.c\ndriver is compiled with DEBUG_QLA1280 enabled and ql_debug_level \u0026gt; 2. I\nthink its clear from the code that the intention here is sg_dma_len(s) not\nlength of sg_next(s) when printing the debug info.(CVE-2025-21957)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: cfg80211: cancel wiphy_work before freeing wiphy\n\nA wiphy_work can be queued from the moment the wiphy is allocated and\ninitialized (i.e. wiphy_new_nm). When a wiphy_work is queued, the\nrdev::wiphy_work is getting queued.\n\nIf wiphy_free is called before the rdev::wiphy_work had a chance to run,\nthe wiphy memory will be freed, and then when it eventally gets to run\nit\u0026apos;ll use invalid memory.\n\nFix this by canceling the work before freeing the wiphy.(CVE-2025-21979)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop\n\nDriver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with\nbuffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated,\nit may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!\n ...\n Call trace:\n hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!\n ...\n Call trace:\n hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc\n\nAdd a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not\nto affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop\ncount of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().(CVE-2025-22010)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock\n\nWhen some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for\nthe service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new\nserver packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server()\nwhich eventually sets pdr-\u0026gt;locator_init_complete to true which process A\nsees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due\nto deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi-\u0026gt;wq and it is\nordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server\nrequest work due to deadlock on list lock.\n\nFix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration\nis already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just\ncall schedule_work() here.\n\n Process A Process B\n\n process_scheduled_works()\npdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work()\n process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server()\n pdr-\u0026gt;locator_init_complete=true;\n pdr_locator_work()\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;pdr-\u0026gt;list_lock);\n\n pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(\u0026amp;pdr-\u0026gt;list_lock);\n\n pdr_get_domain_list()\n pr_err(\u0026quot;PDR: %s get domain list\n txn wait failed: %d\\n\u0026quot;,\n req-\u0026gt;service_name,\n ret);\n\nTimeout error log due to deadlock:\n\n\u0026quot;\n PDR: tms/servreg get domain list txn wait failed: -110\n PDR: service lookup for msm/adsp/sensor_pd:tms/servreg failed: -110\n\u0026quot;\n\nThanks to Bjorn and Johan for letting me know that this commit also fixes\nan audio regression when using the in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it\neasier to hit this race. [1](CVE-2025-22014)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration\n\nA shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the\nsame time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio-\u0026gt;mapping should be\nNULL, and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.\n\nIn __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries to\nupdate, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in page\ncache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray multi-index\nentry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a normal entry during\nxas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction). Fix it by only using\nfolio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray is storing swap cache\nentries or not to choose the right number of xarray entries to update.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/\n\nNote:\nIn __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() \u0026amp;\u0026amp; folio_test_swapcache() is\nused to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in\nswap cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a\nin-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since\n!folio_test_anon() is true and folio-\u0026gt;mapping is NULL. But fortunately,\nits caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY\nwhen folio-\u0026gt;mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.(CVE-2025-22015)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: streamzap: fix race between device disconnection and urb callback\n\nSyzkaller has reported a general protection fault at function\nir_raw_event_store_with_filter(). This crash is caused by a NULL pointer\ndereference of dev-\u0026gt;raw pointer, even though it is checked for NULL in\nthe same function, which means there is a race condition. It occurs due\nto the incorrect order of actions in the streamzap_disconnect() function:\nrc_unregister_device() is called before usb_kill_urb(). The dev-\u0026gt;raw\npointer is freed and set to NULL in rc_unregister_device(), and only\nafter that usb_kill_urb() waits for in-progress requests to finish.\n\nIf rc_unregister_device() is called while streamzap_callback() handler is\nnot finished, this can lead to accessing freed resources. Thus\nrc_unregister_device() should be called after usb_kill_urb().\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-22027)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection\n\nThere is a race condition between session setup and\nksmbd_sessions_deregister. The session can be freed before the connection\nis added to channel list of session.\nThis patch check reference count of session before freeing it.(CVE-2025-22040)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister()\n\nIn multichannel mode, UAF issue can occur in session_deregister\nwhen the second channel sets up a session through the connection of\nthe first channel. session that is freed through the global session\ntable can be accessed again through -\u0026gt;sessions of connection.(CVE-2025-22041)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nacpi: nfit: fix narrowing conversion in acpi_nfit_ctl\n\nSyzkaller has reported a warning in to_nfit_bus_uuid(): \u0026quot;only secondary\nbus families can be translated\u0026quot;. This warning is emited if the argument\nis equal to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_NFIT == 0. Function acpi_nfit_ctl() first\nverifies that a user-provided value call_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family of type u64 is\nnot equal to 0. Then the value is converted to int, and only after that\nis compared to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_MAX. This can lead to passing an invalid\nargument to acpi_nfit_ctl(), if call_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family is non-zero, while\nthe lower 32 bits are zero.\n\nFurthermore, it is best to return EINVAL immediately upon seeing the\ninvalid user input. The WARNING is insufficient to prevent further\nundefined behavior based on other invalid user input.\n\nAll checks of the input value should be applied to the original variable\ncall_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family.\n\n[iweiny: update commit message](CVE-2025-22044)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mm: Fix flush_tlb_range() when used for zapping normal PMDs\n\nOn the following path, flush_tlb_range() can be used for zapping normal\nPMD entries (PMD entries that point to page tables) together with the PTE\nentries in the pointed-to page table:\n\n collapse_pte_mapped_thp\n pmdp_collapse_flush\n flush_tlb_range\n\nThe arm64 version of flush_tlb_range() has a comment describing that it can\nbe used for page table removal, and does not use any last-level\ninvalidation optimizations. Fix the X86 version by making it behave the\nsame way.\n\nCurrently, X86 only uses this information for the following two purposes,\nwhich I think means the issue doesn\u0026apos;t have much impact:\n\n - In native_flush_tlb_multi() for checking if lazy TLB CPUs need to be\n IPI\u0026apos;d to avoid issues with speculative page table walks.\n - In Hyper-V TLB paravirtualization, again for lazy TLB stuff.\n\nThe patch \u0026quot;x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB\u0026quot; which\nis currently under review (see\n\u0026lt;https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230175550.4046587-13-riel@surriel.com/\u0026gt;)\nwould probably be making the impact of this a lot worse.(CVE-2025-22045)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Don\u0026apos;t override subprog\u0026apos;s return value\n\nThe verifier test `calls: div by 0 in subprog` triggers a panic at the\nld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory\naddress returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct\naddress at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).\nBut at commit 73c359d1d356 (\u0026quot;LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values\u0026quot;)\nwe also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).\nFor function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5\nregister. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls\nwhich expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0\nto a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).(CVE-2025-22048)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nspufs: fix gang directory lifetimes\n\nprior to \u0026quot;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks\u0026quot; we used to have\na problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened\ngang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed,\nbut if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and\nkept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we\nended up with a leak.\n\nUnfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way. Dentry of gang\ndirectory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone.\nOne problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir()\nas cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput(). Another bug was\nin the success case - gang creation incremented link count on\nroot directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got\ndestroyed.\n\nFix consists of\n\t* reverting the commit in question\n\t* adding a counter to gang, protected by -\u0026gt;i_rwsem\nof gang directory inode.\n\t* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped\nin both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped\nin spufs_create_context(), provided that it\u0026apos;s not 0.\n\t* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang\ndirectory out when counter reaches zero.(CVE-2025-22072)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: brcmstb: Fix error path after a call to regulator_bulk_get()\n\nIf the regulator_bulk_get() returns an error and no regulators\nare created, we need to set their number to zero.\n\nIf we don\u0026apos;t do this and the PCIe link up fails, a call to the\nregulator_bulk_free() will result in a kernel panic.\n\nWhile at it, print the error value, as we cannot return an error\nupwards as the kernel will WARN() on an error from add_bus().\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log, use comma in the message to match style with\nother similar messages](CVE-2025-22095)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying\n\nPresently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked\nwith JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running\nstress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is\npossible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is\ndestroyed eg:\n\n(umount)\next4_kill_sb\n kill_block_super\n generic_shutdown_super\n sync_filesystem /* commits all txns */\n evict_inodes\n /* might start a new txn */\n ext4_put_super\n\tflush_work(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_sb_upd_work) /* flush the workqueue */\n jbd2_journal_destroy\n journal_kill_thread\n journal-\u0026gt;j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;\n jbd2_journal_commit_transaction\n jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer\n jbd2_journal_bmap\n ext4_journal_bmap\n ext4_map_blocks\n ...\n ext4_inode_error\n ext4_handle_error\n schedule_work(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_sb_upd_work)\n\n /* work queue kicks in */\n update_super_work\n jbd2_journal_start\n start_this_handle\n BUG_ON(journal-\u0026gt;j_flags \u0026amp;\n JBD2_UNMOUNT)\n\nHence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do\na journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just\nfallback to an un-journaled commit.\n\nFurther, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:\n\n 1. Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying\n 2. force a commit and wait for it\n 3. flush pending sb updates\n\nThis sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb\nupdate that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the\njournal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)\n\nAlso, we don\u0026apos;t need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only\ncalled from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.(CVE-2025-22113)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()\n\nThere\u0026apos;s issue as follows:\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172\n\nCPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0\nCall Trace:\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline]\n dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400\n __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560\n kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585\n ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137\n ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896\n ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323\n evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622\n iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline]\n iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline]\n iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758\n ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline]\n ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300\n mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446\n legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611\n vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576\n do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline]\n path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316\n do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514\n do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1\n\nMemory state around the buggy address:\n ffff88807b002f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n ffff88807b002f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n\u0026gt;ffff88807b003000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n ^\n ffff88807b003080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n ffff88807b003100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n\nAbove issue happens as ext4_xattr_delete_inode() isn\u0026apos;t check xattr\nis valid if xattr is in inode.\nTo solve above issue call xattr_check_inode() check if xattr if valid\nin inode. In fact, we can directly verify in ext4_iget_extra_inode(),\nso that there is no divergent verification.(CVE-2025-22121)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0026apos;t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0026apos;s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\u0026quot;md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\u0026quot;)(CVE-2025-22125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error in build_prologue()\n\nVincent reported that running BPF progs with tailcalls on LoongArch\ncauses kernel hard lockup. Debugging the issues shows that the JITed\nimage missing a jirl instruction at the end of the epilogue.\n\nThere are two passes in JIT compiling, the first pass set the flags and\nthe second pass generates JIT code based on those flags. With BPF progs\nmixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls, build_prologue() generates N insns in the\nfirst pass and then generates N+1 insns in the second pass. This makes\nepilogue_offset off by one and we will jump to some unexpected insn and\ncause lockup. Fix this by inserting a nop insn.(CVE-2025-37893)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1464",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:33Z",
"published": "2025-05-09T11:08:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1464"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21948"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21957"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22010"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22027"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22044"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22045"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22048"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22095"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37893"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-58093",
"CVE-2024-58094",
"CVE-2025-21635",
"CVE-2025-21948",
"CVE-2025-21957",
"CVE-2025-21979",
"CVE-2025-22010",
"CVE-2025-22014",
"CVE-2025-22015",
"CVE-2025-22027",
"CVE-2025-22040",
"CVE-2025-22041",
"CVE-2025-22044",
"CVE-2025-22045",
"CVE-2025-22048",
"CVE-2025-22072",
"CVE-2025-22095",
"CVE-2025-22113",
"CVE-2025-22121",
"CVE-2025-22125",
"CVE-2025-37893"
]
}
OESA-2025-2554 (CVE-2022-50306)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-10-31 11:09 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:09 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix potential out of bound read in ext4_fc_replay_scan()
For scan loop must ensure that at least EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN space. If remain space less than EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN which will lead to out of bound read when mounting corrupt file system image. ADD_RANGE/HEAD/TAIL is needed to add extra check when do journal scan, as this three tags will read data during scan, tag length couldn't less than data length which will read.(CVE-2022-50306)
A use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel s netfilter: nf_tables component can be exploited to achieve local privilege escalation.Due to a race condition between nf_tables netlink control plane transaction and nft_set element garbage collection, it is possible to underflow the reference counter causing a use-after-free vulnerability.We recommend upgrading past commit 3e91b0ebd994635df2346353322ac51ce84ce6d8.(CVE-2023-4244)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: multitouch: Correct devm device reference for hidinput input_dev name
Reference the HID device rather than the input device for the devm allocation of the input_dev name. Referencing the input_dev would lead to a use-after-free when the input_dev was unregistered and subsequently fires a uevent that depends on the name. At the point of firing the uevent, the name would be freed by devres management.
Use devm_kasprintf to simplify the logic for allocating memory and formatting the input_dev name string.(CVE-2023-53454)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: Fix deletion race condition
System crash when using debug kernel due to link list corruption. The cause of the link list corruption is due to session deletion was allowed to queue up twice. Here's the internal trace that show the same port was allowed to double queue for deletion on different cpu.
20808683956 015 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 20808683957 027 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1
Move the clearing/setting of deleted flag lock.(CVE-2023-53615)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ses: Fix possible desc_ptr out-of-bounds accesses
Sanitize possible desc_ptr out-of-bounds accesses in ses_enclosure_data_process().(CVE-2023-53675)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFS: Fix a potential data corruption
We must ensure that the subrequests are joined back into the head before we can retransmit a request. If the head was not on the commit lists, because the server wrote it synchronously, we still need to add it back to the retransmission list. Add a call that mirrors the effect of nfs_cancel_remove_inode() for O_DIRECT.(CVE-2023-53711)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: raid1: fix potential OOB in raid1_remove_disk(). If rddev->raid_disk is greater than mddev->raid_disks, there will be an out-of-bounds in raid1_remove_disk(). We have already found similar reports as follows: 1) commit d17f744e883b ("md-raid10: fix KASAN warning") 2) commit 1ebc2cec0b7d ("dm raid: fix KASAN warning in raid5_remove_disk"). Fix this bug by checking whether the "number" variable is valid.(CVE-2023-53722)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is validposix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from thecached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one byone. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to thestarting point.But that s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read outlockless, which leads to the following problem:CPU0 CPU1posix_timer_add() start = sig->posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig->posix_timer_id < 0) start = sig->posix_timer_id; sig->posix_timer_id = 0;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop breaknever happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig->posix_timer_id == start) break;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space ishuge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention ofKCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.(CVE-2023-53728)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid s fd,and get the clk->rwsem read lock, so the error path should releasethe lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid s fd to makethe refcount balance and release the fd related resource.However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting inunbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() beforeget_clock_desc() to fix it, because the ts is not changedafter that.pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socketBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0Read of size 1 at addr ffff888111f322cd by task swapper/0/0CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-dirty #7Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3d0 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0 tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0 tcp_write_timer+0x66/0x170 call_timer_fn+0xfb/0x1d0 __run_timers+0x3f8/0x480 run_timer_softirq+0x9b/0x100 handle_softirqs+0x153/0x390 __irq_exit_rcu+0x103/0x120 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20Code: 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 66 90 0f 00 2d 33 f8 25 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90RSP: 0018:ffffffffa2007e28 EFLAGS: 00000242RAX: 00000000000f3b31 RBX: 1ffffffff4400fc7 RCX: ffffffffa09c3196RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff9f00590fRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102360835dR10: ffff88811b041aeb R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000R13: ffffffffa202d7c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000147d0 default_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x1af/0x1f0 do_idle+0xbc/0x130 cpu_startup_entry+0x33/0x40 rest_init+0x11f/0x210 start_kernel+0x39a/0x420 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x97/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 </TASK>Allocated by task 595: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x87/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x12b/0x3f0 copy_net_ns+0x94/0x380 create_new_namespaces+0x24c/0x500 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x75/0xf0 ksys_unshare+0x24e/0x4f0 __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7eFreed by task 100: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x54/0x70 kmem_cache_free+0x156/0x5d0 cleanup_net+0x5d3/0x670 process_one_work+0x776/0xa90 worker_thread+0x2e2/0x560 kthread+0x1a8/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30Reproduction script:mkdir -p /mnt/nfssharemkdir -p /mnt/nfs/netns_1mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdbmount /dev/sdb /mnt/nfssharesystemctl restart nfs-serverchmod 777 /mnt/nfsshareexportfs -i -o rw,no_root_squash *:/mnt/nfsshareip netns add netns_1ip link add name veth_1_peer type veth peer veth_1ifconfig veth_1_peer 11.11.0.254 upip link set veth_1 netns netns_1ip netns exec netns_1 ifconfig veth_1 11.11.0.1ip netns exec netns_1 /root/iptables -A OUTPUT -d 11.11.0.254 -p tcp --tcp-flags FIN FIN -j DROP(note: In my environment, a DESTROY_CLIENTID operation is always sent immediately, breaking the nfs tcp connection.)ip netns exec netns_1 timeout -s 9 300 mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=4.1 11.11.0.254:/mnt/nfsshare /mnt/nfs/netns_1ip netns del netns_1The reason here is that the tcp socket in netns_1 (nfs side) has beenshutdown and closed (done in xs_destroy), but the FIN message (with ack)is discarded, and the nfsd side keeps sending retransmission messages.As a result, when the tcp sock in netns_1 processes the received message,it sends the message (FIN message) in the sending queue, and the tcp timeris re-established. When the network namespace is deleted, the net structureaccessed by tcp s timer handler function causes problems.To fix this problem, let s hold netns refcnt for the tcp kernel socket asdone in other modules. This is an ugly hack which can easily be backportedto earlier kernels. A proper fix which cleans up the interfaces willfollow, but may not be so easy to backport.(CVE-2024-53168)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capabilityThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden fromthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with IDgreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionallychosen to be hidden from the user.Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the NextCapability Offset field of the previous capability so it points to thecapability after the one that should be hidden.The special case where the first capability in the list should be hiddenis handled differently because there is no previous capability that canbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroedwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability andleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not doneproperly if the capability is unknown, as structvfio_pci_core_device->pci_config_map is set to the capability ID duringinitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later whenused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] andto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greaterthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for directread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id canexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, whichare already checked before).[1]WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1(snip)Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2024-53214)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sockobject. If ieee802154_create() fails later, the allocated sk object isfreed, but the dangling pointer remains in the provided sock object, whichmay allow use-after-free.Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56602)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length checkFix the MST sideband message body length check, which must be at least 1byte accounting for the message body CRC (aka message data CRC) at theend of the message.This fixes a case where an MST branch device returns a header with acorrect header CRC (indicating a correctly received body length), withthe body length being incorrectly set to 0. This will later lead to amemory corruption in drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() and the followingerrors in dmesg: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:786:25 index -1 is out of range for type u8 [48] Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x33d/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 18446744073709551615) of single field &msg->msg[msg->curlen] at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:791 (size 256) Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x324/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 drm_display_helper
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: at91: call input_free_device() on allocated iio_devCurrent implementation of at91_ts_register() calls input_free_deivce()on st->ts_input, however, the err label can be reached before theallocated iio_dev is stored to st->ts_input. Thus callinput_free_device() on input instead of st->ts_input.(CVE-2024-57904)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: ti-ads8688: fix information leak in triggered bufferThe buffer local array is used to push data to user space from atriggered buffer, but it does not set values for inactive channels, asit only uses iio_for_each_active_channel() to assign new values.Initialize the array to zero before using it to avoid pushinguninitialized information to userspace.(CVE-2024-57906)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:selinux: ignore unknown extended permissionsWhen evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions insteadof calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can beadded without interfering with older kernels.(CVE-2024-57931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_tableThe function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the returnvalue of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails toretrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced.Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.In practice this should never happen as this code only gets calledon polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present onthose chips.(CVE-2024-58052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link->downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.kwilczynski: commit log
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call invalidates packet pointers.
Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for global sub-programs, such that the following program could be rejected:
int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0);
return 0;
}
SEC("tc")
int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
... make p valid ...
tail_call(sk);
*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
...
}
The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bitsOn 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writingto an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21665)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:partitions: mac: fix handling of bogus partition tableFix several issues in partition probing: - The bailout for a bad partoffset must use put_dev_sector(), since the preceding read_part_sector() succeeded. - If the partition table claims a silly sector size like 0xfff bytes (which results in partition table entries straddling sector boundaries), bail out instead of accessing out-of-bounds memory. - We must not assume that the partition table contains proper NUL termination - use strnlen() and strncmp() instead of strlen() and strcmp().(CVE-2025-21772)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: fix oops when unload drivers paralleling
When unload hclge driver, it tries to disable sriov first for each ae_dev node from hnae3_ae_dev_list. If user unloads hns3 driver at the time, because it removes all the ae_dev nodes, and it may cause oops.
But we can't simply use hnae3_common_lock for this. Because in the process flow of pci_disable_sriov(), it will trigger the remove flow of VF, which will also take hnae3_common_lock.
To fixes it, introduce a new mutex to protect the unload process.(CVE-2025-21802)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sctp: detect and prevent references to a freed transport in sendmsg
sctp_sendmsg() re-uses associations and transports when possible by doing a lookup based on the socket endpoint and the message destination address, and then sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() sets the selected transport in all the message chunks to be sent.
There's a possible race condition if another thread triggers the removal of that selected transport, for instance, by explicitly unbinding an address with setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM), after the chunks have been set up and before the message is sent. This can happen if the send buffer is full, during the period when the sender thread temporarily releases the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf().
This causes the access to the transport data in sctp_outq_select_transport(), when the association outqueue is flushed, to result in a use-after-free read.
This change avoids this scenario by having sctp_transport_free() signal the freeing of the transport, tagging it as "dead". In order to do this, the patch restores the "dead" bit in struct sctp_transport, which was removed in commit 47faa1e4c50e ("sctp: remove the dead field of sctp_transport").
Then, in the scenario where the sender thread has released the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(), the bit is checked again after re-acquiring the socket lock to detect the deletion. This is done while holding a reference to the transport to prevent it from being freed in the process.
If the transport was deleted while the socket lock was relinquished, sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() will return -EAGAIN to let userspace retry the send.
The bug was found by a private syzbot instance (see the error report [1] and the C reproducer that triggers it [2]).(CVE-2025-23142)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: hfsc: Fix a potential UAF in hfsc_dequeue() too
Similarly to the previous patch, we need to safe guard hfsc_dequeue() too. But for this one, we don't have a reliable reproducer.(CVE-2025-37823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc
As described in Gerrard's report [1], there are use cases where a netem child qdisc will make the parent qdisc's enqueue callback reentrant. In the case of drr, there won't be a UAF, but the code will add the same classifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.
In addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before adding to the list to cover for the reentrant case.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: Flush gso_skb list too during ->change()
Previously, when reducing a qdisc's limit via the ->change() operation, only the main skb queue was trimmed, potentially leaving packets in the gso_skb list. This could result in NULL pointer dereference when we only check sch->limit against sch->q.qlen.
This patch introduces a new helper, qdisc_dequeue_internal(), which ensures both the gso_skb list and the main queue are properly flushed when trimming excess packets. All relevant qdiscs (codel, fq, fq_codel, fq_pie, hhf, pie) are updated to use this helper in their ->change() routines.(CVE-2025-37992)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm()
Lei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check the return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could race with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That could later lead to a UAF.
Fix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an extant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no confirmed client found at all.
In the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and return the result from get_client_locked().(CVE-2025-38724)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2025-39898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf->ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)
In the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the target_lu_gp_members_show function in target_core_configfs.c. The vulnerability arises from the usage of snprintf to write into the buffer "buf" without checking the return value length. When the total formatted string length exceeds LU_GROUP_NAME_BUF (256 bytes), it may cause a buffer overflow. Since snprintf() returns the total number of bytes that would have been written, this value may exceed the buffer length (256 bytes) passed to memcpy(), ultimately causing the memcpy function to report a buffer overflow error. Adding an additional check of the return value of snprintf() can avoid this buffer overflow.(CVE-2025-39998)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix potential out of bound read in ext4_fc_replay_scan()\n\nFor scan loop must ensure that at least EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN space. If remain\nspace less than EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN which will lead to out of bound read\nwhen mounting corrupt file system image.\nADD_RANGE/HEAD/TAIL is needed to add extra check when do journal scan, as this\nthree tags will read data during scan, tag length couldn\u0026apos;t less than data length\nwhich will read.(CVE-2022-50306)\n\nA use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel s netfilter: nf_tables component can be exploited to achieve local privilege escalation.Due to a race condition between nf_tables netlink control plane transaction and nft_set element garbage collection, it is possible to underflow the reference counter causing a use-after-free vulnerability.We recommend upgrading past commit 3e91b0ebd994635df2346353322ac51ce84ce6d8.(CVE-2023-4244)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: multitouch: Correct devm device reference for hidinput input_dev name\n\nReference the HID device rather than the input device for the devm\nallocation of the input_dev name. Referencing the input_dev would lead to a\nuse-after-free when the input_dev was unregistered and subsequently fires a\nuevent that depends on the name. At the point of firing the uevent, the\nname would be freed by devres management.\n\nUse devm_kasprintf to simplify the logic for allocating memory and\nformatting the input_dev name string.(CVE-2023-53454)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: qla2xxx: Fix deletion race condition\n\nSystem crash when using debug kernel due to link list corruption. The cause\nof the link list corruption is due to session deletion was allowed to queue\nup twice. Here\u0026apos;s the internal trace that show the same port was allowed to\ndouble queue for deletion on different cpu.\n\n20808683956 015 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1\n20808683957 027 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1\n\nMove the clearing/setting of deleted flag lock.(CVE-2023-53615)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: ses: Fix possible desc_ptr out-of-bounds accesses\n\nSanitize possible desc_ptr out-of-bounds accesses in\nses_enclosure_data_process().(CVE-2023-53675)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFS: Fix a potential data corruption\n\nWe must ensure that the subrequests are joined back into the head before we can retransmit a request. If the head was not on the commit lists, because the server wrote it synchronously, we still need to add it back to the retransmission list.\nAdd a call that mirrors the effect of nfs_cancel_remove_inode() for O_DIRECT.(CVE-2023-53711)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: raid1: fix potential OOB in raid1_remove_disk(). If rddev-\u0026gt;raid_disk is greater than mddev-\u0026gt;raid_disks, there will be an out-of-bounds in raid1_remove_disk(). We have already found similar reports as follows: 1) commit d17f744e883b (\u0026quot;md-raid10: fix KASAN warning\u0026quot;) 2) commit 1ebc2cec0b7d (\u0026quot;dm raid: fix KASAN warning in raid5_remove_disk\u0026quot;). Fix this bug by checking whether the \u0026quot;number\u0026quot; variable is valid.(CVE-2023-53722)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is validposix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from thecached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one byone. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to thestarting point.But that s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read outlockless, which leads to the following problem:CPU0 CPU1posix_timer_add() start = sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id \u0026lt; 0) start = sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id; sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id = 0;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop breaknever happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id == start) break;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space ishuge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention ofKCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.(CVE-2023-53728)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid s fd,and get the clk-\u0026gt;rwsem read lock, so the error path should releasethe lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid s fd to makethe refcount balance and release the fd related resource.However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting inunbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() beforeget_clock_desc() to fix it, because the ts is not changedafter that.[pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo](CVE-2024-50210)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socketBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0Read of size 1 at addr ffff888111f322cd by task swapper/0/0CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-dirty #7Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1Call Trace: \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt; dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3d0 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0 tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0 tcp_write_timer+0x66/0x170 call_timer_fn+0xfb/0x1d0 __run_timers+0x3f8/0x480 run_timer_softirq+0x9b/0x100 handle_softirqs+0x153/0x390 __irq_exit_rcu+0x103/0x120 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90 \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt; \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20Code: 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 66 90 0f 00 2d 33 f8 25 00 fb f4 \u0026lt;fa\u0026gt; c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90RSP: 0018:ffffffffa2007e28 EFLAGS: 00000242RAX: 00000000000f3b31 RBX: 1ffffffff4400fc7 RCX: ffffffffa09c3196RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff9f00590fRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102360835dR10: ffff88811b041aeb R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000R13: ffffffffa202d7c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000147d0 default_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x1af/0x1f0 do_idle+0xbc/0x130 cpu_startup_entry+0x33/0x40 rest_init+0x11f/0x210 start_kernel+0x39a/0x420 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x97/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;Allocated by task 595: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x87/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x12b/0x3f0 copy_net_ns+0x94/0x380 create_new_namespaces+0x24c/0x500 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x75/0xf0 ksys_unshare+0x24e/0x4f0 __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7eFreed by task 100: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x54/0x70 kmem_cache_free+0x156/0x5d0 cleanup_net+0x5d3/0x670 process_one_work+0x776/0xa90 worker_thread+0x2e2/0x560 kthread+0x1a8/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30Reproduction script:mkdir -p /mnt/nfssharemkdir -p /mnt/nfs/netns_1mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdbmount /dev/sdb /mnt/nfssharesystemctl restart nfs-serverchmod 777 /mnt/nfsshareexportfs -i -o rw,no_root_squash *:/mnt/nfsshareip netns add netns_1ip link add name veth_1_peer type veth peer veth_1ifconfig veth_1_peer 11.11.0.254 upip link set veth_1 netns netns_1ip netns exec netns_1 ifconfig veth_1 11.11.0.1ip netns exec netns_1 /root/iptables -A OUTPUT -d 11.11.0.254 -p tcp --tcp-flags FIN FIN -j DROP(note: In my environment, a DESTROY_CLIENTID operation is always sent immediately, breaking the nfs tcp connection.)ip netns exec netns_1 timeout -s 9 300 mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=4.1 11.11.0.254:/mnt/nfsshare /mnt/nfs/netns_1ip netns del netns_1The reason here is that the tcp socket in netns_1 (nfs side) has beenshutdown and closed (done in xs_destroy), but the FIN message (with ack)is discarded, and the nfsd side keeps sending retransmission messages.As a result, when the tcp sock in netns_1 processes the received message,it sends the message (FIN message) in the sending queue, and the tcp timeris re-established. When the network namespace is deleted, the net structureaccessed by tcp s timer handler function causes problems.To fix this problem, let s hold netns refcnt for the tcp kernel socket asdone in other modules. This is an ugly hack which can easily be backportedto earlier kernels. A proper fix which cleans up the interfaces willfollow, but may not be so easy to backport.(CVE-2024-53168)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capabilityThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden fromthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with IDgreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionallychosen to be hidden from the user.Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the NextCapability Offset field of the previous capability so it points to thecapability after the one that should be hidden.The special case where the first capability in the list should be hiddenis handled differently because there is no previous capability that canbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroedwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability andleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not doneproperly if the capability is unknown, as structvfio_pci_core_device-\u0026gt;pci_config_map is set to the capability ID duringinitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later whenused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] andto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greaterthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for directread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id canexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, whichare already checked before).[1]WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1(snip)Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2024-53214)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sockobject. If ieee802154_create() fails later, the allocated sk object isfreed, but the dangling pointer remains in the provided sock object, whichmay allow use-after-free.Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56602)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length checkFix the MST sideband message body length check, which must be at least 1byte accounting for the message body CRC (aka message data CRC) at theend of the message.This fixes a case where an MST branch device returns a header with acorrect header CRC (indicating a correctly received body length), withthe body length being incorrectly set to 0. This will later lead to amemory corruption in drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() and the followingerrors in dmesg: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:786:25 index -1 is out of range for type u8 [48] Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x33d/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 18446744073709551615) of single field \u0026amp;msg-\u0026gt;msg[msg-\u0026gt;curlen] at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:791 (size 256) Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x324/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper](CVE-2024-56616)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: at91: call input_free_device() on allocated iio_devCurrent implementation of at91_ts_register() calls input_free_deivce()on st-\u0026gt;ts_input, however, the err label can be reached before theallocated iio_dev is stored to st-\u0026gt;ts_input. Thus callinput_free_device() on input instead of st-\u0026gt;ts_input.(CVE-2024-57904)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: ti-ads8688: fix information leak in triggered bufferThe buffer local array is used to push data to user space from atriggered buffer, but it does not set values for inactive channels, asit only uses iio_for_each_active_channel() to assign new values.Initialize the array to zero before using it to avoid pushinguninitialized information to userspace.(CVE-2024-57906)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:selinux: ignore unknown extended permissionsWhen evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions insteadof calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can beadded without interfering with older kernels.(CVE-2024-57931)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_tableThe function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the returnvalue of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails toretrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced.Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.In practice this should never happen as this code only gets calledon polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present onthose chips.(CVE-2024-58052)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link-\u0026gt;downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers\n\nTail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate\npacket pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call\ninvalidates packet pointers.\n\nMaking the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes\nuse of check_cfg() logic that computes \u0026apos;changes_pkt_data\u0026apos; effect for\nglobal sub-programs, such that the following program could be\nrejected:\n\n int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)\n {\n \tbpf_tail_call_static(sk, \u0026amp;jmp_table, 0);\n \treturn 0;\n }\n\n SEC(\u0026quot;tc\u0026quot;)\n int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)\n {\n \tint *p = (void *)(long)sk-\u0026gt;data;\n \t... make p valid ...\n \ttail_call(sk);\n \t*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */\n \t...\n }\n\nThe tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that\ncan invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can\u0026apos;t be freplaced with\ntailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bitsOn 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writingto an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21665)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:partitions: mac: fix handling of bogus partition tableFix several issues in partition probing: - The bailout for a bad partoffset must use put_dev_sector(), since the preceding read_part_sector() succeeded. - If the partition table claims a silly sector size like 0xfff bytes (which results in partition table entries straddling sector boundaries), bail out instead of accessing out-of-bounds memory. - We must not assume that the partition table contains proper NUL termination - use strnlen() and strncmp() instead of strlen() and strcmp().(CVE-2025-21772)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: hns3: fix oops when unload drivers paralleling\n\nWhen unload hclge driver, it tries to disable sriov first for each\nae_dev node from hnae3_ae_dev_list. If user unloads hns3 driver at\nthe time, because it removes all the ae_dev nodes, and it may cause\noops.\n\nBut we can\u0026apos;t simply use hnae3_common_lock for this. Because in the\nprocess flow of pci_disable_sriov(), it will trigger the remove flow\nof VF, which will also take hnae3_common_lock.\n\nTo fixes it, introduce a new mutex to protect the unload process.(CVE-2025-21802)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsctp: detect and prevent references to a freed transport in sendmsg\n\nsctp_sendmsg() re-uses associations and transports when possible by\ndoing a lookup based on the socket endpoint and the message destination\naddress, and then sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() sets the selected transport in\nall the message chunks to be sent.\n\nThere\u0026apos;s a possible race condition if another thread triggers the removal\nof that selected transport, for instance, by explicitly unbinding an\naddress with setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM), after the chunks have\nbeen set up and before the message is sent. This can happen if the send\nbuffer is full, during the period when the sender thread temporarily\nreleases the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf().\n\nThis causes the access to the transport data in\nsctp_outq_select_transport(), when the association outqueue is flushed,\nto result in a use-after-free read.\n\nThis change avoids this scenario by having sctp_transport_free() signal\nthe freeing of the transport, tagging it as \u0026quot;dead\u0026quot;. In order to do this,\nthe patch restores the \u0026quot;dead\u0026quot; bit in struct sctp_transport, which was\nremoved in\ncommit 47faa1e4c50e (\u0026quot;sctp: remove the dead field of sctp_transport\u0026quot;).\n\nThen, in the scenario where the sender thread has released the socket\nlock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(), the bit is checked again after\nre-acquiring the socket lock to detect the deletion. This is done while\nholding a reference to the transport to prevent it from being freed in\nthe process.\n\nIf the transport was deleted while the socket lock was relinquished,\nsctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() will return -EAGAIN to let userspace retry the\nsend.\n\nThe bug was found by a private syzbot instance (see the error report [1]\nand the C reproducer that triggers it [2]).(CVE-2025-23142)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: hfsc: Fix a potential UAF in hfsc_dequeue() too\n\nSimilarly to the previous patch, we need to safe guard hfsc_dequeue()\ntoo. But for this one, we don\u0026apos;t have a reliable reproducer.(CVE-2025-37823)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc\n\nAs described in Gerrard\u0026apos;s report [1], there are use cases where a netem\nchild qdisc will make the parent qdisc\u0026apos;s enqueue callback reentrant.\nIn the case of drr, there won\u0026apos;t be a UAF, but the code will add the same\nclassifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.\n\nIn addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the\nclass was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before adding\nto the list to cover for the reentrant case.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37915)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: Flush gso_skb list too during -\u0026gt;change()\n\nPreviously, when reducing a qdisc\u0026apos;s limit via the -\u0026gt;change() operation, only\nthe main skb queue was trimmed, potentially leaving packets in the gso_skb\nlist. This could result in NULL pointer dereference when we only check\nsch-\u0026gt;limit against sch-\u0026gt;q.qlen.\n\nThis patch introduces a new helper, qdisc_dequeue_internal(), which ensures\nboth the gso_skb list and the main queue are properly flushed when trimming\nexcess packets. All relevant qdiscs (codel, fq, fq_codel, fq_pie, hhf, pie)\nare updated to use this helper in their -\u0026gt;change() routines.(CVE-2025-37992)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm()\n\nLei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check\nthe return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could\nrace with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That\ncould later lead to a UAF.\n\nFix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an\nextant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no\nconfirmed client found at all.\n\nIn the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and\nreturn the result from get_client_locked().(CVE-2025-38724)\n\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2025-39898)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf-\u0026gt;ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the target_lu_gp_members_show function in target_core_configfs.c. The vulnerability arises from the usage of snprintf to write into the buffer \u0026quot;buf\u0026quot; without checking the return value length. When the total formatted string length exceeds LU_GROUP_NAME_BUF (256 bytes), it may cause a buffer overflow. Since snprintf() returns the total number of bytes that would have been written, this value may exceed the buffer length (256 bytes) passed to memcpy(), ultimately causing the memcpy function to report a buffer overflow error. Adding an additional check of the return value of snprintf() can avoid this buffer overflow.(CVE-2025-39998)",
"id": "OESA-2025-2554",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:09:38Z",
"published": "2025-10-31T11:09:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2554"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50306"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53454"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53615"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53675"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53711"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53722"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53728"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50210"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56616"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57904"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57906"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21665"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21772"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21802"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23142"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37992"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38724"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39998"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-50306",
"CVE-2023-4244",
"CVE-2023-53454",
"CVE-2023-53615",
"CVE-2023-53675",
"CVE-2023-53711",
"CVE-2023-53722",
"CVE-2023-53728",
"CVE-2024-50210",
"CVE-2024-53168",
"CVE-2024-53214",
"CVE-2024-56602",
"CVE-2024-56616",
"CVE-2024-57904",
"CVE-2024-57906",
"CVE-2024-57931",
"CVE-2024-58052",
"CVE-2024-58093",
"CVE-2024-58237",
"CVE-2025-21665",
"CVE-2025-21772",
"CVE-2025-21802",
"CVE-2025-23142",
"CVE-2025-37823",
"CVE-2025-37915",
"CVE-2025-37992",
"CVE-2025-38724",
"CVE-2025-39898",
"CVE-2025-39971",
"CVE-2025-39998"
]
}
OESA-2025-2555 (CVE-2022-50306)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-10-31 11:09 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:09 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix potential out of bound read in ext4_fc_replay_scan()
For scan loop must ensure that at least EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN space. If remain space less than EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN which will lead to out of bound read when mounting corrupt file system image. ADD_RANGE/HEAD/TAIL is needed to add extra check when do journal scan, as this three tags will read data during scan, tag length couldn't less than data length which will read.(CVE-2022-50306)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is validposix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from thecached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one byone. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to thestarting point.But that s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read outlockless, which leads to the following problem:CPU0 CPU1posix_timer_add() start = sig->posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig->posix_timer_id < 0) start = sig->posix_timer_id; sig->posix_timer_id = 0;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop breaknever happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig->posix_timer_id == start) break;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space ishuge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention ofKCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.(CVE-2023-53728)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid s fd,and get the clk->rwsem read lock, so the error path should releasethe lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid s fd to makethe refcount balance and release the fd related resource.However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting inunbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() beforeget_clock_desc() to fix it, because the ts is not changedafter that.pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socketBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0Read of size 1 at addr ffff888111f322cd by task swapper/0/0CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-dirty #7Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3d0 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0 tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0 tcp_write_timer+0x66/0x170 call_timer_fn+0xfb/0x1d0 __run_timers+0x3f8/0x480 run_timer_softirq+0x9b/0x100 handle_softirqs+0x153/0x390 __irq_exit_rcu+0x103/0x120 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20Code: 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 66 90 0f 00 2d 33 f8 25 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90RSP: 0018:ffffffffa2007e28 EFLAGS: 00000242RAX: 00000000000f3b31 RBX: 1ffffffff4400fc7 RCX: ffffffffa09c3196RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff9f00590fRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102360835dR10: ffff88811b041aeb R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000R13: ffffffffa202d7c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000147d0 default_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x1af/0x1f0 do_idle+0xbc/0x130 cpu_startup_entry+0x33/0x40 rest_init+0x11f/0x210 start_kernel+0x39a/0x420 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x97/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 </TASK>Allocated by task 595: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x87/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x12b/0x3f0 copy_net_ns+0x94/0x380 create_new_namespaces+0x24c/0x500 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x75/0xf0 ksys_unshare+0x24e/0x4f0 __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7eFreed by task 100: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x54/0x70 kmem_cache_free+0x156/0x5d0 cleanup_net+0x5d3/0x670 process_one_work+0x776/0xa90 worker_thread+0x2e2/0x560 kthread+0x1a8/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30Reproduction script:mkdir -p /mnt/nfssharemkdir -p /mnt/nfs/netns_1mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdbmount /dev/sdb /mnt/nfssharesystemctl restart nfs-serverchmod 777 /mnt/nfsshareexportfs -i -o rw,no_root_squash *:/mnt/nfsshareip netns add netns_1ip link add name veth_1_peer type veth peer veth_1ifconfig veth_1_peer 11.11.0.254 upip link set veth_1 netns netns_1ip netns exec netns_1 ifconfig veth_1 11.11.0.1ip netns exec netns_1 /root/iptables -A OUTPUT -d 11.11.0.254 -p tcp --tcp-flags FIN FIN -j DROP(note: In my environment, a DESTROY_CLIENTID operation is always sent immediately, breaking the nfs tcp connection.)ip netns exec netns_1 timeout -s 9 300 mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=4.1 11.11.0.254:/mnt/nfsshare /mnt/nfs/netns_1ip netns del netns_1The reason here is that the tcp socket in netns_1 (nfs side) has beenshutdown and closed (done in xs_destroy), but the FIN message (with ack)is discarded, and the nfsd side keeps sending retransmission messages.As a result, when the tcp sock in netns_1 processes the received message,it sends the message (FIN message) in the sending queue, and the tcp timeris re-established. When the network namespace is deleted, the net structureaccessed by tcp s timer handler function causes problems.To fix this problem, let s hold netns refcnt for the tcp kernel socket asdone in other modules. This is an ugly hack which can easily be backportedto earlier kernels. A proper fix which cleans up the interfaces willfollow, but may not be so easy to backport.(CVE-2024-53168)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capabilityThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden fromthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with IDgreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionallychosen to be hidden from the user.Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the NextCapability Offset field of the previous capability so it points to thecapability after the one that should be hidden.The special case where the first capability in the list should be hiddenis handled differently because there is no previous capability that canbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroedwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability andleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not doneproperly if the capability is unknown, as structvfio_pci_core_device->pci_config_map is set to the capability ID duringinitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later whenused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] andto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greaterthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for directread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id canexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, whichare already checked before).[1]WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1(snip)Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2024-53214)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sockobject. If ieee802154_create() fails later, the allocated sk object isfreed, but the dangling pointer remains in the provided sock object, whichmay allow use-after-free.Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56602)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length checkFix the MST sideband message body length check, which must be at least 1byte accounting for the message body CRC (aka message data CRC) at theend of the message.This fixes a case where an MST branch device returns a header with acorrect header CRC (indicating a correctly received body length), withthe body length being incorrectly set to 0. This will later lead to amemory corruption in drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() and the followingerrors in dmesg: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:786:25 index -1 is out of range for type u8 [48] Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x33d/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 18446744073709551615) of single field &msg->msg[msg->curlen] at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:791 (size 256) Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x324/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 drm_display_helper
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: at91: call input_free_device() on allocated iio_devCurrent implementation of at91_ts_register() calls input_free_deivce()on st->ts_input, however, the err label can be reached before theallocated iio_dev is stored to st->ts_input. Thus callinput_free_device() on input instead of st->ts_input.(CVE-2024-57904)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: ti-ads8688: fix information leak in triggered bufferThe buffer local array is used to push data to user space from atriggered buffer, but it does not set values for inactive channels, asit only uses iio_for_each_active_channel() to assign new values.Initialize the array to zero before using it to avoid pushinguninitialized information to userspace.(CVE-2024-57906)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:selinux: ignore unknown extended permissionsWhen evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions insteadof calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can beadded without interfering with older kernels.(CVE-2024-57931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_tableThe function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the returnvalue of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails toretrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced.Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.In practice this should never happen as this code only gets calledon polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present onthose chips.(CVE-2024-58052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link->downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.kwilczynski: commit log
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call invalidates packet pointers.
Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for global sub-programs, such that the following program could be rejected:
int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0);
return 0;
}
SEC("tc")
int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
... make p valid ...
tail_call(sk);
*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
...
}
The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bitsOn 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writingto an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21665)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:partitions: mac: fix handling of bogus partition tableFix several issues in partition probing: - The bailout for a bad partoffset must use put_dev_sector(), since the preceding read_part_sector() succeeded. - If the partition table claims a silly sector size like 0xfff bytes (which results in partition table entries straddling sector boundaries), bail out instead of accessing out-of-bounds memory. - We must not assume that the partition table contains proper NUL termination - use strnlen() and strncmp() instead of strlen() and strcmp().(CVE-2025-21772)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: fix oops when unload drivers paralleling
When unload hclge driver, it tries to disable sriov first for each ae_dev node from hnae3_ae_dev_list. If user unloads hns3 driver at the time, because it removes all the ae_dev nodes, and it may cause oops.
But we can't simply use hnae3_common_lock for this. Because in the process flow of pci_disable_sriov(), it will trigger the remove flow of VF, which will also take hnae3_common_lock.
To fixes it, introduce a new mutex to protect the unload process.(CVE-2025-21802)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sctp: detect and prevent references to a freed transport in sendmsg
sctp_sendmsg() re-uses associations and transports when possible by doing a lookup based on the socket endpoint and the message destination address, and then sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() sets the selected transport in all the message chunks to be sent.
There's a possible race condition if another thread triggers the removal of that selected transport, for instance, by explicitly unbinding an address with setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM), after the chunks have been set up and before the message is sent. This can happen if the send buffer is full, during the period when the sender thread temporarily releases the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf().
This causes the access to the transport data in sctp_outq_select_transport(), when the association outqueue is flushed, to result in a use-after-free read.
This change avoids this scenario by having sctp_transport_free() signal the freeing of the transport, tagging it as "dead". In order to do this, the patch restores the "dead" bit in struct sctp_transport, which was removed in commit 47faa1e4c50e ("sctp: remove the dead field of sctp_transport").
Then, in the scenario where the sender thread has released the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(), the bit is checked again after re-acquiring the socket lock to detect the deletion. This is done while holding a reference to the transport to prevent it from being freed in the process.
If the transport was deleted while the socket lock was relinquished, sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() will return -EAGAIN to let userspace retry the send.
The bug was found by a private syzbot instance (see the error report [1] and the C reproducer that triggers it [2]).(CVE-2025-23142)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: hfsc: Fix a potential UAF in hfsc_dequeue() too
Similarly to the previous patch, we need to safe guard hfsc_dequeue() too. But for this one, we don't have a reliable reproducer.(CVE-2025-37823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc
As described in Gerrard's report [1], there are use cases where a netem child qdisc will make the parent qdisc's enqueue callback reentrant. In the case of drr, there won't be a UAF, but the code will add the same classifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.
In addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before adding to the list to cover for the reentrant case.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: Flush gso_skb list too during ->change()
Previously, when reducing a qdisc's limit via the ->change() operation, only the main skb queue was trimmed, potentially leaving packets in the gso_skb list. This could result in NULL pointer dereference when we only check sch->limit against sch->q.qlen.
This patch introduces a new helper, qdisc_dequeue_internal(), which ensures both the gso_skb list and the main queue are properly flushed when trimming excess packets. All relevant qdiscs (codel, fq, fq_codel, fq_pie, hhf, pie) are updated to use this helper in their ->change() routines.(CVE-2025-37992)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm()
Lei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check the return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could race with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That could later lead to a UAF.
Fix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an extant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no confirmed client found at all.
In the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and return the result from get_client_locked().(CVE-2025-38724)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2025-39898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf->ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)
In the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the target_lu_gp_members_show function in target_core_configfs.c. The vulnerability arises from the usage of snprintf to write into the buffer "buf" without checking the return value length. When the total formatted string length exceeds LU_GROUP_NAME_BUF (256 bytes), it may cause a buffer overflow. Since snprintf() returns the total number of bytes that would have been written, this value may exceed the buffer length (256 bytes) passed to memcpy(), ultimately causing the memcpy function to report a buffer overflow error. Adding an additional check of the return value of snprintf() can avoid this buffer overflow.(CVE-2025-39998)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix potential out of bound read in ext4_fc_replay_scan()\n\nFor scan loop must ensure that at least EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN space. If remain\nspace less than EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN which will lead to out of bound read\nwhen mounting corrupt file system image.\nADD_RANGE/HEAD/TAIL is needed to add extra check when do journal scan, as this\nthree tags will read data during scan, tag length couldn\u0026apos;t less than data length\nwhich will read.(CVE-2022-50306)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is validposix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from thecached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one byone. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to thestarting point.But that s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read outlockless, which leads to the following problem:CPU0 CPU1posix_timer_add() start = sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id \u0026lt; 0) start = sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id; sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id = 0;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop breaknever happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id == start) break;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space ishuge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention ofKCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.(CVE-2023-53728)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid s fd,and get the clk-\u0026gt;rwsem read lock, so the error path should releasethe lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid s fd to makethe refcount balance and release the fd related resource.However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting inunbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() beforeget_clock_desc() to fix it, because the ts is not changedafter that.[pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo](CVE-2024-50210)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socketBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0Read of size 1 at addr ffff888111f322cd by task swapper/0/0CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-dirty #7Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1Call Trace: \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt; dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3d0 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0 tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0 tcp_write_timer+0x66/0x170 call_timer_fn+0xfb/0x1d0 __run_timers+0x3f8/0x480 run_timer_softirq+0x9b/0x100 handle_softirqs+0x153/0x390 __irq_exit_rcu+0x103/0x120 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90 \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt; \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20Code: 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 66 90 0f 00 2d 33 f8 25 00 fb f4 \u0026lt;fa\u0026gt; c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90RSP: 0018:ffffffffa2007e28 EFLAGS: 00000242RAX: 00000000000f3b31 RBX: 1ffffffff4400fc7 RCX: ffffffffa09c3196RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff9f00590fRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102360835dR10: ffff88811b041aeb R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000R13: ffffffffa202d7c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000147d0 default_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x1af/0x1f0 do_idle+0xbc/0x130 cpu_startup_entry+0x33/0x40 rest_init+0x11f/0x210 start_kernel+0x39a/0x420 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x97/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;Allocated by task 595: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x87/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x12b/0x3f0 copy_net_ns+0x94/0x380 create_new_namespaces+0x24c/0x500 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x75/0xf0 ksys_unshare+0x24e/0x4f0 __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7eFreed by task 100: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x54/0x70 kmem_cache_free+0x156/0x5d0 cleanup_net+0x5d3/0x670 process_one_work+0x776/0xa90 worker_thread+0x2e2/0x560 kthread+0x1a8/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30Reproduction script:mkdir -p /mnt/nfssharemkdir -p /mnt/nfs/netns_1mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdbmount /dev/sdb /mnt/nfssharesystemctl restart nfs-serverchmod 777 /mnt/nfsshareexportfs -i -o rw,no_root_squash *:/mnt/nfsshareip netns add netns_1ip link add name veth_1_peer type veth peer veth_1ifconfig veth_1_peer 11.11.0.254 upip link set veth_1 netns netns_1ip netns exec netns_1 ifconfig veth_1 11.11.0.1ip netns exec netns_1 /root/iptables -A OUTPUT -d 11.11.0.254 -p tcp --tcp-flags FIN FIN -j DROP(note: In my environment, a DESTROY_CLIENTID operation is always sent immediately, breaking the nfs tcp connection.)ip netns exec netns_1 timeout -s 9 300 mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=4.1 11.11.0.254:/mnt/nfsshare /mnt/nfs/netns_1ip netns del netns_1The reason here is that the tcp socket in netns_1 (nfs side) has beenshutdown and closed (done in xs_destroy), but the FIN message (with ack)is discarded, and the nfsd side keeps sending retransmission messages.As a result, when the tcp sock in netns_1 processes the received message,it sends the message (FIN message) in the sending queue, and the tcp timeris re-established. When the network namespace is deleted, the net structureaccessed by tcp s timer handler function causes problems.To fix this problem, let s hold netns refcnt for the tcp kernel socket asdone in other modules. This is an ugly hack which can easily be backportedto earlier kernels. A proper fix which cleans up the interfaces willfollow, but may not be so easy to backport.(CVE-2024-53168)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capabilityThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden fromthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with IDgreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionallychosen to be hidden from the user.Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the NextCapability Offset field of the previous capability so it points to thecapability after the one that should be hidden.The special case where the first capability in the list should be hiddenis handled differently because there is no previous capability that canbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroedwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability andleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not doneproperly if the capability is unknown, as structvfio_pci_core_device-\u0026gt;pci_config_map is set to the capability ID duringinitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later whenused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] andto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greaterthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for directread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id canexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, whichare already checked before).[1]WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1(snip)Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2024-53214)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sockobject. If ieee802154_create() fails later, the allocated sk object isfreed, but the dangling pointer remains in the provided sock object, whichmay allow use-after-free.Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56602)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length checkFix the MST sideband message body length check, which must be at least 1byte accounting for the message body CRC (aka message data CRC) at theend of the message.This fixes a case where an MST branch device returns a header with acorrect header CRC (indicating a correctly received body length), withthe body length being incorrectly set to 0. This will later lead to amemory corruption in drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() and the followingerrors in dmesg: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:786:25 index -1 is out of range for type u8 [48] Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x33d/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 18446744073709551615) of single field \u0026amp;msg-\u0026gt;msg[msg-\u0026gt;curlen] at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:791 (size 256) Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x324/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper](CVE-2024-56616)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: at91: call input_free_device() on allocated iio_devCurrent implementation of at91_ts_register() calls input_free_deivce()on st-\u0026gt;ts_input, however, the err label can be reached before theallocated iio_dev is stored to st-\u0026gt;ts_input. Thus callinput_free_device() on input instead of st-\u0026gt;ts_input.(CVE-2024-57904)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: ti-ads8688: fix information leak in triggered bufferThe buffer local array is used to push data to user space from atriggered buffer, but it does not set values for inactive channels, asit only uses iio_for_each_active_channel() to assign new values.Initialize the array to zero before using it to avoid pushinguninitialized information to userspace.(CVE-2024-57906)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:selinux: ignore unknown extended permissionsWhen evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions insteadof calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can beadded without interfering with older kernels.(CVE-2024-57931)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_tableThe function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the returnvalue of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails toretrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced.Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.In practice this should never happen as this code only gets calledon polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present onthose chips.(CVE-2024-58052)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link-\u0026gt;downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers\n\nTail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate\npacket pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call\ninvalidates packet pointers.\n\nMaking the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes\nuse of check_cfg() logic that computes \u0026apos;changes_pkt_data\u0026apos; effect for\nglobal sub-programs, such that the following program could be\nrejected:\n\n int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)\n {\n \tbpf_tail_call_static(sk, \u0026amp;jmp_table, 0);\n \treturn 0;\n }\n\n SEC(\u0026quot;tc\u0026quot;)\n int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)\n {\n \tint *p = (void *)(long)sk-\u0026gt;data;\n \t... make p valid ...\n \ttail_call(sk);\n \t*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */\n \t...\n }\n\nThe tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that\ncan invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can\u0026apos;t be freplaced with\ntailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bitsOn 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writingto an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21665)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:partitions: mac: fix handling of bogus partition tableFix several issues in partition probing: - The bailout for a bad partoffset must use put_dev_sector(), since the preceding read_part_sector() succeeded. - If the partition table claims a silly sector size like 0xfff bytes (which results in partition table entries straddling sector boundaries), bail out instead of accessing out-of-bounds memory. - We must not assume that the partition table contains proper NUL termination - use strnlen() and strncmp() instead of strlen() and strcmp().(CVE-2025-21772)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: hns3: fix oops when unload drivers paralleling\n\nWhen unload hclge driver, it tries to disable sriov first for each\nae_dev node from hnae3_ae_dev_list. If user unloads hns3 driver at\nthe time, because it removes all the ae_dev nodes, and it may cause\noops.\n\nBut we can\u0026apos;t simply use hnae3_common_lock for this. Because in the\nprocess flow of pci_disable_sriov(), it will trigger the remove flow\nof VF, which will also take hnae3_common_lock.\n\nTo fixes it, introduce a new mutex to protect the unload process.(CVE-2025-21802)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsctp: detect and prevent references to a freed transport in sendmsg\n\nsctp_sendmsg() re-uses associations and transports when possible by\ndoing a lookup based on the socket endpoint and the message destination\naddress, and then sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() sets the selected transport in\nall the message chunks to be sent.\n\nThere\u0026apos;s a possible race condition if another thread triggers the removal\nof that selected transport, for instance, by explicitly unbinding an\naddress with setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM), after the chunks have\nbeen set up and before the message is sent. This can happen if the send\nbuffer is full, during the period when the sender thread temporarily\nreleases the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf().\n\nThis causes the access to the transport data in\nsctp_outq_select_transport(), when the association outqueue is flushed,\nto result in a use-after-free read.\n\nThis change avoids this scenario by having sctp_transport_free() signal\nthe freeing of the transport, tagging it as \u0026quot;dead\u0026quot;. In order to do this,\nthe patch restores the \u0026quot;dead\u0026quot; bit in struct sctp_transport, which was\nremoved in\ncommit 47faa1e4c50e (\u0026quot;sctp: remove the dead field of sctp_transport\u0026quot;).\n\nThen, in the scenario where the sender thread has released the socket\nlock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(), the bit is checked again after\nre-acquiring the socket lock to detect the deletion. This is done while\nholding a reference to the transport to prevent it from being freed in\nthe process.\n\nIf the transport was deleted while the socket lock was relinquished,\nsctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() will return -EAGAIN to let userspace retry the\nsend.\n\nThe bug was found by a private syzbot instance (see the error report [1]\nand the C reproducer that triggers it [2]).(CVE-2025-23142)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: hfsc: Fix a potential UAF in hfsc_dequeue() too\n\nSimilarly to the previous patch, we need to safe guard hfsc_dequeue()\ntoo. But for this one, we don\u0026apos;t have a reliable reproducer.(CVE-2025-37823)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc\n\nAs described in Gerrard\u0026apos;s report [1], there are use cases where a netem\nchild qdisc will make the parent qdisc\u0026apos;s enqueue callback reentrant.\nIn the case of drr, there won\u0026apos;t be a UAF, but the code will add the same\nclassifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.\n\nIn addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the\nclass was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before adding\nto the list to cover for the reentrant case.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37915)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: Flush gso_skb list too during -\u0026gt;change()\n\nPreviously, when reducing a qdisc\u0026apos;s limit via the -\u0026gt;change() operation, only\nthe main skb queue was trimmed, potentially leaving packets in the gso_skb\nlist. This could result in NULL pointer dereference when we only check\nsch-\u0026gt;limit against sch-\u0026gt;q.qlen.\n\nThis patch introduces a new helper, qdisc_dequeue_internal(), which ensures\nboth the gso_skb list and the main queue are properly flushed when trimming\nexcess packets. All relevant qdiscs (codel, fq, fq_codel, fq_pie, hhf, pie)\nare updated to use this helper in their -\u0026gt;change() routines.(CVE-2025-37992)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm()\n\nLei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check\nthe return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could\nrace with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That\ncould later lead to a UAF.\n\nFix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an\nextant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no\nconfirmed client found at all.\n\nIn the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and\nreturn the result from get_client_locked().(CVE-2025-38724)\n\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2025-39898)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf-\u0026gt;ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the target_lu_gp_members_show function in target_core_configfs.c. The vulnerability arises from the usage of snprintf to write into the buffer \u0026quot;buf\u0026quot; without checking the return value length. When the total formatted string length exceeds LU_GROUP_NAME_BUF (256 bytes), it may cause a buffer overflow. Since snprintf() returns the total number of bytes that would have been written, this value may exceed the buffer length (256 bytes) passed to memcpy(), ultimately causing the memcpy function to report a buffer overflow error. Adding an additional check of the return value of snprintf() can avoid this buffer overflow.(CVE-2025-39998)",
"id": "OESA-2025-2555",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:09:38Z",
"published": "2025-10-31T11:09:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2555"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50306"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53728"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50210"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56616"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57904"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57906"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21665"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21772"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21802"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23142"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37992"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38724"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39998"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-50306",
"CVE-2023-53728",
"CVE-2024-50210",
"CVE-2024-53168",
"CVE-2024-53214",
"CVE-2024-56602",
"CVE-2024-56616",
"CVE-2024-57904",
"CVE-2024-57906",
"CVE-2024-57931",
"CVE-2024-58052",
"CVE-2024-58093",
"CVE-2024-58237",
"CVE-2025-21665",
"CVE-2025-21772",
"CVE-2025-21802",
"CVE-2025-23142",
"CVE-2025-37823",
"CVE-2025-37915",
"CVE-2025-37992",
"CVE-2025-38724",
"CVE-2025-39898",
"CVE-2025-39971",
"CVE-2025-39998"
]
}
SUSE-SU-2025:01600-1
Vulnerability from csaf_suse - Published: 2025-05-20 11:49 - Updated: 2025-05-20 11:49Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.