CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14228 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-PGJR-C8R8-WR55
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-03 18:30 – Updated: 2023-02-09 21:30Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in FUEL-CMS 1.4.13 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary code via post ID to /users/delete/2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-36569"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-03T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in FUEL-CMS 1.4.13 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary code via post ID to /users/delete/2.",
"id": "GHSA-pgjr-c8r8-wr55",
"modified": "2023-02-09T21:30:29Z",
"published": "2023-02-03T18:30:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36569"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/daylightstudio/FUEL-CMS/issues/578"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PGJV-446P-P2P9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:16 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:16A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Streama up to and including v1.10.3. The application does not have CSRF checks in place when performing actions such as uploading local files. As a result, attackers could make a logged-in administrator upload arbitrary local files via a CSRF attack and send them to the attacker.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-41764"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-09-29T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Streama up to and including v1.10.3. The application does not have CSRF checks in place when performing actions such as uploading local files. As a result, attackers could make a logged-in administrator upload arbitrary local files via a CSRF attack and send them to the attacker.",
"id": "GHSA-pgjv-446p-p2p9",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:16:01Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:16:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-41764"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/omriinbar/3c741d309e5d0ede29dc7ecdad4eba3f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/omriinbar/8277193731d0edf20ef71299f304ab93"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/streamaserver/streama"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-PGMV-29GQ-3RVV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:44 – Updated: 2024-04-04 00:02Msvod v10 has a CSRF vulnerability to change user information via the admin/member/edit.html URI.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-11375"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-04-20T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Msvod v10 has a CSRF vulnerability to change user information via the admin/member/edit.html URI.",
"id": "GHSA-pgmv-29gq-3rvv",
"modified": "2024-04-04T00:02:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:44:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11375"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46739"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152604/Msvod-10-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.iwantacve.cn/index.php/archives/198"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PGMW-X2P2-4698
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-13 15:30 – Updated: 2025-11-13 15:30A flaw has been found in Fabian Ros/SourceCodester Simple E-Banking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-13119"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-13T15:15:50Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A flaw has been found in Fabian Ros/SourceCodester Simple E-Banking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-pgmw-x2p2-4698",
"modified": "2025-11-13T15:30:31Z",
"published": "2025-11-13T15:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13119"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/i4G5d/CRITICAL-SECURITY-VULNERABILITY-REPORT-CSRF-Forced-Withdrawal"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.332324"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.332324"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.683335"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-PGPC-4XX9-5QRM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-07 06:32 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:33The ViewMedica 9 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.15. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-12291"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-07T05:15:17Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The ViewMedica 9 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.15. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-pgpc-4xx9-5qrm",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:33:47Z",
"published": "2025-01-07T06:32:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12291"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3227785%40viewmedica\u0026new=3227785%40viewmedica\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/viewmedica/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/646ba700-28d5-455f-88de-2864ef8f202c?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PGPJ-V85Q-H5FM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-19 15:27 – Updated: 2024-10-21 21:06Summary
The pyload API allows any API call to be made using GET requests. Since the session cookie is not set to SameSite: strict, this opens the library up to severe attack possibilities via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. This proof of concept shows how an unauthenticated user could trick the administrator's browser into creating a new admin user.
PoC
We host the following HTML file on an attacker-controlled server.
<html>
<!-- CSRF PoC - generated by Burp Suite Professional -->
<body>
<form action="http://localhost:8000/api/add_user/%22hacker%22,%22hacker%22">
<input type="submit" value="Submit request" />
</form>
<script>
history.pushState('', '', '/');
document.forms[0].submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>
If we now trick an administrator into visiting our malicious page at https://attacker.com/CSRF.html, we see that their browser will make a request to /api/add_user/%22hacker%22,%22hacker%22, adding a new administrator to the pyload application.
The attacker can now authenticate as this newly created administrator user with the username hacker and password hacker.
Impact
Any API call can be made via a CSRF attack by an unauthenticated user.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "pyload-ng"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.5.0b3.dev78"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-22416"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-19T15:27:12Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-18T00:15:38Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe `pyload` API allows any API call to be made using GET requests. Since the session cookie is not set to `SameSite: strict`, this opens the library up to severe attack possibilities via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. This proof of concept shows how an unauthenticated user could trick the administrator\u0027s browser into creating a new admin user.\n\n### PoC\nWe host the following HTML file on an attacker-controlled server.\n```html\n\u003chtml\u003e\n \u003c!-- CSRF PoC - generated by Burp Suite Professional --\u003e\n \u003cbody\u003e\n \u003cform action=\"http://localhost:8000/api/add_user/%22hacker%22,%22hacker%22\"\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit request\" /\u003e\n \u003c/form\u003e\n \u003cscript\u003e\n history.pushState(\u0027\u0027, \u0027\u0027, \u0027/\u0027);\n document.forms[0].submit();\n \u003c/script\u003e\n \u003c/body\u003e\n\u003c/html\u003e\n```\n\nIf we now trick an administrator into visiting our malicious page at `https://attacker.com/CSRF.html`, we see that their browser will make a request to `/api/add_user/%22hacker%22,%22hacker%22`, adding a new administrator to the `pyload` application.\n\n\nThe attacker can now authenticate as this newly created administrator user with the username `hacker` and password `hacker`.\n\n\n### Impact\nAny API call can be made via a CSRF attack by an unauthenticated user.\n",
"id": "GHSA-pgpj-v85q-h5fm",
"modified": "2024-10-21T21:06:20Z",
"published": "2024-01-19T15:27:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload/security/advisories/GHSA-pgpj-v85q-h5fm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22416"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload/commit/1374c824271cb7e927740664d06d2e577624ca3e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload/commit/c7cdc18ad9134a75222974b39e8b427c4af845fc"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/pyload-ng/PYSEC-2024-17.yaml"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-Site Request Forgery on any API call in pyLoad may lead to admin privilege escalation"
}
GHSA-PGQH-GV8F-F5WQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:35 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:35A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections on the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on a targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg88291.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-0210"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-03-08T07:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections on the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on a targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg88291.",
"id": "GHSA-pgqh-gv8f-f5wq",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:35:36Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:35:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0210"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180307-dcnm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103335"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040465"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PGQW-M834-QPV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-09 21:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in spicethemes SpicePress spicepress allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects SpicePress: from n/a through <= 2.3.2.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39621"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T09:16:32Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in spicethemes SpicePress spicepress allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects SpicePress: from n/a through \u003c= 2.3.2.5.",
"id": "GHSA-pgqw-m834-qpv3",
"modified": "2026-04-09T21:31:28Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T09:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39621"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/spicepress/vulnerability/wordpress-spicepress-theme-2-3-2-5-csrf-to-arbitrary-plugin-installation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PGV2-996Q-246F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 21:15 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:46Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CRM Perks Integration for Contact Form 7 and Zoho CRM, Bigin plugin <= 1.2.2 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-25976"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-26T12:15:16Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CRM Perks Integration for Contact Form 7 and Zoho CRM, Bigin plugin \u003c=\u00a01.2.2 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-pgv2-996q-246f",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:46:55Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T21:15:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25976"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/cf7-zoho/wordpress-integration-for-contact-form-7-and-zoho-crm-bigin-plugin-1-2-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PGVW-9Q7P-5VWX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-16 00:00 – Updated: 2022-08-17 00:00The E Unlocked - Student Result WordPress plugin through 1.0.4 is lacking CSRF and validation when uploading the School logo, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin upload arbitrary files, such as PHP via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-2381"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-15T11:21:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The E Unlocked - Student Result WordPress plugin through 1.0.4 is lacking CSRF and validation when uploading the School logo, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin upload arbitrary files, such as PHP via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-pgvw-9q7p-5vwx",
"modified": "2022-08-17T00:00:22Z",
"published": "2022-08-16T00:00:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2381"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c39c41bf-f622-4239-a0a1-4dfe0e079f7f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.