Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-352

Allowed

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

14228 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-PG6H-M56F-Q74P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-15 18:30 – Updated: 2024-11-15 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system.

This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the REST API to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected system to reload. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. 

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-20853"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-15T16:15:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco\u0026nbsp;Expressway Series and Cisco\u0026nbsp;TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system.\n\nThis vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the REST API to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected system to reload.\nCisco\u0026nbsp;has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.\u0026nbsp;",
  "id": "GHSA-pg6h-m56f-q74p",
  "modified": "2024-11-15T18:30:50Z",
  "published": "2024-11-15T18:30:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20853"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-bw-thinrcpt-xss-gSj4CecU"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-cssm-priv-esc-SEjz69dv"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-expressway-csrf-sqpsSfY6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wsa-prv-esc-8PdRU8t8"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-PG6J-C3FC-2FVJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-09 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in George Sexton WordPress Events Calendar Plugin – connectDaily allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects WordPress Events Calendar Plugin – connectDaily: from n/a through 1.4.8.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-32597"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-09T17:15:47Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in George Sexton WordPress Events Calendar Plugin \u2013 connectDaily allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects WordPress Events Calendar Plugin \u2013 connectDaily: from n/a through 1.4.8.",
  "id": "GHSA-pg6j-c3fc-2fvj",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:36Z",
  "published": "2025-04-09T18:30:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32597"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/connect-daily-web-calendar/vulnerability/wordpress-wordpress-events-calendar-plugin-connectdaily-plugin-1-4-8-csrf-to-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-PG7H-R4FR-RGWP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:28
VLAI
Details

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) Data Stewardship, (2) Business Admin, and (3) Product interfaces in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management (MDM) Server 8.5 before 8.5.0.82, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.38, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.35, 10.0 before 10.0.0.0.26, and 10.1 before 10.1.0.0.15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-0873"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-03-16T14:06:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) Data Stewardship, (2) Business Admin, and (3) Product interfaces in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management (MDM) Server 8.5 before 8.5.0.82, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.38, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.35, 10.0 before 10.0.0.0.26, and 10.1 before 10.1.0.0.15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.",
  "id": "GHSA-pg7h-r4fr-rgwp",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:28:04Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:28:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0873"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90994"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21666462"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-PGC6-6QW3-W7JH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-10 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-16 00:00
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was found in CoreHR Core Portal up to 27.0.7. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 27.0.8 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-25064"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-06-09T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in CoreHR Core Portal up to 27.0.7. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 27.0.8 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.",
  "id": "GHSA-pgc6-6qw3-w7jh",
  "modified": "2022-06-16T00:00:23Z",
  "published": "2022-06-10T00:00:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-25064"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.146832"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-PGCC-VFMC-7CW5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-13 23:55 – Updated: 2026-07-13 23:55
VLAI
Summary
Kimai: Login CSRF in Default Team Creation Endpoints Allows Unauthorized Team and Permission Structure Changes
Details

Summary

Kimai 2.56.0 contains authenticated cross-site request forgery issues in its default team creation shortcuts for projects, customers, and activities. These endpoints are exposed through GET routes and directly create or reuse a Team, add the current user as teamlead, and bind the target object to that team.

As a result, an attacker can trick a logged-in user with the required permissions into visiting a malicious page and cause unauthorized changes to team, teamlead, and object-binding relationships. This is a real authorization-structure modification issue rather than a harmless UI shortcut.

Details

The issue affects at least the following routes:

  • GET /en/admin/project/{id}/create_team
  • GET /en/admin/customer/{id}/create_team
  • GET /en/admin/activity/{id}/create_team

Each of these routes is a GET endpoint, yet each performs persistent writes that alter authorization structure:

  • create or reuse a Team
  • add the current user as teamlead
  • bind the target Project, Customer, or Activity to that team

A PoC was provided, but removed for security reasons.

Impact

This vulnerability allows an attacker to remotely alter permission topology while the victim is logged in. A successful exploit can create or reuse a team, assign the victim as its teamlead, and bind a project, customer, or activity to that team without intentional user action.

The pre-requisite is, that the logged-in user already has access to manage permissions of the object in question.

Because these routes modify authorization structure rather than a simple personal preference, the business impact can extend into visibility rules, assignment scope, team-based access control, reporting, and later privilege-expansion chains. This makes the issue materially more serious than a low-value cosmetic CSRF.

Solution

  • The routes have been moved to API POST endpoints

See https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-pgcc-vfmc-7cw5

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.57.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "kimai/kimai"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.58.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-49992"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-13T23:55:01Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nKimai 2.56.0 contains authenticated cross-site request forgery issues in its default team creation shortcuts for projects, customers, and activities. These endpoints are exposed through `GET` routes and directly create or reuse a `Team`, add the current user as teamlead, and bind the target object to that team.\n\nAs a result, an attacker can trick a logged-in user with the required permissions into visiting a malicious page and cause unauthorized changes to team, teamlead, and object-binding relationships. This is a real authorization-structure modification issue rather than a harmless UI shortcut.\n\n### Details\n\nThe issue affects at least the following routes:\n\n- `GET /en/admin/project/{id}/create_team`\n- `GET /en/admin/customer/{id}/create_team`\n- `GET /en/admin/activity/{id}/create_team`\n\nEach of these routes is a `GET` endpoint, yet each performs persistent writes that alter authorization structure:\n\n- create or reuse a `Team`\n- add the current user as `teamlead`\n- bind the target `Project`, `Customer`, or `Activity` to that team\n\n*A PoC was provided, but removed for security reasons.*\n\n### Impact\n\nThis vulnerability allows an attacker to remotely alter permission topology while the victim is logged in. A successful exploit can create or reuse a team, assign the victim as its teamlead, and bind a project, customer, or activity to that team without intentional user action.\n\nThe pre-requisite is, that the logged-in user already has access to manage permissions of the object in question.\n\nBecause these routes modify authorization structure rather than a simple personal preference, the business impact can extend into visibility rules, assignment scope, team-based access control, reporting, and later privilege-expansion chains. This makes the issue materially more serious than a low-value cosmetic CSRF.\n\n## Solution\n\n- The routes have been moved to API `POST` endpoints\n\nSee https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-pgcc-vfmc-7cw5",
  "id": "GHSA-pgcc-vfmc-7cw5",
  "modified": "2026-07-13T23:55:01Z",
  "published": "2026-07-13T23:55:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kimai/kimai/security/advisories/GHSA-pgcc-vfmc-7cw5"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/kimai/kimai"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-pgcc-vfmc-7cw5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": " Kimai: Login CSRF in Default Team Creation Endpoints Allows Unauthorized Team and Permission Structure Changes"
}

GHSA-PGCM-23Q3-R64W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-16 09:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 08:39
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matt McKenny Stout Google Calendar plugin <= 1.2.3 versions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-45273"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-16T09:15:10Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matt McKenny Stout Google Calendar plugin \u003c=\u00a01.2.3 versions.",
  "id": "GHSA-pgcm-23q3-r64w",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T08:39:46Z",
  "published": "2023-10-16T09:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45273"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/stout-google-calendar/wordpress-stout-google-calendar-plugin-1-2-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-PGCX-VFVX-Q6C9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-29 00:01 – Updated: 2022-04-05 00:00
VLAI
Details

The Translate WordPress with GTranslate WordPress plugin before 2.9.9 does not have CSRF check in some files, and write debug data such as user's cookies in a publicly accessible file if a specific parameter is used when requesting them. Combining those two issues, an attacker could gain access to a logged in admin cookies by making them open a malicious link or page

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-0770"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-28T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Translate WordPress with GTranslate WordPress plugin before 2.9.9 does not have CSRF check in some files, and write debug data such as user\u0027s cookies in a publicly accessible file if a specific parameter is used when requesting them. Combining those two issues, an attacker could gain access to a logged in admin cookies by making them open a malicious link or page",
  "id": "GHSA-pgcx-vfvx-q6c9",
  "modified": "2022-04-05T00:00:50Z",
  "published": "2022-03-29T00:01:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0770"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/49abe79c-ab1c-4dbf-824c-8daaac7e079d"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-PGF6-FWMM-QF67

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-23 06:32 – Updated: 2024-11-23 06:32
VLAI
Details

The WP-Orphanage Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wporphanageex_menu_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to escalate the privileges of all orphan accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-11415"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-23T04:15:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The WP-Orphanage Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wporphanageex_menu_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to escalate the privileges of all orphan accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
  "id": "GHSA-pgf6-fwmm-qf67",
  "modified": "2024-11-23T06:32:47Z",
  "published": "2024-11-23T06:32:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-11415"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-orphanage-extended/trunk/wp-orphanage-extended-options.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3194570%40wp-orphanage-extended\u0026new=3194570%40wp-orphanage-extended\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/f7ed6255-d8df-4f57-961b-1a0c21e352ac?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-PGGX-8R6V-M6GF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-23 15:30 – Updated: 2025-10-23 18:31
VLAI
Details

Cross site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in KeeneticOS before 4.3 at "/rci" API endpoint allows attackers to take over the device via adding additional users with full permissions by managing the victim to open page with exploit.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-56009"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-23T15:15:39Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in KeeneticOS before 4.3 at \"/rci\" API endpoint allows attackers to take over the device via adding additional users with full permissions by managing the victim to open page with exploit.",
  "id": "GHSA-pggx-8r6v-m6gf",
  "modified": "2025-10-23T18:31:14Z",
  "published": "2025-10-23T15:30:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-56009"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://keenetic.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://keenetic.com/global/security#october-2025-web-api-vulnerabilities"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-PGJ8-Q9W4-WP3F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:49 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:13
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in Eventum 3.5.0. CSRF in htdocs/manage/users.php allows creating another user with admin privileges.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-12628"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-07-10T12:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Eventum 3.5.0. CSRF in htdocs/manage/users.php allows creating another user with admin privileges.",
  "id": "GHSA-pgj8-q9w4-wp3f",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T01:13:46Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:49:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-12628"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eventum/eventum/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eventum/eventum/releases/tag/v3.5.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.

Mitigation
Implementation

Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)

An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.

CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing

An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.

CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification

An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.