Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-862

Allowed-with-Review

Missing Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

14540 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-JPW6-2R95-2WMF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:02 – Updated: 2024-04-04 02:42
VLAI
Details

SiteVision 4 has Incorrect Access Control.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-12734"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-12-06T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "SiteVision 4 has Incorrect Access Control.",
  "id": "GHSA-jpw6-2r95-2wmf",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T02:42:06Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:02:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12734"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.sitevision.com/Main/Default.aspx"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cybercom.com/About-Cybercom/Blogs/Security-Advisories/high-risk-vulnerabilities-in-cms-product"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cybercom.com/contentassets/ac929be030744b8e92dc6e457fdb7dcc/sitevision-disclosure-insufficient-access-control.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sitevision.se"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155584/SiteVision-4.x-5.x-Insufficient-Module-Access-Control.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/13"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JPW9-952G-5QCP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-03 21:34 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:34
VLAI
Details

FairSketch Rise Ultimate Project Manager & CRM 3.9.4 is vulnerable to Insecure Permissions. A remote authenticated user can append comments or upload attachments to tickets for which they lack view or edit authorization, due to missing authorization checks in the ticketing/commenting API.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-63293"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-03T21:19:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "FairSketch Rise Ultimate Project Manager \u0026 CRM 3.9.4 is vulnerable to Insecure Permissions. A remote authenticated user can append comments or upload attachments to tickets for which they lack view or edit authorization, due to missing authorization checks in the ticketing/commenting API.",
  "id": "GHSA-jpw9-952g-5qcp",
  "modified": "2025-11-03T21:34:45Z",
  "published": "2025-11-03T21:34:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-63293"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://medium.com/@barrattjack89/cve-2025-63293-insecure-permissions-in-rise-crm-3-9-4-452c88c24195"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://fairsketch.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JPX4-2V97-44RR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-01 06:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in KingAddons.com King Addons for Elementor. This issue affects King Addons for Elementor: from n/a through 24.12.58.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-30926"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-01T06:15:55Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in KingAddons.com King Addons for Elementor. This issue affects King Addons for Elementor: from n/a through 24.12.58.",
  "id": "GHSA-jpx4-2v97-44rr",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:18Z",
  "published": "2025-04-01T06:30:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30926"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/king-addons/vulnerability/wordpress-king-addons-for-elementor-plugin-24-12-58-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JPX5-RG85-R3XV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:05 – Updated: 2022-07-29 00:00
VLAI
Details

The import_data function of the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4 had no capability or nonce checks making it possible for unauthenticated users to import a set of site redirects.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-24353"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-14T14:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The import_data function of the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4 had no capability or nonce checks making it possible for unauthenticated users to import a set of site redirects.",
  "id": "GHSA-jpx5-rg85-r3xv",
  "modified": "2022-07-29T00:00:42Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:05:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24353"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/74c23d56-e81f-47e9-bf8b-33d3f0e81894"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2021/05/severe-vulnerabilities-patched-in-simple-301-redirects-by-betterlinks-plugin"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JQ25-PGM7-4VH9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-30 12:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:16
VLAI
Details

The AffiliateWP for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'affwp_activate_addons_page_plugin' function called via an AJAX action in versions up to, and including, 2.14.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to activate arbitrary plugins.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-4600"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-30T12:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The AffiliateWP for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the \u0027affwp_activate_addons_page_plugin\u0027 function called via an AJAX action in versions up to, and including, 2.14.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to activate arbitrary plugins.",
  "id": "GHSA-jq25-pgm7-4vh9",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T07:16:30Z",
  "published": "2023-08-30T12:30:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4600"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://affiliatewp.com/changelog"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/eab422b8-8cf5-441e-a21f-6a0e1b7642b2?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JQ2F-59PJ-P3M3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-14 23:34 – Updated: 2026-04-24 20:42
VLAI
Summary
Craft CMS has a Missing Authorization Check on User Group Removal via save-permissions Action
Details

Summary

The actionSavePermissions() endpoint allows a user with only viewUsers permission to remove arbitrary users from all user groups. While _saveUserGroups() enforces per-group authorization for additions, it performs no equivalent authorization check for removals, so submitting an empty groups value removes all existing group memberships.

Affected Versions

  • Craft CMS 5.6.0 through 5.9.14 (latest release at time of report)
  • Regression introduced in 5.6.0 when the viewUsers permission was added
  • Prior to 5.6.0, editedUser() required editUsers, which implicitly protected this endpoint
  • Requires Pro edition or higher (the vulnerable code path is gated by CmsEdition::Pro)

Vulnerability Details

Root Cause

This is a regression introduced in Craft CMS 5.6.0 when the viewUsers permission was added. Before that change, editedUser() required editUsers permission for accessing other users’ data, which implicitly protected actionSavePermissions(). After the change, actionSavePermissions() became reachable for users with read-only access to other users, but the underlying group-saving logic still lacked authorization for group removals.

The vulnerability has two components:

  1. actionSavePermissions() reachable with read-only access: The action only requires a control panel request and delegates to editedUser(), which now only checks viewUsers — a permission explicitly documented as "read-only access to user elements."

  2. Asymmetric authorization in _saveUserGroups(): The method checks assignUserGroup permission only when adding a user to a new group. When the groups parameter is an empty string (resulting in an empty array), the loop is skipped entirely, no authorization checks are run, and all group memberships are removed.

Prerequisites

  • Attacker has a control panel account with accessCp and viewUsers permissions only
  • Target user belongs to one or more user groups that grant additional permissions
  • Pro edition or higher

Attack Steps

  1. Attacker authenticates to the Control Panel
  2. Attacker sends a POST request to actions/users/save-permissions with:
  3. userId = target user's ID
  4. groups = `` (empty string)
  5. All group memberships for the target user are removed
  6. All permissions inherited from those groups are immediately revoked

Impact

  • Privilege revocation: An attacker can strip group-based permissions from arbitrary users, including accounts whose effective access derives from group membership
  • Denial of access: Users lose access to sections, volumes, and features that were granted through group membership
  • Bypass of elevated session requirement: Group removal does not trigger requireElevatedSession() (which is only triggered when new groups are added)
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "craftcms/cms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.6.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.9.15"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-41128"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T23:34:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T00:16:28Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nThe `actionSavePermissions()` endpoint allows a user with only `viewUsers` permission to remove arbitrary users from all user groups. While `_saveUserGroups()` enforces per-group authorization for additions, it performs no equivalent authorization check for removals, so submitting an empty `groups` value removes all existing group memberships.\n\n## Affected Versions\n\n- Craft CMS 5.6.0 through 5.9.14 (latest release at time of report)\n- Regression introduced in 5.6.0 when the `viewUsers` permission was added\n- Prior to 5.6.0, `editedUser()` required `editUsers`, which implicitly protected this endpoint\n- Requires Pro edition or higher (the vulnerable code path is gated by `CmsEdition::Pro`)\n\n## Vulnerability Details\n\n### Root Cause\n\nThis is a **regression** introduced in Craft CMS 5.6.0 when the `viewUsers` permission was added. Before that change, `editedUser()` required `editUsers` permission for accessing other users\u2019 data, which implicitly protected `actionSavePermissions()`. After the change, `actionSavePermissions()` became reachable for users with read-only access to other users, but the underlying group-saving logic still lacked authorization for group removals.\n\nThe vulnerability has two components:\n\n1. **`actionSavePermissions()` reachable with read-only access**: The action only requires a control panel request and delegates to `editedUser()`, which now only checks `viewUsers` \u2014 a permission explicitly documented as \"read-only access to user elements.\"\n\n2. **Asymmetric authorization in `_saveUserGroups()`**: The method checks `assignUserGroup` permission only when **adding** a user to a new group. When the `groups` parameter is an empty string (resulting in an empty array), the loop is skipped entirely, no authorization checks are run, and all group memberships are removed.\n\n### Prerequisites\n\n- Attacker has a control panel account with `accessCp` and `viewUsers` permissions only\n- Target user belongs to one or more user groups that grant additional permissions\n- Pro edition or higher\n\n### Attack Steps\n\n1. Attacker authenticates to the Control Panel\n2. Attacker sends a POST request to `actions/users/save-permissions` with:\n   - `userId` = target user\u0027s ID\n   - `groups` = `` (empty string)\n3. All group memberships for the target user are removed\n4. All permissions inherited from those groups are immediately revoked\n\n### Impact\n\n- **Privilege revocation**: An attacker can strip group-based permissions from arbitrary users, including accounts whose effective access derives from group membership\n- **Denial of access**: Users lose access to sections, volumes, and features that were granted through group membership\n- **Bypass of elevated session requirement**: Group removal does not trigger `requireElevatedSession()` (which is only triggered when new groups are added)",
  "id": "GHSA-jq2f-59pj-p3m3",
  "modified": "2026-04-24T20:42:09Z",
  "published": "2026-04-14T23:34:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms/security/advisories/GHSA-jq2f-59pj-p3m3"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41128"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms/commit/b135384808ad43fcf8836a9dd9b877fb0087bc27"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Craft CMS has a Missing Authorization Check on User Group Removal via save-permissions Action"
}

GHSA-JQ3C-GR2X-RXG8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-22 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Tareq Hasan WP User Frontend allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects WP User Frontend: from n/a through 4.1.11.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-58672"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-22T19:16:18Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Tareq Hasan WP User Frontend allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects WP User Frontend: from n/a through 4.1.11.",
  "id": "GHSA-jq3c-gr2x-rxg8",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:17Z",
  "published": "2025-09-22T21:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58672"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-user-frontend/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-user-frontend-plugin-4-1-11-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JQ5M-6MWV-F3J3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-13 06:30 – Updated: 2025-06-13 06:30
VLAI
Details

The WP Travel Engine – Tour Booking Plugin – Tour Operator Software plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the delete_package() function in all versions up to, and including, 6.5.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-5282"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-13T04:15:28Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The WP Travel Engine \u2013 Tour Booking Plugin \u2013 Tour Operator Software plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the delete_package() function in all versions up to, and including, 6.5.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts.",
  "id": "GHSA-jq5m-6mwv-f3j3",
  "modified": "2025-06-13T06:30:26Z",
  "published": "2025-06-13T06:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-5282"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3305447/wp-travel-engine/tags/6.5.2/includes/classes/Core/Controllers/RestAPI/V2/Trip.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ebc8d724-3936-42d8-8850-bc330c5221dc?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JQJ2-X4C5-JFXM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-06 21:09 – Updated: 2026-07-06 21:09
VLAI
Summary
Coder: Devcontainer recreate endpoint missing write authorization allows read-only roles to destroy containers
Details

Summary

The devcontainer recreate endpoint relied on route middleware that checked only ActionRead on the workspace and, unlike the sibling delete endpoint, performed no ActionUpdate check before triggering the destructive rebuild.

Note: Exploitation requires an existing low-privilege role with access to the target workspace.

Impact

Any authenticated principal with read-only workspace access, such as a Template Admin or Org Template Admin, could recreate a devcontainer, destroying uncommitted in-container state and, if called repeatedly, denying service. This is an authorization bypass leading to data loss and denial of service.

Patches

The fix adds an explicit ActionUpdate authorization check before the agent is dialed like the delete endpoint.

The fix was backported to all supported release lines:

Release line Patched version
2.34 v2.34.2
2.33 v2.33.8
2.32 v2.32.7
2.29 (ESR) v2.29.17

Workarounds

None.

Resources

  • Fix: #25812

Credits

Coder would like to thank Anthropic's Security Team (ANT-2026-22454) for independently disclosing this issue!

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/coder/coder/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.34.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.34.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/coder/coder/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.33.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.33.8"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/coder/coder/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.30.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.32.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/coder/coder/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.29.17"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-55433"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-06T21:09:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe devcontainer recreate endpoint relied on route middleware that checked only `ActionRead` on the workspace and, unlike the sibling delete endpoint, performed no `ActionUpdate` check before triggering the destructive rebuild.\n\n\u003e **Note:** Exploitation requires an existing low-privilege role with access to the target workspace.\n\n### Impact\n\nAny authenticated principal with read-only workspace access, such as a Template Admin or Org Template Admin, could recreate a devcontainer, destroying uncommitted in-container state and, if called repeatedly, denying service. This is an authorization bypass leading to data loss and denial of service.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe fix adds an explicit `ActionUpdate` authorization check before the agent is dialed like the delete endpoint.\n\nThe fix was backported to all supported release lines:\n\n| Release line | Patched version |\n|---|---|\n| 2.34 | [v2.34.2](https://github.com/coder/coder/releases/tag/v2.34.2) |\n| 2.33 | [v2.33.8](https://github.com/coder/coder/releases/tag/v2.33.8) |\n| 2.32 | [v2.32.7](https://github.com/coder/coder/releases/tag/v2.32.7) |\n| 2.29 (ESR) | [v2.29.17](https://github.com/coder/coder/releases/tag/v2.29.17) |\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNone.\n\n### Resources\n\n- Fix: #25812\n\n### Credits\n\nCoder would like to thank Anthropic\u0027s Security Team (ANT-2026-22454) for independently disclosing this issue!",
  "id": "GHSA-jqj2-x4c5-jfxm",
  "modified": "2026-07-06T21:09:11Z",
  "published": "2026-07-06T21:09:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/coder/coder/security/advisories/GHSA-jqj2-x4c5-jfxm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/coder/coder/pull/25812"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/coder/coder"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Coder: Devcontainer recreate endpoint missing write authorization allows read-only roles to destroy containers"
}

GHSA-JQJ4-298C-3HHV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:35 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:35
VLAI
Details

SAP Solution Manager 7.2 (User Experience Monitoring), version - 7.2, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user. Due to inadequate access control, a network attacker authenticated as a regular user can use operations which should be restricted to administrators. These operations can be used to Change the User Experience Monitoring configuration, obtain details about the configured SAP Solution Manager agents, Deploy a malicious User Experience Monitoring script.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-26830"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-12-09T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "SAP Solution Manager 7.2 (User Experience Monitoring), version - 7.2, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user. Due to inadequate access control, a network attacker authenticated as a regular user can use operations which should be restricted to administrators. These operations can be used to Change the User Experience Monitoring configuration, obtain details about the configured SAP Solution Manager agents, Deploy a malicious User Experience Monitoring script.",
  "id": "GHSA-jqj4-298c-3hhv",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:35:34Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:35:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26830"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/2983204"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=564757079"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163161/SAP-Solution-Manager-7.2-Missing-Authorization.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Jun/29"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws

An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.