CWE-347
AllowedImproper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.
1345 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-4W9G-4H2X-7QXQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-18 21:31 – Updated: 2025-04-18 21:31NSSCryptoSignBackend.cc in Poppler before 25.04.0 does not verify the adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures on documents, resulting in potential signature forgeries.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-43903"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-18T21:15:44Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "NSSCryptoSignBackend.cc in Poppler before 25.04.0 does not verify the adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures on documents, resulting in potential signature forgeries.",
"id": "GHSA-4w9g-4h2x-7qxq",
"modified": "2025-04-18T21:31:21Z",
"published": "2025-04-18T21:31:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-43903"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/commit/f1b9c830f145a0042e853d6462b2f9ca4016c669"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4WHM-CVQV-V84Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:40 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:40Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Network Convergence System (NCS) 540 Series Routers, only when running Cisco IOS XR NCS540L software images, and Cisco IOS XR Software for the Cisco 8000 Series Routers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute unsigned code during the boot process on an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-1244"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-02-04T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Network Convergence System (NCS) 540 Series Routers, only when running Cisco IOS XR NCS540L software images, and Cisco IOS XR Software for the Cisco 8000 Series Routers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute unsigned code during the boot process on an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.",
"id": "GHSA-4whm-cvqv-v84q",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:40:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:40:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1244"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-ioxr-l-zNhcGCBt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-4WX6-WJ3Q-MF77
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-03 12:31 – Updated: 2026-03-03 12:31A vulnerability was found in Dataease SQLBot up to 1.5.1. This impacts the function validateEmbedded of the file backend/apps/system/middleware/auth.py of the component JWT Token Handler. Performing a manipulation results in improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is said to be difficult. The exploit has been made public and could be used. A comment in the source code warns users about using this feature. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-15598"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-345",
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-03T10:16:05Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in Dataease SQLBot up to 1.5.1. This impacts the function validateEmbedded of the file backend/apps/system/middleware/auth.py of the component JWT Token Handler. Performing a manipulation results in improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is said to be difficult. The exploit has been made public and could be used. A comment in the source code warns users about using this feature. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.",
"id": "GHSA-4wx6-wj3q-mf77",
"modified": "2026-03-03T12:31:27Z",
"published": "2026-03-03T12:31:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15598"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yaowenxiao721/Poc/blob/main/SQLBot/SQLBot-JWT-Signature-Verification-Bypass.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.348292"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.348292"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.707291"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-4XR6-9WFX-7QVW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-11 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-11 18:30Foxit PDF Editor and Reader before 2025.2.1 allow signature spoofing via triggers. An attacker can embed triggers (e.g., JavaScript) in a PDF document that execute during the signing process. When a signer reviews the document, the content appears normal. However, once the signature is applied, the triggers modify content on other pages or optional content layers without explicit warning. This can cause the signed PDF to differ from what the signer saw, undermining the trustworthiness of the digital signature. The fixed versions are 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-59803"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-11T16:16:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Foxit PDF Editor and Reader before 2025.2.1 allow signature spoofing via triggers. An attacker can embed triggers (e.g., JavaScript) in a PDF document that execute during the signing process. When a signer reviews the document, the content appears normal. However, once the signature is applied, the triggers modify content on other pages or optional content layers without explicit warning. This can cause the signed PDF to differ from what the signer saw, undermining the trustworthiness of the digital signature. The fixed versions are 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1.",
"id": "GHSA-4xr6-9wfx-7qvw",
"modified": "2025-12-11T18:30:44Z",
"published": "2025-12-11T18:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59803"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.foxit.com/support/security-bulletins.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4XX7-2CX3-X473
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-19 18:30 – Updated: 2024-12-20 17:48Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-xgfv-xpx8-qhcr. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
A flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based on the position of the signature in the XML document, rather than the Reference element used to specify the signed element. This flaw allows attackers to create crafted responses that can bypass the validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation or impersonation attacks.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-saml-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "25.0.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-19T19:48:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-19T16:15:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-xgfv-xpx8-qhcr. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n# Original Description\n\nA flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based on the position of the signature in the XML document, rather than the Reference element used to specify the signed element. This flaw allows attackers to create crafted responses that can bypass the validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation or impersonation attacks.",
"id": "GHSA-4xx7-2cx3-x473",
"modified": "2024-12-20T17:48:24Z",
"published": "2024-09-19T18:30:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-8698"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/releases/tag/25.0.6"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311641"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-8698"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8826"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8824"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8823"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6890"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6889"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6888"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6887"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6886"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6880"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6879"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6878"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Keycloak SAML signature validation flaw",
"withdrawn": "2024-12-20T17:48:24Z"
}
GHSA-522R-9946-FW43
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-06 09:30 – Updated: 2025-08-06 17:39Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-2x5j-vhc8-9cwm. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
A flaw was found in CIRCL's implementation of the FourQ elliptic curve. This vulnerability allows an attacker to compromise session security via low-order point injection and incorrect point validation during Diffie-Hellman key exchange.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/cloudflare/circl"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.6.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-08-06T17:39:16Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-06T09:15:28Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-2x5j-vhc8-9cwm. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\n\nA flaw was found in CIRCL\u0027s implementation of the FourQ elliptic curve. This vulnerability allows an attacker to compromise session security via low-order point injection and incorrect point validation during Diffie-Hellman key exchange.",
"id": "GHSA-522r-9946-fw43",
"modified": "2025-08-06T17:39:16Z",
"published": "2025-08-06T09:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/security/advisories/GHSA-2x5j-vhc8-9cwm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8556"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-8556"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371624"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/cloudflare/circl"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/tree/v1.6.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: CIRCL-Fourq: Missing and wrong validation can lead to incorrect results",
"withdrawn": "2025-08-06T17:39:16Z"
}
GHSA-523F-8C6H-PJ8G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-20 00:00 – Updated: 2022-08-25 00:00Emerson Electric's Proficy Machine Edition Version 9.00 and prior is vulenrable to CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature, and does not properly verify compiled logic (PDT files) and data blocks data (BLD/BLK files).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-2790"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-19T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Emerson Electric\u0027s Proficy Machine Edition Version 9.00 and prior is vulenrable to CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature, and does not properly verify compiled logic (PDT files) and data blocks data (BLD/BLK files).",
"id": "GHSA-523f-8c6h-pj8g",
"modified": "2022-08-25T00:00:26Z",
"published": "2022-08-20T00:00:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2790"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-228-06"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-52F2-92W4-MX97
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:18 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:18An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 where records in the answer section of a NXDOMAIN response lacking an SOA were not properly validated in SyncRes::processAnswer, allowing an attacker to bypass DNSSEC validation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-12244"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-05-19T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 where records in the answer section of a NXDOMAIN response lacking an SOA were not properly validated in SyncRes::processAnswer, allowing an attacker to bypass DNSSEC validation.",
"id": "GHSA-52f2-92w4-mx97",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:18:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:18:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-12244"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2020-02.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NMP72NJGKBWR5WEBXAWX5KSLQUDFTG6S"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PS4ZN5XGENYNFKX7QIIOUCQQHXE37GJF"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4691"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00052.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/05/19/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-52Q6-XHG6-RW2J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-16 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-07 03:30Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Galaxy Store prior to version 4.6.03.8 allows local attacker to install arbitrary application.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-21002"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-16T14:18:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Galaxy Store prior to version 4.6.03.8 allows local attacker to install arbitrary application.",
"id": "GHSA-52q6-xhg6-rw2j",
"modified": "2026-04-07T03:30:24Z",
"published": "2026-03-16T15:30:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21002"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2026\u0026month=03"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-52V5-JR5W-GJXR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 19:58 – Updated: 2026-07-01 19:58Summary
The documented certificateOIDs option in sigstore.verify() is accepted by the public API but discarded before verification, so required certificate extension OIDs are never checked.
Details
The public verify options include certificateOIDs and the documentation says those OID/value pairs “must be present in the certificate’s extension list.” The policy-construction path used by sigstore.verify() and createVerifier() only copies the SAN and issuer settings into the verification policy and completely ignores certificateOIDs.
As a result, callers can believe they are constraining verification to certificates carrying specific Fulcio or workload-identifying OIDs, while the actual verifier never receives those constraints. Any bundle that satisfies the remaining checks is accepted even if the required OID extensions are absent or mismatched.
This is reachable from supported usage through the documented certificateOIDs verify option.
PoC
const { createVerificationPolicy } = require("sigstore/dist/config");
const policy = createVerificationPolicy({
certificateIssuer: "https://issuer.example",
certificateIdentityEmail: "victim@example.com",
certificateOIDs: {
"1.2.3.4": "required-value",
},
});
console.log("certificateOIDs" in policy, JSON.stringify(policy));
// false {"subjectAlternativeName":"victim@example.com","extensions":{"issuer":"https://issuer.example"}}
Impact
Applications that rely on certificateOIDs to restrict which certificates may sign artifacts receive no such protection. Unauthorized certificates that should be rejected on extension policy can be accepted as long as they satisfy the remaining verification checks.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.1.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "sigstore"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-48815"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-01T19:58:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe documented `certificateOIDs` option in `sigstore.verify()` is accepted by the public API but discarded before verification, so required certificate extension OIDs are never checked.\n\n### Details\n\nThe public verify options include `certificateOIDs` and the documentation says those OID/value pairs \u201cmust be present in the certificate\u2019s extension list.\u201d The policy-construction path used by `sigstore.verify()` and `createVerifier()` only copies the SAN and issuer settings into the verification policy and completely ignores `certificateOIDs`.\n\nAs a result, callers can believe they are constraining verification to certificates carrying specific Fulcio or workload-identifying OIDs, while the actual verifier never receives those constraints. Any bundle that satisfies the remaining checks is accepted even if the required OID extensions are absent or mismatched.\n\nThis is reachable from supported usage through the documented `certificateOIDs` verify option.\n\n### PoC\n\n```javascript\nconst { createVerificationPolicy } = require(\"sigstore/dist/config\");\n\nconst policy = createVerificationPolicy({\n certificateIssuer: \"https://issuer.example\",\n certificateIdentityEmail: \"victim@example.com\",\n certificateOIDs: {\n \"1.2.3.4\": \"required-value\",\n },\n});\n\nconsole.log(\"certificateOIDs\" in policy, JSON.stringify(policy));\n// false {\"subjectAlternativeName\":\"victim@example.com\",\"extensions\":{\"issuer\":\"https://issuer.example\"}}\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nApplications that rely on `certificateOIDs` to restrict which certificates may sign artifacts receive no such protection. Unauthorized certificates that should be rejected on extension policy can be accepted as long as they satisfy the remaining verification checks.",
"id": "GHSA-52v5-jr5w-gjxr",
"modified": "2026-07-01T19:58:28Z",
"published": "2026-07-01T19:58:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-js/security/advisories/GHSA-52v5-jr5w-gjxr"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-js"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "sigstore\u0027s `certificateOIDs` verification constraints are silently dropped and never enforced"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-463: Padding Oracle Crypto Attack
An adversary is able to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key if a target system leaks data on whether or not a padding error happened while decrypting the ciphertext. A target system that leaks this type of information becomes the padding oracle and an adversary is able to make use of that oracle to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key by issuing on average 128*b calls to the padding oracle (where b is the number of bytes in the ciphertext block). In addition to performing decryption, an adversary is also able to produce valid ciphertexts (i.e., perform encryption) by using the padding oracle, all without knowing the encryption key.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.