ghsa-52f2-92w4-mx97
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:18
Modified
2022-05-24 17:18
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 where records in the answer section of a NXDOMAIN response lacking an SOA were not properly validated in SyncRes::processAnswer, allowing an attacker to bypass DNSSEC validation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-12244"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-05-19T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 where records in the answer section of a NXDOMAIN response lacking an SOA were not properly validated in SyncRes::processAnswer, allowing an attacker to bypass DNSSEC validation.",
"id": "GHSA-52f2-92w4-mx97",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:18:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:18:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-12244"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2020-02.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NMP72NJGKBWR5WEBXAWX5KSLQUDFTG6S"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PS4ZN5XGENYNFKX7QIIOUCQQHXE37GJF"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4691"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00052.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/05/19/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…