Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-327
Allowed-with-ReviewUse of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.
972 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-67336 (GCVE-0-2026-67336)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-01 12:22 – Updated: 2026-08-03 15:23
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
better-auth before 1.6.11 Insecure Cryptographic Defaults via oidcProvider
Summary
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain is used instead of the required S256 method.
Severity
8.7 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/securi… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/better-auth-… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| better-auth | better-auth |
Affected:
0 , < 1.6.11
(semver)
Unaffected: 1.6.11 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-05-31 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-67336",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-03T15:23:30.091668Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T15:23:44.055Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/better-auth",
"product": "better-auth",
"vendor": "better-auth",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.6.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.6.11",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:better-auth:better-auth\\/oauth-provider:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.6.11",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "subhanUmer"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain is used instead of the required S256 method."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-01T12:22:18.271Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-9h47-pqcx-hjr4)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-9h47-pqcx-hjr4"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: better-auth before 1.6.11 Insecure Cryptographic Defaults via oidcProvider",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/better-auth-before-insecure-cryptographic-defaults-via-oidcprovider"
}
],
"title": "better-auth before 1.6.11 Insecure Cryptographic Defaults via oidcProvider",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-67336",
"datePublished": "2026-08-01T12:22:18.271Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-29T13:07:47.016Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T15:23:44.055Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-65309 (GCVE-0-2026-65309)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-31 07:17 – Updated: 2026-07-31 16:36
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Storage of passwords in a reversible format
Summary
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores
and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a
one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the
credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored
passwords.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.andritz.com/ |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDRITZ | HIPASE-250 |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 7.20
(custom)
Unaffected: 7.50 |
|
| ANDRITZ | 250 SCALA |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 7.20
(custom)
Unaffected: 7.50 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-65309",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-31T16:36:20.637917Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-31T16:36:34.930Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "HIPASE-250",
"vendor": "ANDRITZ",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.50"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "250 SCALA",
"vendor": "ANDRITZ",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.50"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Duc Anh Nguyen (NTCS OT Penetration Testing Team)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Ta Duc Thien (NTCS OT Penetration Testing Team)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores\nand transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a\none-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the\ncredential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored\npasswords.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores\nand transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a\none-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the\ncredential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored\npasswords."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-50",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-50 Password Recovery Exploitation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-257",
"description": "CWE-257 Storing passwords in a recoverable format",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-31T07:17:40.473Z",
"orgId": "7d092a75-6bbd-48c6-a15a-0297458009bc",
"shortName": "CyberDanube"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.andritz.com/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Storage of passwords in a reversible format",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d092a75-6bbd-48c6-a15a-0297458009bc",
"assignerShortName": "CyberDanube",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-65309",
"datePublished": "2026-07-31T07:17:40.473Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-21T20:33:52.962Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-31T16:36:34.930Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-63761 (GCVE-0-2026-63761)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-20 12:04 – Updated: 2026-07-28 01:05
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
SurrealDB before 3.1.0 Algorithm Downgrade via ES512
Summary
SurrealDB before 3.1.0 silently substitutes the ES384 algorithm when a JWT access method is configured with ALGORITHM ES512 (DEFINE ACCESS ... TYPE JWT ALGORITHM ES512), because the underlying jsonwebtoken crate (v10.x) has no ES512 variant and the mapping defaults to ES384 without any error, warning, or log message. Users who supply the correct P-521 key for ES512 experience authentication handshake failures due to the curve mismatch with ES384 (which expects P-384), and tokens are rejected by external systems expecting genuine ES512 signatures. The flaw cannot be used to forge tokens or compromise data confidentiality or integrity, as ES384 remains cryptographically strong.
Severity
4.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/security/a… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/surrealdb-be… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-05-27 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-63761",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-20T13:48:06.564282Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-20T13:48:16.345Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "surrealdb",
"vendor": "surrealdb",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:surrealdb:surrealdb:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "q1uf3ng"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SurrealDB before 3.1.0 silently substitutes the ES384 algorithm when a JWT access method is configured with ALGORITHM ES512 (DEFINE ACCESS ... TYPE JWT ALGORITHM ES512), because the underlying jsonwebtoken crate (v10.x) has no ES512 variant and the mapping defaults to ES384 without any error, warning, or log message. Users who supply the correct P-521 key for ES512 experience authentication handshake failures due to the curve mismatch with ES384 (which expects P-384), and tokens are rejected by external systems expecting genuine ES512 signatures. The flaw cannot be used to forge tokens or compromise data confidentiality or integrity, as ES384 remains cryptographically strong."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T01:05:51.441Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-fwg2-gr34-q3w8)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/security/advisories/GHSA-fwg2-gr34-q3w8"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: SurrealDB before 3.1.0 Algorithm Downgrade via ES512",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/surrealdb-before-algorithm-downgrade-via-es512"
}
],
"title": "SurrealDB before 3.1.0 Algorithm Downgrade via ES512",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-63761",
"datePublished": "2026-07-20T12:04:50.878Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-18T12:30:08.354Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T01:05:51.441Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-57997 (GCVE-0-2026-57997)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-29 21:16 – Updated: 2026-07-09 18:48
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Strapi users-permissions - JWT Algorithm Confusion via Missing Algorithm Configuration
Summary
Strapi users-permissions plugin fails to restrict JWT algorithms when plugin::users-permissions.jwt.algorithm is not explicitly configured, allowing acceptance of HS384 and HS512 tokens alongside HS256. Attackers possessing the jwtSecret can mint tokens with non-standard HMAC variants to bypass algorithm restrictions and weaken authentication controls.
Severity
4.8 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/strapi/strapi/issues/26587 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/strapi/strapi/pull/26752 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/strapi/strapi | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/strapi-users… | third-party-advisory |
Date Public
2026-02-06 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-57997",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-01T14:24:53.643492Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T14:25:16.553Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/strapi",
"product": "strapi",
"vendor": "strapi",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.7.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:strapi:strapi:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.7.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "BL4CK570RM"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-02-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Strapi users-permissions plugin fails to restrict JWT algorithms when plugin::users-permissions.jwt.algorithm is not explicitly configured, allowing acceptance of HS384 and HS512 tokens alongside HS256. Attackers possessing the jwtSecret can mint tokens with non-standard HMAC variants to bypass algorithm restrictions and weaken authentication controls."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T18:48:34.051Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Pull Issue",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/strapi/strapi/issues/26587"
},
{
"name": "Pull Issue",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/strapi/strapi/pull/26752"
},
{
"name": "Product Details",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/strapi/strapi"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/strapi-users-permissions-jwt-algorithm-confusion-via-missing-algorithm-configuration"
}
],
"title": "Strapi users-permissions - JWT Algorithm Confusion via Missing Algorithm Configuration",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-57997",
"datePublished": "2026-06-29T21:16:35.174Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-26T17:58:05.796Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T18:48:34.051Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-56609 (GCVE-0-2026-56609)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-03 11:26 – Updated: 2026-08-03 13:17
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
HCL iControl is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities(CVE-2026-56608 and CVE-2026-56609).
Summary
HCL iControl is affected by Weak SSL/TLS Version Supported vulnerability. It was observed that the application was using weak TLS versions such as TLS 1.0 and 1.1. These outdated protocols lack modern security features, making them vulnerable to known attacks and exposing sensitive information during data transmission.
Severity
4.8 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCL Software | HCL iControl |
Affected:
v3.2.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-56609",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-03T13:17:49.688193Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T13:17:58.577Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HCL iControl",
"vendor": "HCL Software",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "v3.2.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "HCL iControl is affected by Weak SSL/TLS Version Supported vulnerability. It was observed that the application was using weak TLS versions such as TLS 1.0 and 1.1. These outdated protocols lack modern security features, making them vulnerable to known attacks and exposing sensitive information during data transmission."
}
],
"value": "HCL iControl is affected by Weak SSL/TLS Version Supported vulnerability. It was observed that the application was using weak TLS versions such as TLS 1.0 and 1.1. These outdated protocols lack modern security features, making them vulnerable to known attacks and exposing sensitive information during data transmission."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T12:31:44.075Z",
"orgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"shortName": "HCL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0132564"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "HCL iControl is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities(CVE-2026-56608 and CVE-2026-56609).",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"assignerShortName": "HCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-56609",
"datePublished": "2026-08-03T11:26:07.457Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-22T13:40:09.127Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T13:17:58.577Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-56582 (GCVE-0-2026-56582)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-21 17:38 – Updated: 2026-07-22 18:26
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
HCL MyCloud was affected with SSL/TLS Protocol Affected with LUCKY13 Vulnerability.
Summary
HCL MyCloud was affected by the SSL/TLS LUCKY13 Vulnerability. An attacker may exploit this vulnerability to decrypt sensitive information through a TLS/SSL padding oracle attack.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_articl… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCLSoftware | MyCloud |
Affected:
10.8.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-56582",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T18:13:47.806476Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T18:26:23.193Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MyCloud",
"vendor": "HCLSoftware",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.8.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eHCL MyCloud was affected by the SSL/TLS LUCKY13 Vulnerability. An attacker may exploit this vulnerability to decrypt sensitive information through a TLS/SSL padding oracle attack.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "HCL MyCloud was affected by the SSL/TLS LUCKY13 Vulnerability. An attacker may exploit this vulnerability to decrypt sensitive information through a TLS/SSL padding oracle attack."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T17:38:24.830Z",
"orgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"shortName": "HCL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0132381"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "HCL MyCloud was affected with SSL/TLS Protocol Affected with LUCKY13 Vulnerability.",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"assignerShortName": "HCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-56582",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T17:38:24.830Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-22T13:39:47.965Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T18:26:23.193Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-56454 (GCVE-0-2026-56454)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-16 13:08 – Updated: 2026-07-16 13:41
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1.
Summary
HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. These legacy protocols contain numerous cryptographic design flaws that expose data to interception and decryption. To remediate this risk, the application must disable all support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, and exclusively enable support for secure protocols, specifically TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCL Software | DFXAnalytics |
Affected:
version 3.0 and below
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-56454",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-16T13:41:11.631048Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-16T13:41:57.396Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "DFXAnalytics",
"vendor": "HCL Software",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "version 3.0 and below"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. These legacy protocols contain numerous cryptographic design flaws that expose data to interception and decryption. To remediate this risk, the application must disable all support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, and exclusively enable support for secure protocols, specifically TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3."
}
],
"value": "HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. These legacy protocols contain numerous cryptographic design flaws that expose data to interception and decryption. To remediate this risk, the application must disable all support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, and exclusively enable support for secure protocols, specifically TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-16T13:08:38.448Z",
"orgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"shortName": "HCL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0131787"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1.",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"assignerShortName": "HCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-56454",
"datePublished": "2026-07-16T13:08:38.448Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-22T13:38:32.649Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-16T13:41:57.396Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-54780 (GCVE-0-2026-54780)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-08 22:15 – Updated: 2026-07-09 19:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
CoreWCF: WS-Security Reference DigestMethod Algorithm-Suite Bypass
Summary
CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, the CoreWCF WS-Security 1.0 receive pipeline validates ds:SignedInfo SignatureMethod against the configured SecurityAlgorithmSuite but does not validate each ds:Reference DigestMethod, allowing a sender to use a rejected digest algorithm such as SHA-1 while the message is still accepted. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/5874231… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/9104e58… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/fea67b2… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/releases/tag/v1.8.1 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/releases/tag/v1.9.1 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-54780",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-09T19:21:29.380282Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T19:21:36.312Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "CoreWCF",
"vendor": "CoreWCF",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.9.0, \u003c 1.9.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.8.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, the CoreWCF WS-Security 1.0 receive pipeline validates ds:SignedInfo SignatureMethod against the configured SecurityAlgorithmSuite but does not validate each ds:Reference DigestMethod, allowing a sender to use a rejected digest algorithm such as SHA-1 while the message is still accepted. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-757",
"description": "CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation (\u0027Algorithm Downgrade\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-08T22:15:06.161Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/security/advisories/GHSA-4v55-cpmv-3vcm",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/security/advisories/GHSA-4v55-cpmv-3vcm"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/58742312117cc671e6e9c694c2f5f9f669c17136",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/58742312117cc671e6e9c694c2f5f9f669c17136"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/9104e581cff3d047ace5e179bfae86807a44be1f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/9104e581cff3d047ace5e179bfae86807a44be1f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/fea67b2cd73a5a85115c325d504303ec7382e133",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/commit/fea67b2cd73a5a85115c325d504303ec7382e133"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/releases/tag/v1.8.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/releases/tag/v1.8.1"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/releases/tag/v1.9.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/releases/tag/v1.9.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-4v55-cpmv-3vcm",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "CoreWCF: WS-Security Reference DigestMethod Algorithm-Suite Bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-54780",
"datePublished": "2026-07-08T22:15:06.161Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-15T23:23:57.714Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T19:21:36.312Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-50268 (GCVE-0-2026-50268)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-17 22:01 – Updated: 2026-06-18 13:53
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Steeltoe: OAEP setting silently selects PKCS#1 v1.5 padding
Summary
Steeltoe is an open source project that provides a collection of libraries that helps users build cloud-native applications. In Steeltoe.Configuration.Encryption 4.0.0 through 4.1.0, configuring `encrypt:rsa:algorithm=OAEP` does not enable OAEP encryption. Due to an incorrect BouncyCastle transformation string, the `OAEP` setting selects PKCS#1 v1.5, which is the same algorithm as the `DEFAULT` setting. Steeltoe.Configuration.Encryption version 4.2.0 patches the issue.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/security-advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/Steeltoe/commit/6c… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SteeltoeOSS | Steeltoe.Configuration.Encryption |
Affected:
>= 4.0.0, < 4.2.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50268",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-18T13:46:22.767424Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-18T13:53:58.470Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Steeltoe.Configuration.Encryption",
"vendor": "SteeltoeOSS",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.2.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Steeltoe is an open source project that provides a collection of libraries that helps users build cloud-native applications. In Steeltoe.Configuration.Encryption 4.0.0 through 4.1.0, configuring `encrypt:rsa:algorithm=OAEP` does not enable OAEP encryption. Due to an incorrect BouncyCastle transformation string, the `OAEP` setting selects PKCS#1 v1.5, which is the same algorithm as the `DEFAULT` setting. Steeltoe.Configuration.Encryption version 4.2.0 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 1.9,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-256",
"description": "CWE-256: Plaintext Storage of a Password",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T22:01:19.712Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-4j9m-h44m-2hv8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-4j9m-h44m-2hv8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/Steeltoe/commit/6cfee5cccddf8f9a31de69b0ca5ccdd771b73e5b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/Steeltoe/commit/6cfee5cccddf8f9a31de69b0ca5ccdd771b73e5b"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-4j9m-h44m-2hv8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Steeltoe: OAEP setting silently selects PKCS#1 v1.5 padding"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-50268",
"datePublished": "2026-06-17T22:01:19.712Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-04T16:26:05.984Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-18T13:53:58.470Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-50086 (GCVE-0-2026-50086)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-12 15:01 – Updated: 2026-06-12 15:48
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Aqara unauthenticated AES oracle
Summary
The Aqara IAM/SSO gateway (gw-builder.aqara.com) exposes bidirectional AES round-trups against the platform's signing key without authentication. This is an instance of "CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function" and "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm," and has an estimated CVSS of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (7.5 High).
Severity
10 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/xn0tsa/theres-no-place-like-home | technical-description |
| https://www.runzero.com/advisories/aqara-unauth-a… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aqara | Aqara IAM/SSO Gateway |
Affected:
2026-04-20 , < 0
(date)
|
Date Public
2026-06-12 15:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50086",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-12T15:48:33.784868Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T15:48:59.149Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/xn0tsa/theres-no-place-like-home"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Aqara IAM/SSO Gateway",
"vendor": "Aqara",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2026-04-20",
"versionType": "date"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Sammy Azdoufal"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Tod Beardsley of runZero, Inc."
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-12T15:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The Aqara IAM/SSO gateway (gw-builder.aqara.com) exposes bidirectional AES round-trups against the platform\u0027s signing key without authentication. This is an instance of \"CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function\" and \"CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm,\" and has an estimated CVSS of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (7.5 High)."
}
],
"value": "The Aqara IAM/SSO gateway (gw-builder.aqara.com) exposes bidirectional AES round-trups against the platform\u0027s signing key without authentication. This is an instance of \"CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function\" and \"CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm,\" and has an estimated CVSS of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (7.5 High)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T15:01:26.055Z",
"orgId": "44488dab-36db-4358-99f9-bc116477f914",
"shortName": "runZero"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/xn0tsa/theres-no-place-like-home"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.runzero.com/advisories/aqara-unauth-aes-oracle-cve-2026-50086"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Aqara unauthenticated AES oracle",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "44488dab-36db-4358-99f9-bc116477f914",
"assignerShortName": "runZero",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-50086",
"datePublished": "2026-06-12T15:01:26.055Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-03T14:25:34.982Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T15:48:59.149Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation MIT-24
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis.
- For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification [REF-1192].
- Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak.
- Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]
Mitigation MIT-52
Architecture and Design
Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm to be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. With hardware, design the product at the Intellectual Property (IP) level so that one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation of the hardware product.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Carefully manage and protect cryptographic keys (see CWE-320). If the keys can be guessed or stolen, then the strength of the cryptography itself is irrelevant.
Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Industry-standard implementations will save development time and may be more likely to avoid errors that can occur during implementation of cryptographic algorithms. Consider the ESAPI Encryption feature.
Mitigation MIT-25
Implementation
Architecture and Design
When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
CAPEC-20: Encryption Brute Forcing
An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-473: Signature Spoof
An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.
CAPEC-608: Cryptanalysis of Cellular Encryption
The use of cryptanalytic techniques to derive cryptographic keys or otherwise effectively defeat cellular encryption to reveal traffic content. Some cellular encryption algorithms such as A5/1 and A5/2 (specified for GSM use) are known to be vulnerable to such attacks and commercial tools are available to execute these attacks and decrypt mobile phone conversations in real-time. Newer encryption algorithms in use by UMTS and LTE are stronger and currently believed to be less vulnerable to these types of attacks. Note, however, that an attacker with a Cellular Rogue Base Station can force the use of weak cellular encryption even by newer mobile devices.
CAPEC-614: Rooting SIM Cards
SIM cards are the de facto trust anchor of mobile devices worldwide. The cards protect the mobile identity of subscribers, associate devices with phone numbers, and increasingly store payment credentials, for example in NFC-enabled phones with mobile wallets. This attack leverages over-the-air (OTA) updates deployed via cryptographically-secured SMS messages to deliver executable code to the SIM. By cracking the DES key, an attacker can send properly signed binary SMS messages to a device, which are treated as Java applets and are executed on the SIM. These applets are allowed to send SMS, change voicemail numbers, and query the phone location, among many other predefined functions. These capabilities alone provide plenty of potential for abuse.
CAPEC-97: Cryptanalysis
Cryptanalysis is a process of finding weaknesses in cryptographic algorithms and using these weaknesses to decipher the ciphertext without knowing the secret key (instance deduction). Sometimes the weakness is not in the cryptographic algorithm itself, but rather in how it is applied that makes cryptanalysis successful. An attacker may have other goals as well, such as: Total Break (finding the secret key), Global Deduction (finding a functionally equivalent algorithm for encryption and decryption that does not require knowledge of the secret key), Information Deduction (gaining some information about plaintexts or ciphertexts that was not previously known) and Distinguishing Algorithm (the attacker has the ability to distinguish the output of the encryption (ciphertext) from a random permutation of bits).