CWE-306
AllowedMissing Authentication for Critical Function
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
3483 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-5JXR-5V22-49GF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-07 18:30 – Updated: 2026-05-07 18:30The MQTT broker embedded in Yarbo firmware v2.3.9 is configured to allow anonymous connections with no topic-level read or write ACLs. Any host on the same network can subscribe to sensitive telemetry topics or publish control messages directly to the robot without authentication or authorization of any kind.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-7415"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-07T17:15:59Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The MQTT broker embedded in Yarbo firmware v2.3.9 is configured to allow anonymous connections with no topic-level read or write ACLs. Any host on the same network can subscribe to sensitive telemetry topics or publish control messages directly to the robot without authentication or authorization of any kind.",
"id": "GHSA-5jxr-5v22-49gf",
"modified": "2026-05-07T18:30:40Z",
"published": "2026-05-07T18:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Bin4ry/yarbo-nat-in-my-back-yard"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://takeonme.org/gcves/GCVE-1337-2026-00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000111111111100111111111110000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001001"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5M5M-Q46W-3JPX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-20 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:18The web interface on multiple Samsung Harman AMX N-Series devices allows directory listing for the /tmp/ directory, without authentication, exposing sensitive information such as the command history and screenshot of the file being processed. This affects N-Series N1115 Wallplate Video Encoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N1x22A Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N1x33A Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N1x33 Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N2x35 Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N2x35A Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N2xx2 Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N2xx2A Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N3000 Video Encoder/Decoder before 2.12.105, and N-Series N4321 Audio Transceiver before 1.00.06.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-38523"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-20T19:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The web interface on multiple Samsung Harman AMX N-Series devices allows directory listing for the /tmp/ directory, without authentication, exposing sensitive information such as the command history and screenshot of the file being processed. This affects N-Series N1115 Wallplate Video Encoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N1x22A Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N1x33A Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N1x33 Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N2x35 Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N2x35A Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N2xx2 Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N2xx2A Video Encoder/Decoder before 1.15.61, N-Series N3000 Video Encoder/Decoder before 2.12.105, and N-Series N4321 Audio Transceiver before 1.00.06.",
"id": "GHSA-5m5m-q46w-3jpx",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:18:06Z",
"published": "2023-07-20T21:30:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38523"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n1115-svsi-firmware"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n1x22a-updater"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n1x33-updater"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n1x33a-updater"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n2x35-updater-hotfix"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n2x35a-updater-hotfix"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n2xx2-updater-hotfix"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n2xx2a-updater"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/n3k-updater-hotfix"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.harmanpro.com/svsi-n4321-firmware"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.notveg.ninja/blog/CVE-2023-38523"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5M5X-66VW-R2RP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-04 06:31 – Updated: 2025-11-04 06:31The CE21 Suite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized plugin settings update due to a missing capability check on the wp_ajax_nopriv_ce21_single_sign_on_save_api_settings AJAX action in versions 2.2.1 to 2.3.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's API settings including a secret key used for authentication. This allows unauthenticated attackers to create new admin accounts on an affected site.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-11007"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-04T04:15:36Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The CE21 Suite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized plugin settings update due to a missing capability check on the wp_ajax_nopriv_ce21_single_sign_on_save_api_settings AJAX action in versions 2.2.1 to 2.3.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin\u0027s API settings including a secret key used for authentication. This allows unauthenticated attackers to create new admin accounts on an affected site.",
"id": "GHSA-5m5x-66vw-r2rp",
"modified": "2025-11-04T06:31:10Z",
"published": "2025-11-04T06:31:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11007"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/ce21-suite"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/5e24feac-1812-45d7-b3c3-27787eed1cf1?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5M6V-W55C-PH7P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-24 06:31 – Updated: 2026-03-24 06:31Vitals ESP developed by Galaxy Software Services has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute certain functions to obtain sensitive information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-4640"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-24T05:16:25Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vitals ESP developed by Galaxy Software Services has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute certain functions to obtain sensitive information.",
"id": "GHSA-5m6v-w55c-ph7p",
"modified": "2026-03-24T06:31:14Z",
"published": "2026-03-24T06:31:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4640"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10795-25784-2.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10794-704a2-1.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-5M6W-WVH7-57VM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-24 16:32 – Updated: 2026-05-06 21:24Summary
There is a high severity authentication bypass vulnerability in Traefik's ForwardAuth and snippet-based authentication middleware. Traefik's forwarded-header sanitization logic targets only canonical header names (e.g., X-Forwarded-Proto) and does not strip or normalize alias variants that use underscores instead of dashes (e.g., X_Forwarded_Proto). These unsanitized alias headers are forwarded intact to the authentication backend. When the backend normalizes underscore and dash header forms equivalently, an attacker can inject spoofed trust context — such as a trusted scheme or host — through the alias headers and bypass authentication on protected routes without valid credentials.
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.43
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.14
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-rc.2
For more information
If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
Original Description ### Summary An authentication bypass arises from chaining two bugs: incomplete forwarded-header sanitization at ingress and overly permissive header forwarding in pre-auth subrequests. While canonical `X-Forwarded-*` headers are handled, alias variants (e.g., underscore forms) are neither normalized nor stripped consistently. When downstream auth services normalize these headers, attackers can inject trusted context and bypass authentication on protected routes without credentials. ### Details This issue results from the interaction between forwarded-header handling and auth subrequest construction, creating a trust boundary mismatch. At ingress, Traefik defines a fixed set of canonical forwarded headers (`X-Forwarded-Proto`, `X-Forwarded-For`, etc.): Reference : [`pkg/middlewares/forwardedheaders/forwarded_header.go#L29-L36`](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/174e5d81111d8e9fb3d3c81cf6d22f3e33eb4f78/pkg/middlewares/forwardedheaders/forwarded_header.go#L29-L36)var xHeaders = []string{
xForwardedProto,
xForwardedFor,
xForwardedHost,
xForwardedPort,
This logic focuses exclusively on canonical header names and does not account for alias forms such as `X_Forwarded_Proto`. As a result, while standard headers may be sanitized or rewritten, semantically equivalent variants can pass through unchanged.
During ForwardAuth processing, request headers are copied wholesale into the auth subrequest:
Reference : [`pkg/middlewares/auth/forward.go#L401-L408`](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/174e5d81111d8e9fb3d3c81cf6d22f3e33eb4f78/pkg/middlewares/auth/forward.go#L401-L408)
utils.CopyHeaders(forwardReq.Header, req.Header)
RemoveConnectionHeaders(forwardReq)
utils.RemoveHeaders(forwardReq.Header, hopHeaders...)
This implementation forwards nearly all client-supplied headers to the auth backend, with filtering limited to hop-by-hop headers. There is no normalization or deduplication between canonical and alias header forms, meaning attacker-controlled headers can reach the auth service intact.
A similar pattern exists in snippet-based auth:
Reference : [`pkg/middlewares/ingressnginx/snippet/snippet.go#L574-L581`](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/174e5d81111d8e9fb3d3c81cf6d22f3e33eb4f78/pkg/middlewares/ingressnginx/snippet/snippet.go#L574-L581)
utils.CopyHeaders(forwardReq.Header, req.Header)
RemoveConnectionHeaders(forwardReq)
utils.RemoveHeaders(forwardReq.Header, hopHeaders...)
Again, headers are forwarded without enforcing a consistent trust model or canonicalization.
The vulnerability emerges when the auth backend normalizes header names (e.g., treating `X_Forwarded_Proto` and `X-Forwarded-Proto` equivalently). In that case:
- Traefik sanitizes only canonical headers.
- Alias headers remain attacker-controlled.
- The auth service merges or evaluates these aliases during normalization.
- Trust predicates (e.g., scheme = HTTPS, trusted host) are satisfied using spoofed values.
This allows a single crafted request to simultaneously bypass ingress trust enforcement and satisfy authentication checks, resulting in unauthorized access to protected backends.
### PoC
1. Configure a protected route using ForwardAuth or snippet-based auth, with an auth backend that normalizes header names (underscore ↔ dash).
2. Send a control request (expected: denied):
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: target.local
User-Agent: poc-control
Connection: close
3. Send an exploit request with alias headers (expected: allowed):
GET /protected HTTP/1.1
Host: app.example.local
X_Forwarded_Proto: https
X_Forwarded_Host: trusted.example
Connection: close
### Impact
This vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication at the proxy-to-auth boundary by injecting spoofed trust context through header aliases. In deployments where authorization decisions depend on forwarded headers, attackers can access protected endpoints and interact with backend services as if they were fully authenticated. This effectively undermines ForwardAuth and similar mechanisms, potentially exposing sensitive internal functionality and data.
### Suggested Remediation
1. Strip and regenerate both canonical and alias forms of forwarded headers consistently at ingress and during auth subrequests.
2. Apply a unified normalization policy across all forwarded header families (including RFC7239 and `X-Forwarded-*`).
3. Restrict which headers are forwarded to auth services (prefer explicit allowlists).
4. Add regression tests covering alias normalization inconsistencies across common backend frameworks.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.7.0-ea.1"
},
{
"fixed": "3.7.0-rc.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0-beta1"
},
{
"fixed": "3.6.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.11.43"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.7.34"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39858"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290",
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-24T16:32:34Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-30T21:16:32Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThere is a high severity authentication bypass vulnerability in Traefik\u0027s `ForwardAuth` and snippet-based authentication middleware. Traefik\u0027s forwarded-header sanitization logic targets only canonical header names (e.g., `X-Forwarded-Proto`) and does not strip or normalize alias variants that use underscores instead of dashes (e.g., `X_Forwarded_Proto`). These unsanitized alias headers are forwarded intact to the authentication backend. When the backend normalizes underscore and dash header forms equivalently, an attacker can inject spoofed trust context \u2014 such as a trusted scheme or host \u2014 through the alias headers and bypass authentication on protected routes without valid credentials.\n\n## Patches\n\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.43\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.14\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-rc.2\n\n## For more information\n\nIf there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues).\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eOriginal Description\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n### Summary\nAn authentication bypass arises from chaining two bugs: incomplete forwarded-header sanitization at ingress and overly permissive header forwarding in pre-auth subrequests. While canonical `X-Forwarded-*` headers are handled, alias variants (e.g., underscore forms) are neither normalized nor stripped consistently. When downstream auth services normalize these headers, attackers can inject trusted context and bypass authentication on protected routes without credentials.\n\n### Details\nThis issue results from the interaction between forwarded-header handling and auth subrequest construction, creating a trust boundary mismatch.\n\nAt ingress, Traefik defines a fixed set of canonical forwarded headers (`X-Forwarded-Proto`, `X-Forwarded-For`, etc.):\n\nReference : [`pkg/middlewares/forwardedheaders/forwarded_header.go#L29-L36`](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/174e5d81111d8e9fb3d3c81cf6d22f3e33eb4f78/pkg/middlewares/forwardedheaders/forwarded_header.go#L29-L36)\n\n```go\nvar xHeaders = []string{\n\txForwardedProto,\n\txForwardedFor,\n\txForwardedHost,\n\txForwardedPort,\n```\n\nThis logic focuses exclusively on canonical header names and does not account for alias forms such as `X_Forwarded_Proto`. As a result, while standard headers may be sanitized or rewritten, semantically equivalent variants can pass through unchanged.\n\nDuring ForwardAuth processing, request headers are copied wholesale into the auth subrequest:\n\nReference : [`pkg/middlewares/auth/forward.go#L401-L408`](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/174e5d81111d8e9fb3d3c81cf6d22f3e33eb4f78/pkg/middlewares/auth/forward.go#L401-L408)\n\n```go\nutils.CopyHeaders(forwardReq.Header, req.Header)\nRemoveConnectionHeaders(forwardReq)\nutils.RemoveHeaders(forwardReq.Header, hopHeaders...)\n```\n\nThis implementation forwards nearly all client-supplied headers to the auth backend, with filtering limited to hop-by-hop headers. There is no normalization or deduplication between canonical and alias header forms, meaning attacker-controlled headers can reach the auth service intact.\n\nA similar pattern exists in snippet-based auth:\n\nReference : [`pkg/middlewares/ingressnginx/snippet/snippet.go#L574-L581`](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/blob/174e5d81111d8e9fb3d3c81cf6d22f3e33eb4f78/pkg/middlewares/ingressnginx/snippet/snippet.go#L574-L581)\n\n```go\nutils.CopyHeaders(forwardReq.Header, req.Header)\nRemoveConnectionHeaders(forwardReq)\nutils.RemoveHeaders(forwardReq.Header, hopHeaders...)\n```\n\nAgain, headers are forwarded without enforcing a consistent trust model or canonicalization.\n\nThe vulnerability emerges when the auth backend normalizes header names (e.g., treating `X_Forwarded_Proto` and `X-Forwarded-Proto` equivalently). In that case:\n\n- Traefik sanitizes only canonical headers.\n- Alias headers remain attacker-controlled.\n- The auth service merges or evaluates these aliases during normalization.\n- Trust predicates (e.g., scheme = HTTPS, trusted host) are satisfied using spoofed values.\n\nThis allows a single crafted request to simultaneously bypass ingress trust enforcement and satisfy authentication checks, resulting in unauthorized access to protected backends.\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Configure a protected route using ForwardAuth or snippet-based auth, with an auth backend that normalizes header names (underscore \u2194 dash).\n2. Send a control request (expected: denied):\n\n```http\nGET / HTTP/1.1\nHost: target.local\nUser-Agent: poc-control\nConnection: close\n```\n\n3. Send an exploit request with alias headers (expected: allowed):\n\n```http\nGET /protected HTTP/1.1\nHost: app.example.local\nX_Forwarded_Proto: https\nX_Forwarded_Host: trusted.example\nConnection: close\n```\n\n### Impact\nThis vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication at the proxy-to-auth boundary by injecting spoofed trust context through header aliases. In deployments where authorization decisions depend on forwarded headers, attackers can access protected endpoints and interact with backend services as if they were fully authenticated. This effectively undermines ForwardAuth and similar mechanisms, potentially exposing sensitive internal functionality and data.\n\n### Suggested Remediation\n1. Strip and regenerate both canonical and alias forms of forwarded headers consistently at ingress and during auth subrequests.\n2. Apply a unified normalization policy across all forwarded header families (including RFC7239 and `X-Forwarded-*`).\n3. Restrict which headers are forwarded to auth services (prefer explicit allowlists).\n4. Add regression tests covering alias normalization inconsistencies across common backend frameworks.\n\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n---",
"id": "GHSA-5m6w-wvh7-57vm",
"modified": "2026-05-06T21:24:39Z",
"published": "2026-04-24T16:32:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-5m6w-wvh7-57vm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39858"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.43"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.14"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-rc.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Traefik: Pre-authentication decision bypass due to forwarded alias spoofing"
}
GHSA-5MF3-992W-8XCP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-28 21:30 – Updated: 2023-11-28 21:30There is no BIOS password on the FACSChorus workstation. A threat actor with physical access to the workstation can potentially exploit this vulnerability to access the BIOS configuration and modify the drive boot order and BIOS pre-boot authentication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-29061"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-11-28T21:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "There is no BIOS password on the FACSChorus workstation. A threat actor with physical access to the workstation can potentially exploit this vulnerability to access the BIOS configuration and modify the drive boot order and BIOS pre-boot authentication.",
"id": "GHSA-5mf3-992w-8xcp",
"modified": "2023-11-28T21:30:25Z",
"published": "2023-11-28T21:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-29061"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.bd.com/en-us/about-bd/cybersecurity/bulletin/bd-facschorus-software"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5MHP-VR58-C5WV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-14 18:32 – Updated: 2026-07-14 18:32Missing authentication for critical function in Microsoft Windows DNS allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering locally.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49174"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-14T17:16:52Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing authentication for critical function in Microsoft Windows DNS allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering locally.",
"id": "GHSA-5mhp-vr58-c5wv",
"modified": "2026-07-14T18:32:00Z",
"published": "2026-07-14T18:32:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49174"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5MJ6-FM92-WW5M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-03 21:34 – Updated: 2025-11-07 03:30Insider Threat Management (ITM) Server versions prior to 7.17.2 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated users on an adjacent network to perform agent unregistration when the number of registered agents exceeds the licensed limit. Successful exploitation prevents the server from receiving new events from affected agents, resulting in a partial loss of integrity and availability with no impact to confidentiality.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-8558"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-03T19:16:16Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Insider Threat Management (ITM) Server\u00a0versions prior to 7.17.2\u00a0contain an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated users on an adjacent network to perform agent unregistration when the number of registered agents exceeds the licensed limit. Successful exploitation prevents the server from receiving new events from affected agents, resulting in a partial loss of integrity and availability with no impact to confidentiality.",
"id": "GHSA-5mj6-fm92-ww5m",
"modified": "2025-11-07T03:30:25Z",
"published": "2025-11-03T21:34:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8558"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.proofpoint.com/us/security/security-advisories/pfpt-sa-2025-003"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-5MRQ-972X-QWR6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-20 00:00 – Updated: 2025-05-05 18:31The SiteGround Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass that allows unauthenticated users to log in as administrative users due to missing identity verification on initial 2FA set-up that allows unauthenticated and unauthorized users to configure 2FA for pending accounts. Upon successful configuration, the attacker is logged in as that user without access to a username/password pair which is the expected first form of authentication. This affects versions up to, and including, 1.2.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0992"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287",
"CWE-288",
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-19T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The SiteGround Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass that allows unauthenticated users to log in as administrative users due to missing identity verification on initial 2FA set-up that allows unauthenticated and unauthorized users to configure 2FA for pending accounts. Upon successful configuration, the attacker is logged in as that user without access to a username/password pair which is the expected first form of authentication. This affects versions up to, and including, 1.2.5.",
"id": "GHSA-5mrq-972x-qwr6",
"modified": "2025-05-05T18:31:39Z",
"published": "2022-04-20T00:00:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0992"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2706302"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2022/04/critical-authentication-bypass-vulnerability-patched-in-siteground-security-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6e5c6bf7-a653-4571-9566-574d2bb35c4f?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5MV2-M792-G4PG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-26 21:32 – Updated: 2024-12-17 18:33Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in OpenText™ AccuRev for LDAP Integration allows Authentication Bypass. The vulnerability could allow
a valid AccuRev username to gain access to AccuRev source control without knowing the user’s password.
This issue affects AccuRev for LDAP Integration: 2017.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-17082"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306",
"CWE-522"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-26T20:15:19Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in OpenText\u2122 AccuRev for LDAP Integration allows Authentication Bypass. The vulnerability could allow\u00a0\n\na valid AccuRev username to gain access to AccuRev source control without knowing the user\u2019s password.\n\nThis issue affects AccuRev for LDAP Integration: 2017.1.",
"id": "GHSA-5mv2-m792-g4pg",
"modified": "2024-12-17T18:33:44Z",
"published": "2024-11-26T21:32:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17082"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.microfocus.com/kb/kmdoc.php?id=KM03544106"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:I/V:C/RE:M/U:Red",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
- Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
- In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
- Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
- In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Mitigation MIT-4.5
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Mitigation
When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].
CAPEC-12: Choosing Message Identifier
This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.
CAPEC-166: Force the System to Reset Values
An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions.
CAPEC-216: Communication Channel Manipulation
An adversary manipulates a setting or parameter on communications channel in order to compromise its security. This can result in information exposure, insertion/removal of information from the communications stream, and/or potentially system compromise.
CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality
An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.