Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-284

Discouraged

Improper Access Control

Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

8370 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-GFVR-RF79-H88G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 21:32 – Updated: 2026-07-22 21:32
VLAI
Details

Administrator routes and install/update/uninstall processing did not consistently enforce component-management and installation permissions. An unauthorized backend user or CSRF attack could install, update or remove extensions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64791"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-22T21:18:10Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "Administrator routes and install/update/uninstall processing did not consistently enforce component-management and installation permissions. An unauthorized backend user or CSRF attack could install, update or remove extensions.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfvr-rf79-h88g",
  "modified": "2026-07-22T21:32:09Z",
  "published": "2026-07-22T21:32:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64791"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://regularlabs.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-GFXQ-FCQM-PV8X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-14 18:30 – Updated: 2025-10-14 18:30
VLAI
Details

Arbitrary file deletion vulnerabilities have been identified in the command-line interface of an AOS-8 Controller/Mobility Conductor. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an authenticated remote malicious actor to delete arbitrary files within the affected system.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-37135"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-14T17:15:40Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Arbitrary file deletion vulnerabilities have been identified in the command-line interface of an AOS-8 Controller/Mobility Conductor. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an authenticated remote malicious actor to delete arbitrary files within the affected system.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfxq-fcqm-pv8x",
  "modified": "2025-10-14T18:30:28Z",
  "published": "2025-10-14T18:30:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37135"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw04957en_us\u0026docLocale=en_US"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GG2F-R4JH-VPMH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-18 15:30 – Updated: 2025-03-26 14:41
VLAI
Summary
TastyIgniter Has an Incorrect Access Control Vulnerability via `invoice()` Function
Details

TastyIgniter 3.7.6 contains an Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in the invoice() function within Orders.php which allows unauthorized users to access and generate invoices due to missing permission checks.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "tastyigniter/tastyigniter"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-44313"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-03-26T14:41:43Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-18T15:15:53Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "TastyIgniter 3.7.6 contains an Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in the invoice() function within Orders.php which allows unauthorized users to access and generate invoices due to missing permission checks.",
  "id": "GHSA-gg2f-r4jh-vpmh",
  "modified": "2025-03-26T14:41:43Z",
  "published": "2025-03-18T15:30:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44313"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/tastyigniter/TastyIgniter"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tastyigniter/TastyIgniter/blob/3.x/app/admin/controllers/Orders.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://medium.com/@cnetsec/cve-2024-44313-incorrect-access-control-in-tastyigniter-3-7-6-01a73c548b74"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "TastyIgniter Has an Incorrect Access Control Vulnerability via `invoice()` Function"
}

GHSA-GG2P-P8WP-MQ7G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-14 15:31 – Updated: 2024-08-14 15:31
VLAI
Details

Improper access control in some Intel(R) UEFI Integrator Tools on Aptio V for Intel(R) NUC may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-26022"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-14T14:15:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper access control in some Intel(R) UEFI Integrator Tools on Aptio V for Intel(R) NUC may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.",
  "id": "GHSA-gg2p-p8wp-mq7g",
  "modified": "2024-08-14T15:31:16Z",
  "published": "2024-08-14T15:31:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26022"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01172.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GG38-FPH6-54G7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-10 21:30 – Updated: 2025-05-30 18:30
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in Zebra Enterprise Home Screen 4.1.19. By using the embedded Google Chrome application, it is possible to install an unauthorized application via a downloaded APK.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-36442"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-01-10T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Zebra Enterprise Home Screen 4.1.19. By using the embedded Google Chrome application, it is possible to install an unauthorized application via a downloaded APK.",
  "id": "GHSA-gg38-fph6-54g7",
  "modified": "2025-05-30T18:30:45Z",
  "published": "2023-01-10T21:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36442"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cds.thalesgroup.com/en/tcs-cert/CVE-2022-36442"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://excellium-services.com/cert-xlm-advisory/CVE-2022-36442"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.zebra.com/us/en/products/software/mobile-computers/mobile-app-utilities/enterprise-home-screen.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GG43-3XRG-56MF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:22 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:22
VLAI
Details

Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607, and Windows Server 2016 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted image file, aka "Windows Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-7212"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-11-10T06:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607, and Windows Server 2016 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted image file, aka \"Windows Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-gg43-3xrg-56mf",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:22:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:22:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7212"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2016/ms16-130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94027"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037241"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GG4X-FGG2-H9W9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-06 18:00 – Updated: 2026-01-06 18:00
VLAI
Summary
Bypassing Kyverno Policies via Double Policy Exceptions
Details

Summary

If a cluster has a Kyverno policy in enforce mode and there are two exceptions, this allows the policy to be bypassed, even if the first exception is more restrictive than the second.

Details

The following policy was applied:

apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
kind: ClusterPolicy
metadata:
  name: disallow-host-path
  annotations:
    policies.kyverno.io/title: Disallow hostPath
    policies.kyverno.io/category: Pod Security Standards (Baseline)
    policies.kyverno.io/severity: medium
    policies.kyverno.io/subject: Pod,Volume
    kyverno.io/kyverno-version: 1.6.0
    kyverno.io/kubernetes-version: "1.22-1.23"
    policies.kyverno.io/description: >-
      HostPath volumes let Pods use host directories and volumes in containers.
      Using host resources can be used to access shared data or escalate privileges
      and should not be allowed. This policy ensures no hostPath volumes are in use.
spec:
  validationFailureAction: Enforce
  background: true
  rules:
    - name: host-path
      match:
        any:
        - resources:
            kinds:
              - Pod
      validate:
        message: >-
          HostPath volumes are forbidden. The field spec.volumes[*].hostPath must be unset.
        pattern:
          spec:
            =(volumes):
              - X(hostPath): "null"

And two exceptions:

apiVersion: kyverno.io/v2beta1
kind: PolicyException
metadata:
  name: disallow-host-path-exception
  namespace: kyverno
spec:
  exceptions:
  - policyName: disallow-host-path
    ruleNames:
    - host-path
  match:
    any:
    - resources:
        kinds:
        - DaemonSet
        - Deployment
        - Job
        - StatefulSet
        - ReplicaSet
        - ReplicationController
        - Pod
        - CronJob
        namespaces:
        - luntry
        - tstkyverno
        - examplens
apiVersion: kyverno.io/v2beta1
kind: PolicyException
metadata:
  name: disallow-host-path-exception-names
  namespace: kyverno
spec:
  exceptions:
  - policyName: disallow-host-path
    ruleNames:
    - host-path
  match:
    any:
    - resources:
        kinds:
        - DaemonSet
        - Deployment
        - Job
        - StatefulSet
        - ReplicaSet
        - ReplicationController
        - Pod
        - CronJob
        names:
        - '*haproxy*'
        - '*ingress*'

Trying to apply such a yaml will result in the expected ban:

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: mtkpi
  labels:
    app: pentest
spec:
  containers:
  - name: mtkpi
    image: ubuntu
    volumeMounts:
    - mountPath: /host
      name: noderoot
    command: [ "/bin/sh", "-c", "--" ]
    args: [ "while true; do sleep 30; done;" ]  
  volumes:
  - name: noderoot
    hostPath:
      path: /

Снимок экрана 2025-09-04 в 13 35 46

However, if the load name is changed to satisfy the second exception, the restrictions can be bypassed:

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: ingress
  labels:
    app: pentest
spec:
  containers:
  - name: mtkpi
    image: ubuntu
    volumeMounts:
    - mountPath: /host
      name: noderoot
    command: [ "/bin/sh", "-c", "--" ]
    args: [ "while true; do sleep 30; done;" ]  
  volumes:
  - name: noderoot
    hostPath:
      path: /

Снимок экрана 2025-09-04 в 13 37 09

It turns out that the second exception is higher in priority for Kyverno and allows for bypass of the restrictions.

Impact

The security restrictions can be bypassed.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.12.7"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/kyverno/kyverno"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.9.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.13.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-06T18:00:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nIf a cluster has a `Kyverno` policy in enforce mode and there are two exceptions, this allows the policy to be bypassed, even if the first exception is more restrictive than the second.\n\n### Details\n\nThe following policy was applied:\n\n```yaml\napiVersion: kyverno.io/v1\nkind: ClusterPolicy\nmetadata:\n  name: disallow-host-path\n  annotations:\n    policies.kyverno.io/title: Disallow hostPath\n    policies.kyverno.io/category: Pod Security Standards (Baseline)\n    policies.kyverno.io/severity: medium\n    policies.kyverno.io/subject: Pod,Volume\n    kyverno.io/kyverno-version: 1.6.0\n    kyverno.io/kubernetes-version: \"1.22-1.23\"\n    policies.kyverno.io/description: \u003e-\n      HostPath volumes let Pods use host directories and volumes in containers.\n      Using host resources can be used to access shared data or escalate privileges\n      and should not be allowed. This policy ensures no hostPath volumes are in use.\nspec:\n  validationFailureAction: Enforce\n  background: true\n  rules:\n    - name: host-path\n      match:\n        any:\n        - resources:\n            kinds:\n              - Pod\n      validate:\n        message: \u003e-\n          HostPath volumes are forbidden. The field spec.volumes[*].hostPath must be unset.\n        pattern:\n          spec:\n            =(volumes):\n              - X(hostPath): \"null\"\n```\n\nAnd two exceptions:\n\n```yaml\napiVersion: kyverno.io/v2beta1\nkind: PolicyException\nmetadata:\n  name: disallow-host-path-exception\n  namespace: kyverno\nspec:\n  exceptions:\n  - policyName: disallow-host-path\n    ruleNames:\n    - host-path\n  match:\n    any:\n    - resources:\n        kinds:\n        - DaemonSet\n        - Deployment\n        - Job\n        - StatefulSet\n        - ReplicaSet\n        - ReplicationController\n        - Pod\n        - CronJob\n        namespaces:\n        - luntry\n        - tstkyverno\n        - examplens\n```\n```yaml\napiVersion: kyverno.io/v2beta1\nkind: PolicyException\nmetadata:\n  name: disallow-host-path-exception-names\n  namespace: kyverno\nspec:\n  exceptions:\n  - policyName: disallow-host-path\n    ruleNames:\n    - host-path\n  match:\n    any:\n    - resources:\n        kinds:\n        - DaemonSet\n        - Deployment\n        - Job\n        - StatefulSet\n        - ReplicaSet\n        - ReplicationController\n        - Pod\n        - CronJob\n        names:\n        - \u0027*haproxy*\u0027\n        - \u0027*ingress*\u0027\n```\nTrying to apply such a yaml will result in the expected ban:\n\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: mtkpi\n  labels:\n    app: pentest\nspec:\n  containers:\n  - name: mtkpi\n    image: ubuntu\n    volumeMounts:\n    - mountPath: /host\n      name: noderoot\n    command: [ \"/bin/sh\", \"-c\", \"--\" ]\n    args: [ \"while true; do sleep 30; done;\" ]  \n  volumes:\n  - name: noderoot\n    hostPath:\n      path: /\n```\n\u003cimg width=\"855\" height=\"483\" alt=\"\u0421\u043d\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043a \u044d\u043a\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0430 2025-09-04 \u0432 13 35 46\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/deb28128-52fb-4f5f-a9bd-b68eefd411b2\" /\u003e\n\nHowever, if the load name is changed to satisfy the second exception, the restrictions can be bypassed:\n\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: ingress\n  labels:\n    app: pentest\nspec:\n  containers:\n  - name: mtkpi\n    image: ubuntu\n    volumeMounts:\n    - mountPath: /host\n      name: noderoot\n    command: [ \"/bin/sh\", \"-c\", \"--\" ]\n    args: [ \"while true; do sleep 30; done;\" ]  \n  volumes:\n  - name: noderoot\n    hostPath:\n      path: /\n```\n\n\u003cimg width=\"449\" height=\"386\" alt=\"\u0421\u043d\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043a \u044d\u043a\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0430 2025-09-04 \u0432 13 37 09\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8d5ad1e2-6d16-4768-8741-f11363bb9b22\" /\u003e\n\nIt turns out that the second exception is higher in priority for Kyverno and allows for bypass of the restrictions.\n\n### Impact\nThe security restrictions can be bypassed.",
  "id": "GHSA-gg4x-fgg2-h9w9",
  "modified": "2026-01-06T18:00:16Z",
  "published": "2026-01-06T18:00:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kyverno/kyverno/security/advisories/GHSA-gg4x-fgg2-h9w9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/kyverno/kyverno"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Bypassing Kyverno Policies via Double Policy Exceptions"
}

GHSA-GG56-3XGV-F3JX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-22 00:31
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the WebCenter Content: Imaging product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise WebCenter Content: Imaging. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of WebCenter Content: Imaging. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-60472"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T22:17:49Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the WebCenter Content: Imaging product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core).  Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and  14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise WebCenter Content: Imaging.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of WebCenter Content: Imaging. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
  "id": "GHSA-gg56-3xgv-f3jx",
  "modified": "2026-07-22T00:31:43Z",
  "published": "2026-07-22T00:31:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-60472"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GG64-46CM-RJ5F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-15 21:31 – Updated: 2025-04-15 21:31
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Java VM component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 19.3-19.26, 21.3-21.17 and 23.4-23.7. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java VM. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Java VM accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Java VM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-30736"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-15T21:16:03Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Java VM component of Oracle Database Server.  Supported versions that are affected are 19.3-19.26, 21.3-21.17 and  23.4-23.7. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java VM.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Java VM accessible data as well as  unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Java VM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-gg64-46cm-rj5f",
  "modified": "2025-04-15T21:31:48Z",
  "published": "2025-04-15T21:31:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30736"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2025.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GG7C-Q6GM-6Q67

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 00:32 – Updated: 2026-07-22 00:32
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Regulatory Management product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Regulatory Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Process Manufacturing Regulatory Management accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Process Manufacturing Regulatory Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-62514"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T22:19:06Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Regulatory Management product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations).  Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Regulatory Management.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Process Manufacturing Regulatory Management accessible data as well as  unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Process Manufacturing Regulatory Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-gg7c-q6gm-6q67",
  "modified": "2026-07-22T00:32:32Z",
  "published": "2026-07-22T00:32:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62514"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-1
Architecture and Design Operation

Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.

Mitigation MIT-46
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

  • Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts

An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.

CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion

An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.

CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.

CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.

CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof

An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.

CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure

An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.

CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration

An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.

CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment

An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.

CAPEC-550: Install New Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.

CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.

CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit

An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.

CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers

When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.

CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable

An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.

CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File

An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.

CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot

An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.

CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon

Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.

CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.