CWE-119
DiscouragedImproper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
Abstraction: Class · Status: Stable
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
17493 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-X6P5-7C22-QRQ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-22 18:30 – Updated: 2024-03-18 18:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Prevent out-of-bounds memory access
The test_tag test triggers an unhandled page fault:
# ./test_tag [ 130.640218] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001b898004, era == 9000000003137f7c, ra == 9000000003139e70 [ 130.640501] Oops[#3]: [ 130.640553] CPU: 0 PID: 1326 Comm: test_tag Tainted: G D O 6.7.0-rc4-loong-devel-gb62ab1a397cf #47 61985c1d94084daa2432f771daa45b56b10d8d2a [ 130.640764] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 [ 130.640874] pc 9000000003137f7c ra 9000000003139e70 tp 9000000104cb4000 sp 9000000104cb7a40 [ 130.641001] a0 ffff80001b894000 a1 ffff80001b897ff8 a2 000000006ba210be a3 0000000000000000 [ 130.641128] a4 000000006ba210be a5 00000000000000f1 a6 00000000000000b3 a7 0000000000000000 [ 130.641256] t0 0000000000000000 t1 00000000000007f6 t2 0000000000000000 t3 9000000004091b70 [ 130.641387] t4 000000006ba210be t5 0000000000000004 t6 fffffffffffffff0 t7 90000000040913e0 [ 130.641512] t8 0000000000000005 u0 0000000000000dc0 s9 0000000000000009 s0 9000000104cb7ae0 [ 130.641641] s1 00000000000007f6 s2 0000000000000009 s3 0000000000000095 s4 0000000000000000 [ 130.641771] s5 ffff80001b894000 s6 ffff80001b897fb0 s7 9000000004090c50 s8 0000000000000000 [ 130.641900] ra: 9000000003139e70 build_body+0x1fcc/0x4988 [ 130.642007] ERA: 9000000003137f7c build_body+0xd8/0x4988 [ 130.642112] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) [ 130.642261] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) [ 130.642353] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE) [ 130.642458] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7) [ 130.642554] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) [ 130.642658] BADV: ffff80001b898004 [ 130.642719] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000) [ 130.642815] Modules linked in: [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(O)] [ 130.642924] Process test_tag (pid: 1326, threadinfo=00000000f7f4015f, task=000000006499f9fd) [ 130.643062] Stack : 0000000000000000 9000000003380724 0000000000000000 0000000104cb7be8 [ 130.643213] 0000000000000000 25af8d9b6e600558 9000000106250ea0 9000000104cb7ae0 [ 130.643378] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 [ 130.643538] 0000000000000090 9000000106250ea0 ffff80001b894000 ffff80001b894000 [ 130.643685] 00007ffffb917790 900000000313ca94 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 130.643831] ffff80001b894000 0000000000000ff7 0000000000000000 9000000100468000 [ 130.643983] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 25af8d9b6e600558 [ 130.644131] 0000000000000bb7 ffff80001b894048 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 130.644276] 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 0000000000000090 9000000104cb7bdc [ 130.644423] ffff80001b894000 0000000000000000 00007ffffb917790 90000000032acfb0 [ 130.644572] ... [ 130.644629] Call Trace: [ 130.644641] [<9000000003137f7c>] build_body+0xd8/0x4988 [ 130.644785] [<900000000313ca94>] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x228/0x4ec [ 130.644891] [<90000000032acfb0>] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x158/0x1b0 [ 130.645003] [<90000000032b3504>] bpf_prog_load+0x760/0xb44 [ 130.645089] [<90000000032b6744>] __sys_bpf+0xbb8/0x2588 [ 130.645175] [<90000000032b8388>] sys_bpf+0x20/0x2c [ 130.645259] [<9000000003f6ab38>] do_syscall+0x7c/0x94 [ 130.645369] [<9000000003121c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158 [ 130.645507] [ 130.645539] Code: 380839f6 380831f9 28412bae <24000ca6> 004081ad 0014cb50 004083e8 02bff34c 58008e91 [ 130.645729] [ 130.646418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
On my machine, which has CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_16KB=y, the test failed at loading a BPF prog with 2039 instructions:
prog = (struct bpf_prog )ffff80001b894000 insn = (struct bpf_insn )(prog->insnsi)fff ---truncated---
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-26588"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119",
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-22T17:15:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Prevent out-of-bounds memory access\n\nThe test_tag test triggers an unhandled page fault:\n\n # ./test_tag\n [ 130.640218] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001b898004, era == 9000000003137f7c, ra == 9000000003139e70\n [ 130.640501] Oops[#3]:\n [ 130.640553] CPU: 0 PID: 1326 Comm: test_tag Tainted: G D O 6.7.0-rc4-loong-devel-gb62ab1a397cf #47 61985c1d94084daa2432f771daa45b56b10d8d2a\n [ 130.640764] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022\n [ 130.640874] pc 9000000003137f7c ra 9000000003139e70 tp 9000000104cb4000 sp 9000000104cb7a40\n [ 130.641001] a0 ffff80001b894000 a1 ffff80001b897ff8 a2 000000006ba210be a3 0000000000000000\n [ 130.641128] a4 000000006ba210be a5 00000000000000f1 a6 00000000000000b3 a7 0000000000000000\n [ 130.641256] t0 0000000000000000 t1 00000000000007f6 t2 0000000000000000 t3 9000000004091b70\n [ 130.641387] t4 000000006ba210be t5 0000000000000004 t6 fffffffffffffff0 t7 90000000040913e0\n [ 130.641512] t8 0000000000000005 u0 0000000000000dc0 s9 0000000000000009 s0 9000000104cb7ae0\n [ 130.641641] s1 00000000000007f6 s2 0000000000000009 s3 0000000000000095 s4 0000000000000000\n [ 130.641771] s5 ffff80001b894000 s6 ffff80001b897fb0 s7 9000000004090c50 s8 0000000000000000\n [ 130.641900] ra: 9000000003139e70 build_body+0x1fcc/0x4988\n [ 130.642007] ERA: 9000000003137f7c build_body+0xd8/0x4988\n [ 130.642112] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)\n [ 130.642261] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)\n [ 130.642353] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE)\n [ 130.642458] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7)\n [ 130.642554] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)\n [ 130.642658] BADV: ffff80001b898004\n [ 130.642719] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000)\n [ 130.642815] Modules linked in: [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(O)]\n [ 130.642924] Process test_tag (pid: 1326, threadinfo=00000000f7f4015f, task=000000006499f9fd)\n [ 130.643062] Stack : 0000000000000000 9000000003380724 0000000000000000 0000000104cb7be8\n [ 130.643213] 0000000000000000 25af8d9b6e600558 9000000106250ea0 9000000104cb7ae0\n [ 130.643378] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000\n [ 130.643538] 0000000000000090 9000000106250ea0 ffff80001b894000 ffff80001b894000\n [ 130.643685] 00007ffffb917790 900000000313ca94 0000000000000000 0000000000000000\n [ 130.643831] ffff80001b894000 0000000000000ff7 0000000000000000 9000000100468000\n [ 130.643983] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 25af8d9b6e600558\n [ 130.644131] 0000000000000bb7 ffff80001b894048 0000000000000000 0000000000000000\n [ 130.644276] 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 0000000000000090 9000000104cb7bdc\n [ 130.644423] ffff80001b894000 0000000000000000 00007ffffb917790 90000000032acfb0\n [ 130.644572] ...\n [ 130.644629] Call Trace:\n [ 130.644641] [\u003c9000000003137f7c\u003e] build_body+0xd8/0x4988\n [ 130.644785] [\u003c900000000313ca94\u003e] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x228/0x4ec\n [ 130.644891] [\u003c90000000032acfb0\u003e] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x158/0x1b0\n [ 130.645003] [\u003c90000000032b3504\u003e] bpf_prog_load+0x760/0xb44\n [ 130.645089] [\u003c90000000032b6744\u003e] __sys_bpf+0xbb8/0x2588\n [ 130.645175] [\u003c90000000032b8388\u003e] sys_bpf+0x20/0x2c\n [ 130.645259] [\u003c9000000003f6ab38\u003e] do_syscall+0x7c/0x94\n [ 130.645369] [\u003c9000000003121c5c\u003e] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158\n [ 130.645507]\n [ 130.645539] Code: 380839f6 380831f9 28412bae \u003c24000ca6\u003e 004081ad 0014cb50 004083e8 02bff34c 58008e91\n [ 130.645729]\n [ 130.646418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n\nOn my machine, which has CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_16KB=y, the test failed at\nloading a BPF prog with 2039 instructions:\n\n prog = (struct bpf_prog *)ffff80001b894000\n insn = (struct bpf_insn *)(prog-\u003einsnsi)fff\n---truncated---",
"id": "GHSA-x6p5-7c22-qrq6",
"modified": "2024-03-18T18:32:18Z",
"published": "2024-02-22T18:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26588"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36a87385e31c9343af9a4756598e704741250a67"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4631c2dd69d928bca396f9f58baeddf85e14ced5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7924ade13a49c0067da6ea13e398102979c0654a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9aeb09f4d85a87bac46c010d75a2ea299d462f28"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X6PX-24P3-X59F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:13 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:13Lack of check of buffer size before copying in a WLAN function can lead to a buffer overflow in Snapdragon Mobile in version SD 845, SD 850.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-11875"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-10-29T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Lack of check of buffer size before copying in a WLAN function can lead to a buffer overflow in Snapdragon Mobile in version SD 845, SD 850.",
"id": "GHSA-x6px-24p3-x59f",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:13:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:13:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-11875"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.qualcomm.com/company/product-security/bulletins"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107681"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X6Q8-W8XF-7859
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:02 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:02Stack-based buffer overflow in NTWebServer.exe in the test web service in InduSoft NTWebServer, as distributed in Advantech Studio 6.1 and InduSoft Web Studio 7.0, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long request to TCP port 80.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-0488"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-01-18T18:03:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in NTWebServer.exe in the test web service in InduSoft NTWebServer, as distributed in Advantech Studio 6.1 and InduSoft Web Studio 7.0, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long request to TCP port 80.",
"id": "GHSA-x6q8-w8xf-7859",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:02:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:02:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0488"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/64678"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://downloadt.advantech.com/download/downloadsr.aspx?File_Id=1-I1D7QD"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42883"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42903"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.advantechdirect.com/emarketingprograms/AStudio_Patch/AStudio_Patch.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.indusoft.com/blog/?p=337"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/506864"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/70396"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45783"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-10-337-01.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0092"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0093"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-X6QV-5QX2-PVJW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:04 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:04A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Catalina 10.15. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-8781"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-12-18T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Catalina 10.15. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-x6qv-5qx2-pvjw",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:04:35Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:04:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-8781"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/HT210634"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-X6R4-V6W5-36CR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:32 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:32Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1775, CVE-2014-1779, CVE-2014-1799, CVE-2014-1803, and CVE-2014-2757.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0282"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-06-11T04:56:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka \"Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability,\" a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1775, CVE-2014-1779, CVE-2014-1799, CVE-2014-1803, and CVE-2014-2757.",
"id": "GHSA-x6r4-v6w5-36cr",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:32:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:32:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0282"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2014/ms14-035"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/33860"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/107851"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/67862"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030370"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-X6R5-8XCJ-PV7F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-28 15:30 – Updated: 2025-01-10 21:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
firmware: arm_scmi: Harden accesses to the reset domains
Accessing reset domains descriptors by the index upon the SCMI drivers requests through the SCMI reset operations interface can potentially lead to out-of-bound violations if the SCMI driver misbehave.
Add an internal consistency check before any such domains descriptors accesses.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-48655"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119",
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-28T13:15:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfirmware: arm_scmi: Harden accesses to the reset domains\n\nAccessing reset domains descriptors by the index upon the SCMI drivers\nrequests through the SCMI reset operations interface can potentially\nlead to out-of-bound violations if the SCMI driver misbehave.\n\nAdd an internal consistency check before any such domains descriptors\naccesses.",
"id": "GHSA-x6r5-8xcj-pv7f",
"modified": "2025-01-10T21:31:24Z",
"published": "2024-04-28T15:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48655"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f08a1b26cfc53b7715abc46857c6023bb1b87de"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7184491fc515f391afba23d0e9b690caaea72daf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e65edf0d37698f7a6cb174608d3ec7976baf49e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e9076ffbcaed5da6c182b144ef9f6e24554af268"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2277d9e2a0d092c13bae7ee82d75432bb8b5108"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00019.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240912-0008"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X6RC-QRPH-CQ5H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:45 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:45Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) recognize_eps_file function (src/psgen.c) and (2) tilde_subst function (src/util.c) in GNU enscript 1.6.1, and possibly earlier, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an epsf escape sequence with a long filename.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-5078"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-12-19T17:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) recognize_eps_file function (src/psgen.c) and (2) tilde_subst function (src/util.c) in GNU enscript 1.6.1, and possibly earlier, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an epsf escape sequence with a long filename.",
"id": "GHSA-x6rc-qrph-cq5h",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:45:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:45:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5078"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473958"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/47680"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11807"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00000.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33181"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2008-504.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-1021.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021401"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-X6RM-7JHF-954P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:49 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:49Heap-based buffer overflow in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.302 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.203 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.481 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.180, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.180, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 18.0.0.180 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4432 and CVE-2015-5118.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-3135"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-07-09T16:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.302 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.203 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.481 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.180, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.180, and Adobe AIR SDK \u0026 Compiler before 18.0.0.180 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4432 and CVE-2015-5118.",
"id": "GHSA-x6rm-7jhf-954p",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:49:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:49:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3135"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb15-16.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201507-13"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00017.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00018.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1214.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75592"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032810"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-X6RR-372C-RMR2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:03 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:03A vulnerability in the Identity Firewall feature of Cisco ASA Software before 9.6(2.1) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of the affected system or to remotely execute code. The vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow in the affected code area. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted NetBIOS packet in response to a NetBIOS probe sent by the ASA software. An exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the system or cause a reload of the affected system. Note: Only traffic directed to the affected system can be used to exploit this vulnerability. This vulnerability affects systems configured in routed and transparent firewall mode and in single or multiple context mode. This vulnerability can be triggered by IPv4 traffic.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-6432"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-10-27T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the Identity Firewall feature of Cisco ASA Software before 9.6(2.1) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of the affected system or to remotely execute code. The vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow in the affected code area. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted NetBIOS packet in response to a NetBIOS probe sent by the ASA software. An exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the system or cause a reload of the affected system. Note: Only traffic directed to the affected system can be used to exploit this vulnerability. This vulnerability affects systems configured in routed and transparent firewall mode and in single or multiple context mode. This vulnerability can be triggered by IPv4 traffic.",
"id": "GHSA-x6rr-372c-rmr2",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:03:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:03:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6432"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20161019-asa-idfw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93784"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037059"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X6RW-M9V7-FF3G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:38 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:38A vulnerability in the implementation of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) functionality in Cisco Small Business SPA50x, SPA51x, and SPA52x Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to become unresponsive, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to the improper handling of SIP request messages by an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using formatted specifiers in a SIP payload that is sent to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to become unresponsive, resulting in a DoS condition that persists until the device is restarted manually. This vulnerability affects Cisco Small Business SPA50x, SPA51x, and SPA52x Series IP Phones that are running firmware release 7.6.2SR1 or earlier. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc63986.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-12260"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-10-19T08:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the implementation of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) functionality in Cisco Small Business SPA50x, SPA51x, and SPA52x Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to become unresponsive, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to the improper handling of SIP request messages by an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using formatted specifiers in a SIP payload that is sent to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to become unresponsive, resulting in a DoS condition that persists until the device is restarted manually. This vulnerability affects Cisco Small Business SPA50x, SPA51x, and SPA52x Series IP Phones that are running firmware release 7.6.2SR1 or earlier. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc63986.",
"id": "GHSA-x6rw-m9v7-ff3g",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:38:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:38:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-12260"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20171018-sip1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101495"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039616"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
- Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Mitigation MIT-4.1
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Mitigation MIT-10
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Mitigation MIT-9
- Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
- Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.
- When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
- Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
- If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
Mitigation MIT-11
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-13
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
CAPEC-10: Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the adversary finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
CAPEC-100: Overflow Buffers
Buffer Overflow attacks target improper or missing bounds checking on buffer operations, typically triggered by input injected by an adversary. As a consequence, an adversary is able to write past the boundaries of allocated buffer regions in memory, causing a program crash or potentially redirection of execution as per the adversaries' choice.
CAPEC-123: Buffer Manipulation
An adversary manipulates an application's interaction with a buffer in an attempt to read or modify data they shouldn't have access to. Buffer attacks are distinguished in that it is the buffer space itself that is the target of the attack rather than any code responsible for interpreting the content of the buffer. In virtually all buffer attacks the content that is placed in the buffer is immaterial. Instead, most buffer attacks involve retrieving or providing more input than can be stored in the allocated buffer, resulting in the reading or overwriting of other unintended program memory.
CAPEC-14: Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow
This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service. This hostile service is created to deliver the correct content to the client software. For example, if the client-side application is a browser, the service will host a webpage that the browser loads.
CAPEC-24: Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow
In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
CAPEC-42: MIME Conversion
An attacker exploits a weakness in the MIME conversion routine to cause a buffer overflow and gain control over the mail server machine. The MIME system is designed to allow various different information formats to be interpreted and sent via e-mail. Attack points exist when data are converted to MIME compatible format and back.
CAPEC-44: Overflow Binary Resource File
An attack of this type exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in the handling of binary resources. Binary resources may include music files like MP3, image files like JPEG files, and any other binary file. These attacks may pass unnoticed to the client machine through normal usage of files, such as a browser loading a seemingly innocent JPEG file. This can allow the adversary access to the execution stack and execute arbitrary code in the target process.
CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An adversary can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
CAPEC-46: Overflow Variables and Tags
This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The adversary crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
CAPEC-47: Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion
In this attack, the target software is given input that the adversary knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
CAPEC-8: Buffer Overflow in an API Call
This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An adversary who has knowledge of known vulnerable libraries or shared code can easily target software that makes use of these libraries. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
CAPEC-9: Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An adversary can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.