CVE-2025-61732 (GCVE-0-2025-61732)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-05 03:42 – Updated: 2026-02-05 14:57
VLAI?
Title
Potential code smuggling via doc comments in cmd/cgo
Summary
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
Severity ?
8.6 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE
  • CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Assigner
Go
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Go toolchain cmd/cgo Affected: 0 , < 1.24.13 (semver)
Affected: 1.25.0-0 , < 1.25.7 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
RyotaK (https://ryotak.net) of GMO Flatt Security Inc.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "LOCAL",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 8.6,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "CHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-61732",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-02-05T14:56:35.952364Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-94",
                "description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-05T14:57:44.851Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "cmd/cgo",
          "product": "cmd/cgo",
          "vendor": "Go toolchain",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.24.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "1.25.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.25.0-0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RyotaK (https://ryotak.net) of GMO Flatt Security Inc."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-05T03:42:26.392Z",
        "orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
        "shortName": "Go"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://go.dev/cl/734220"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://go.dev/issue/76697"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/K09ubi9FQFk"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4433"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Potential code smuggling via doc comments in cmd/cgo"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
    "assignerShortName": "Go",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-61732",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-05T03:42:26.392Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-09-30T15:05:03.606Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-05T14:57:44.851Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-61732\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@golang.org\",\"published\":\"2026-02-05T04:15:50.873\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-02-10T15:17:26.930\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":6.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-94\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.24.13\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9FEE539A-EDC2-4044-A38C-5A0FDF567509\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.25.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.25.7\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B275853C-E253-485B-B469-31D1A7383965\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://go.dev/cl/734220\",\"source\":\"security@golang.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Product\"]},{\"url\":\"https://go.dev/issue/76697\",\"source\":\"security@golang.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/K09ubi9FQFk\",\"source\":\"security@golang.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4433\",\"source\":\"security@golang.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\",\"Patch\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.6, \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-61732\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-02-05T14:56:35.952364Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-94\", \"description\": \"CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-02-05T14:53:51.558Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Potential code smuggling via doc comments in cmd/cgo\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"RyotaK (https://ryotak.net) of GMO Flatt Security Inc.\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Go toolchain\", \"product\": \"cmd/cgo\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.24.13\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.25.0-0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.25.7\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageName\": \"cmd/cgo\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://pkg.go.dev\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://go.dev/cl/734220\"}, {\"url\": \"https://go.dev/issue/76697\"}, {\"url\": \"https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/K09ubi9FQFk\"}, {\"url\": \"https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4433\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc\", \"shortName\": \"Go\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-02-05T03:42:26.392Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-61732\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-02-05T14:57:44.851Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-09-30T15:05:03.606Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-02-05T03:42:26.392Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Go\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.