CWE-760

Use of a One-Way Hash with a Predictable Salt

The product uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the product uses a predictable salt as part of the input.

CVE-2025-26486 (GCVE-0-2025-26486)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-03-19 15:46
Modified
2025-07-02 14:34
CWE
  • CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
  • CWE-916 - Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
  • CWE-328 - Use of Weak Hash
  • CWE-760 - Use of a One-Way Hash with a Predictable Salt
Summary
Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm, Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort, Use of Weak Hash, Use of a One-Way Hash with a Predictable Salt vulnerabilities in Beta80 "Life 1st Identity Manager" enable an attacker with access to password hashes to bruteforce user passwords or find a collision to ultimately while attempting to gain access to a target application that uses "Life 1st Identity Manager" as a service for authentication. This issue affects Life 1st: 1.5.2.14234.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Beta80 Life 1st Version: 1.5.2.14234
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-26486",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-03-19T18:28:07.501414Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-19T18:28:28.268Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Life 1st",
          "vendor": "Beta80",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.5.2.14234"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm, Use of Password Hash \nWith Insufficient Computational Effort, Use of Weak Hash, Use of a \nOne-Way Hash with a Predictable Salt vulnerabilities in Beta80 \"Life 1st Identity Manager\"\nenable an attacker with access to\npassword hashes\nto bruteforce user passwords or find a collision to ultimately while attempting to gain access to a target application that uses \"Life 1st Identity Manager\" as a service for authentication.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Life 1st: 1.5.2.14234.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm, Use of Password Hash \nWith Insufficient Computational Effort, Use of Weak Hash, Use of a \nOne-Way Hash with a Predictable Salt vulnerabilities in Beta80 \"Life 1st Identity Manager\"\nenable an attacker with access to\npassword hashes\nto bruteforce user passwords or find a collision to ultimately while attempting to gain access to a target application that uses \"Life 1st Identity Manager\" as a service for authentication.\nThis issue affects Life 1st: 1.5.2.14234."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-49",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-327",
              "description": "CWE-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-916",
              "description": "CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-328",
              "description": "CWE-328 Use of Weak Hash",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-760",
              "description": "CWE-760 Use of a One-Way Hash with a Predictable Salt",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-07-02T14:34:15.470Z",
        "orgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
        "shortName": "ENISA"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "government-resource"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.cvcn.gov.it/cvcn/cve/CVE-2025-26486"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry"
          ],
          "url": "https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/vulnerability/CVE-2025-26486"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
    "assignerShortName": "ENISA",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-26486",
    "datePublished": "2025-03-19T15:46:34.309Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-02-11T08:24:51.661Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-07-02T14:34:15.470Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Mitigation ID: MIT-51

Phase: Architecture and Design

Description:

  • Use an adaptive hash function that can be configured to change the amount of computational effort needed to compute the hash, such as the number of iterations ("stretching") or the amount of memory required. Some hash functions perform salting automatically. These functions can significantly increase the overhead for a brute force attack compared to intentionally-fast functions such as MD5. For example, rainbow table attacks can become infeasible due to the high computing overhead. Finally, since computing power gets faster and cheaper over time, the technique can be reconfigured to increase the workload without forcing an entire replacement of the algorithm in use.
  • Some hash functions that have one or more of these desired properties include bcrypt [REF-291], scrypt [REF-292], and PBKDF2 [REF-293]. While there is active debate about which of these is the most effective, they are all stronger than using salts with hash functions with very little computing overhead.
  • Note that using these functions can have an impact on performance, so they require special consideration to avoid denial-of-service attacks. However, their configurability provides finer control over how much CPU and memory is used, so it could be adjusted to suit the environment's needs.
Mitigation

Phase: Implementation

Description:

  • If a technique that requires extra computational effort can not be implemented, then for each password that is processed, generate a new random salt using a strong random number generator with unpredictable seeds. Add the salt to the plaintext password before hashing it. When storing the hash, also store the salt. Do not use the same salt for every password.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.

Back to CWE stats page