var-201802-0013
Vulnerability from variot
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Fortinet FortiGate UTM WAF appliances with FortiOS 4.3.x before 4.3.6 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving the (1) Endpoint Monitor, (2) Dialup List, or (3) Log&Report Display modules, or the fields_sorted_opt parameter to (4) user/auth/list or (5) endpointcompliance/app_detect/predefined_sig_list. Fortinet FortiOS Contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.Information may be obtained and information may be altered. Successful exploits will allow attacker-supplied HTML and script code to run in the context of the affected browser, potentially allowing the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials or control how the site is rendered to the user. Other attacks are also possible. Fortinet FortiGate UTM WAF appliances is a firewall device from Fortinet. FortiOS is an operating system that runs on it. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary Web scripts or HTML. Title: ====== Fortigate UTM WAF Appliance - Multiple Web Vulnerabilities
Date:
2012-01-27
References:
http://vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=144
VL-ID:
144
Introduction:
The FortiGate series of multi-threat security systems detect and eliminate the most damaging, content-based threats from email and Web traffic such as viruses, worms, intrusions, inappropriate Web content and more in real time - without degrading network performance.
Ranging from the FortiGate-30 series for small offices to the FortiGate-5000 series for large enterprises, service providers and carriers, the FortiGate line combines the FortiOS™ security operating system with FortiASIC processors and other hardware to provide a comprehensive and high-performance array of security and networking functions including:
* Firewall, VPN, and Traffic Shaping
* Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
* Antivirus/Antispyware/Antimalware
* Web Filtering
* Antispam
* Application Control (e.g., IM and P2P)
* VoIP Support (H.323. and SCCP)
* Layer 2/3 routing
* Multiple WAN interface options
FortiGate appliances provide cost-effective, comprehensive protection against network, content, and application-level threats - including complex attacks favored by cybercriminals - without degrading network availability and uptime. FortiGate platforms incorporate sophisticated networking features, such as high availability (active/active, active/passive) for maximum network uptime, and virtual domain (VDOM) capabilities to separate various networks requiring different security policies.
(Copy from the Vendor Homepage: http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortigate/ && http://www.avfirewalls.com/)
Abstract:
1.1 Vulnerability-Lab Team discovered multiple persistent Web Vulnerabilities on the FortiGate UTM Appliance Application.
1.2 Vulnerability-Lab Team discovered multiple non-persistent Web Vulnerabilities on the FortiGate UTM Appliance Application.
Report-Timeline:
2012-01-27: Public or Non-Public Disclosure
Status:
Published
Affected Products:
Exploitation-Technique:
Remote
Severity:
High
Details:
1.1 Multiple input validation vulnerabilities(persistent) are detected on FortGate UTM Appliance Series. Remote attacker can include (persistent) malicious script code to manipulate specific customer/admin requests. The vulnerability allows an local low privileged attacker to manipulate the appliance(application) via persistent script code inject.
It is also possible to hijack customer sessions via persistent script code execution on application side. Successful exploitation can also result in content/module request manipulation, execution of persistent malicious script code, session hijacking, account steal & phishing.
Vulnerable Module(s): (Persistent) [+] Endpoint => Monitor => Endpoint Monitor [+] Dailup List [+] Log&Report => Display
Picture(s): ../ive2.png ../ive3.png
1.2 Multiple input validation vulnerabilities(non-persistent) are detected on FortGate UTM Appliance Series. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to hijack admin/customer sessions with required user inter action (client-side). Successful exploitation allows to phish user accounts, redirect over client side requests or manipulate website context on client-side browser requests.
Vulnerable Module(s): (Non-Persistent) [+] Endpoint -> NAC -> Application Database -> Listings [+] List field sorted
Picture(s): ../ive1.png
Proof of Concept:
The vulnerabilities can be exploited by remote attackers with or without user inter action. For demonstration or reproduce ...
poc: => http://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=144
Solution:
1.1 To fix/patch the persistent input validation vulnerabilities restrict the input fields & parse the input. Locate the vulnerable area(s) reproduce the bugs & parse the output after a malicious(test) insert. Setup a filter or restriction mask to prevent against future persistent input validation attacks.
1.2 To fix the client side input validation vulnerability parse the vulnerable request by filtering the input & cleanup the output. Set a input restriction or configure whitelist/filter to stop client side requests and form a secure exception-handling around.
Risk:
1.1 The security risk of the persistent vulnerabilities are estimated as high because of multiple persistent input validation vulnerabilities on different modules.
1.2 The security risk of the non-persistent cross site requests are estimated as low because of required user inter-action to hijack a not expired session.
Credits:
Vulnerability Research Laboratory - Benjamin Kunz Mejri (Rem0ve)
Disclaimer:
The information provided in this advisory is provided as it is without any warranty. Vulnerability-Lab disclaims all warranties, either expressed or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and capability for a particular purpose. Vulnerability- Lab or its suppliers are not liable in any case of damage, including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential loss of business profits or special damages, even if Vulnerability-Lab or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not apply. Any modified copy or reproduction, including partially usages, of this file requires authorization from Vulnerability- Lab. Permission to electronically redistribute this alert in its unmodified form is granted. All other rights, including the use of other media, are reserved by Vulnerability-Lab or its suppliers.
Copyright © 2012|Vulnerability-Lab
-- Website: www.vulnerability-lab.com ; vuln-lab.com or vuln-db.com Contact: admin@vulnerability-lab.com or support@vulnerability-lab.com
. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
SC Magazine awards the Secunia CSI a 5-Star rating Top-level rating for ease of use, performance, documentation, support, and value for money. Read more and get a free trial here: http://secunia.com/blog/296
TITLE: JBoss Multiple Products JMX Console Authentication Bypass
SECUNIA ADVISORY ID: SA47850
VERIFY ADVISORY: Secunia.com http://secunia.com/advisories/47850/ Customer Area (Credentials Required) https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=47850
RELEASE DATE: 2012-02-06
DISCUSS ADVISORY: http://secunia.com/advisories/47850/#comments
AVAILABLE ON SITE AND IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Last Update * Popularity * Comments * Criticality Level * Impact * Where * Solution Status * Operating System / Software * CVE Reference(s)
http://secunia.com/advisories/47850/
ONLY AVAILABLE IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Authentication Level * Report Reliability * Secunia PoC * Secunia Analysis * Systems Affected * Approve Distribution * Remediation Status * Secunia CVSS Score * CVSS
https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=47850
ONLY AVAILABLE WITH SECUNIA CSI AND SECUNIA PSI: * AUTOMATED SCANNING
http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/ http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/corporate/wsus_sccm_3rd_third_party_patching/
DESCRIPTION: A security issue has been reported in multiple JBoss products, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions.
The security issue is caused due to improper access restrictions to the JMX Console.
For more information see vulnerability #1 in: SA39563
The security issue is reported in the following products: * JBoss Communications Platform 1.2 * JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.0 and 5.0.1 * JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 4.3 * JBoss Enterprise Web Platform 5.0 * JBoss SOA-Platform 4.2, 4.3, and 5.0
SOLUTION: Update to a fixed version.
Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/
ORIGINAL ADVISORY: JBPAPP-3952: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-3952
JBPAPP-4713: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-4713
Red Hat Doc#30741: https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-30741
OTHER REFERENCES: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/
DEEP LINKS: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/
EXTENDED DESCRIPTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/
EXTENDED SOLUTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/
EXPLOIT: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/
About: This Advisory was delivered by Secunia as a free service to help private users keeping their systems up to date against the latest vulnerabilities.
Subscribe: http://secunia.com/advisories/secunia_security_advisories/
Definitions: (Criticality, Where etc.) http://secunia.com/advisories/about_secunia_advisories/
Please Note: Secunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive by clicking the link. Secunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. Secunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only use those supplied by the vendor.
Unsubscribe: Secunia Security Advisories http://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org
Show details on source website
{
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/VARIoTentry#",
"affected_products": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/affected_products"
},
"configurations": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/configurations"
},
"credits": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/credits"
},
"cvss": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/"
},
"description": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/description/"
},
"exploit_availability": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/exploit_availability/"
},
"external_ids": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/external_ids/"
},
"iot": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot/"
},
"iot_taxonomy": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot_taxonomy/"
},
"patch": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/patch/"
},
"problemtype_data": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/problemtype_data/"
},
"references": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/references/"
},
"sources": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources/"
},
"sources_release_date": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_release_date/"
},
"sources_update_date": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_update_date/"
},
"threat_type": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/threat_type/"
},
"title": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/title/"
},
"type": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/type/"
}
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/vuln/VAR-201802-0013",
"affected_products": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/affected_products#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources"
}
},
"data": [
{
"model": "fortios",
"scope": "lt",
"trust": 1.0,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": "4.3.6"
},
{
"model": "fortios",
"scope": "gte",
"trust": 1.0,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": "4.3.0"
},
{
"model": "fortios",
"scope": "lt",
"trust": 0.8,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": "4.3.x"
},
{
"model": "fortios",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.8,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": "4.3.6"
},
{
"model": "fortios",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.6,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": "4.3.0"
},
{
"model": "fortigate",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": "800"
},
{
"model": "fortigate 620b",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": "5000"
},
{
"model": "fortigate",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": "3950"
},
{
"model": "fortigate 3810a",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate 3600a",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate 311b",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate 310b",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate 3016b",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate 300a",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate 224b",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate 200b",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "fortigate 1240b",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "fortinet",
"version": null
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
}
]
},
"configurations": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/configurations#",
"children": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"cpe_match": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"nodes": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe22Uri": "cpe:/o:fortinet:fortios",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
}
]
},
"credits": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/credits#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "Benjamin Kunz Mejri (Rem0ve)",
"sources": [
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201201-446"
}
],
"trust": 0.9
},
"cve": "CVE-2012-0941",
"cvss": {
"@context": {
"cvssV2": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV2#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV2"
},
"cvssV3": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV3#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV3/"
},
"severity": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/cvss/severity#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/severity"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources"
}
},
"data": [
{
"cvssV2": [
{
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"author": "nvd@nist.gov",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"id": "CVE-2012-0941",
"impactScore": 2.9,
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"trust": 1.8,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
{
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"author": "VULHUB",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"id": "VHN-54222",
"impactScore": 2.9,
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"trust": 0.1,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/AU:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
}
],
"cvssV3": [
{
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"author": "nvd@nist.gov",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"id": "CVE-2012-0941",
"impactScore": 2.7,
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"trust": 1.8,
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"author": "nvd@nist.gov",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941",
"trust": 1.0,
"value": "MEDIUM"
},
{
"author": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941",
"trust": 0.8,
"value": "Medium"
},
{
"author": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142",
"trust": 0.6,
"value": "MEDIUM"
},
{
"author": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222",
"trust": 0.1,
"value": "MEDIUM"
}
]
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
}
]
},
"description": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/description#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Fortinet FortiGate UTM WAF appliances with FortiOS 4.3.x before 4.3.6 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving the (1) Endpoint Monitor, (2) Dialup List, or (3) Log\u0026Report Display modules, or the fields_sorted_opt parameter to (4) user/auth/list or (5) endpointcompliance/app_detect/predefined_sig_list. Fortinet FortiOS Contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.Information may be obtained and information may be altered. \nSuccessful exploits will allow attacker-supplied HTML and script code to run in the context of the affected browser, potentially allowing the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials or control how the site is rendered to the user. Other attacks are also possible. Fortinet FortiGate UTM WAF appliances is a firewall device from Fortinet. FortiOS is an operating system that runs on it. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary Web scripts or HTML. Title:\n======\nFortigate UTM WAF Appliance - Multiple Web Vulnerabilities\n\n\nDate:\n=====\n2012-01-27\n\n\nReferences:\n===========\nhttp://vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=144\n\n\nVL-ID:\n=====\n144\n\n\nIntroduction:\n=============\nThe FortiGate series of multi-threat security systems detect and eliminate the most damaging, content-based threats from email \nand Web traffic such as viruses, worms, intrusions, inappropriate Web content and more in real time - without degrading \nnetwork performance. \n\nRanging from the FortiGate-30 series for small offices to the FortiGate-5000 series for large enterprises, service providers and \ncarriers, the FortiGate line combines the FortiOS\u2122 security operating system with FortiASIC processors and other hardware to provide \na comprehensive and high-performance array of security and networking functions including:\n\n * Firewall, VPN, and Traffic Shaping\n * Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)\n * Antivirus/Antispyware/Antimalware\n * Web Filtering\n * Antispam\n * Application Control (e.g., IM and P2P)\n * VoIP Support (H.323. and SCCP)\n * Layer 2/3 routing\n * Multiple WAN interface options\n\nFortiGate appliances provide cost-effective, comprehensive protection against network, content, and application-level threats - including \ncomplex attacks favored by cybercriminals - without degrading network availability and uptime. FortiGate platforms incorporate sophisticated \nnetworking features, such as high availability (active/active, active/passive) for maximum network uptime, and virtual domain (VDOM) \ncapabilities to separate various networks requiring different security policies. \n\n(Copy from the Vendor Homepage: http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortigate/ \u0026\u0026 http://www.avfirewalls.com/)\n\n\nAbstract:\n=========\n1.1\nVulnerability-Lab Team discovered multiple persistent Web Vulnerabilities on the FortiGate UTM Appliance Application. \n\n1.2\nVulnerability-Lab Team discovered multiple non-persistent Web Vulnerabilities on the FortiGate UTM Appliance Application. \n\n\nReport-Timeline:\n================\n2012-01-27:\tPublic or Non-Public Disclosure\n\n\nStatus:\n========\nPublished\n\n\nAffected Products:\n==================\n\nExploitation-Technique:\n=======================\nRemote\n\n\nSeverity:\n=========\nHigh\n\n\nDetails:\n========\n1.1\nMultiple input validation vulnerabilities(persistent) are detected on FortGate UTM Appliance Series. Remote attacker can include (persistent) \nmalicious script code to manipulate specific customer/admin requests. The vulnerability allows an local low privileged attacker to manipulate \nthe appliance(application) via persistent script code inject. \n\nIt is also possible to hijack customer sessions via persistent script code execution on application side. Successful exploitation can also \nresult in content/module request manipulation, execution of persistent malicious script code, session hijacking, account steal \u0026 phishing. \n\n\nVulnerable Module(s): (Persistent)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t[+] Endpoint =\u003e Monitor =\u003e Endpoint Monitor\n\t\t\t\t\t\t[+] Dailup List\n\t\t\t\t\t\t[+] Log\u0026Report =\u003e Display\n\nPicture(s):\n\t\t\t\t\t\t../ive2.png\n\t\t\t\t\t\t../ive3.png\n\n\n1.2\nMultiple input validation vulnerabilities(non-persistent) are detected on FortGate UTM Appliance Series. The vulnerability allows remote \nattackers to hijack admin/customer sessions with required user inter action (client-side). Successful exploitation allows to phish user accounts,\nredirect over client side requests or manipulate website context on client-side browser requests. \n\nVulnerable Module(s): (Non-Persistent)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t[+] Endpoint -\u003e NAC -\u003e Application Database -\u003e Listings\n\t\t\t\t\t\t[+] List field sorted\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\nPicture(s):\n\t\t\t\t\t\t../ive1.png\n\n\nProof of Concept:\n=================\nThe vulnerabilities can be exploited by remote attackers with or without user inter action. For demonstration or reproduce ... \n\npoc: =\u003e http://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=144\n\n\nSolution:\n=========\n1.1\nTo fix/patch the persistent input validation vulnerabilities restrict the input fields \u0026 parse the input. \nLocate the vulnerable area(s) reproduce the bugs \u0026 parse the output after a malicious(test) insert. \nSetup a filter or restriction mask to prevent against future persistent input validation attacks. \n\n\n1.2\nTo fix the client side input validation vulnerability parse the vulnerable request by filtering the input \u0026 cleanup the output. \nSet a input restriction or configure whitelist/filter to stop client side requests and form a secure exception-handling around. \n\n\nRisk:\n=====\n1.1\nThe security risk of the persistent vulnerabilities are estimated as high because of multiple persistent input validation vulnerabilities on different modules. \n\n1.2\nThe security risk of the non-persistent cross site requests are estimated as low because of required user inter-action to hijack a not expired session. \n\n\nCredits:\n========\nVulnerability Research Laboratory - Benjamin Kunz Mejri (Rem0ve)\n\n\nDisclaimer:\n===========\nThe information provided in this advisory is provided as it is without any warranty. Vulnerability-Lab disclaims all warranties, \neither expressed or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and capability for a particular purpose. Vulnerability-\nLab or its suppliers are not liable in any case of damage, including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential loss of business \nprofits or special damages, even if Vulnerability-Lab or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some \nstates do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation \nmay not apply. Any modified copy or reproduction, including partially usages, of this file requires authorization from Vulnerability-\nLab. Permission to electronically redistribute this alert in its unmodified form is granted. All other rights, including the use of \nother media, are reserved by Vulnerability-Lab or its suppliers. \n\n \t\t\t\t\t\tCopyright \u00a9 2012|Vulnerability-Lab\n\n\n\n\n-- \nWebsite: www.vulnerability-lab.com ; vuln-lab.com or vuln-db.com\nContact: admin@vulnerability-lab.com or support@vulnerability-lab.com\n\n. ----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nSC Magazine awards the Secunia CSI a 5-Star rating\nTop-level rating for ease of use, performance, documentation, support, and value for money. Read more and get a free trial here: http://secunia.com/blog/296 \n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTITLE:\nJBoss Multiple Products JMX Console Authentication Bypass\n\nSECUNIA ADVISORY ID:\nSA47850\n\nVERIFY ADVISORY:\nSecunia.com\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/47850/\nCustomer Area (Credentials Required)\nhttps://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory\u0026vuln_id=47850\n\nRELEASE DATE:\n2012-02-06\n\nDISCUSS ADVISORY:\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/47850/#comments\n\nAVAILABLE ON SITE AND IN CUSTOMER AREA:\n * Last Update\n * Popularity\n * Comments\n * Criticality Level\n * Impact\n * Where\n * Solution Status\n * Operating System / Software\n * CVE Reference(s)\n\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/47850/\n\nONLY AVAILABLE IN CUSTOMER AREA:\n * Authentication Level\n * Report Reliability\n * Secunia PoC\n * Secunia Analysis\n * Systems Affected\n * Approve Distribution\n * Remediation Status\n * Secunia CVSS Score\n * CVSS\n\nhttps://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory\u0026vuln_id=47850\n\nONLY AVAILABLE WITH SECUNIA CSI AND SECUNIA PSI:\n * AUTOMATED SCANNING\n\nhttp://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/\nhttp://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/corporate/wsus_sccm_3rd_third_party_patching/\n\nDESCRIPTION:\nA security issue has been reported in multiple JBoss products, which\ncan be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security\nrestrictions. \n\nThe security issue is caused due to improper access restrictions to\nthe JMX Console. \n\nFor more information see vulnerability #1 in:\nSA39563\n\nThe security issue is reported in the following products:\n* JBoss Communications Platform 1.2\n* JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.0 and 5.0.1\n* JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 4.3\n* JBoss Enterprise Web Platform 5.0\n* JBoss SOA-Platform 4.2, 4.3, and 5.0\n\nSOLUTION:\nUpdate to a fixed version. \n\nFurther details available in Customer Area:\nhttp://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/\n\nORIGINAL ADVISORY:\nJBPAPP-3952:\nhttps://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-3952\n\nJBPAPP-4713:\nhttps://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-4713\n\nRed Hat Doc#30741:\nhttps://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-30741\n\nOTHER REFERENCES:\nFurther details available in Customer Area:\nhttp://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/\n\nDEEP LINKS:\nFurther details available in Customer Area:\nhttp://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/\n\nEXTENDED DESCRIPTION:\nFurther details available in Customer Area:\nhttp://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/\n\nEXTENDED SOLUTION:\nFurther details available in Customer Area:\nhttp://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/\n\nEXPLOIT:\nFurther details available in Customer Area:\nhttp://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAbout:\nThis Advisory was delivered by Secunia as a free service to help\nprivate users keeping their systems up to date against the latest\nvulnerabilities. \n\nSubscribe:\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/secunia_security_advisories/\n\nDefinitions: (Criticality, Where etc.)\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/about_secunia_advisories/\n\n\nPlease Note:\nSecunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive by\nclicking the link. \nSecunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. \nSecunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only\nuse those supplied by the vendor. \n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nUnsubscribe: Secunia Security Advisories\nhttp://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n",
"sources": [
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708"
},
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109168"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109458"
}
],
"trust": 2.16
},
"external_ids": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/external_ids#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708",
"trust": 2.6
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941",
"trust": 2.5
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109168",
"trust": 1.8
},
{
"db": "SECTRACK",
"id": "1026594",
"trust": 1.7
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401",
"trust": 0.8
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142",
"trust": 0.7
},
{
"db": "SECUNIA",
"id": "47850",
"trust": 0.7
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201201-446",
"trust": 0.6
},
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222",
"trust": 0.1
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109458",
"trust": 0.1
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109168"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109458"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201201-446"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
}
]
},
"id": "VAR-201802-0013",
"iot": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": true,
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
}
],
"trust": 0.01
},
"last_update_date": "2024-08-14T14:51:44.502000Z",
"patch": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/patch#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"title": "FG-IR-012-001",
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-012-001"
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
}
]
},
"problemtype_data": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/problemtype_data#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"problemtype": "CWE-79",
"trust": 1.9
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
}
]
},
"references": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/references#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"trust": 2.3,
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51708"
},
{
"trust": 1.8,
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=144"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/fg-ir-012-001"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/109168/vl-144.txt"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "https://securitytracker.com/id/1026594"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/72761"
},
{
"trust": 0.9,
"url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/fga-2012-02.html"
},
{
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=cve-2012-0941"
},
{
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2012-0941"
},
{
"trust": 0.6,
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47850"
},
{
"trust": 0.4,
"url": "http://vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=144"
},
{
"trust": 0.3,
"url": "http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortigate_overview.html"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://www.avfirewalls.com/)"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortigate/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/doc-30741"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/jbpapp-3952"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/secunia_security_advisories/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/corporate/wsus_sccm_3rd_third_party_patching/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47850/#comments"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47850/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory\u0026vuln_id=47850"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/jbpapp-4713"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/blog/296"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/about_secunia_advisories/"
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109168"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109458"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201201-446"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
}
]
},
"sources": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109168"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109458"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201201-446"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
}
]
},
"sources_release_date": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_release_date#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"date": "2018-02-08T00:00:00",
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
},
{
"date": "2012-01-27T00:00:00",
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708"
},
{
"date": "2018-03-13T00:00:00",
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"date": "2012-01-27T23:38:44",
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109168"
},
{
"date": "2012-02-06T04:01:35",
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109458"
},
{
"date": "1900-01-01T00:00:00",
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201201-446"
},
{
"date": "2012-02-10T00:00:00",
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
},
{
"date": "2018-02-08T23:29:00.313000",
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
}
]
},
"sources_update_date": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_update_date#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"date": "2018-02-27T00:00:00",
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-54222"
},
{
"date": "2012-03-26T07:40:00",
"db": "BID",
"id": "51708"
},
{
"date": "2018-03-13T00:00:00",
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
},
{
"date": "2012-02-02T00:00:00",
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201201-446"
},
{
"date": "2018-02-12T00:00:00",
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
},
{
"date": "2018-02-27T19:44:58.543000",
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2012-0941"
}
]
},
"threat_type": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/threat_type#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "remote",
"sources": [
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201201-446"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
}
],
"trust": 1.2
},
"title": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/title#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "Fortinet FortiOS Vulnerable to cross-site scripting",
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2012-006401"
}
],
"trust": 0.8
},
"type": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/type#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "xss",
"sources": [
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "109168"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201202-142"
}
],
"trust": 0.7
}
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.