usn-2554-1
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Daniel Genkin, Lev Pachmanov, Itamar Pipman, and Eran Tromer discovered that GnuPG was susceptible to an attack via physical side channels. A local attacker could use this attack to possibly recover private keys. (CVE-2014-3591)
Daniel Genkin, Adi Shamir, and Eran Tromer discovered that GnuPG was susceptible to an attack via physical side channels. A local attacker could use this attack to possibly recover private keys. (CVE-2015-0837)
Hanno Böck discovered that GnuPG incorrectly handled certain malformed keyrings. If a user or automated system were tricked into opening a malformed keyring, a remote attacker could use this issue to cause GnuPG to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1606, CVE-2015-1607)
In addition, this update improves GnuPG security by validating that the keys returned by keyservers match those requested.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"cves_map": {
"cves": [
{
"id": "CVE-2014-3591",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-0837",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-1606",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-1607",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
}
],
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS"
}
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "gnupg",
"binary_version": "1.4.16-1ubuntu2.3"
},
{
"binary_name": "gnupg-curl",
"binary_version": "1.4.16-1ubuntu2.3"
},
{
"binary_name": "gpgv",
"binary_version": "1.4.16-1ubuntu2.3"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS",
"name": "gnupg",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/gnupg@1.4.16-1ubuntu2.3?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.16-1ubuntu2.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.4.14-1ubuntu2",
"1.4.15-1.1ubuntu1",
"1.4.15-1.1ubuntu2",
"1.4.15-2ubuntu1",
"1.4.16-1ubuntu1",
"1.4.16-1ubuntu2",
"1.4.16-1ubuntu2.1"
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"cves_map": {
"cves": [
{
"id": "CVE-2014-3591",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-0837",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-1606",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-1607",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "low",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
}
],
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS"
}
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "gnupg-agent",
"binary_version": "2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3"
},
{
"binary_name": "gnupg2",
"binary_version": "2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3"
},
{
"binary_name": "gpgsm",
"binary_version": "2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3"
},
{
"binary_name": "gpgv2",
"binary_version": "2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3"
},
{
"binary_name": "scdaemon",
"binary_version": "2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS",
"name": "gnupg2",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/gnupg2@2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.0.20-1ubuntu3",
"2.0.22-1ubuntu1",
"2.0.22-3ubuntu1",
"2.0.22-3ubuntu1.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "Daniel Genkin, Lev Pachmanov, Itamar Pipman, and Eran Tromer discovered\nthat GnuPG was susceptible to an attack via physical side channels. A local\nattacker could use this attack to possibly recover private keys.\n(CVE-2014-3591)\n\nDaniel Genkin, Adi Shamir, and Eran Tromer discovered that GnuPG was\nsusceptible to an attack via physical side channels. A local attacker could\nuse this attack to possibly recover private keys. (CVE-2015-0837)\n\nHanno B\u00f6ck discovered that GnuPG incorrectly handled certain malformed\nkeyrings. If a user or automated system were tricked into opening a\nmalformed keyring, a remote attacker could use this issue to cause GnuPG to\ncrash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary\ncode. (CVE-2015-1606, CVE-2015-1607)\n\nIn addition, this update improves GnuPG security by validating that the\nkeys returned by keyservers match those requested.\n",
"id": "USN-2554-1",
"modified": "2026-02-10T04:40:53Z",
"published": "2015-04-01T13:23:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-2554-1"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-3591"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-5270"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-0837"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-1606"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-1607"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"summary": "gnupg, gnupg2 vulnerabilities",
"upstream": [
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-3591",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-5270",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2015-0837",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2015-1606",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2015-1607"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.