usn-2232-1
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Jüri Aedla discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled invalid DTLS fragments. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. This issue only affected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, Ubuntu 13.10, and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2014-0195)
Imre Rad discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled DTLS recursions. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2014-0221)
KIKUCHI Masashi discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain handshakes. A remote attacker could use this flaw to perform a machine-in-the-middle attack and possibly decrypt and modify traffic. (CVE-2014-0224)
Felix Gröbert and Ivan Fratrić discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled anonymous ECDH ciphersuites. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, Ubuntu 13.10, and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2014-3470)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"cves_map": {
"cves": [
{
"id": "CVE-2014-0195",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2014-0221",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2014-0224",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2014-3470",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
}
],
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS"
}
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libssl1.0.0",
"binary_version": "1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.2"
},
{
"binary_name": "openssl",
"binary_version": "1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.2"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS",
"name": "openssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/openssl@1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.2?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0.1e-3ubuntu1",
"1.0.1e-4ubuntu1",
"1.0.1e-4ubuntu2",
"1.0.1e-4ubuntu3",
"1.0.1e-4ubuntu4",
"1.0.1f-1ubuntu1",
"1.0.1f-1ubuntu2",
"1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "J\u00fcri Aedla discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled invalid DTLS\nfragments. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause OpenSSL to\ncrash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary\ncode. This issue only affected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, Ubuntu 13.10, and\nUbuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2014-0195)\n\nImre Rad discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled DTLS recursions. A\nremote attacker could use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting\nin a denial of service. (CVE-2014-0221)\n\nKIKUCHI Masashi discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain\nhandshakes. A remote attacker could use this flaw to perform a\nmachine-in-the-middle attack and possibly decrypt and modify traffic.\n(CVE-2014-0224)\n\nFelix Gr\u00f6bert and Ivan Fratri\u0107 discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled\nanonymous ECDH ciphersuites. A remote attacker could use this issue to\ncause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only\naffected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, Ubuntu 13.10, and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.\n(CVE-2014-3470)\n",
"id": "USN-2232-1",
"modified": "2026-04-22T07:36:31Z",
"published": "2014-06-05T12:14:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-2232-1"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-0195"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-0221"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-0224"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-3470"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"summary": "openssl vulnerabilities",
"upstream": [
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0195",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0221",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0224",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-3470"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.