UBUNTU-CVE-2026-8720 (CVE-2026-8720)
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu – Published: 2026-06-25 22:17 – Updated: 2026-06-25 22:17 – Source website
VLAI
Details
wc_Blake2bHmacFinal and wc_Blake2sHmacFinal discard the message when the key length exceeds the block size, producing a MAC that is independent of the input. When the supplied key is longer than the BLAKE2 block size the key-hashing branch reinitialized the running hash state, discarding the accumulated message data, so the resulting MAC depended only on the key and not on the message being authenticated. This bug is specific to the HMAC-BLAKE2 APIs that were added in wolfSSL version 5.9.0.
Severity
7.5 (High)
N/A (UNKNOWN)
References
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libcyassl5",
"binary_version": "3.4.8+dfsg-1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libwolfssl0",
"binary_version": "3.4.8+dfsg-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:16.04:LTS",
"name": "wolfssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/wolfssl@3.4.8+dfsg-1?arch=source\u0026distro=xenial"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"3.4.8+dfsg-1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libwolfssl15",
"binary_version": "3.13.0+dfsg-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:18.04:LTS",
"name": "wolfssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/wolfssl@3.13.0+dfsg-1?arch=source\u0026distro=bionic"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"3.10.2+dfsg-2",
"3.12.0+dfsg-1",
"3.12.2+dfsg-1",
"3.13.0+dfsg-1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libwolfssl24",
"binary_version": "4.3.0+dfsg-2"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:20.04:LTS",
"name": "wolfssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/wolfssl@4.3.0+dfsg-2?arch=source\u0026distro=focal"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"4.1.0+dfsg-2",
"4.2.0+dfsg-1",
"4.2.0+dfsg-2",
"4.2.0+dfsg-3",
"4.3.0+dfsg-2"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libwolfssl32",
"binary_version": "5.2.0-2"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:22.04:LTS",
"name": "wolfssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/wolfssl@5.2.0-2?arch=source\u0026distro=jammy"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"4.6.0-3",
"5.0.0-1",
"5.1.1-1",
"5.2.0-1",
"5.2.0-2"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libwolfssl42t64",
"binary_version": "5.6.6-1.3build1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:24.04:LTS",
"name": "wolfssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/wolfssl@5.6.6-1.3build1?arch=source\u0026distro=noble"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"5.5.4-2",
"5.5.4-2.1",
"5.6.4-2",
"5.6.6-1.2",
"5.6.6-1.3",
"5.6.6-1.3build1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libwolfssl42t64",
"binary_version": "5.7.2-0.1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:25.10",
"name": "wolfssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/wolfssl@5.7.2-0.1?arch=source\u0026distro=questing"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"5.7.2-0.1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libwolfssl44",
"binary_version": "5.9.1-0.1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:26.04:LTS",
"name": "wolfssl",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/wolfssl@5.9.1-0.1?arch=source\u0026distro=resolute"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"5.7.2-0.1",
"5.8.2-1.2",
"5.8.4-1",
"5.9.1-0.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "wc_Blake2bHmacFinal and wc_Blake2sHmacFinal discard the message when the key length exceeds the block size, producing a MAC that is independent of the input. When the supplied key is longer than the BLAKE2 block size the key-hashing branch reinitialized the running hash state, discarding the accumulated message data, so the resulting MAC depended only on the key and not on the message being authenticated. This bug is specific to the HMAC-BLAKE2 APIs that were added in wolfSSL version 5.9.0.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2026-8720",
"modified": "2026-06-25T22:17:00Z",
"published": "2026-06-25T22:17:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-8720"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8720"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/10447"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/10447"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.wolfssl.com/docs/security-vulnerabilities/"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-8720"
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…