ubuntu-cve-2015-9542
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Published
2015-12-31 00:00
Modified
2025-09-08 16:43
Summary
Details
add_password in pam_radius_auth.c in pam_radius 1.4.0 does not correctly check the length of the input password, and is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow during memcpy(). An attacker could send a crafted password to an application (loading the pam_radius library) and crash it. Arbitrary code execution might be possible, depending on the application, C library, compiler, and other factors.
Severity
7.5 (High)
N/A (UNKNOWN)
References
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "Available with Ubuntu Pro (Infra-only): https://ubuntu.com/pro",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libpam-radius-auth",
"binary_version": "1.3.17-0ubuntu4+esm1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS",
"name": "libpam-radius-auth",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/libpam-radius-auth@1.3.17-0ubuntu4+esm1?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty/esm"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.17-0ubuntu4+esm1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.3.17-0ubuntu4"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libpam-radius-auth",
"binary_version": "1.3.17-0ubuntu4.1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:16.04:LTS",
"name": "libpam-radius-auth",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/libpam-radius-auth@1.3.17-0ubuntu4.1?arch=source\u0026distro=xenial"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.17-0ubuntu4.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.3.17-0ubuntu4"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libpam-radius-auth",
"binary_version": "1.3.17-0ubuntu5.18.04.1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:18.04:LTS",
"name": "libpam-radius-auth",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/libpam-radius-auth@1.3.17-0ubuntu5.18.04.1?arch=source\u0026distro=bionic"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.17-0ubuntu5.18.04.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.3.17-0ubuntu5"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "add_password in pam_radius_auth.c in pam_radius 1.4.0 does not correctly check the length of the input password, and is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow during memcpy(). An attacker could send a crafted password to an application (loading the pam_radius library) and crash it. Arbitrary code execution might be possible, depending on the application, C library, compiler, and other factors.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2015-9542",
"modified": "2025-09-08T16:43:33Z",
"published": "2015-12-31T00:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-9542"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-4290-1"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-4290-2"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-9542"
}
],
"related": [
"USN-4290-1",
"USN-4290-2"
],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2015-9542"
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…