rustsec-2026-0011
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2026-02-13 12:00
Modified
2026-03-17 22:31
Summary
`polymarket-client-sdks` was removed from crates.io for malicious code
Details
It appeared to be typosquatting existing crate
polymarket-client-sdk (sdks vs sdk)
and attempting to steal credentials from local files.
The malicious crate had 1 version published on 2026-02-09 and had been downloaded only 33 times. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.
Thanks to Roland Peelen for finding and reporting this to the crates.io team!
References
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [
"malicious"
],
"cvss": null,
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "polymarket-client-sdks",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/polymarket-client-sdks"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"GHSA-p5vf-5754-x7p3"
],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "It appeared to be typosquatting existing crate\n[`polymarket-client-sdk`](https://crates.io/crates/polymarket-client-sdk) (`sdks` vs `sdk`)\nand attempting to steal credentials from local files.\n\nThe malicious crate had 1 version published on 2026-02-09 and had been downloaded only 33 times.\nThere were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.\n\nThanks to Roland Peelen for finding and reporting this to the crates.io team!",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0011",
"modified": "2026-03-17T22:31:38Z",
"published": "2026-02-13T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/polymarket-client-sdks"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0011.html"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "`polymarket-client-sdks` was removed from crates.io for malicious code"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…