rustsec-2023-0056
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2023-09-01 12:00
Modified
2023-09-06 17:18
Summary
Default functions in VolatileMemory trait lack bounds checks, potentially leading to out-of-bounds memory accesses
Details

An issue was discovered in the default implementations of the VolatileMemory::{get_atomic_ref, aligned_as_ref, aligned_as_mut, get_ref, get_array_ref} trait functions, which allows out-of-bounds memory access if the VolatileMemory::get_slice function returns a VolatileSlice whose length is less than the function’s count argument. No implementations of get_slice provided in vm_memory are affected. Users of custom VolatileMemory implementations may be impacted if the custom implementation does not adhere to get_slice's documentation.

The issue started in version 0.1.0 but was fixed in version 0.12.2 by inserting a check that verifies that the VolatileSlice returned by get_slice is of the correct length.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "categories": [
          "memory-exposure"
        ],
        "cvss": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
        "informational": "unsound"
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "affected_functions": null,
        "affects": {
          "arch": [],
          "functions": [
            "vm_memory::volatile_memory::VolatileMemory::aligned_as_mut",
            "vm_memory::volatile_memory::VolatileMemory::aligned_as_ref",
            "vm_memory::volatile_memory::VolatileMemory::get_array_ref",
            "vm_memory::volatile_memory::VolatileMemory::get_atomic_ref",
            "vm_memory::volatile_memory::VolatileMemory::get_ref"
          ],
          "os": []
        }
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "vm-memory",
        "purl": "pkg:cargo/vm-memory"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0-0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.12.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-41051",
    "GHSA-49hh-fprx-m68g"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "license": "CC0-1.0"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in the default implementations of the `VolatileMemory::{get_atomic_ref, aligned_as_ref, aligned_as_mut, get_ref, get_array_ref}` trait functions, which allows out-of-bounds memory access if the `VolatileMemory::get_slice` function returns a `VolatileSlice` whose length is less than the function\u2019s `count` argument. No implementations of `get_slice` provided in `vm_memory` are affected. Users of custom `VolatileMemory` implementations may be impacted if the custom implementation does not adhere to `get_slice`\u0027s documentation.\n\nThe issue started in version 0.1.0 but was fixed in version 0.12.2 by inserting a check that verifies that the `VolatileSlice` returned by `get_slice` is of the correct length.",
  "id": "RUSTSEC-2023-0056",
  "modified": "2023-09-06T17:18:09Z",
  "published": "2023-09-01T12:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/vm-memory"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2023-0056.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/rust-vmm/vm-memory/issues/250"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rust-vmm/vm-memory/commit/aff1dd4a5259f7deba56692840f7a2d9ca34c9c8"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Default functions in VolatileMemory trait lack bounds checks, potentially leading to out-of-bounds memory accesses"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…