rustsec-2022-0068
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2022-11-30 12:00
Modified
2022-11-30 22:16
Summary
out-of-bounds read possible when setting list-of-pointers
Details

If a message consumer expects data of type "list of pointers", and if the consumer performs certain specific actions on such data, then a message producer can cause the consumer to read out-of-bounds memory. This could trigger a process crash in the consumer, or in some cases could allow exfiltration of private in-memory data.

The C++ Cap'n Proto library is also affected by this bug. See the advisory on the main Cap'n Proto repo for a succinct description of the exact circumstances in which the problem can arise.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "categories": [
          "memory-exposure"
        ],
        "cvss": null,
        "informational": null
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "affected_functions": null,
        "affects": {
          "arch": [],
          "functions": [],
          "os": []
        }
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "capnp",
        "purl": "pkg:cargo/capnp"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0-0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.13.7"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "0.14.0-0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.14.11"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "0.15.0-0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.15.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-46149",
    "GHSA-qqff-4vw4-f6hx"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "license": "CC0-1.0"
  },
  "details": "If a message consumer expects data\nof type \"list of pointers\",\nand if the consumer performs certain specific actions on such data,\nthen a message producer can cause the consumer to read out-of-bounds memory.\nThis could trigger a process crash in the consumer,\nor in some cases could allow exfiltration of private in-memory data.\n\nThe C++ Cap\u0027n Proto library is also affected by this bug.\nSee the [advisory](https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto/tree/master/security-advisories/2022-11-30-0-pointer-list-bounds.md)\non the main Cap\u0027n Proto repo for a succinct description of\nthe exact circumstances in which the problem can arise.",
  "id": "RUSTSEC-2022-0068",
  "modified": "2022-11-30T22:16:39Z",
  "published": "2022-11-30T12:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/capnp"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0068.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto/tree/master/security-advisories/2022-11-30-0-pointer-list-bounds.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://dwrensha.github.io/capnproto-rust/2022/11/30/out_of_bounds_memory_access_bug.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto/security/advisories/GHSA-qqff-4vw4-f6hx"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "out-of-bounds read possible when setting list-of-pointers"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…