RHSA-2001:142
Vulnerability from csaf_redhat - Published: 2001-11-02 20:08 - Updated: 2025-11-21 17:24Linux kernel 2.0, 2.2 and 2.4 with syncookies enabled allows remote attackers to bypass firewall rules by brute force guessing the cookie.
| Product | Identifier | Version | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Red Hat Linux 6.2
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:6.2
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
|
Red Hat Linux 7.0
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.0
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
|
Red Hat Linux 7.1
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.1
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
|
Red Hat Linux 7.2
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.2
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
TUX HTTP server 2.1.0-2 in Red Hat Linux allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long Host: header.
{
"document": {
"aggregate_severity": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"text": "Important"
},
"category": "csaf_security_advisory",
"csaf_version": "2.0",
"distribution": {
"text": "Copyright \u00a9 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.",
"tlp": {
"label": "WHITE",
"url": "https://www.first.org/tlp/"
}
},
"lang": "en",
"notes": [
{
"category": "summary",
"text": "Syncookies are used to protect a system against certain Denial Of Service\n(DOS) attacks. A flaw in this mechanism has been found which can be used to\ncircumvent certain types of firewall configurations.\n\nNote: syncookies are not enabled in the default installation of Red Hat\nLinux but many server administrators do enable syncookies.",
"title": "Topic"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "Syncookies, while not enabled in default installations of Red Hat Linux,\nare used to protect an Internet server against a certain type of DoS\nattack--the so called \"synflood\"--by using a cryptographic challenge\nprotocol which ensures legitimate users can keep using the server. Under an\nattack, the TCP/IP layer will, instead of just accepting new connections,\nsend back the challenge and only accept the connections in the\nsecond phase (\"syn ack\") of the TCP/IP handshake (where the other party\nreturns the challenge value). The DoS attack, which consists of sending as\nmany first phase (\"syn\") packets as possible will be neutralized because\nsystem resources are only used as part of the second phase.\n\nCertain firewall configurations only filter the first phase (\"syn\") packets\nto prevent connections to specific services. These systems are vulnerable\nwhen an attacker can both force a system into flood protection state (by\nstarting a synflood attack on a non-firewalled port) and guess the\ncryptographic challenge of a firewalled port. \n\nWhile the cryptographic hash used is strong, the number of bits available\nis restricted by the TCP protocol header design. With a high speed link and\na lot of time, an attacker can eventually succeed in faking a valid cookie\nand making a connection that a syn only firewall rule might have\nprohibited.\n\nThe updated kernels have a modified synflood protection algorithm that now\nuses a per port \"under attack\" state so that ports with only a first-phase\nfirewall rule will not use the \"under attack\" regime even when other,\nnon-firewalled, ports are under attack.\n\nIn addition, these packages fix a remote denial of service attack against\nthe TUX web server. This attack can only succeed if the TUX web server\nhas been explicitly enabled; it is disabled by default. Thanks to\nAidan O\u0027Rawe for finding this bug.",
"title": "Details"
},
{
"category": "legal_disclaimer",
"text": "This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original.",
"title": "Terms of Use"
}
],
"publisher": {
"category": "vendor",
"contact_details": "https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/",
"issuing_authority": "Red Hat Product Security is responsible for vulnerability handling across all Red Hat products and services.",
"name": "Red Hat Product Security",
"namespace": "https://www.redhat.com"
},
"references": [
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2001:142",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2001:142"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "http://cr.yp.to/syncookies.html",
"url": "http://cr.yp.to/syncookies.html"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "54829",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54829"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "54851",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54851"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "54868",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54868"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "55067",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55067"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "55082",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55082"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "55097",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55097"
},
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "Canonical URL",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2001/rhsa-2001_142.json"
}
],
"title": "Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel 2.2 and 2.4",
"tracking": {
"current_release_date": "2025-11-21T17:24:43+00:00",
"generator": {
"date": "2025-11-21T17:24:43+00:00",
"engine": {
"name": "Red Hat SDEngine",
"version": "4.6.12"
}
},
"id": "RHSA-2001:142",
"initial_release_date": "2001-11-02T20:08:00+00:00",
"revision_history": [
{
"date": "2001-11-02T20:08:00+00:00",
"number": "1",
"summary": "Initial version"
},
{
"date": "2001-10-26T00:00:00+00:00",
"number": "2",
"summary": "Last updated version"
},
{
"date": "2025-11-21T17:24:43+00:00",
"number": "3",
"summary": "Last generated version"
}
],
"status": "final",
"version": "3"
}
},
"product_tree": {
"branches": [
{
"branches": [
{
"branches": [
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:6.2"
}
}
},
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.0"
}
}
},
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.1"
}
}
},
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.2",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.2",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 7.2",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.2"
}
}
}
],
"category": "product_family",
"name": "Red Hat Linux"
}
],
"category": "vendor",
"name": "Red Hat"
}
]
},
"vulnerabilities": [
{
"cve": "CVE-2001-0851",
"ids": [
{
"system_name": "Red Hat Bugzilla ID",
"text": "1616625"
}
],
"notes": [
{
"category": "description",
"text": "Linux kernel 2.0, 2.2 and 2.4 with syncookies enabled allows remote attackers to bypass firewall rules by brute force guessing the cookie.",
"title": "Vulnerability description"
},
{
"category": "summary",
"text": "security flaw",
"title": "Vulnerability summary"
}
],
"product_status": {
"fixed": [
"Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"Red Hat Linux 7.2"
]
},
"references": [
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "Canonical URL",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2001-0851"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "RHBZ#1616625",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616625"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-0851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-0851"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-0851",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-0851"
}
],
"release_date": "2001-11-02T00:00:00+00:00",
"remediations": [
{
"category": "vendor_fix",
"date": "2001-11-02T20:08:00+00:00",
"details": "Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata\nrelevant to your system have been applied. \n\nThe procedure for upgrading the kernel is documented at:\n\nhttp://www.redhat.com/support/docs/howto/kernel-upgrade/\n\nPlease read the directions for your architecture carefully before\nproceeding with the kernel upgrade.\n\nPlease note that this update is also available via Red Hat Network. Many\npeople find this to be an easier way to apply updates. To use Red Hat\nNetwork, launch the Red Hat Update Agent with the following command:\n\nup2date\n\nThis will start an interactive process that will result in the appropriate\nRPMs being upgraded on your system. Note that you need to select the kernel\nexplicitly on default configurations of up2date.",
"product_ids": [
"Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"Red Hat Linux 7.2"
],
"restart_required": {
"category": "none"
},
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2001:142"
}
],
"threats": [
{
"category": "impact",
"details": "Important"
}
],
"title": "security flaw"
},
{
"cve": "CVE-2001-0852",
"ids": [
{
"system_name": "Red Hat Bugzilla ID",
"text": "1616626"
}
],
"notes": [
{
"category": "description",
"text": "TUX HTTP server 2.1.0-2 in Red Hat Linux allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long Host: header.",
"title": "Vulnerability description"
},
{
"category": "summary",
"text": "security flaw",
"title": "Vulnerability summary"
}
],
"product_status": {
"fixed": [
"Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"Red Hat Linux 7.2"
]
},
"references": [
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "Canonical URL",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2001-0852"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "RHBZ#1616626",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616626"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-0852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-0852"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-0852",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-0852"
}
],
"release_date": "2001-11-05T00:00:00+00:00",
"remediations": [
{
"category": "vendor_fix",
"date": "2001-11-02T20:08:00+00:00",
"details": "Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata\nrelevant to your system have been applied. \n\nThe procedure for upgrading the kernel is documented at:\n\nhttp://www.redhat.com/support/docs/howto/kernel-upgrade/\n\nPlease read the directions for your architecture carefully before\nproceeding with the kernel upgrade.\n\nPlease note that this update is also available via Red Hat Network. Many\npeople find this to be an easier way to apply updates. To use Red Hat\nNetwork, launch the Red Hat Update Agent with the following command:\n\nup2date\n\nThis will start an interactive process that will result in the appropriate\nRPMs being upgraded on your system. Note that you need to select the kernel\nexplicitly on default configurations of up2date.",
"product_ids": [
"Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"Red Hat Linux 7.2"
],
"restart_required": {
"category": "none"
},
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2001:142"
}
],
"threats": [
{
"category": "impact",
"details": "Important"
}
],
"title": "security flaw"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.