PYSEC-2026-4194
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-10-05 22:16 - Updated: 2026-10-08 09:43Docling simplifies document processing by parsing diverse formats and providing integrations with the generative AI ecosystem. From 2.45.0 until 2.131.0, METS-GBS format detection in docling/datamodel/document.py and the backend in docling/backend/mets_gbs_backend.py call tarfile.TarFile.getmembers() before enforcing the max_member_count limit, causing the full archive member list to be allocated before the limit can stop processing. A small gzip-compressed tar archive with a very large number of empty members can therefore consume memory proportional to the declared member count, including during format detection before the allowed_formats restriction is applied. This issue is a residual weakness in the member-count protection added for CVE-2026-44018. This issue is fixed in 2.131.0.
| Name | purl | docling | pkg:pypi/docling |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "docling",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/docling"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.45.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.131.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.100.0",
"2.101.0",
"2.102.0",
"2.102.1",
"2.102.2",
"2.103.0",
"2.104.0",
"2.105.0",
"2.106.0",
"2.107.0",
"2.108.0",
"2.109.0",
"2.110.0",
"2.111.0",
"2.112.0",
"2.113.0",
"2.114.0",
"2.115.0",
"2.116.0",
"2.117.0",
"2.118.0",
"2.118.1",
"2.119.0",
"2.120.1",
"2.120.2",
"2.120.3",
"2.121.0",
"2.122.0",
"2.123.0",
"2.123.1",
"2.124.0",
"2.125.0",
"2.126.0",
"2.127.0",
"2.128.0",
"2.129.0",
"2.130.0",
"2.45.0",
"2.46.0",
"2.47.0",
"2.47.1",
"2.48.0",
"2.49.0",
"2.50.0",
"2.51.0",
"2.52.0",
"2.53.0",
"2.54.0",
"2.55.0",
"2.55.1",
"2.56.0",
"2.56.1",
"2.57.0",
"2.58.0",
"2.59.0",
"2.60.0",
"2.60.1",
"2.61.0",
"2.61.1",
"2.61.2",
"2.62.0",
"2.63.0",
"2.64.0",
"2.64.1",
"2.65.0",
"2.66.0",
"2.67.0",
"2.68.0",
"2.69.0",
"2.69.1",
"2.70.0",
"2.71.0",
"2.72.0",
"2.73.0",
"2.73.1",
"2.74.0",
"2.75.0",
"2.76.0",
"2.77.0",
"2.78.0",
"2.79.0",
"2.80.0",
"2.81.0",
"2.82.0",
"2.83.0",
"2.84.0",
"2.85.0",
"2.86.0",
"2.87.0",
"2.88.0",
"2.89.0",
"2.90.0",
"2.91.0",
"2.92.0",
"2.93.0",
"2.94.0",
"2.95.0",
"2.96.0",
"2.96.1",
"2.97.0",
"2.98.0",
"2.99.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-105747",
"GHSA-3cr3-8m4c-fpxw"
],
"details": "Docling simplifies document processing by parsing diverse formats and providing integrations with the generative AI ecosystem. From 2.45.0 until 2.131.0, METS-GBS format detection in docling/datamodel/document.py and the backend in docling/backend/mets_gbs_backend.py call tarfile.TarFile.getmembers() before enforcing the max_member_count limit, causing the full archive member list to be allocated before the limit can stop processing. A small gzip-compressed tar archive with a very large number of empty members can therefore consume memory proportional to the declared member count, including during format detection before the allowed_formats restriction is applied. This issue is a residual weakness in the member-count protection added for CVE-2026-44018. This issue is fixed in 2.131.0.",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-4194",
"modified": "2026-10-08T09:43:12.545255Z",
"published": "2026-10-05T22:16:57.633Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/docling-project/docling/releases/tag/v2.131.0"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/docling-project/docling/commit/ebae65cd71c37c88b36185b406a449b92d8f7ffa"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/docling-project/docling/pull/4412"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/docling-project/docling/security/advisories/GHSA-3cr3-8m4c-fpxw"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.