pysec-2021-519
Vulnerability from pysec
TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. TFlite graphs must not have loops between nodes. However, this condition was not checked and an attacker could craft models that would result in infinite loop during evaluation. In certain cases, the infinite loop would be replaced by stack overflow due to too many recursive calls. For example, the While
implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/106d8f4fb89335a2c52d7c895b7a7485465ca8d9/tensorflow/lite/kernels/while.cc) could be tricked into a scneario where both the body and the loop subgraphs are the same. Evaluating one of the subgraphs means calling the Eval
function for the other and this quickly exhaust all stack space. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range. Please consult our security guide(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-cpu", "purl": "pkg:pypi/tensorflow-cpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "9c1dc920d8ffb4893d6c9d27d1f039607b326743" }, { "fixed": "c6173f5fe66cdbab74f4f869311fe6aae2ba35f4" } ], "repo": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow", "type": "GIT" }, { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.1.4" }, { "introduced": "2.2.0" }, { "fixed": "2.2.3" }, { "introduced": "2.3.0" }, { "fixed": "2.3.3" }, { "introduced": "2.4.0" }, { "fixed": "2.4.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "1.15.0", "2.1.0", "2.1.1", "2.1.2", "2.1.3", "2.2.0", "2.2.1", "2.2.2", "2.3.0", "2.3.1", "2.3.2", "2.4.0", "2.4.1" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-29591", "GHSA-cwv3-863g-39vx" ], "details": "TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. TFlite graphs must not have loops between nodes. However, this condition was not checked and an attacker could craft models that would result in infinite loop during evaluation. In certain cases, the infinite loop would be replaced by stack overflow due to too many recursive calls. For example, the `While` implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/106d8f4fb89335a2c52d7c895b7a7485465ca8d9/tensorflow/lite/kernels/while.cc) could be tricked into a scneario where both the body and the loop subgraphs are the same. Evaluating one of the subgraphs means calling the `Eval` function for the other and this quickly exhaust all stack space. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range. Please consult our security guide(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.", "id": "PYSEC-2021-519", "modified": "2021-12-09T06:34:57.477070Z", "published": "2021-05-14T20:15:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-cwv3-863g-39vx" }, { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/9c1dc920d8ffb4893d6c9d27d1f039607b326743" }, { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/c6173f5fe66cdbab74f4f869311fe6aae2ba35f4" } ] }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.