PYSEC-2021-247
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2021-05-14 20:15 - Updated: 2021-08-27 03:22TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. The validation in tf.raw_ops.QuantizeAndDequantizeV2 allows invalid values for axis argument:. The validation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/eccb7ec454e6617738554a255d77f08e60ee0808/tensorflow/core/kernels/quantize_and_dequantize_op.cc#L74-L77) uses || to mix two different conditions. If axis_ < -1 the condition in OP_REQUIRES will still be true, but this value of axis_ results in heap underflow. This allows attackers to read/write to other data on the heap. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
| Name | purl | tensorflow | pkg:pypi/tensorflow |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/tensorflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "c5b0d5f8ac19888e46ca14b0e27562e7fbbee9a9"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.0rc0"
},
{
"introduced": "2.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.0rc0"
},
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.4"
},
{
"introduced": "2.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.4.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.12.0",
"0.12.0rc0",
"0.12.0rc1",
"0.12.1",
"1.0.0",
"1.0.1",
"1.1.0",
"1.1.0rc0",
"1.1.0rc1",
"1.1.0rc2",
"1.10.0",
"1.10.0rc0",
"1.10.0rc1",
"1.10.1",
"1.11.0",
"1.11.0rc0",
"1.11.0rc1",
"1.11.0rc2",
"1.12.0",
"1.12.0rc0",
"1.12.0rc1",
"1.12.0rc2",
"1.12.2",
"1.12.3",
"1.13.0rc0",
"1.13.0rc1",
"1.13.0rc2",
"1.13.1",
"1.13.2",
"1.14.0",
"1.14.0rc0",
"1.14.0rc1",
"1.15.0",
"1.15.0rc0",
"1.15.0rc1",
"1.15.0rc2",
"1.15.0rc3",
"1.15.2",
"1.15.3",
"1.15.4",
"1.15.5",
"1.2.0",
"1.2.0rc0",
"1.2.0rc1",
"1.2.0rc2",
"1.2.1",
"1.3.0",
"1.3.0rc0",
"1.3.0rc1",
"1.3.0rc2",
"1.4.0",
"1.4.0rc0",
"1.4.0rc1",
"1.4.1",
"1.5.0",
"1.5.0rc0",
"1.5.0rc1",
"1.5.1",
"1.6.0",
"1.6.0rc0",
"1.6.0rc1",
"1.7.0",
"1.7.0rc0",
"1.7.0rc1",
"1.7.1",
"1.8.0",
"1.8.0rc0",
"1.8.0rc1",
"1.9.0",
"1.9.0rc0",
"1.9.0rc1",
"1.9.0rc2",
"2.0.0",
"2.0.0a0",
"2.0.0b0",
"2.0.0b1",
"2.0.0rc0",
"2.0.0rc1",
"2.0.0rc2",
"2.0.1",
"2.0.2",
"2.0.3",
"2.0.4",
"2.1.0",
"2.1.0rc0",
"2.1.0rc1",
"2.1.0rc2",
"2.1.1",
"2.1.2",
"2.1.3",
"2.1.4",
"2.2.0",
"2.2.1",
"2.2.2",
"2.2.3",
"2.3.0",
"2.3.1",
"2.3.2",
"2.3.3",
"2.4.0",
"2.4.1",
"2.4.2"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-29610",
"GHSA-mq5c-prh3-3f3h"
],
"details": "TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. The validation in `tf.raw_ops.QuantizeAndDequantizeV2` allows invalid values for `axis` argument:. The validation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/eccb7ec454e6617738554a255d77f08e60ee0808/tensorflow/core/kernels/quantize_and_dequantize_op.cc#L74-L77) uses `||` to mix two different conditions. If `axis_ \u003c -1` the condition in `OP_REQUIRES` will still be true, but this value of `axis_` results in heap underflow. This allows attackers to read/write to other data on the heap. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.",
"id": "PYSEC-2021-247",
"modified": "2021-08-27T03:22:41.001819Z",
"published": "2021-05-14T20:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-mq5c-prh3-3f3h"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/c5b0d5f8ac19888e46ca14b0e27562e7fbbee9a9"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.