pysec-2016-7
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2016-04-13 16:59
Modified
2021-07-05 00:01
Details

Integer overflow in the ImagingResampleHorizontal function in libImaging/Resample.c in Pillow before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via negative values of the new size, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.




{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "pillow",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/pillow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4e0d9b0b9740d258ade40cce248c93777362ac1e"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow",
          "type": "GIT"
        },
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "1.0",
        "1.1",
        "1.2",
        "1.3",
        "1.4",
        "1.5",
        "1.6",
        "1.7.0",
        "1.7.1",
        "1.7.2",
        "1.7.3",
        "1.7.4",
        "1.7.5",
        "1.7.6",
        "1.7.7",
        "1.7.8",
        "2.0.0",
        "2.1.0",
        "2.2.0",
        "2.2.1",
        "2.2.2",
        "2.3.0",
        "2.3.1",
        "2.3.2",
        "2.4.0",
        "2.5.0",
        "2.5.1",
        "2.5.2",
        "2.5.3",
        "2.6.0",
        "2.6.1",
        "2.6.2",
        "2.7.0",
        "2.8.0",
        "2.8.1",
        "2.8.2",
        "2.9.0",
        "3.0.0",
        "3.1.0",
        "3.1.0.rc1",
        "3.1.0rc1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-4009",
    "GHSA-hvr8-466p-75rh"
  ],
  "details": "Integer overflow in the ImagingResampleHorizontal function in libImaging/Resample.c in Pillow before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via negative values of the new size, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2016-7",
  "modified": "2021-07-05T00:01:24.042207Z",
  "published": "2016-04-13T16:59:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/4e0d9b0b9740d258ade40cce248c93777362ac1e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/1714"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/blob/c3cb690fed5d4bf0c45576759de55d054916c165/CHANGES.rst"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/86064"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-52"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hvr8-466p-75rh"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.