pysec-2016-7
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2016-04-13 16:59
Modified
2021-07-05 00:01
Details
Integer overflow in the ImagingResampleHorizontal function in libImaging/Resample.c in Pillow before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via negative values of the new size, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "pillow", "purl": "pkg:pypi/pillow" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "4e0d9b0b9740d258ade40cce248c93777362ac1e" } ], "repo": "https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow", "type": "GIT" }, { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "3.1.1" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "1.0", "1.1", "1.2", "1.3", "1.4", "1.5", "1.6", "1.7.0", "1.7.1", "1.7.2", "1.7.3", "1.7.4", "1.7.5", "1.7.6", "1.7.7", "1.7.8", "2.0.0", "2.1.0", "2.2.0", "2.2.1", "2.2.2", "2.3.0", "2.3.1", "2.3.2", "2.4.0", "2.5.0", "2.5.1", "2.5.2", "2.5.3", "2.6.0", "2.6.1", "2.6.2", "2.7.0", "2.8.0", "2.8.1", "2.8.2", "2.9.0", "3.0.0", "3.1.0", "3.1.0.rc1", "3.1.0rc1" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-4009", "GHSA-hvr8-466p-75rh" ], "details": "Integer overflow in the ImagingResampleHorizontal function in libImaging/Resample.c in Pillow before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via negative values of the new size, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.", "id": "PYSEC-2016-7", "modified": "2021-07-05T00:01:24.042207Z", "published": "2016-04-13T16:59:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/4e0d9b0b9740d258ade40cce248c93777362ac1e" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/1714" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/blob/c3cb690fed5d4bf0c45576759de55d054916c165/CHANGES.rst" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/86064" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-52" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hvr8-466p-75rh" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.