pysec-2010-22
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2010-10-19 20:00
Modified
2010-10-20 04:00
Details

pyftpdlib before 0.1.1 does not choose a random value for the port associated with the PASV command, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information about the number of in-progress data connections by reading the response to this command.

Impacted products
Name purl
pyftpdlib pkg:pypi/pyftpdlib
Aliases



{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "pyftpdlib",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/pyftpdlib"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-6738"
  ],
  "details": "pyftpdlib before 0.1.1 does not choose a random value for the port associated with the PASV command, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information about the number of in-progress data connections by reading the response to this command.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2010-22",
  "modified": "2010-10-20T04:00:00Z",
  "published": "2010-10-19T20:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/source/browse/trunk/HISTORY"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…